scholarly journals A Multifunctional LNA Oligonucleotide-Based Strategy Blocks AR Expression and Transactivation Activity in PCa Cells

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. 63-75
Author(s):  
Daniela Castanotto ◽  
Xiaowei Zhang ◽  
Jacqueline Rüger ◽  
Jessica Alluin ◽  
Ritin Sharma ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Wu ◽  
Yingyue Shen ◽  
Ming Zheng ◽  
Chunyan Yang ◽  
Yilin Chen ◽  
...  

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (20) ◽  
pp. 4133-4141 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Kato ◽  
Y. Taniguchi ◽  
H. Kurooka ◽  
S. Minoguchi ◽  
T. Sakai ◽  
...  

Notch is involved in the cell fate determination of many cell lineages. The intracellular region (RAMIC) of Notch1 transactivates genes by interaction with a DNA binding protein RBP-J. We have compared the activities of mouse RAMIC and its derivatives in transactivation and differentiation suppression of myogenic precursor cells. RAMIC comprises two separate domains, IC for transactivation and RAM for RBP-J binding. Although the physical interaction of IC with RBP-J was much weaker than with RAM, transactivation activity of IC was shown to involve RBP-J by using an RBP-J null mutant cell line. IC showed differentiation suppression activity that was generally comparable to its transactivation activity. The RBP-J-VP16 fusion protein, which has strong transactivation activity, also suppressed myogenesis of C2C12. The RAM domain, which has no other activities than binding to RBP-J, synergistically stimulated transactivation activity of IC to the level of RAMIC. The RAM domain was proposed to compete with a putative co-repressor for binding to RBP-J because the RAM domain can also stimulate the activity of RBP-J-VP16. These results taken together, indicate that differentiation suppression of myogenic precursor cells by Notch signalling is due to transactivation of genes carrying RBP-J binding motifs.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chan Yul Yoo ◽  
Qing Sang ◽  
Jiangman He ◽  
Yongjian Qiu ◽  
Lingyun Long ◽  
...  

Phytochrome B (PHYB) triggers diverse light responses in Arabidopsis by binding to a group of antagonistically acting PHYTOCHROME-INTERACTING transcription FACTORs (PIFs) to promote PIF degradation, consequently downregulating PIF target genes. However, whether PHYB directly controls the transactivation activity of PIFs remains ambiguous. Here we show that the prototypic PIF, PIF3, possesses a p53-like transcription activation domain (TAD) consisting of a sequence-specific, hydrophobic activator motif surrounded by acidic residues. A PIF3mTAD mutant in which the activator motif is replaced with alanines fails to activate PIF3 target genes in Arabidopsis in dark, light, and shade conditions, validating the in vivo functions of the PIF3 TAD. Intriguingly, binding of the N-terminal photosensory module of PHYB to the PHYB-binding site adjacent to the TAD inhibits its transactivation activity. These results unveil a photoresponsive transcriptional switching mechanism in which photoactivated PHYB directly masks the transactivation activity of PIF3. Our study also suggests the unexpected conservation of sequence-specific TADs between the animal and plant kingdoms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 6984
Author(s):  
Hye-Yeon Seok ◽  
Jimin Ha ◽  
Sun-Young Lee ◽  
Hyoungjoon Bae ◽  
Yong-Hwan Moon

AtERF73/HRE1 is an AP2/ERF transcription factor in Arabidopsis and has two distinct alternative splicing variants, HRE1α and HRE1β. In this study, we examined the differences between the molecular functions of HRE1α and HRE1β. We found that HRE1α and HRE1β are both involved in hypoxia response and root development and have transactivation activity. Two conserved motifs in the C-terminal region of HRE1α and HRE1β, EELL and LWSY-like, contributed to their transactivation activity, specifically the four E residues in the EELL motif and the MGLWS amino acid sequence at the end of the LWSY-like motif. The N-terminal region of HRE1β also showed transactivation activity, mediated by the VDDG motif, whereas that of HRE1α did not. The transactivation activity of HRE1β was stronger than that of HRE1α in Arabidopsis protoplasts. Both transcription factors transactivated downstream genes via the GCC box. RNA-sequencing analysis further supported that both HRE1α and HRE1β might regulate gene expression associated with the hypoxia stress response, although they may transactivate different subsets of genes in downstream pathways. Our results, together with previous studies, suggested that HRE1α and HRE1β differentially transactivate downstream genes in hypoxia response and root development in Arabidopsis.


2008 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 805-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Meloni ◽  
Federica Incani ◽  
Denise Corda ◽  
Antonio Cao ◽  
Maria Cristina Rosatelli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document