scholarly journals PCN75 Direct Medical Cost of Breast Cancer in Saudi Arabia

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S435
Author(s):  
A. Alghamdi ◽  
S. Alqahtani
2020 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S596
Author(s):  
B. Balkhi ◽  
S. Alqusair ◽  
B. Alotaibi ◽  
A. Alghamdi ◽  
Y. AlRuthia ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 ◽  
pp. v680
Author(s):  
H. Lemhouer ◽  
D M E C Verhoeven ◽  
V. Corluy ◽  
D. De Graeve

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
NADIA FARHANAH SYAFHAN ◽  
AGUSDINI BANUN SAPTANINGSIH ◽  
MUTIARA JEANY RAHAYU PERTIWI

ABSTRACTAdministration of ceftazidime shortened duration of neutropenia and hospitalization days in breast cancer patients who had infection after myelosupressive chemotherapy. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) as one of pharmacoeconomic methods was important to determine treatment attaining effect for lower cost. The aim of this study was to comparethe total direct medical cost and effectiveness, which was measured from length-of-stay (LOS), of generic ceftazidime A and B usage, and to decide which ceftazidime that was more cost-effective in early-stage and late-stage breast cancer patients at National Cancer Center Dharmais Hospital Jakarta year 2012. The study design was non-experimental withcomparative study retrospectively on secondary data from medical records and administrative data in 2012. Samples were taken by using total sampling method. The number of samples were 9 patients, which included 7 patients with generic ceftazidime A and 2 patients with generic ceftazidime B. The total direct medical cost of generic ceftazidime A in early-stage and late-stage breast cancer patients, respectively Rp 15.930.407,45 and Rp 15.962.519,25, were higher than generic B, respectively Rp 6.716.225,21 and Rp 7.147.956,92. Median LOS of generic A ceftazidime in early-stage and late-stage breast cancer patients, respectively 7 days and 10 days, were longer than generic B, respectively 3 days and 4 days. According to CEA result, generic ceftazidime B was more cost-effective than generic A.ABSTRAKPemberian seftazidim dapat mempersingkat durasi neutropenia dan lama hari rawat inap pada pasien kanker payudara yang mengalami infeksi setelah kemoterapi mielosupresif. Analisis cost-effectiveness merupakan salah satu metode farmakoekonomi yang penting untuk menentukan obat efektif dengan biaya yang lebih rendah. Penelitian dilakukan untuk membandingkan total biaya medis langsung dan efektivitas yang dilihat dari lama hari rawat penggunaan seftazidim generik A dan B, serta menentukan seftazidim yang lebih cost-effective pada pasien kanker payudara stadium awal dan lanjut di Rumah Sakit Kanker “Dharmais” Jakarta, 2012. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi komparatif secara retrospektif terhadap data rekam medis dan administrasi tahun 2012. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan secara total sampling. Jumlah pasien yang dilibatkan dalam analisis 9 pasien, yaitu 7 pasien menggunakan seftazidim generik A dan 2 pasien menggunakan seftazidim generik B. Median total biaya medis langsung kelompok generik A pada pasien kanker stadium awal maupun lanjut berturut-turut sebesar Rp 15.930.407,45 dan Rp 15.962.519,25 lebih tinggi dibanding generik B, berturut-turut sebesar Rp 6.716.225,21 dan Rp 7.147.956,92. Median lama hari rawat kelompok generik A pada pasien kanker stadium awal maupun lanjut berturut-turut 7 hari dan 10 hari, lebih panjang dibanding generik B, berturut-turut 3 hari dan 4 hari. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa seftazidim generik B lebih cost-effective dibanding generik A.


