scholarly journals Team Conflict Dynamics & Conflict Management: Derivation of A Model for Software Organisations to Enhance Team Performance and Software Quality

Author(s):  
Deepak Kumar Nunkoo ◽  
Roopesh Kevin Sungkur
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Sri Wartini

<p><em>The purpose of this research </em><em>is </em><em>to explain influence</em><em> of</em><em> </em><em>conflict</em><em> management</em><em> strategy </em><em>on teamwork</em><em> performance</em><em>. This kind of</em><em> conflict can happen to everyone and</em><em> in any places disregarding</em><em> status, income and position. Someone who ca</em><em>n not</em><em> manage conflict</em><em>s</em><em> will </em><em>have a</em><em> threat</em><em> for his</em><em> personal performance</em><em>,</em><em> and </em><em>unfortunately, </em><em>company’s performance will </em><em>also gain</em><em> the effect. </em><em>Accordingly</em><em>, we need a strategy to manage  conflict</em><em>s</em><em> as a</em><em>n</em><em> effort to create a good performance </em><em>for</em><em> individual employee performance a</em><em>s well as tha</em><em> team performance. </em><em>The p</em><em>opulation af this research is</em><em> the</em><em> entire educational employee</em><em>s</em><em> in UNNES by taking some samples using propotional sampling </em><em>to </em><em>around 88 samples</em><em>. </em><em>The result of this research  prove</em><em>s</em><em> that hypothesis stat</em><em>ing</em><em> “conflict</em><em> management</em><em> strategy” influenced positively and significantly </em><em>on</em><em> </em><em>teamwork performance</em><em> is accepted. This</em><em> explain</em><em>s that </em><em>conflict</em><em> management</em><em> strategy can give contribution to</em><em> the</em><em> teamwork performance through employee’s </em><em>ability</em><em> to accomodate ideas from partner</em><em>s</em><em> of work, avoid </em><em>disputes</em><em> by respect</em><em>ing</em><em> each other, </em><em>maintaining</em><em> communicati</em><em>on</em><em> and </em><em>conduct</em><em> colaboration </em><em>on</em><em> work</em><em>ing</em><em> method</em><em>s</em><em>. </em><em>It is s</em><em>uggest</em><em>ed</em><em> </em><em>that</em><em> this research should improve strateg</em><em>ies</em><em> in managing conflict</em><em>s</em><em> such as strat</em><em>egies</em><em> to compete </em><em>at</em><em> work by giving chance to other partner to use theirs skill in making decision and finding solution to solve the job.</em></p><em>Keywords: conflict management strategy, teamwork’s performance, educational employee</em>


2020 ◽  
pp. 000183922096518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priti Pradhan Shah ◽  
Randall S. Peterson ◽  
Stephen L. Jones ◽  
Amanda J. Ferguson

Teams scholars have historically conceptualized and measured intragroup conflict at the team level. But emerging evidence suggests that perceptions of intragroup conflict are often not uniform, shared, or static. These findings suggest important questions about the microfoundations of intragroup conflict: Where does conflict within teams originate? And how does it evolve over time? We address these and other questions in three abductive studies. We consider four origination points—an individual, dyad, subgroup, or team—and three evolutionary trajectories—conflict continuity, contagion, and concentration. Study 1, a qualitative study of narrative accounts, and Study 2, a longitudinal social networks study of student teams, reveal that fewer than 30 percent of teams experience team-level conflict. Instead, conflict more commonly originates and persists at individual, dyadic, or subgroup levels. Study 2 further demonstrates that traditional psychometric intragroup conflict scales mask the existence of these various origins and trajectories of conflict. Study 3, a field study of manufacturing teams, reveals that individual and dyadic task conflict origins positively predict team performance, whereas traditional intragroup task conflict measures negatively predict team performance. The results raise serious concerns about current methods and theory in the team conflict literature and suggest that researchers must go beyond team-level conceptualizations of conflict.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 960-985
Author(s):  
Frank Lefley

