scholarly journals Neurologic disease and COVID-19: A comparative study between first and second wave hospitalized patients in Brescia, Lombardia, Italy

2021 ◽  
Vol 429 ◽  
pp. 117806
Author(s):  
Viviana Cristillo ◽  
Andrea Pilotto ◽  
Marcello Giunta ◽  
Martina Locatelli ◽  
Stefano Gipponi ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 31 (05) ◽  
pp. 170-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-J. Möller ◽  
J. Gallinat ◽  
U. Hegerl ◽  
M. Arató ◽  
Z. Janka ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 717-719
Author(s):  
Nuria Rodríguez-Núñez ◽  
Francisco Gude ◽  
Adriana Lama ◽  
Carlos Rábade ◽  
Alfonso Varela ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
rihab Jbeli ◽  
Sabrine Louhaichi ◽  
Ikbel Khlfallah ◽  
Safa Marzouki ◽  
Line Kaabi ◽  
...  

Neurology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Collin Herman ◽  
Kirby Mayer ◽  
Aarti Sarwal

ObjectiveThe emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presents a challenge for neurologists caring for patients with preexisting neurologic conditions hospitalized for COVID-19 or for evaluation of patients who have neurologic complications during COVID-19 infection. We conducted a scoping review of the available literature on COVID-19 to assess the potential effect on neurologists in terms of prevalent comorbidities and incidence of new neurologic events in patients hospitalized with COVID-19.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), and Scopus databases for adult patients with preexisting neurologic disease who were diagnosed and hospitalized for COVID-19 or reported incidence of secondary neurologic events following diagnosis of COVID-19. Pooled descriptive statistics of clinical data and comorbidities were examined.ResultsAmong screened articles, 322 of 4,014 (8.0%) of hospitalized patients diagnosed and treated for COVID-19 had a preexisting neurologic illness. Four retrospective studies demonstrated an increased risk of secondary neurologic complications in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (incidence of 6%, 20%, and 36.4%, respectively). Inconsistent reporting and limited statistical analysis among these studies did not allow for assessment of comparative outcomes.ConclusionEmerging literature suggests a daunting clinical relationship between COVID-19 and neurologic illness. Neurologists need to be prepared to reorganize their consultative practices to serve the neurologic needs of patients during this pandemic.


2021 ◽  
pp. jim-2021-001876
Author(s):  
Mohsin Sheraz Mughal ◽  
Ikwinder Preet Kaur ◽  
Chang Wang ◽  
Reem Alhashemi ◽  
Alvin Buemio ◽  
...  

As of February 2, 2021, the USA has 26,431,799 reported COVID-19 cases with 446,744 deaths. A high mortality rate (15%–40%) was reported among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic. However, data regarding variation in COVID-19-related mortality and severity of illness among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 are heterogeneous. In this retrospective single-center study, we aimed to investigate the demographic characteristics, clinical presentations, disease severity, clinical outcomes, and in-hospital mortality of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 during the second wave of the pandemic. Adults with reverse transcription-PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. In-hospital mortality due to COVID-19 was the primary outcome, and intensive care unit admission, acute kidney injury, acute respiratory distress syndrome, respiratory failure requiring intubation, and septic shock were the secondary outcomes. A total of 101 adult patients were hospitalized with COVID-19 during the second wave study period. Of 101 patients, 8 were intubated and 6 died. The median duration of hospital stay was 6 days. Patients in the second wave were more likely to receive dexamethasone and remdesivir and less likely to require invasive mechanical ventilation. In-hospital mortality during the second wave was lower (5.9%) compared with the first wave (15.5%). At the last follow-up date, 86.1% were discharged alive from the hospital, 5.9% died and 7.9% were still in the hospital. Multivariate logistic regression showed higher odds of mortality were associated with higher age and elevated lactate dehydrogenase peak.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rocío Aznar-Gimeno ◽  
J. Ramón Paño-Pardo ◽  
Luis M. Esteban ◽  
Gorka Labata-Lezaun ◽  
M. José Esquillor-R ◽  
...  

Abstract A comparison between pandemic waves could help to understand the evolution of this disease. The objective of this work was to study the evolution of COVID-19 hospitalized patients on different pandemic waves in terms of severity and mortality. We performed an observational retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients (5,220) with SARS-CoV-2 infection from February to September in Aragon, Spain. In a comparative way, we analyzed ICU admission and 30-day mortality, clinical characteristics and risk factors, of first and second waves. SARS-CoV-2 virus genome were analyzed in 236 samples. Patients in the first wave (n=2,547) were older (74 y, IQR: 60-86 vs. 70 y, IQR: 53-85; p<0.001) and showed worse clinical and analytical parameters related to severe COVID-19 than in the second wave (n=2,673). The probability of ICU admission at 30 days was 16% and 10% in the first and second wave, respectively (p<0.001). The cumulative 30-day mortality rates were 38% in the first wave and 32% in the second one (p=0.007). Survival differences were observed among patients aged 60 to 80 years. There was variability among death risk factors and virus genome between waves. Therefore, the two COVID-19 pandemic waves analyzed were different, in terms of disease severity and mortality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (5) ◽  
pp. 1026-1032
Author(s):  
Priscila Fernandes Martins ◽  
Marcia Galan Perroca

ABSTRACT Objectives: To compare care necessities as perceived by the patient and nursing team and to investigate the sociodemographic factors associated with these perceptions. Method: A comparative study was conducted in units and hospitalized patients of a hospital institution in the state of São Paulo. The participants comprised 100 health professionals (50 nurses and 50 nursing technicians and auxiliaries) and 50 patients. A questionnaire was constructed and validated regarding care needs and was completed by the participants. Results: Considering cut-off value kappa ≥ 0.61, or that is, good and very good intervals, the greatest agreement between the perception of the patients and the nursing team was in the areas of: Care and Communication, both with 92.6% agreement; followed by Basic Care with 74.1%. The lowest value was found in the field of Care Planning and Organization, 64.3%. Conclusion: In a general manner, there was an agreement between the care needs from the view of the patients themselves and the nursing team.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document