scholarly journals EP1.01-57 Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes of NSCLC in Elderly Subjects with Poor Performance Status from India

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. S934-S935
Author(s):  
D. Behera ◽  
V. Muthu ◽  
N. Singh ◽  
K. Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Clinical Profile ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Poor Performance Status

Ifosfamide, Methotrexate, Etoposide, and Prednisolone (IMEP) Plus L-Asparaginase As a First-Line Therapy Improves Outcomes In Stage III/IV NK/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type (NTCL)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4347-4347
Author(s):  
Miso Kim ◽  
Ki Hwan Kim ◽  
Bhumsuk Keam ◽  
Se-Hoon Lee ◽  
Dong-Wan Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background The prognosis of NTCL patients presenting in stage III/IV is extremely poor and there is no standard chemotherapy. Although L-asparaginase (L-asp) is known to be effective for NTCL, its significance has not been well demonstrated in a relatively homogenous subset. In addition, there were few studies to evaluate treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in stage III/IV NTCL. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of L-asparaginase-based combination chemotherapy (IMEP plus L-asp) and prognostic factors in stage III/IV NTCL. Methods A total of 70 patients with newly diagnosed NTCL at stage III/IV were enrolled from 3 Korean centers between Jan 2000 and Feb 2013. All patients received IMEP plus L-asp (N=22) regimens or combination chemotherapy without L-asp (N=48) as a first-line treatment. Recurrent cases were excluded. Clinical prognostic factors, treatment outcomes, and prognostic scores were compared between the groups. Independent prognostic factors for survivals were identified using multivariate analyses. Results The median age was 48.5 years (range, 18-73 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 2.2:1. After a median follow-up period of 12.8 months (range, 1.1-186.6 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.6 months and 12.3 months, respectively. Clinical factors and treatment outcomes were compared between IMEP plus L-asp and chemotherapy without L-asp groups (Table 1). Higher response rate (RR) and complete response (CR) rates were observed in patients treated with IMEP plus L-asp compared with those treated with chemotherapy without L-asp (RR 90.0% vs. 34.8%, P< 0.0001; and CR rates 65.0% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.001). In addition, PFS and OS were significantly higher for IMEP plus L-asp group compared with chemotherapy without L-asp group (Table 1). Use of chemotherapy without L-asp (hazards ratio [HR]=2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-4.29; P = 0.010) and poor performance status (HR=2.10, 95% CI 1.23-3.59; P = 0.007) were independent predictors for reduced PFS. Independent factors adversely affecting OS were poor performance status (HR=1.99, 95% CI 1.08-3.65; P = 0.027), 2 or more extranodal sites (HR=2.91, 95% CI 1.25-6.77; P = 0.013), and chemotherapy without L-asp (HR=3.51, 95% CI 1.53-8.06; P= 0.003). Conclusions L-asparaginase-based combination chemotherapy (IMEP plus L-asp) is active against stage III/IV NTCL and an independent predictor for improved survivals. L-asp containing regimen might be useful as a first-line treatment for stage III/IV NTCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals COVID-19 and cancer registries: learning from the first peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvin J. X. Lee ◽  
Karin Purshouse
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Cancer Registries ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
International Studies ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk

AbstractThe SARS-Cov-2 pandemic in 2020 has caused oncology teams around the world to adapt their practice in the aim of protecting patients. Early evidence from China indicated that patients with cancer, and particularly those who had recently received chemotherapy or surgery, were at increased risk of adverse outcomes following SARS-Cov-2 infection. Many registries of cancer patients infected with SARS-Cov-2 emerged during the first wave. We collate the evidence from these national and international studies and focus on the risk factors for patients with solid cancers and the contribution of systemic anti-cancer treatments (SACT—chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted and hormone therapy) to outcomes following SARS-Cov-2 infection. Patients with cancer infected with SARS-Cov-2 have a higher probability of death compared with patients without cancer. Common risk factors for mortality following COVID-19 include age, male sex, smoking history, number of comorbidities and poor performance status. Oncological features that may predict for worse outcomes include tumour stage, disease trajectory and lung cancer. Most studies did not identify an association between SACT and adverse outcomes. Recent data suggest that the timing of receipt of SACT may be associated with risk of mortality. Ongoing recruitment to these registries will enable us to provide evidence-based care.

scholarly journals Clinical indicators for the incidence of postoperative ileus after elective surgery for colorectal cancer

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Namba ◽  
Yuzo Hirata ◽  
Shoichiro Mukai ◽  
Sho Okimoto ◽  
Seiji Fujisaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Postoperative Ileus ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Clinical Indicators ◽  
Patient Morbidity ◽  
Two Factors

Abstract Background The occurrence of postoperative ileus leads to increased patient morbidity, longer hospitalization, and higher healthcare costs. No clear policy on postoperative ileus prevention exists. Therefore, we aim to evaluate the clinical factors involved in the development of postoperative ileus after elective surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent elective surgery involving bowel resection with or without re-anastomosis for colon cancer between April 2015 and March 2020. The primary readout was the presence or absence of postoperative ileus. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify pre- and intraoperative risk factors, and the incidence of postoperative ileus was assessed using independent factors. Results Postoperative ileus occurred in 48 out of 356 patients (13.5%). In multivariate analysis, male sex poor performance status, and intraoperative in–out balance per body weight were independently associated with postoperative ileus development. The incidence of postoperative ileus was 2.5% in the cases with no independent factors; however, it increased to 36.1% when two factors were observed and 75.0% when three factors were matched. Conclusions We discovered that male gender, poor performance status, and intraoperative in–out balance per body weight were associated with the development of postoperative ileus. Of these, intraoperative in–out balance per body weight is a controllable factor. Hence it is important to control the intraoperative in–out balance to lower the risk for postoperative ileus.

scholarly journals Feasibility and effectiveness of afatinib for poor performance status patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiao-En Wu ◽  
Ching-Fu Chang ◽  
Chen-Yang Huang ◽  
Cheng-Ta Yang ◽  
Chih-Hsi Scott Kuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background Afatinib is one of the standard treatments for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the use of afatinib in patients with poor performance status (PS ≥ 2) are limited. This study aimed to retrospectively review the clinical outcomes and safety of afatinib treatment in EGFR-mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC patients with PS ≥ 2. Methods The data for 62 patients who were treated at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from January 2010 to August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ clinicopathological features were obtained, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify possible prognostic factors. Data on adverse events were collected to evaluate general tolerance for afatinib therapy. Results Until February 2020, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 58.1% (36/62), 69.4% (43/62), 8.8 months, and 12.9 months, respectively. The absence of liver metastasis (PFS: p = 0.044; OS: p = 0.061) and good disease control (p < 0.001 for PFS and OS) were independent favorable prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Bone metastasis (p = 0.036) and dose modification (reduction/interruption, p = 0.021) were predictors of disease control. Conclusion Afatinib demonstrated acceptable efficacy and safety in the current cohort. This study provided evidence to support the use of afatinib as a first-line treatment in EGFRm+ NSCLC patients with poor PS.

Limited impact of palliative chemotherapy on survival in advanced solid tumours in patients with poor performance status

2011 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 426-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfonso Sánchez-Muñoz ◽  
Elisabeth Pérez-Ruiz ◽  
María Isabel Sáez ◽  
José Manuel Trigo ◽  
M. Mar Galindo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Chemotherapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Solid Tumours ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Limited Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document