Toxicity and efficacy of bolus (BOL) versus continuous intravenous (CIV) dosing of doxorubicin (DOX) in soft tissue sarcoma (STS): Post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11023-11023
Author(s):  
Lee D. Cranmer ◽  
Yao Lu ◽  
Karla V. Ballman ◽  
Elizabeth Trice Loggers ◽  
Seth Pollack
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Post Hoc

11023 Background: DOX remains critical in STS treatment. Controversy exists regarding its optimal administration route (BOL vs CIV). BOL vs CIV could affect toxicity and/or efficacy. A randomized trial to assess this is unlikely. We conducted a post hoc analysis to explore differences in these routes of DOX administration. Methods: Data from a prospective randomized phase III study of doxorubicin with or without evofosfamide (TH-302) were used. At the discretion of treating physician, BOL or CIV DOX could be used. Grade 3-5 hematologic, non-hematologic and cardiac toxicities and treatment response were explored using multivariable logistic regression. OS and PFS were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards. Results: 640 subjects were enrolled (556 BOL, 84 CIV). Baseline differences in age, extent of disease and prior radiotherapy were controlled for in regression models. Hematologic toxicity was associated with age, performance status (PS) and cumulative (CUM) DOX dose. Non-hematologic toxicity was associated with age, PS, receipt of prior radiotherapy and CUM TH-302 dose. Cardiac toxicity was only associated with CUM DOX dose. Odds of response were strongly associated with CUM DOX dose (mg/m2, OR = 1.011, p < 0.0001), and, to a lesser extent, with CUM TH-302 dose (g/m2, OR = 1.081, p = 0.0008), STS subtype and prior radiotherapy. Comparing CIV to BOL DOX, neither OS (median 21.7m vs 18.3m, HR = 0.85, p = 0.29) nor PFS (median 6.1m vs. 6.1m, HR = 0.89, p = 0.43) was affected by manner of DOX administration (CIV vs BOL). Cox analyses indicated that factors reflecting tumoral biology and host status, rather than treatment received, were associated with OS (PS, histologic STS subtype, histologic grade, receipt of prior radiotherapy) and PFS (PS, treatment-related toxicity). Conclusions: Our analyses provide no evidence for superiority of either BOL or CIV administration of DOX as regards toxicity or efficacy in STS treatment. Thus, the logistically simpler BOL administration of DOX should be favored over CIV administration.

Baseline liver function and outcomes in the phase III REFLECT study in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 524-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arndt Vogel ◽  
Catherine Frenette ◽  
Max W. Sung ◽  
Bruno Daniele ◽  
Ari David Baron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Function ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Safety Outcomes ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Post Hoc

524 Background: Lenvatinib (LEN) is approved for first-line treatment of uHCC. Baseline (BL) liver function (Child-Pugh score [CPS] and albumin-bilirubin grade [ALBI]) was prognostic in uHCC patients (pts) who received sorafenib (SOR) but has not been assessed with LEN in uHCC. Here, we report post hoc analysis of BL liver function and efficacy/safety outcomes from the phase 3 REFLECT study. Methods: Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety were stratified by BL ALBI or CPS. OS and PFS were estimated by Kaplan–Meier method. Independent radiologic review utilized mRECIST criteria for ORR. Safety was assessed using NCI-CTCAE, version 4.0. Results: Liver function measured by ALBI and CPS seemed to be prognostic for OS and ORR. Median OS was longer in ALBI grade 1 (ALBI-1) vs grade 2 (ALBI-2) pts or for CPS-5 vs CPS-6 on either treatment arm and was longer for LEN vs SOR. ORR was higher in pts with better ALBI or CPS and for LEN vs SOR. Rates of treatment-emergent adverse events grade ≥3 were lower with better BL liver function (ALBI-1 vs ALBI-2: 70% vs 86%; CPS-5 vs CPS-6: 72% vs 86%). Study-drug withdrawal, dose reduction, and dose interruption occurred more often in pts with worse BL liver function. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis suggests ALBI (by OS, PFS and ORR) and CPS (by ORR) may be prognostic in uHCC pts and that BL liver function may be linked with efficacy/safety outcomes. This analysis also found that LEN provided benefit vs SOR for uHCC, regardless of BL liver function. The benefit of LEN may be underestimated, as more ALBI-2 pts and fewer ALBI-1 pts received LEN vs SOR. Clinical trial information: NCT01761266. [Table: see text]

Overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) by depth of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline in the phase III PROSPER trial of men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) treated with enzalutamide (ENZA).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 94-94
Author(s):  
Maha H. A. Hussain ◽  
Cora N. Sternberg ◽  
Eleni Efstathiou ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Qi Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Reference Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Psa Nadir ◽  
Post Hoc

94 Background: The PROSPER trial demonstrated prolonged MFS and OS for men with nmCRPC and rapidly rising PSA treated with ENZA vs placebo, both in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The final survival analysis of PROSPER (Sternberg et al. NEJM 2020) recently reported a median OS of 67.0 months (95% CI, 64.0 to not reached) with ENZA and 56.3 months (95% CI, 54.4 to 63.0) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] for death, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.89; P = .001). Post hoc analyses of PROSPER evaluating PSA dynamics have demonstrated longer MFS with greater PSA decline (Hussain et al. ESMO Sept 19-21, 2020. Poster 685P) and increased risk of metastases in patients with even modest PSA progression vs those without (Saad et al. Eur Urol 2020). Here we further explored the relationship between PSA dynamics and outcomes in PROSPER using uniquely defined PSA subgroups of decline. Methods: Eligible men in PROSPER had nmCRPC, a PSA level ≥ 2 ng/mL at baseline, and a PSA doubling time ≤ 10 months. Men continued ADT, were randomized 2:1 to ENZA 160 mg once daily vs placebo, and had PSA evaluation at week 17 and every 16 weeks thereafter. This post hoc analysis evaluated OS and MFS for 4 mutually exclusive subgroups defined by PSA nadir using men with PSA reduction < 50% as the reference group. The HR is based on an unstratified Cox proportional hazards analysis model. Results: 1401 men were enrolled in PROSPER; 933 were treated with ENZA and PSA data were available for 905. Measured at nadir, 38% of these men achieved PSA reduction ≥ 90% (actual nadir < 0.2 ng/mL), and another 27% achieved PSA reduction ≥ 90% (actual nadir ≥ 0.2 ng/mL). Among men in the placebo arm of PROSPER only 3/457 reported PSA reduction ≥ 90%. Median OS and MFS increased with increasing depth of PSA decline (Table). Conclusions: In men with nmCRPC and rapidly rising PSA treated with ADT plus ENZA, there was a close relationship between the degree of PSA decline and survival outcomes. Defining PSA by both percent decline and actual decline below 0.2 ng/mL revealed a previously under-appreciated relationship between these PSA metrics and highlights the importance of PSA nadir as an intermediate biomarker in nmCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02003924. [Table: see text]

Body weight loss (BWL) as a prognostic/predictive factor in previously treated patients (pts) with metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (mGC/GEJC): Post-hoc analyses of the phase III tags trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 476-476
Author(s):  
Michele Ghidini ◽  
Howard S. Hochster ◽  
Toshihiko Doi ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Lukas Makris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Body Weight Loss ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Body Weight Data ◽  
Grade 3

476 Background: Nutritional status is closely linked to cancer mortality, and BWL has been shown to be prognostic for survival in curative, first-, and second-line settings in mGC/GEJC. In the phase III TAGS trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) showed clinical benefit versus placebo (PBO) and manageable safety in pts with mGC/GEJC who had received ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens. The association of early BWL with survival outcomes in TAGS was examined in retrospective analyses. Methods: The TAGS intent-to-treat (ITT) population was categorized into pts who experienced <3% or ≥3% BWL from the start of treatment until day 1 of cycle 2 (each cycle: 28 days). Overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between subgroups within each treatment arm due to significant imbalances of early BWL between treatment arms. The effect of early BWL on OS was assessed by a univariate Cox proportional hazards (PH) model as well as a multivariate Cox PH model that adjusted for baseline prognostic factors identified in the original ITT analysis. Results: Body weight data were available for 451 of 507 (89%) pts in the study (n=304, FTD/TPI; n=147, PBO). In the FTD/TPI and PBO arms, respectively, 74% (224/304 pts) and 65% (95/147) experienced <3% BWL, whereas 26% (80/304) and 35% (52/147) experienced ≥3% BWL at the end of cycle 1. Pts with <3% BWL had longer OS than those with ≥3% BWL in both FTD/TPI (median [m] OS: 6.5 vs 4.9 months [mo]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55–1.02) and PBO arms (mOS: 6.0 vs 2.5 mo; HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21–0.49). The PFS HR for pts with <3% BWL vs ≥3% BWL was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.71–1.25; mPFS, 2.1 vs 1.9 mo) in the FTD/TPI group and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.34–0.72; mPFS, 1.9 vs 1.7 mo) in the PBO group. In the pooled ITT population, the unadjusted HR for the <3% vs ≥3% BWL group calculated using a univariate Cox model was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46–0.73), indicating a strong prognostic effect of early BWL. Results of multivariate analyses were consistent with univariate analyses and suggested that early BWL was both a prognostic ( P<0.0001) and predictive (interaction P=0.0003) factor for OS in pts with mGC/GEJC. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) of any cause were reported in 77% and 82% of FTD/TPI-treated pts in the <3% and ≥3% BWL subgroups, respectively, and in 45% and 67% of placebo-treated pts in the <3% and ≥3% BWL subgroups. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first analysis to show that BWL is negatively associated with survival in pts with mGC/GEJC receiving third- or later-line treatment. In TAGS, early BWL (≥3% BWL at the end of cycle 1) was a strong negative prognostic factor for OS regardless of FTD/TPI or PBO treatment. Grade ≥3 AE frequencies were similar in FTD/TPI-treated pts with <3% or ≥3% BWL. The relationship of BWL to other prognostic factors will be explored further. Clinical trial information: NCT02500043.

