Dosimetric impact of interfraction prostate and seminal vesicle volume changes and rotation: A post-hoc analysis of a phase III randomized trial of MRI-guided versus CT-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy

11023 Background: DOX remains critical in STS treatment. Controversy exists regarding its optimal administration route (BOL vs CIV). BOL vs CIV could affect toxicity and/or efficacy. A randomized trial to assess this is unlikely. We conducted a post hoc analysis to explore differences in these routes of DOX administration. Methods: Data from a prospective randomized phase III study of doxorubicin with or without evofosfamide (TH-302) were used. At the discretion of treating physician, BOL or CIV DOX could be used. Grade 3-5 hematologic, non-hematologic and cardiac toxicities and treatment response were explored using multivariable logistic regression. OS and PFS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards. Results: 640 subjects were enrolled (556 BOL, 84 CIV). Baseline differences in age, extent of disease and prior radiotherapy were controlled for in regression models. Hematologic toxicity was associated with age, performance status (PS) and cumulative (CUM) DOX dose. Non-hematologic toxicity was associated with age, PS, receipt of prior radiotherapy and CUM TH-302 dose. Cardiac toxicity was only associated with CUM DOX dose. Odds of response were strongly associated with CUM DOX dose (mg/m2, OR = 1.011, p < 0.0001), and, to a lesser extent, with CUM TH-302 dose (g/m2, OR = 1.081, p = 0.0008), STS subtype and prior radiotherapy. Comparing CIV to BOL DOX, neither OS (median 21.7m vs 18.3m, HR = 0.85, p = 0.29) nor PFS (median 6.1m vs. 6.1m, HR = 0.89, p = 0.43) was affected by manner of DOX administration (CIV vs BOL). Cox analyses indicated that factors reflecting tumoral biology and host status, rather than treatment received, were associated with OS (PS, histologic STS subtype, histologic grade, receipt of prior radiotherapy) and PFS (PS, treatment-related toxicity). Conclusions: Our analyses provide no evidence for superiority of either BOL or CIV administration of DOX as regards toxicity or efficacy in STS treatment. Thus, the logistically simpler BOL administration of DOX should be favored over CIV administration.

Download Full-text

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (mirage): a phase iii randomized trial

BMC Cancer ◽

10.1186/s12885-021-08281-x ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Ting Martin Ma ◽

James M. Lamb ◽

Maria Casado ◽

Xiaoyan Wang ◽

T. Vincent Basehart ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽

Prostate Cancer ◽

Magnetic Resonance ◽

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Resonance Imaging ◽

Ct Guided ◽

Gu Toxicity ◽

Gi Toxicity ◽

Mri Guided

Abstract Background Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is becoming increasingly used in treating localized prostate cancer (PCa), with evidence showing similar toxicity and efficacy profiles when compared with longer courses of definitive radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided radiotherapy has multiple potential advantages over standard computed tomography (CT)-guided radiotherapy, including enhanced prostate visualization (abrogating the need for fiducials and MRI fusion), enhanced identification of the urethra, the ability to track the prostate in real-time, and the capacity to perform online adaptive planning. However, it is unknown whether these potential advantages translate into improved outcomes. This phase III randomized superiority trial is designed to prospectively evaluate whether toxicity is lower after MRI-guided versus CT-guided SBRT. Methods Three hundred men with localized PCa will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to SBRT using CT or MRI guidance. Randomization will be stratified by baseline International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) (≤15 or > 15) and prostate gland volume (≤50 cc or > 50 cc). Five fractions of 8 Gy will be delivered to the prostate over the course of fourteen days, with or without hormonal therapy and elective nodal radiotherapy (to a dose of 5 Gy per fraction) as per the investigator’s discretion. The primary endpoint is the incidence of physician-reported acute grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU) toxicity (during the first 90 days after SBRT), as assessed by the CTCAE version 4.03 scale. Secondary clinical endpoints include incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, 5-year cumulative incidences of physician-reported late grade ≥ 2 GU and GI toxicity, temporal changes in patient-reported quality of life (QOL) outcomes, 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival and the proportion of fractions of MRI-guided SBRT in which online adaptive radiotherapy is used. Discussion The MIRAGE trial is the first randomized trial comparing MRI-guided with standard CT-guided SBRT for localized PCa. The primary hypothesis is that MRI-guided SBRT will lead to an improvement in the cumulative incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity when compared to CT-guided SBRT. The pragmatic superiority design focused on an acute toxicity endpoint will allow an early comparison of the two technologies. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04384770. Date of registration: May 12, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04384770 Protocol version Version 2.1, Aug 28, 2020.

