scholarly journals Data on the arc magmatism developed in the Antarctic Peninsula and Patagonia during the Late Triassic – Jurassic: a compilation of new and previous geochronology, geochemistry and isotopic tracing results.

Data in Brief ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107042
Author(s):  
Joaquin Bastias ◽  
Richard Spikings ◽  
Teal Riley ◽  
Alexey Ulianov ◽  
Anne Grunow ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 198 (3) ◽  
pp. 1758-1774 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.A. Jordan ◽  
R.F. Neale ◽  
P.T. Leat ◽  
A.P.M. Vaughan ◽  
M.J. Flowerdew ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin Bastias ◽  
Richard Spikings ◽  
Alexey Ulianov ◽  
Teal Riley ◽  
Anne Grunow ◽  
...  

<p>We present new geochemical, isotopic and geochronological analyses of Late Triassic-Jurassic volcanic and intrusive rocks of the Antarctic Peninsula and Patagonia. Whole-rock geochemical data suggest that all of these igneous units formed in an active margin setting. This conclusion challenges the current paradigm that Jurassic magmatism of the Chon Aike province formed by the migration of the Karoo mantle plume from Africa towards the Pacific margin (Pankhurst et al., 2000). KDE analysis of 98 crystallisation ages reveals four main pulses of magmatism (V0: ~223-200 Ma; V1: ~188-178 Ma; V2: ~173-160 Ma; V3: ~157-145 Ma), which are approximately coincident with the episodic nature of the Chon Aike Magmatic Province reported by Pankhurst et al. (2000). Some magmatic units in eastern Patagonia are distal to the hypothetical paleo-trench relative to most active margin magmatism. These rocks have geochemical and geochronological characteristics that are indistinguishable from active margin-related rocks located ~200km from the palaeo-trench. Thus, we propose that a segment of the slab formed a flat-slab along southwestern Gondwana during the Late Triassic-Jurassic. This flat-slab is probably a temporal extension of the flat-slab episode suggested by Navarrete et al. (2019) for the Late Triassic (V0 episode) in eastern Patagonia. The progressive migration of the flat-slab magmatism to the southwestern margin of Patagonia suggest an evolution of its architecture during the Jurassic. Further, we propose that the flat-slab magmatism present in eastern Patagonia was triggered by slab failure, where foundering of the slab drove upwelling of hot mantle, forming a broad arc in an inland position in eastern Patagonia. Flat-slab subduction finished during the V3 episode (~157-145 Ma), with a continuation of an active margin along the western margin of the Antarctic Peninsula and Patagonia. Coeval extension in the South Atlantic and in western Patagonia lead to sea floor spreading, the formation of the Weddell Sea (~155-147 Ma; e.g. Konig & Jokat. 2006) and the Rocas Verdes Basin (~150 Ma; e.g. Calderon et al., 2007), respectively. The paleogeographic reconstructions juxtapose the northern Antarctic Peninsula and southern Patagonia during the Late Jurassic (e.g. Jokat et al., 2003), which suggest that the Rocas Verdes Basin and the Weddell Sea are oriented by a ~120° angle and potentially meet in southern Patagonia. This junction of sea-floor spreadings corresponds to the limits of the southern Rocas Verdes Basin with the eastern Weddell Sea oceanic lithosphere. We suggest that these rifts formed part of a triple junction, while the third rift arm should be located with a sub north-south orientation in the Antarctic Peninsula. Vast regions of the Antarctic Peninsula remain unexplored beneath the ice-cap, although we speculate that the third arm may correspond to the Eastern Palmer Land Shear Zone, which currently has a lateral extension of ~1500km (Vaughan & Storey, 2000). This new triple junction would be a Ridge-Ridge-Transform Fault intersection.</p><p>Calderon et al. 2007. JGS,164: 1011-1022.</p><p>Jokat et al. 2003. JGR, 108: 2428.</p><p>Konig & Jokat. 2006, 111: B12102.</p><p>Pankhurst et al. 2000. JP, 41(5): 605-625.</p><p>Navarrete et al. 2019. ESR, 194: 125-159.</p><p>Vaughan & Storey. 2000. JGS, 157: 1243-1256.</p>


1981 ◽  
Vol 118 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. L. Smellie

SummaryPrior to Late Triassic–Early Jurassic times, the geological history of the Antarctic Peninsula region was dominated almost entirely by Gondwana sequences that together comprised a major arc-trench system. Subduction complex, trench-slope-break and fore-arc basin sedimentation can all be recognized, and deposition was at least partly on early Palaeozoic or older continental crust. The only evidence for a contemporaneous magmatic arc situated in the Antarctic Peninsula at this time consists of patchy occurrences of metavolcanic rocks, possibly representing the frontal edge of the arc, and the major outcrop area of these rocks is believed to lie under the broad shallow continental shelf E of the Antarctic Peninsula. This is contrary to most current hypotheses in which a marginal basin, presumably floored by oceanic crust, is thought to crop out close to the E coast of the Antarctic Peninsula. However, the complete absence of substantial outcrops of pre-Jurassic volcanic rocks anywhere in eastern Antarctica and South Africa, which are the closest and most likely places in which these should exist, supports the new proposal. Moreover, the identification of back-arc elements of the arc-trench system (foreland fold-thrust belt and retro-arc foreland basin) in eastern Antarctica and South Africa greatly strengthens the likelihood of the arc cropping out in the area suggested.Towards the end of the Triassic and during the Early Jurassic Periods, an intense diastrophic event, or culmination of events, of orogenic magnitude occurred (Gondwanian orogeny), causing substantial redistribution of the pre-existing elements of the arc-trench system. In particular, all the fore-arc sequences were strongly deformed, some possibly for the first time (e.g. in the fore-arc basin), and became firmly accreted to the continental margin. Moreover, the magmatic foci migrated trenchwards to intrude the deformed rocks in the Antarctic Peninsula. Because many of the plutons were emplaced synkinematically, they often closely resemble ‘basement’ gneisses. The distinction between these rocks remains a serious problem in the Antarctic Peninsula and it can be solved only partially by radiometric dating.


