BISAP score and procalcitonin versus APACHE II score and C-reactive protein in early assessment of the severity and outcome of acute pancreatitis

Pancreatology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 534 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bezmarevic ◽  
D. Mirkovic ◽  
S. Mickovic ◽  
N. Perisic
2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. 425-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mihailo Bezmarevic ◽  
Zoran Kostic ◽  
Miodrag Jovanovic ◽  
Sasa Mickovic ◽  
Darko Mirkovic ◽  
...  

Background/Aim. Early assessment of severity and continuous monitoring of patients are the key factors for adequate treatment of acute pancreatitis (AP). The aim of this study was to determine the value of procalcitonin (PCT) and Bedside Index for Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP) scoring system as prognostic markers in early stages of AP with comparison to other established indicators such as Creactive protein (CRP) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score. Methods. This prospective study included 51 patients (29 with severe AP). In the first 24 h of admission in all patients the APACHE II score and BISAP score, CRP and PCT serum concentrations were determined. The values of PCT serum concentrations and BISAP score were compared with values of CRP serum concentrations and APACHE II score, in relation to the severity and outcome of the disease. Results. Values of PCT, CRP, BISAP score and APACHE II score, measured at 24 h of admission, were significantly elevated in patients with severe form of the disease. In predicting severity of AP at 24 h of admission, sensitivity and specificity of the BISAP score were 74% and 59%, respectively, APACHE II score 89% and 69%, respectively, CRP 75% and 86%, respectively, and PCT 86% and 63%, respectively. It was found that PCT is highly significant predictor of the disease outcome (p < 0,001). Conclusion. In early assessment of AP severity, PCT has better predictive value than CRP, and similar to the APACHE II score. APACHE II score is a stronger predictor of the disease severity than BISAP score. PCT is a good predictor of AP outcome.


HPB ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. e321-e322
Author(s):  
H. Losada Morales ◽  
A. Troncoso Trujillo ◽  
L. Burgos San Juan ◽  
J. Silva Abarca ◽  
L. Acencio Barrientos ◽  
...  

HPB Surgery ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Digalakis ◽  
Iraklis E. Katsoulis ◽  
Kalliopi Biliri ◽  
Katina Themeli-Digalaki

Background-Aims. Early prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis would lead to prompt intensive treatment resulting in improvement of the outcome. The present study investigated the use of C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) as prognosticators of the severity of the disease. Methods. Twenty-six patients with acute pancreatitis were studied. Patients with APACHE II score of 9 or more formed the severe group, while the mild group consisted of patients with APACHE II score of less than 9. Serum samples for measurement of CRP, IL-8 and TNF- were collected on the day of admission and additionally on the 2nd, 3rd and 7th days. Results. Significantly higher levels of IL-8 were found in patients with severe acute pancreatitis compared to those with mild disease especially at the 2nd and 3rd days ( and , resp.). No significant difference for CRP and TNF- was observed between the two groups. The optimal cut-offs for IL-8 in order to discriminate severe from mild disease at the 2nd and 3rd days were 25.4 pg/mL and 14.5 pg/mL, respectively. Conclusions. IL-8 in early phase of acute pancreatitis is superior marker compared to CRP and TNF- for distinguishing patients with severe disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rong Qu ◽  
Linhui Hu ◽  
Yun Ling ◽  
Yating Hou ◽  
Heng Fang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background It is not clear whether there are valuable inflammatory markers for prognosis judgment in the intensive care unit (ICU). We therefore conducted a multicenter, prospective, observational study to evaluate the prognostic role of inflammatory markers. Methods The clinical and laboratory data of patients at admission, including C-reactive protein (CRP), were collected in four general ICUs from September 1, 2018, to August 1, 2019. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with nonsurvival. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate the effect size of different factors in predicting mortality during ICU stay. 3 -knots were used to assess whether alternative cut points for these biomarkers were more appropriate. Results A total of 813 patients were recruited, among whom 121 patients (14.88%) died during the ICU stay. The AUC-ROC values of PCT and CRP for discriminating ICU mortality were 0.696 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.650–0.743) and 0.684 (95% CI, 0.633–0.735), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, only APACHE II score (odds ratio, 1.166; 95% CI, 1.129–1.203; P = 0.000) and CRP concentration > 62.8 mg/L (odds ratio, 2.145; 95% CI, 1.343–3.427; P = 0.001), were significantly associated with an increased risk of ICU mortality. Moreover, the combination of APACHE II score and CRP > 62.8 mg/L significantly improved risk reclassification over the APACHE II score alone, with NRI (0.556) and IDI (0.013). Restricted cubic spline analysis confirmed that CRP concentration > 62.8 mg/L was the optimal cut-off value for differentiating between surviving and nonsurviving patients. Conclusion CRP markedly improved risk reclassification for prognosis prediction.


