The F-Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale-18 (FMSP-18): Internal consistency, construct, concurrent and divergent validity

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. s286-s286
Author(s):  
M.J. Soares ◽  
A.T. Pereira ◽  
A. Araújo ◽  
D. Silva ◽  
A.P. Amaral ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe FMPS is a 35-item self-report questionnaire to measure perfectionism. It evaluates: concern over mistakes/CM, doubts about actions/DA, parental criticism/PC and expectations/PE, personal standards/PS and organization/O.ObjectivesTo develop a shortened version of FMPS and study its internal consistency, the construct, concurrent and divergent validity.MethodsOne hundred and ninety-two university students (78.1% females), aged 19.74 years (sd = 2.10) completed the Portuguese versions of the: FMPS, Hewitt and Flett MPS/H&FMPS, Life Orientation Test Revised/LOT-R, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory/STAI, and Profile of Mood States/POMS.ResultsCorrelations between each item and corrected FMPS total scores/corrected total subscales scores were ≥ 0.20 for the items 13, 15, 25, 31, 35 and 10, 2, 25, and 26, respectively. The internal consistency of FMPS was high (α: .857) with 32 items contributing for this consistency (exceptions: 13, 25 and 31). The principal component analysis of the 35 items with factors varimax rotation was performed. The three items with higher loading in each factor that also contributed to the FMPS reliability were selected for the FMPS shortened version (FMPS-18). The principal component analysis of the 18 items with factors varimax rotation showed that six factors explained 74.6% of FMPS-18 total variance. These factors revealed adequate internal consistency (α: O = 0.740; PC = 0.859; PE = 0.847; PS = 0.726; CM = 0.740; DA = 0.832; total = 0.768). Convergent correlations between FMPS and the matched FMPS-18 scores were 0.839 to 0.971 (all P < .01). Correlations of the FMPS-18 and FMPS with H&F-MPS, STAI, LOT-R and NA/PA scores were of similar significance and valence.ConclusionFMPS-18 is a brief, reliable and valid instrument to measure perfectionism.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. s287-s287
Author(s):  
M.J. Soares ◽  
A.T. Pereira ◽  
A. Araújo ◽  
D. Silva ◽  
J. Valente ◽  
...  

IntroductionThe Hewitt and Flett Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (H&F-MPS) is one of the most used measures of perfectionism. Their 45-items evaluate self-Oriented (SOP), Self-Prescribed (SPP), and Other Oriented (OOP) perfectionism.ObjectivesTo study the internal consistency and convergent validity of the H&F-MSP13.MethodsOne hundred and ninety-two university students (78.1% females), aged 19.74 years (sd = 2.10; range: 17–28) completed the Portuguese versions of H&F-MPS (Soares et al., 2003) and of Frost et al. MPS (F-MPS) (Amaral et al., 2013). Thirteen items were selected from the Portuguese version of the H&F-MPS, based on their loading in the factor (0.60 and over) (Soares et al., 2003).ResultsThe H&FMPS13 revealed good internal consistency (α = 0.816). The corrected item-total subscale Spearman's correlations were high (from 0.418 to 0.820). The principal component analysis with factors varimax rotation produced three factors, which revealed acceptable/good internal consistency (SOP: explained variance/EV = 35.4%, α = .900; SPP: EV = 16.3%, α = 0.695; OOP: EV = 10.8%, α = 0.709). The correlations between the H&F-MSP13 scores and the matching scores of the H&F-MPS were high (from r = 0.745 to r = 0.945, all P < .01), suggesting that both scales measure similarly the constructs. The H&F-MSP13 and the H&F-MPS total scores demonstrate good convergent validity with the total score of F-MPS, as indicated by the correlations (r = 0.581/r = 0.636, respectively). The correlations similarities between the H&F-MSP13 and H&F-MSP dimensions and the F-MPS dimensions and total scores were also considerable.ConclusionsThe H&F-MSP13 is a valid instrument to measure perfectionism that reveals convergent validity with the F-MPS, retaining the adequate psychometric properties of the H&F-MPS and its administration is less time consuming.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wu-Yang Zhang ◽  
Yan-Jie Zhao ◽  
Yao Zhang ◽  
Fan He ◽  
Hong-Qing Pan ◽  
...  