2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. A70
Author(s):  
L Cortés-Sanabria ◽  
H Soto-Molina ◽  
K De la Cruz-Aguirre ◽  
E Salas-Gonzalez ◽  
G Aguayo-Alcaraz ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3138-3138
Author(s):  
Kathryn R. McCaffrey ◽  
Kenneth R. Carson ◽  
Lucie Kutikova ◽  
Matt Fisher ◽  
Simon Pickard ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: While Congress has mandated that the NIH provide a national estimate of the cost of cancer, almost all cancer cost studies have focused exclusively on breast cancer. No study has reported comparison data for persons with Hodgkin’s disease (HD) or non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). These illnesses have a high cure rate, and affected persons are likely to experience significant economic hardships. Many participate in the workforce during treatment and long after the treatment is complete. Herein, we report preliminary results from an ongoing study on the out-of-pocket direct medical and non-medical costs for a cohort of patients with lymphoma and provide contextual comparison with a cohort of breast cancer patients who received care at the same cancer center (Arozullah, Supportive Oncology, 2004). Methods: 178 breast cancer and lymphoma patients provided information on out-of-pocket costs for the preceding 3-month period; 12% had a diagnosis of HD or NHL. In total, 120 lymphoma patients will be interviewed for this study. Direct medical costs are costs related to medical care such as medications, procedures, and doctor visits. Direct non-medical costs are costs related to cancer, but not medical care, such as costs for meals, transportation, parking, and phone calls. Results: The majority of both lymphoma and breast cancer patients were < 65 years old, married, and employed. All patients had healthcare insurance coverage, with the majority insured with private plans. In comparison to women with breast cancer, persons with HD/NHL had similar mean monthly out-of-pocket cost expenditures, $635 versus $728. For lymphoma patients, factors associated with high direct medical costs included ≤ 12th grade education ($1,585/month) and HD ($1,133/month). Conclusion: Mean monthly out-of-pocket expenditures are similar for HD/NHL and breast cancer. Direct medical out-of-pocket expenditures for lymphoma vary. Direct medical expenditures are greatest for HD ($1,130), intermediate for aggressive NHL and breast cancer ($512–$597), and lowest for indolent NHL ($180). Comprehensive economic analyses of cancer should include a range of malignancies. Average Monthly Out-of-Pocket Costs for Lymphoma and Breast Cancer Patients. Direct Medical Cost Direct Medical Cost Direct Non-Medical Cost Direct Non-Medical Cost Lymphoma Breast Lymphoma Breast Household Income < $60,000 $381 $664 $40 $111 ≥ $60,000 $599 $553 $159 $161 Education ≤ 12th grade $1,585 $610 $72 $118 > 12th grade $437 $653 $141 $122 Diagnosis < 6 Months $577 $487 $114 $135 ≥ 6 Months $333 $660 $128 $130 Total Lymphoma $516 .. $119 .. HD $1,133 .. $155 .. AggressiveNHL $512 .. $167 .. Indolent NHL $180 .. $166 .. Total Breast Cancer .. $597 .. $131


Author(s):  
Bander Balkhi ◽  
Ahmed Alghamdi ◽  
Sulaiman Alqusair ◽  
Bader Alotaibi ◽  
Yazed AlRuthia ◽  
...  

Osteoporosis and its complications are a major health concern in Saudi Arabia, and the prevalence of osteoporosis is on the rise. The aim of this study was to estimate the direct healthcare cost for patients with osteoporosis. A retrospective study was carried out among adult patients with osteoporosis in a teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia. A bottom-up approach was conducted to estimate the healthcare resources used and the total direct medical cost for the treatment of osteoporosis and related fractures. The study included 511 osteoporosis patients, 93% of whom were female. The average (SD) age was 68.5 years (10.2). The total mean direct medical costs for patients without fractures were USD 975.77 per person per year (PPPY), and for those with osteoporotic fractures, the total direct costs were USD 9716.26 PPPY, of which 56% of the costs were attributable to surgery procedures. Prior to fractures, the main cost components were medication, representing 61%, and physician visits, representing 18%. The findings of this study indicated the economic impact of osteoporosis and related fractures. With the aging population in Saudi Arabia, the burden of disease could increase significantly, which highlights the need for effective prevention strategies to minimize the economic burden of osteoporosis.


Author(s):  
Saad Alhumaidi ◽  
Abdullah Alshehri ◽  
Abdullah Altowairqi ◽  
Ahmad Alharthy ◽  
Bader Malki

Author(s):  
Fatmah Alsharif ◽  
Wedad Almutairi ◽  
Faygah Shibily ◽  
Fatmah Alhothari ◽  
Fidaa Batwa ◽  
...  

Background: Lymphedema is a condition in which excessive fluid accumulates in soft tissues. It is a common complication of breast cancer treatments. It can lead to serious consequences and interfere with the activity of daily living. This study aimed to determine the level of awareness of breast-cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) among women with breast cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This was a descriptive quantitative cross-sectional design that included a convenience sample of women diagnosed with breast cancer in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Data were collected by distributing a self-administrated online questionnaire consisting of four parts, including demographic data (five items), the status of education about BCRL (three items), basic medical history of breast cancer (six items), and BCRL level of awareness of risk factors and management (nine items). Results: In total, 95 out of 135 of participants did not know about lymphedema, 119 of the participants (88.1%) did not receive any explanation about the possibility of lymphedema from their medical team before surgery, and 121 of them (89.6%) did not receive it after surgery. The most significant factor affecting participants’ level of awareness regarding BCRL was the lack of information about the possibility of BCRL occurrence, which was not provided to them by the medical team. Recommendation: Early and continuous education for future management is essential to prevent problems related to BCRL and improve quality of life.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document