Download Full-text

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and the Efficacy of Capecitabine and Fluorouracil in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Post Hoc Analysis of the AXEPT Randomised Phase III Trial

SSRN Electronic Journal ◽

10.2139/ssrn.3723611 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Sun Young Kim ◽

Ji Sung Lee ◽

Junho Kang ◽

Satoshi Morita ◽

Young Suk Park ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Proton Pump Inhibitor ◽

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽

Proton Pump ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Phase Iii Trial ◽

Post Hoc Analysis ◽

Post Hoc

Download Full-text

935. Effect of Tesamorelin in People with HIV with and without Dorsocervical Fat: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase III Double Blind Placebo Control Trial

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1121 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. S500-S501

Author(s):

Farah Rahman ◽

Marilyn de Chantal ◽

Pedro Mesquita ◽

Judith A Aberg

Keyword(s):

Growth Hormone ◽

Abdominal Fat ◽

Fat Deposition ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Placebo Control ◽

People Living With Hiv ◽

Anthropometric Parameters ◽

Double Blind ◽

Post Hoc Analysis ◽

Post Hoc

Abstract Background Lipohypertrophy is defined as excess fat deposition in abdominal defined as visceral adipose tissue (VAT) as well as in the dorsocervical region, breasts, trunk, and along with possible fat deposition in liver, muscle, myocardium and epicardium. Multiple factors have been described as contributing to lipohypertrophy in people living with HIV (PLWH), including patient characteristics, antiretroviral therapy (ART) and also impaired growth hormone (GH) secretion. Tesamorelin, a synthetic form of growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), is indicated for reduction of excess abdominal fat in PLWH with lipodystrophy Methods Post-hoc analysis was done on phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter trials. Patients were eligible if between 18 and 65 years of age, had confirmed HIV infection, had evidence of excess abdominal fat accumulation and on stable ART regimen for 8 weeks or more. Participants were randomized to receive tesamorelin 2 mg daily or placebo daily for 26 weeks. Only tesamorelin responders, defined as patients with at least 8% decrease in VAT and who were adherent to the medication, were used for this analysis. Results are reported for patients with and without dorsocervical (DC) fat deposition. Results Demographic characteristics of responders at week 26 are shown according to presence or absence of DC fat (Table 1). At week 26, on average, the patients with DC fat deposition had higher BMI and waist circumference (WC) than the group without DC fat. Most patients in both groups had lipoatrophy. Metabolic and anthropometric parameters were measured at week 26 in patients with and without DC fat (Table 2). There was a decrease in VAT and also an improvement in their WC at week 26 in both groups. Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of Tesamorelin Responder Subjects at Week 26, by Dorsocervical Status Table 2: Change in Abdominal Adiposity, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Levels, and Metabolic Parameters Between Baseline and Week 26 Among Tesamorelin Responders Conclusion This data demonstrates that tesamorelin is effective at reducing VAT in both patients with and without DC fat. The medication was well tolerated without significant changes to metabolic based measurements. Treatment of excessive VAT with tesamorelin has seemingly positive results in fat reduction in patients with or without DC fat deposition and our study contributes to the growing literature. Disclosures Marilyn de Chantal, PhD, Theratechnologies Inc (Employee) Pedro Mesquita, PhD, Theratechnologies, Inc. (Employee) Judith A. Aberg, MD, Theratechnology (Consultant)

Download Full-text

Pain Progression at Initiation of Cabazitaxel in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC): A Post Hoc Analysis of the PROSELICA Study

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13061284 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (6) ◽

pp. 1284

Author(s):

Nicolas Delanoy ◽

Debbie Robbrecht ◽

Mario Eisenberger ◽

Oliver Sartor ◽

Ronald de Wit ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Progression Free Survival ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽

Radiological Progression ◽

Post Hoc Analysis ◽

Psa Response ◽

Phase Iii Study ◽

Psa Progression ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Post Hoc

Background: In the PROSELICA phase III trial (NCT01308580), cabazitaxel 20 mg/m2 (CABA20) was non-inferior to cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 (CABA25) in mCRPC patients previously treated with docetaxel (DOC). The present post hoc analysis evaluates how the type of progression at randomization affected outcomes. Methods: Progression type at randomization was defined as follows: PSA progression only (PSA-p; no radiological progression (RADIO-p), no pain), RADIO-p (±PSA-p, no pain), or pain progression (PAIN-p, ±PSA-p, ±RADIO-p). Relationships between progression type and overall survival (OS), radiological progression-free survival (rPFS), and PSA response (confirmed PSA decrease ≥ 50%) were analyzed. Results: All randomized patients (n = 1200) had received prior DOC, and 25.7% had received prior abiraterone or enzalutamide. Progression type at randomization was evaluable in 1075 patients (PSA-p = 24.4%, RADIO-p = 20.8%, PAIN-p = 54.8%). Pain progression was associated with clinical and biological features of aggressive disease. Median OS from CABA initiation or date of mCRPC diagnosis, all arms combined, was shorter in the PAIN-p group than in the RADIO-p or the PSA-p groups (12.0 versus 16.8 and 18.4 months, respectively, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, all arms combined, PAIN-p was an independent predictor of poor OS (HR = 1.44, p < 0.001). PSA response, rPFS, and OS were numerically higher with CABA25 versus CABA20 in patients with PAIN-p. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis of the PROSELICA phase III study shows that pain progression at initiation of CABA in mCRPC patients previously treated with DOC is associated with a poor prognosis. Disease progression should be carefully monitored, even in the absence of PSA rise.

Download Full-text