Association between radiographic response and overall survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving chemotherapy.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 118-118
Author(s):  
G. Sonpavde ◽  
G. R. Pond ◽  
W. R. Berry ◽  
R. De Wit ◽  
M. A. Eisenberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Objective Assessment ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Kaplan Meier

118 Background: In men with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC),the association of measurable tumor responses with overall survival (OS) is unknown. We retrospectively evaluated the TAX327 phase III trial to study this relationship. Methods: Eligible patients for this analysis included those with WHO-defined measurable metastatic disease randomized to receive either docetaxel or mitoxantrone. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the prognostic relationship of WHO-defined radiologic response with OS was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Landmark analyses evaluated survival from baseline and 2, 3, 4 and 6 months after baseline. Results: Four hundred and twelve patients enrolled on the TAX327 trial had measurable tumors. Thirty-seven patients exhibited a complete or partial objective response (CR/PR, 9.0%), 116 had stable disease (SD, 28.2%), 99 had progressive disease (PD,24%) and 160 (38.8%) did not have a post-baseline objective assessment. Partial responders demonstrated longer median OS (29.0 months) than patients with SD (22.1 months), or those with PD (10.8 months) or those who were not assessed (12.7 months). These results remained after landmark analysis. We found a significant association between ≥30% PSA declines and radiologic response, with ≥30% PSA declines occurring in all patients with CR/PR, 79.8% of patients with SD and 34.4% with PD. Radiologic response remained a significant but modest post-treatment prognostic factor for OS after adjusting for treatment, pain-response and ≥30% PSA-decline (p=0.009). Conclusions: In men with metastatic CRPC and measurable disease receiving chemotherapy, objective tumor response was prognostic for OS, and appears to complement PSA assessment. [Table: see text]

A phase III randomized intergroup trial (S0016) comparing CHOP plus rituximab with CHOP plus iodine-131-tositumomab for front-line treatment of follicular lymphoma: Results of subset analyses and a comparison of prognostic models.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8001-8001
Author(s):  
Oliver W. Press ◽  
Joseph M Unger ◽  
Michael Leo LeBlanc ◽  
Lisa M. Rimsza ◽  
Jonathan W. Friedberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Prognostic Models ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Follicular Lymphomas

8001 Background: Advanced follicular lymphomas (FL) are considered incurable with chemotherapy and there is no consensus on the best treatment. Outcomes are variable, but can be partially predicted by defined prognostic factors. SWOG and CALGB compared the safety and efficacy of 2 immunochemotherapy regimens in a Phase III trial enrolling 554 patients between 3/1/2001 and 9/15/2008. Methods: Patients were eligible if they had bulky stage II, III or IV FL and had not received prior therapy. Patients randomized to CHOP-R received 6 cycles of CHOP every 21 days + 6 doses of rituximab. Patients randomized to CHOP-RIT received 6 cycles of CHOP, followed by consolidative radioimmunotherapy with tositumomab/iodine I-131 tositumomab. A Cox proportional hazards multi-variable regression analysis assessed the prognostic impact of age, stage, LDH, LN size and number, performance status, hemoglobin, β2 microglobulin, BM involvement, and B symptoms.  The prognostic value of 3 multi-variable models were compared. Results: Outcomes were outstanding with either CHOP-R or CHOP-RIT (2 yr PFS: 76% vs 80% [ p =0.11]; 2 yr OS: 97% vs 93% [p =0.08], respectively).  Subset analyses so far have not identified any subgroups clearly benefitting to a greater degree from CHOP-R or CHOP-RIT in terms of both PFS and OS. Cox multivariable regression analysis identified serum-β2M, LDH level, and FLIPI index as the strongest prognostic factors associated with worse PFS and OS. Conclusions: Both regimens produced outstanding PFS and OS, and no statistically significant differences between them were observed.  FLIPI, FLIPI2, and LDH + β2M models were all strong predictors of patient outcomes.  A combination of LDH + β2M was as good as the FLIPI index, and was simpler to apply.  (Supported in part by NCI grants CA32102 and CA38926 from the NCI and GlaxoSmithKline.) [Table: see text]