1997 ◽  
Vol 134 (4) ◽  
pp. 507-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOE J. MCCARRON ◽  
IAN L. MILLAR

Fore-arc magmatic sequences associated with high Mg number andesite lavas unconformably overlie LeMay Group accretionary complex in Alexander Island. High-resolution 40Ar/39Ar, U–Pb zircon, fission track and K–Ar ages demonstrate that subduction-related fore-arc magmatism migrated northwards along the length of Alexander Island between c. 80 Ma and c. 46 Ma. The magmatic rocks represent a third of the western margin of the Antarctic Peninsula magmatic arc and are critical to the understanding of the final phase of subduction along the southern Antarctic Peninsula margin. The onset of late Cretaceous magmatism is recorded by poorly exposed volcanic rocks on Monteverdi Peninsula (79.7±2.5 Ma). In central and northern Alexander Island, the magmatic rocks can be distinguished by the proportion, range and types of lithofacies present, and by the periods of magmatism represented. The volcanic rocks of the Colbert Mountains range in age from c. 69–62 Ma and are dominated by large volume dacitic and rhyolitic crystal-rich ignimbrites interpreted as caldera-fill deposits. Elgar Uplands sequences range in age from c. 55–50 Ma, and contain approximately equal proportions of pyroclastic deposits and less evolved (basaltic-andesite and andesite) lavas including high Mg number andesite lavas near the base of three sequences. The volcanic rocks of Finlandia Foothills probably represent the youngest calc-alkaline units on Alexander Island (48±2 Ma). The sequence is lithologically similar to the Elgar Uplands and also contains high Mg number andesite lavas, but it is dominated by polymict conglomerates, with minor lavas, which were deposited in a graben associated with regional extension. Plutonic rocks exposed in the Rouen Mountains, adjacent to the Elgar Uplands, yielded a U–Pb age of 56±3 Ma which is in discordance with a previously published Rb–Sr age (46±3 Ma), probably due to hydrothermal perturbation of the Rb–Sr system. Northwards migration of magmatism was caused by the progressive collision and subduction of three ridge segments prior to the previously reported ridge crest–trench collisions that occurred c. 20–30 Ma later and following which subduction ceased.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin Bastias ◽  
Richard Spikings ◽  
Alex Ulianov ◽  
Teal Riley ◽  
Alex Burton-Johnson ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 81 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joaquin Bastias ◽  
Richard Spikings ◽  
Alex Ulianov ◽  
Teal Riley ◽  
Alex Burton-Johnson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Brean ◽  
Manuel Dall’Osto ◽  
Rafel Simó ◽  
Zongbo Shi ◽  
David C. S. Beddows ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-27
Author(s):  
H. Jay Zwally ◽  
John W. Robbins ◽  
Scott B. Luthcke ◽  
Bryant D. Loomis ◽  
Frédérique Rémy

Abstract GRACE and ICESat Antarctic mass-balance differences are resolved utilizing their dependencies on corrections for changes in mass and volume of the same underlying mantle material forced by ice-loading changes. Modeled gravimetry corrections are 5.22 times altimetry corrections over East Antarctica (EA) and 4.51 times over West Antarctica (WA), with inferred mantle densities 4.75 and 4.11 g cm−3. Derived sensitivities (Sg, Sa) to bedrock motion enable calculation of motion (δB0) needed to equalize GRACE and ICESat mass changes during 2003–08. For EA, δB0 is −2.2 mm a−1 subsidence with mass matching at 150 Gt a−1, inland WA is −3.5 mm a−1 at 66 Gt a−1, and coastal WA is only −0.35 mm a−1 at −95 Gt a−1. WA subsidence is attributed to low mantle viscosity with faster responses to post-LGM deglaciation and to ice growth during Holocene grounding-line readvance. EA subsidence is attributed to Holocene dynamic thickening. With Antarctic Peninsula loss of −26 Gt a−1, the Antarctic total gain is 95 ± 25 Gt a−1 during 2003–08, compared to 144 ± 61 Gt a−1 from ERS1/2 during 1992–2001. Beginning in 2009, large increases in coastal WA dynamic losses overcame long-term EA and inland WA gains bringing Antarctica close to balance at −12 ± 64 Gt a−1 by 2012–16.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document