Background: Accurate and reliable self-report measurement tools examining depressive symptoms are scant in child psychiatry. This study assessed the psychometric properties of the Chinese Version of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (C-QIDS-SR) in depressed adolescents in China.Methods: Adolescents with major depressive episodes or bipolar depressive episodes were assessed using the C-QIDS-SR. The structure validity of the C-QIDS-SR was estimated using principal component analysis with varimax rotation.Results: A total of 246 depressed adolescents were included in the study. Cronbach's alpha was 0.77. The correlation coefficient between the baseline and endpoint assessments was 0.49 (p &lt; 0.001), whereas, the correlation coefficient between the C-QIDS-SR and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression−17 items (HAMD-17) was 0.63 (p &lt; 0.001). Principal component analysis with varimax rotation demonstrated the unidimensional structure of the C-QIDS-SR.Conclusion: The C-QIDS-SR is a reliable and valid instrument with acceptable psychometric properties to measure depressive symptoms in adolescents.


2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 901-914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Reidar Ommundsen ◽  
Kees van der Veer ◽  
Hao Van Le ◽  
Krum Krumov ◽  
Knud S. Larsen

This is a report on the utility of a scale measuring attitudes toward illegal immigrants in two samples from nations that have more people moving out of the country than moving into the country. The Attitude toward Illegal Immigrants Scale was administered to 219 undergraduates from Sofia University in Bulgaria, and 179 undergraduates from Hanoi State University in Vietnam. Results yielded a scale with no sex differences, and acceptable alpha coefficients. Item analysis identified the most contributory and least contributory items, with considerable overlap in the two samples. A principal component analysis with varimax rotation was carried out to examine the structure.


Pflege ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Christina Köhlen ◽  
Marie-Luise Friedemann

In diesem Beitrag wird die Überprüfung des Assessment-Instruments zur Einschätzung der Wirksamkeit familiärer Strategien (ASF-E) für die Anwendung in Deutschland und der deutschsprachigen Schweiz beschrieben. Das ASF-E ist ein Screening-Instrument für Familiengesundheit, wie sie in der Theorie des systemischen Gleichgewichts definiert ist (Friedemann, 1991). Zunächst wurde das Instrument in den frühen 1990er Jahren in der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung kultureller Unterschiede ins Deutsche übersetzt. Die vorliegende Testung war die erste in Deutschland und die zweite in der Schweiz. Das Instrument hatte ursprünglich 26 Items, wobei jedes drei Aussagen beinhaltet, die Familienstrategien ausdrücken und von denen die Probanden dasjenige auswählen sollten, das am ehesten auf ihre Familiensituation zutrifft. Die Aussagen sind von 1 bis 3 gestaffelt, wobei der Wert 3 für optimale, zufrieden stellende Gesundheit steht. In Deutschland wurde das Instrument von 343 und in der Schweiz von 209 Befragten aus der Gemeinde ausgefüllt, die sowohl unterschiedlichen Alters als auch unterschiedlicher ökonomischer Herkunft waren. Eine Principal Component Analysis mit Varimax Rotation brachte vier Faktoren mit einem Eigenwert > 1 hervor. Acht Items mussten herausgenommen werden, da sie eine unzureichende Verteilung oder zu schwache Faktorladungen aufwiesen. Das endgültige Assessment-Instrument hat 18 Items mit einem akzeptablen Wert für Reliabilität (Cronbach Alpha). Das ASF-E kann in Deutschland und in der Schweiz genutzt werden, um Forschung mit Familien zu begleiten und Familiengesundheit in Verbindung mit Pflegeinterventionen einzuschätzen.


2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 390-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shashwath A. Meda ◽  
Michael C. Stevens ◽  
Marc N. Potenza ◽  
Brian Pittman ◽  
Ralitza Gueorguieva ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anu Realo ◽  
Kati Koido ◽  
Eva Ceulemans ◽  
Jüri Allik

In this article, following an assumption that individualism and collectivism are separate factors, we have further established that three central components of individualism can be distinguished. In the first part of the article we examined whether the three proposed components of individualism—autonomy, mature self‐responsibility, and uniqueness—can be distinguished from each other in one cultural context, Estonia. A new scale was developed to measure the three aspects of individualism which demonstrated both the reasonable internal‐consistency reliability as well as convergent and divergent validity with several other measures of individualism and collectivism and related constructs. In the second part of the article we studied whether individualism generalizes across specific contexts or domains of social relationships, namely, across relations with family and close others; friends and peers; state and nation. The results of the three‐mode principal component analysis showed that the individualistic tendencies of the respondents did not differ much while measured toward the three types of social relation. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