Pretreatment albumin may help select patients for intrahepatic Y-90 microsphere transarterial radioembolization (TARE) for malignancies of the liver.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 453-453
Author(s):  
Kelly Elizabeth Orwat ◽  
Samuel Lewis Cooper ◽  
Michael Ashenafi ◽  
M. Bret Anderson ◽  
Marcelo Guimaraes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Carolina ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
University Of South Carolina ◽  
Liver Malignancies ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽  
Synthetic Function ◽  
Radiation Induced ◽  
Grade 3

453 Background: Systemic therapies for unresectable liver malignancies may provide a survival benefit, but eventually prove intolerable or ineffective. TARE provides an additional liver-directed treatment option to improve local control for these patients, but there is limited data on patient factors associated with survival. Methods: All patients that received TARE at the Medical University of South Carolina from March 2006 through May of 2014 were included in this analysis of overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS from date of first procedure are reported. Potential prognostic factors for OS were evaluated using log rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: In 114 patients that received TARE at our institution, median follow-up was 6.4 months [range 0-86], with the following tumor histology: colorectal (CR) n=55, hepatocellular (HC) n=20, cholangiocarcinoma (CC) n=16, neuroendocrine (NE) n=12, breast (BR) n=6, other n=5. At least 1 line of systemic therapy prior to TARE was noted in 79% of patients. Median OS was 6.6 months and 1-year OS was 30.7%. The percentage of patients who died within 3 months of TARE were 46.2% for patients with albumin < 3 but only 20.3% for patients with albumin ≥ 3. Grade ≥ 2 toxicity was observed in 22 patients (19.3%) including 9 (7.9%) with Grade 3 and 1 (0.9%) with Grade 4 toxicity. A single patient with a pre-existing pulmonary arteriovenous malformation experienced Grade 3 pneumonitis that resolved with steroids. No deaths were attributed to radiation-induced liver disease. Conclusions: TARE is a relatively safe and effective treatment for unresectable intrahepatic malignancies. Patients with NE or BR histology as well as those with better hepatic synthetic function were associated with significantly better survival. Our data suggest that patients with albumin below 3 may not benefit from TARE. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals 2780. Reactogenicity Profile of Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine after Dose 2 According to the Intensity of the Same Event Experienced after Dose 1

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S981-S982
Author(s):  
Romulo Colindres ◽  
Valentine Wascotte ◽  
Alain Brecx ◽  
Christopher Clarke ◽  
Caroline Hervé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injection Site ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
High Efficacy ◽  
Lower Intensity ◽  
Zoster Vaccine ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Recombinant Zoster Vaccine ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Background In the pivotal clinical trials, ZOE-50 (NCT01165177) and ZOE-70 (NCT01165229), the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) showed high efficacy against herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia. The incidence of reported solicited events was higher in RZV compared with placebo recipients. Methods In these phase III, observer-blind, placebo-controlled trials conducted in 18 countries, adults ≥50 years of age (YOA, ZOE-50) and ≥70 YOA (ZOE-70), randomized 1:1, received 2 doses of RZV or placebo 2 months apart. Injection-site and general events were solicited for 7 days after each dose via diary cards in a participant subset. For this post-hoc analysis, ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 data from participants having completed the diary cards for both RZV doses were pooled. The intensity of each solicited event after dose 2 was stratified by the intensity of the same event after dose 1. Results Solicited injection-site and general events were recorded for both RZV doses by 4,676 and 4,668 vaccinees, respectively (Figure 1). Of 1,235 vaccinees with no injection-site event at dose 1, 881 (71.3%) reported no injection-site event and 20 (1.6%) reported a grade 3 event after dose 2. A total of 433 (9.3%) vaccinees reported a grade 3 injection-site event, either after dose 1 or dose 2. Of 244 vaccinees with grade 3 injection-site events at dose 1, 79 (32.4%) also reported a grade 3 event after dose 2. Of 2,312 vaccinees with no general event at dose 1, 1,617 (69.9%) reported no general event and 67 (2.9%) reported a grade 3 event after dose 2. A total of 499 (10.7%) vaccinees reported a grade 3 general event, either after dose 1 or dose 2. Of 222 vaccinees with grade 3 general events at dose 1, 81 (36.5%) also reported a grade 3 general event after dose 2. In general, vaccinees who did not experience a certain event after dose 1, did not experience this event after dose 2 either. Most vaccinees reporting a specific event at high intensity after dose 1, reported the same event at a lower intensity (or not at all) after dose 2 (Figures 2 and 3). Conclusion While not powered to predict event intensity of the second RZV dose, our data provides an overview of event intensity after RZV dose 2 according to the intensity of the same event experienced after dose 1. Funding: GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Neutropenia as a potential pharmacodynamic marker for docetaxel-based chemotherapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Russell Pond ◽  
William R. Berry ◽  
Matt D. Galsky ◽  
Brian A. Wood ◽  
Lance Howard Leopold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Pharmacodynamic Marker ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Dose Modulation ◽  
Grade 3