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the current management perceptions regarding conflict within teams, specifically looking at capital investment appraisals, with the aim of improving team performance.Design/methodology/approachThe research was undertaken in two stages. The first stage is based on a postal questionnaire survey relating to the appraisal of capital investments, addressed to large UK organisations. The second stage was conducted through semi-structured interviews, which were followed by a short-questionnaire sent out by e-mail, and designed from the information obtained from the interviews. The research is both qualitative and quantitative.FindingsFrom the exploratory study, the author was able to identify and further investigate what the author’s respondents termed “personal” and “departmental” conflicts, as well as what the author perceived to be “good” (positive) conflict and “bad” (negative) conflict. The author finds that controlled “departmental” conflict may lead to enhanced decision making, while “personal” conflict may be destructive and lead to non-optimal decision making. The author also identified the importance of the investment appraisal “procedure” as distinct from the individual models used, and suggests that this is one way of controlling conflict within teams.Research limitations/implicationsThe research is limited by the fact that it is based on individual perceptions of a small sample number. However, the sample consists of some of the most senior executives from the largest UK organisations whose views are usually difficult to obtain by academics.Practical implicationsIt provides senior managers with a comprehensive view, by their peers, and a better understanding of team conflict, especially with regard to “personal” and “departmental” conflicts; thus, allowing them to manage teams more efficiently in the future.Originality/valueThe research is unique in that it focusses on conflict within teams that are given the specific task of appraising capital projects and it theorises on what the respondents’ terms “departmental” and “personal” conflict. It brings up-to-date, managements’ current perception of team conflict and contributes to the ongoing search for a better understanding of conflict within business teams, and ultimately to an enhanced team performance and improved decision making.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 373-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jielin Yin ◽  
Muxiao Jia ◽  
Zhenzhong Ma ◽  
Ganli Liao

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate how a team leader’s conflict management style (CMS) affects team innovation performance (TIP) in entrepreneurial teams using a team emotion perspective. Design/methodology/approach It is proposed in this study that team passion mediates the impact of team leader’s CMSs on team performance, which is further moderated by team emotional intelligence (TEI). Then this study collected paired data from 105 teams including 105 team leaders and 411 team members to test the proposed model. Findings The results show that a team leader’s cooperative CMS has a significant positive impact on TIP and team passion further mediates the relationship between the team leader’s CMSs and TIP. The results also show that TEI moderates the relationship between the leader’s CMSs and team passion. Originality/value This study helps enriches the literature of conflict management by exploring the mechanisms through which a team leader’s CMSs affect team performance in entrepreneurial activities, and the findings of this study highlight the important role of team passion in this process. In addition, this study integrates the research on conflict management and the research on team passion in entrepreneurial teams to provide a new perspective to explore the dynamic process of entrepreneurial activities, which sheds light on the investigation of the important implications of effective conflict management in the entrepreneurship.


2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 170-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanuel G. Tekleab ◽  
Narda R. Quigley ◽  
Paul E. Tesluk

Author(s):  
Setria Feri ◽  

This article is a literature review that discusses the effect of diversity on the occurrence of team conflict and how emotion al intelligence role as a moderating variable to improve team performance. Diversity may trigger relationship conflicts within the team that affect their performance. However, not all diversity has a negative impact if the organization concerned can create a cohesiv e team. Team members with higher levels of expertise on the team should be given more influence over team processes and outcomes. Organizational support and openness have different effects on the relationship of diversity to the occurrence of conflict within the organiz ation. The emotional intelligence of team members was found to play an important role in reducing the negative effects that might be trigg ered by diversity. Emotionally intelligent team members are generally more capable of dealing with differences. Thus, they are more aware of the creative potential of their different thoughts, values, and beliefs. In conclusion, one of the efforts to improve team performance is to reduce or prevent conflicts within the team through emotional intelligence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zulfadil ◽  
Susi Hendriani ◽  
Machasin

PurposeTo analyze the influence of emotional intelligence on team performance, knowledge sharing, team conflict, and the structure mechanism, the influence of knowledge sharing, team conflict, the structure mechanism, and emotional intelligence on team performance, and the influence of emotional intelligence on team performance through knowledge sharing, team conflict, and the structure mechanism.Design/methodology/approachThis research uses the quantitative research method and is included in explanatory research. Data collection was done cross-sectionally. This research was conducted at provincial hospitals in South Sulawesi and in Central Sulawesi.FindingsEmotional intelligence directly influences knowledge sharing, conflict in teams, the structure mechanism, and team performance. There is a direct influence of knowledge sharing, team conflict, and the structure mechanism on team performance. Then, there is an indirect influence of emotional intelligence on team performance through the mediation of knowledge sharing, team conflict, and the structure mechanism.Originality/valueThe novelty of this research is in its effort to observe the mediation of knowledge sharing, team conflict and the structure mechanism with other variables developed in the research model. No previous studies have found a relationship between emotional intelligence and team performance, knowledge sharing, team conflict, and the structure mechanism, or the influence of knowledge sharing, team conflict, the structure mechanism, and emotional intelligence on team performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document