Tumor regression grades, K-RAS mutational profile and c-MET in colorectal liver metastases

2017 ◽  
Vol 213 (8) ◽  
pp. 1002-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Lorenzon ◽  
Luana Ricca ◽  
Emanuela Pilozzi ◽  
Antoinette Lemoine ◽  
Valentina Riggio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Tumor Regression

Histological tumor regression after preoperative chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: Correlations with radiological response and prognosis.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 609-609
Author(s):  
Ryo Inada ◽  
Shigeyoshi Iwamoto ◽  
Masaki Kaibori ◽  
Morihiko Ishizaki ◽  
Hiroya Iida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Preoperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Molecular Target ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
Major Response ◽  
Radiological Response ◽  
Regression Grade

609 Background: The purpose of this study was to characterize histological tumor regression grade (TRG) to colorectal liver metastases (CLM) treated with preoperative chemotherapy followed by liver surgery, and to evaluate whether TRG correlates with radiological response and prognosis. Methods: This study included 30 patients with CLM treated by surgical resection after preoperative chemotherapy with oxaliplatin- or irrinotecan-based regimens with or without molecular target agents. TRG was determined by the amount of fibrosis and necrosis replaced from tumor cells, ranging TRG 0 (0%), 1 (1-24%), 2 (25-50%), 3 (51-99%), and 4 (100%). Results: TRG 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 were observed in 0%, 6.7%, 10.0%, 66.7%, and 16.6% of the patients, respectively. There were no relations between TRG and regimen, including molecular target agents. As shown in the table, radiological response was not significantly correlated with TRG. Patients with histological major response (TRG 3+4) had better prognosis (MST; TRG 1+2 vs. 3+4: 20.0 vs. 50 months, P= 0.007), and a multivariate analysis identified histological major response as an independent good prognostic factor. Conclusions: In this analysis, histological TRG predicted survival after preoperative chemotherapy and resection for CLM. Preoperative radiological response could not evaluate TRG. [Table: see text]

Colorectal Liver Metastases - Does the Number of Lesions Determine the Sensibility of Resection?

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Knoefel ◽  
Brunken ◽  
Neumann ◽  
Gundlach ◽  
Rogiers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Chirurgische Entfernung

Die komplette chirurgische Entfernung von Lebermetastasen bietet Patienten nach kolorektalem Karzinom die einzige kurative Chance. Es gibt jedoch eine, anscheinend unbegrenzte, Anzahl an Parametern, die die Prognose dieser Patienten bestimmen und damit den Sinn dieser Therapie vorhersagen können. Zu den am häufigsten diskutierten und am einfachsten zu bestimmenden Parametern gehört die Anzahl der Metastasen. Ziel dieser Studie war es daher die Wertigkeit dieses Parameters in der Literatur zu reflektieren und unsere eigenen Patientendaten zu evaluieren. Insgesamt konnte von 302 Patienten ein komplettes Follow-up erhoben werden. Die gebildeten Patientengruppen wurden mit Hilfe einer Kaplan Meier Analyse und konsekutivem log rank Test untersucht. Die Literatur wurde bis Dezember 1998 revidiert. Die Anzahl der Metastasen bestätigte sich als ein prognostisches Kriterium. Lagen drei oder mehr Metastasen vor, so war nicht nur die Wahrscheinlichkeit einer R0 Resektion deutlich geringer (17.8% versus 67.2%) sondern auch das Überleben der Patienten nach einer R0 Resektion tendenziell unwahrscheinlicher. Das 5-Jahres Überleben betrug bei > 2 Metastasen 9% bei > 2 Metastasen 36%. Das 10-Jahres Überleben beträgt bislang bei > 2 Metastasen 0% bei > 2 Metastasen 18% (p < 0.07). Die Anzahl der Metastasen spielt in der Prognose der Patienten mit kolorektalen Lebermetastasen eine Rolle. Selbst bei mehr als vier Metastasen ist jedoch gelegentlich eine R0 Resektion möglich. In diesen Fällen kann der Patient auch langfristig von einer Operation profitieren. Das wichtigere Kriterium einer onkologisch sinnvollen Resektabilität ist die Frage ob technisch und funktionell eine R0 Resektion durchführbar ist. Ist das der Fall, so sollte auch einem Patienten mit mehreren Metastasen die einzige kurative Chance einer Resektion nicht vorenthalten bleiben.

Radiofrequency ablation of colorectal liver metastases

2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (10) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Colorectal Liver Metastases ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Liver Resections ◽  
Multi Stage

Introduction: Radical liver resection is the only method for the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, only 20–30% of patients with CLMs can be radically treated. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is one of the possible methods of palliative treatment in such patients. Methods: RFA was performed in 381 patients with CLMs between 01 Jan 2001 and 31 Dec 2018. The mean age of the patients was 65.2±8.7 years. The male to female ratio was 2:1. Open laparotomy was done in 238 (62.5%) patients and the CT-navigated transcutaneous approach was used in 143 (37.5%) patients. CLMs <5 cm (usually <3 cm) in diameter were the indication for RFA. We used RFA as the only method in 334 (87.6%) patients; RFA in combination with resection was used in 36 (9.4%), and with multi-stage resection in 11 (3%) patients. We performed RFA in a solitary CLM in 170 (44.6%) patients, and in 2−5 CLMs in 211 (55.6%) patients. We performed computed tomography in each patient 48 hours after procedure. Results: The 30-day postoperative mortality was zero. Complications were present in 4.8% of transcutaneous and in 14.2% of open procedures, respectively, in the 30-day postoperative period. One-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 94.8, 66.8, 43.9 and 16.6%, respectively, in patients undergoing RFA, and 90.6, 69.1, 52.8 and 39.2%, respectively, in patients with liver resections. Disease free survival was 63.2, 30.1, 18.4 and 13.1%, respectively, in the same patients after RFA, and 71.1, 33.3, 22.8 and 15.5%, respectively, after liver resections. Conclusion: RFA is a palliative thermal ablation method, which is one of therapeutic options in patients with radically non-resectable CLMs. RFA is useful especially in a non-resectable, or resectable (but for the price of large liver resection) solitary CLM <3 cm in diameter and in CLM relapses. RFA is also part of multi-stage liver procedures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document