Visceral adiposity, inflammation, and hippocampal function in obesity

2021 ◽  
pp. 108920
Author(s):  
Alexis M. Stranahan
Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2091-P
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPH H. SAELY ◽  
ALEXANDER VONBANK ◽  
CHRISTINE HEINZLE ◽  
DANIELA ZANOLIN ◽  
BARBARA LARCHER ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihály Racsmány ◽  
Dorottya Bencze ◽  
Péter Pajkossy ◽  
Ágnes Szőllősi ◽  
Miklós Marián

AbstractOne of the greatest commonplaces in memory research is that context improves recall and enhances or leaves recognition intact. Here we present results which draw attention to the fact that the reappearance of irrelevant and unattended background contexts of encoding significantly impairs memory discrimination functions. This manuscript presents the results of two experiments in which participants made indoor/outdoor judgements for a large number of object images presented together with individual, irrelevant and presumably unattended background scenes. On a subsequent unexpected recognition test participants saw the incidentally encoded target objects, visually similar lures or new foil objects on the same or new background scenes. Our results showed that although the reappearance of the background scene raised the hit rate for target objects, it decreased mnemonic discrimination, a behavioral score for pattern separation, a hippocampal function that is affected in early dementia. Furthermore, the presence of the encoded background scene at the recognition test increased the false recognition of lure objects, even when participants were explicitly instructed to neglect the context scene. Altogether these results gave evidence that if context increases recognition hits for target memories, it does so at the cost of increasing false recognition and diminished discriminability for similar information.


Author(s):  
Froylan David Martínez-Sánchez ◽  
Valerie Paola Vargas-Abonce ◽  
Andrea Rocha-Haro ◽  
Romina Flores-Cardenas ◽  
Milagros Fernández-Barrio ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302110062
Author(s):  
Bin Yan ◽  
Jian Yang ◽  
Li Qian ◽  
Fengjie Gao ◽  
Ling Bai ◽  
...  

Background: Observational studies have found an association between visceral adiposity and stroke. Aims: The purpose of this study was to investigate the role and genetic effect of visceral adipose tissue (VAT) accumulation on stroke and its subtypes. Methods: In this two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study, genetic variants (221 single nucleotide polymorphisms; P<5×10-8) using as instrumental variables for MR analysis was obtained from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) of VAT. The outcome datasets for stroke and its subtypes were obtained from the MEGASTROKE consortium (up to 67,162 cases and 453,702 controls). MR standard analysis (inverse variance weighted method) was conducted to investigate the effect of genetic liability to visceral adiposity on stroke and its subtypes. Sensitivity analysis (MR-Egger, weighted median, MR-PRESSO) were also utilized to assess horizontal pleiotropy and remove outliers. Multi-variable MR analysis was employed to adjust potential confounders. Results: In the standard MR analysis, genetically determined visceral adiposity (per 1 SD) was significantly associated with a higher risk of stroke (odds ratio [OR] 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21-1.41, P=1.48×10-11), ischemic stroke (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.20-1.41, P=4.01×10-10), and large artery stroke (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.22-1.83, P=1.16×10-4). The significant association was also found in sensitivity analysis and multi-variable MR analysis. Conclusions: Genetic liability to visceral adiposity was significantly associated with an increased risk of stroke, ischemic stroke, and large artery stroke. The effect of genetic susceptibility to visceral adiposity on the stroke warrants further investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document