1995 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 2341-2348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Pezzilli ◽  
Paola Billi ◽  
Rita Miniero ◽  
Manuela Fiocchi ◽  
Onda Cappelletti ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Zhou ◽  
Nan Zheng ◽  
Xiang Li ◽  
Dongmei Zhu ◽  
YI HAN

Abstract Background: Neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR) has been reported as better indicator of bacteremia than procalcitonin (PCT), and better predictor of mortality than C-reactive protein (CRP) in various medical conditions. However, large controversy remains upon this topic. We compared the efficiency of NLCR with conventional inflammatory markers in predicting the prognosis of critical illness. Methods: We performed a multiple-centered retrospective cohort study consisting of 536 ICU patients with outcomes of survival, 28- and 7-day mortality. NLCR was compared with conventional inflammatory markers such as PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP), serum lactate (LAC), white blood cell, neutrophil and severity score APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) to evaluate the predictive value on outcomes of critical illness. Then receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed to assess and compare each marker’s sensitivity and specificity respectively. Results: NLCR values were not differential among survival and mortality groups. Meanwhile remarkable differences were observed upon APACHE II score, CRP, PCT and LAC levels among survival and death groups. ROC analysis revealed that NLCR was not competent to predict prognosis of critical illness. The AUROCs of conventional markers such as CRP, PCT, LAC and APACHE II score were more significant in predicting 28- and 7-day mortality. Conclusions: NLCR is not competent and less reliable than conventional markers CRP, PCT, LAC and APACHE II score in assessing severity and in predicting outcomes of critical illness.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zepeng Duan ◽  
Yujing Wang ◽  
Hua Ling ◽  
Qiong Li ◽  
Xingui Dai

Abstract Background: The elevated plasma mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is associated with prognosis in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). However, it is not clear that the dynamic process of plasma mtDNA during the early stage of SAP and the correction between mtDNA and clinical features.Methods: Twenty-six eligible patients with SAP in the general intensive care unit of our institution were enrolled in this study. The mtDNA concentration were assessed at admission and on days 3, 5, and 7.Results: The mtDNA concentration of the patients with SAP was elevated at each time point compared with that in the healthy controls. The mtDNA levels increased rapidly, peaking on day 3 after admission, and began to decrease on day 5. The trend remained statistically consistent among the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) score, the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and mtDNA levels. Contrastingly, the changes were not statistically consistent among the procalcitonin (PCT), calciumion (Ca2+) and mtDNA concentrations. The mtDNA level correlated significantly with the APACHE II score, SOFA score, and Ranson score, but not with the CRP, PCT, and Ca2+ concentrations. Conclusions: The dynamic change of plasma mtDNA correlated significantly with SAP development. The elevated mtDNA levels could be used as a biomarker for the early stage of SAP.Trial registration: NCT: 04079777. Registered 4 September 2019 - Retrospectively registered, https://register.clinicaltrials.gov/prs/app/action/SelectProtocol?sid=S00096E5&selectaction=Edit&uid=U0002O5I&ts=2&cx=-e6bci8


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document