2002 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 807-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann F. Schneider

The aim of this study was to examine the relations among self-talk, self-consciousness, and self-knowledge through an exploratory principal component analysis and to test the hypothesis that only the functional and reflective aspects of self-consciousness contribute to self-knowledge. A self-report questionnaire including 6 scales assessing different aspects of self-talk, self-consciousness, and self-knowledge was administered to 203 German undergraduate university students. A principal component analysis of the scales yielded a two-factor solution, supporting the distinction between functional and dysfunctional self-consciousness. In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, only functional self-consciousness was a significant predictor of self-knowledge. Limitations of the present measures of inner speech are addressed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117822341983554 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Curr Beamer ◽  
Marcia Grant

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to report the initial validation process for using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) for radiodermatitis of the breast. Methods: This is an additional analysis of a study designed to report a longitudinal study in skin-related and global quality of life in women with breast radiodermatitis. A total of 40 participants completed the DLQI instrument weekly while receiving external radiotherapy of the female breast. At week 5 on treatment, 31 (78%) participants provided narrative feedback on how each DLQI item affected her life. Agreement between participant DLQI numerical ratings and narrative feedback on items was assessed. Construct validity was estimated using principal component analysis (PCA). Internal consistency of the DLQI was assessed using Cronbach alpha. Results: Percentage of agreement between participant DLQI ratings and narratives ranged from 71% to 98%. Each participant responded “no” to the work and study item leading to zero variance and removal from our analyses. Principal component analysis supported the inclusion of all of the remaining items. The DLQI with nine remaining items demonstrated moderately good internal consistency (α = .69). Conclusions: The results of our examination of the DLQI when used for breast radiodermatitis are promising. Next steps include additional larger studies among more diverse populations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (13) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Serrão ◽  
Luísa Castro ◽  
Andreia Teixeira ◽  
Ana Rita Rodrigues ◽  
Ivone Duarte

Introduction: The aim of this study is to explore the validation of the Resilience Scale in its long and brief versions (25 items and 14 items). This instrument assesses the individual’s ability to withstand stressors, thrive and make sense of vital challenges.Material and Methods: The sample included 511 Portuguese physicians. Both versions were validated through the study of internal structure validity, reliability, and convergent validity. The validity of the internal structure was analysed using the principal component analysis technique. Reliability was verified by the internal consistency study. For convergent validity, the correlation coefficients between these versions of the Resilience Scale and other scales validated to measure depression, anxiety, stress, and life satisfaction were calculated.Results: Both versions of Resilience Scale showed good internal consistency. For each of the versions, one factor was retained in the principal component analysis. Convergent validity was verified by significant positive correlations between Resilience Scale (25 and 14) and a life satisfaction scale and significant negative correlations between Resilience Scale and depression, anxiety, and stress subscales.Discussion: The results show the one-dimensional character of both versions of the Resilience Scale and support their usefulness and validity in the physician’s class. Conclusion: This is the first validation study of this scale in a group of physicians. Its results are very satisfactory, and its use in this specific group is recommended.


2007 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 333-338
Author(s):  
Arief Darmanegara Liem ◽  
Paulus Hidajat Prasetya

This study provides preliminary evidence for the validity of the Bahasa Indonesian version of the Study Process Questionnaire (BI-SPQ) from a sample of 147 psychology students (22 men and 125 women; M age = 21.8 yr., SD=1.3). The internal consistency alpha of the BI-SPQ subscales were found to range from .46 (Surface Strategy) to .77 (Deep Strategy), with a median of .67. Principal component analysis indicated a two-factor solution, where the Deep and Achieving subscales loaded onto Factor 1 and the Surface subscales loaded on Factor 2. Students' GPAs were associated negatively with Surface Motive ( r = −.24) and were associated positively with Deep and Achieving Motives ( rs = .20). Further studies with larger samples involving students majoring in other disciplines are needed to provide further evidence of the validity of the BI-SPQ.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document