scholarly journals Awareness of breast cancer risk related to a positive family history and alcohol consumption among women aged 15–44 years in United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 101029
Author(s):  
Jaya S. Khushalani ◽  
Jin Qin ◽  
Donatus U. Ekwueme ◽  
Arica White
2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pia Sillanp???? ◽  
Ari Hirvonen ◽  
Vesa Kataja ◽  
Matti Eskelinen ◽  
Veli-Matti Kosma ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 407-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine B. Ambrosone ◽  
James R. Marshall ◽  
John E. Vena ◽  
Rosemary Laughlin ◽  
Saxon Graham ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2671-2677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy C. Degnim ◽  
Daniel W. Visscher ◽  
Hal K. Berman ◽  
Marlene H. Frost ◽  
Thomas A. Sellers ◽  
...  

Purpose Atypical hyperplasia is a well-recognized risk factor for breast cancer, conveying an approximately four-fold increased risk. Data regarding long-term absolute risk and factors for risk stratification are needed. Patients and Methods Women with atypical hyperplasia in the Mayo Benign Breast Disease Cohort were identified through pathology review. Subsequent breast cancers were identified via medical records and a questionnaire. Relative risks (RRs) were estimated using standardized incidence ratios, comparing the observed number of breast cancers with those expected based on Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data. Age, histologic factors, and family history were evaluated as risk modifiers. Plots of cumulative breast cancer incidence provided estimates of risk over time. Results With mean follow-up of 13.7 years, 66 breast cancers (19.9%) occurred among 331 women with atypia. RR of breast cancer with atypia was 3.88 (95% CI, 3.00 to 4.94). Marked elevations in risk were seen with multifocal atypia (eg, three or more foci with calcifications [RR, 10.35; 95% CI, 6.13 to 16.4]). RR was higher for younger women (< 45; RR, 6.76; 95% CI, 3.24 to 12.4). Risk was similar for atypical ductal and atypical lobular hyperplasia, and family history added no significant risk. Breast cancer risk remained elevated over 20 years, and the cumulative incidence approached 35% at 30 years. Conclusion Among women with atypical hyperplasia, multiple foci of atypia and the presence of histologic calcifications may indicate “very high risk” status (> 50% risk at 20 years). A positive family history does not further increase risk in women with atypia.


Author(s):  
Waheed Ahmad ◽  
Sabika Firasat ◽  
Muhammad Sohail Akhtar ◽  
Kiran Afshan ◽  
Kaukab Jabeen ◽  
...  

Objective: Breast cancer is a second major cause of female death worldwide. This study aimed to explore epidemiology, clinical profiles and contribution of reproductive and non-reproductive risk factors in breast cancer development among females from South Punjab, Pakistan. Methods: Data was collected through hospitals between October 2017 and March 2018 and study got approval by Bioethical Committee of Quaid-i-Azam University in September, 2017. A total of 163 cases and 163 age-matched controls were recruited through non-probability consecutive sampling method. All histologically confirmed patients irrespective of age, family history, clinical presentation and histopathological type were included in the study as cases. Patients, who were not willing to participate were excluded from the study. Details regarding socio-demographic characteristics, family history of cancer, reproductive health and lifestyle factors were recorded using a structured questionnaire. Conditional logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios at 95% confidence intervals for breast cancer by menstrual and reproductive factors after adjustment of potential confounders. Conditional logistic regression was also applied for various demographic and medical risk factors/exposures. Results: We found positive family history and hypertension significantly linked to an increased breast cancer risk (adjusted O.R >1.5, 95% CI, P<0.05) whereas, intense physical activity, increased anthropometric measurements and breastfeeding per child in months were inversely associated with breast cancer risk (adjusted O.R <1.0, 95% CI, P<0.05) in our study cohort. Conclusion: Our study reaffirms contribution of established risk factors for breast cancer, highlights protective factors and necessitates awareness/screening programs to reduce breast cancer burden in upcoming generations. Continuous...


2017 ◽  
Vol 186 (5) ◽  
pp. 524-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Ja Kim ◽  
Seungyoun Jung ◽  
A. Heather Eliassen ◽  
Wendy Y. Chen ◽  
Walter C. Willett ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Amy Rudge ◽  
Kristen Foley ◽  
Belinda Lunnay ◽  
Emma R. Miller ◽  
Samantha Batchelor ◽  
...  

A dose-dependent relationship between alcohol consumption and increased breast cancer risk is well established, even at low levels of consumption. Australian women in midlife (45–64 years) are at highest lifetime risk for developing breast cancer but demonstrate low awareness of this link. We explore women’s exposure to messages about alcohol and breast cancer in Australian print media in the period 2002–2018. Methods: Paired thematic and framing analyses were undertaken of Australian print media from three time-defined subsamples: 2002–2004, 2009–2011, and 2016–2018. Results: Five key themes arose from the thematic framing analysis: Ascribing Blame, Individual Responsibility, Cultural Entrenchment, False Equilibrium, and Recognition of Population Impact. The framing analysis showed that the alcohol–breast cancer link was predominantly framed as a behavioural concern, neglecting medical and societal frames. Discussion: We explore the representations of the alcohol and breast cancer risk relationship. We found their portrayal to be conflicting and unbalanced at times and tended to emphasise individual choice and responsibility in modifying health behaviours. We argue that key stakeholders including government, public health, and media should accept shared responsibility for increasing awareness of the alcohol–breast cancer link and invite media advocates to assist with brokering correct public health information.


2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Cox ◽  
Susan E. Hankinson ◽  
David J. Hunter

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Seymour ◽  
Silvia Casadei ◽  
Valentina Zampiga ◽  
Simonetta Rosato ◽  
Rita Danesi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document