The efficacy of topiramate in adult refractory status epilepticus: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center

2012 ◽  
Vol 98 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 232-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea S. Synowiec ◽  
Kristin A. Yandora ◽  
Vamsi Yenugadhati ◽  
James P. Valeriano ◽  
Carol J. Schramke ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek Mathew ◽  
Sahil Kohli ◽  
SureshBabu Pasangulapati ◽  
Sangeetha Yoganathan ◽  
GideonLyngsyun Rynjah ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Deepanshu Dubey ◽  
Sanjeev K. Bhoi ◽  
Jayantee Kalita ◽  
Usha K. Misra

AbstractObjective: Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) can influence the outcome of status epilepticus (SE). In the present study, we report the aetiology and predictors of outcomes of RSE in a developing country. Methods: This is a prospective hospital-based study of SE patients (continuous seizures for five minutes or more). Those who had SE persisting after two antiepileptic drugs were defined as having RSE. We present the demographic information, duration, and type of SE, and we note its severity using the status epilepticus severity score (STESS), its aetiology, comorbidities and imaging findings. The outcome of RSE was defined as cessation of seizures and the condition upon discharge, as assessed by the modified Rankin Scale. Results: A total of 35 (42.5%) of our 81 patients had RSE. The median duration of SE before starting treatment was 2 hours (range=0.008-160 h). The most common causes of RSE were stroke in 5 (14.3%), central nervous system (CNS) infections in 12 (34.3%) and metabolic encephalopathies in 13 (37.1%) patients. Some 21 (60%) patients had comorbidities, and the STESS was favourable in 7 (20%) patients. A total of 14 (20%) patients died, but death was directly related to SE in only one of these. Some 10 patients had super-refractory status epilepticus, which was due to CNS infection in 5 (50%) and metabolic encephalopathy in 3 (30%). On multivariate analysis, an unfavourable STESS (p=0.05) and duration of SE before treatment (p=0.01) predicted RSE. Metabolic aetiology (p=0.05), mechanical ventilation (p<0.001) and age >60 years (p=0.003) were predictors of poor outcomes. Conclusions: RSE was common (42.5%) among patients with SE in a tertiary care center in India. It was associated with high mortality and poor outcomes. Age above 60 years and metabolic aetiology were found to be predictors of poor outcomes.


Seizure ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manjari Tripathi ◽  
Deepti Vibha ◽  
Navita Choudhary ◽  
Kameshwar Prasad ◽  
M.V. Padma Srivastava ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 3-5
Author(s):  
Dipanjan Halder ◽  
Neha Karar ◽  
Sabyasachi Som ◽  
Debarshi Jana

INTRODUCTION: Status epilepticus (SE) is a medical and neurological emergency. The objectives of the study were to determine the clinical, etiological and epidemiological profile of SE in pediatric age group admitted to pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) in a tertiary care center at West Bengal. MATERIAL AND METHOD: An observational descriptive study, 108 children with age more than 28 days and upto 12 years presenting with SE were included in Department of Pediatric Medicine, R.G.Kar Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata from January 2016 to January 2017. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Test of proportion showed that the proportion of the patients in the age group 5-10 years (54.6%) were significantly higher than other age group (Z= 2.75; p=0.006). 11(10.2%) patient was with age<1 year. Acute Symptomatic (38.9%) was the commonest among the etiologies followed by Idiopathic (31.5%) which were significantly higher than other etiologies (Z=4.36;p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with younger age are more vulnerable to develop SE. Most of the children belonged to lower class socio-economic status. Acute symptomatic is the most common etiology followed by idiopathic.Convulsive SE with generalized tonic clonic type of convulsion is the most common variety.


2011 ◽  
Vol 96 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 140-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Rudin ◽  
Leticia Grize ◽  
Christian Schindler ◽  
Stephan Marsch ◽  
Stephan Rüegg ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 213-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chinmay Chetan ◽  
Suvasini Sharma ◽  
Surendra B. Mathur ◽  
Puneet Jain ◽  
Satinder Aneja

2005 ◽  
Vol 72 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheffali Gulati ◽  
Veena Kalra ◽  
M. R. Sridhar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document