51 Background: Data suggest docetaxel clearance is increased in castrate men. An association of docetaxel-induced grade ≥3 neutropenia with overall survival (OS) may provide a rationale for tailored dosing in mCRPC. Methods: The association of cycle 1 neutropenia with OS was examined in a randomized phase II trial of 221 men with mCRPC receiving docetaxel-prednisone combined with placebo or AT-101 (bcl-2 inhibitor), which performed weekly blood cell counts during the first cycle. Patients from both arms were combined as no outcome or neutropenia differences were observed. OS was calculated from randomization by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the association with OS. Results: The difference in OS between men with day 8 ≥grade 3 neutropenia and those with ≤grade 2 neutropenia was significant after adjusting for stratification factors (HR: 0.64, p= 0.048). Excluding men with delayed cycle 2 yielded a more significant association of grade 3-4 neutropenia on day 8 with survival (Table). Men with ≥grade 3 neutropenia and ≥30% PSA decline by day 90 had improved OS compared with men exhibiting neither (HR: 0.51, p=0.014). Conclusions: In mCRPC receiving docetaxel, ≥grade 3 neutropenia on day 8 was prognostic for improved OS, suggesting its potential utility as a pharmacodynamic marker in this hypothesis-generating analysis. Since the association was stronger after excluding patients that experienced dose delays, grade 3 neutropenia may confer a more favorable therapeutic index than grade 4 neutropenia. The exploration of dose modulation of docetaxel to attain ≥grade 3 neutropenia on day 8 may be warranted. [Table: see text]

Impact of on-study corticosteroid use on efficacy and safety in the phase III AFFIRM study of enzalutamide (ENZA), an androgen receptor inhibitor.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Howard I. Scher ◽  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Fred Saad ◽  
Kim N. Chi ◽  
Mary-Ellen Taplin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Psa Progression ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
The Impact

6 Background: ENZA increased median overall survival (OS) by 4.8 mo (P <0.001, HR 0.63) vs placebo (PBO) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) post-docetaxel in AFFIRM (HI Scher et al, NEJM 2012). Corticosteroids (CS) can activate AR signaling in nonclinical models (J Richards, Can Res 2012). In a multivariate model of AFFIRM data baseline CS use was associated with reduced OS (HI Scher et al. ESMO 2012 abstract 899PD). The impact of CS use during study treatment in AFFIRM was evaluated to test if concomitant CS use is also associated with inferior outcomes. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to ENZA 160 mg/d or PBO. Pts were allowed but not required to take CS. OS was the primary endpoint. In a post-hoc analysis On-study CS use was defined as oral CS user for ≥ 1 day on study. Results: On study CS use was 48% in ENZA and 45% in PBO pts. Prognostic factors were slightly better in the no CS group compared to the CS group. Use of CS regardless of treatment was associated median OS of 11.5 mo (95% CI: 10.5, 13.0) for CS pts vs median OS NM (NM, NM) for no CS pts (HR=0.40; 95% CI: 0.33, 0.48). ENZA was consistently superior to PBO for OS, radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) and time to PSA progression (TTPP), regardless of CS use (Table). Pts on CS had higher rates of grade 3 - 4 adverse events (AE) compared to no CS pts: 63.3% vs 34.4% respectively. Conclusions: In this post-hoc analysis, on study CS use was associated with reduced OS and higher rates of grade 3 -4 AEs in mCRPC pts post-docetaxel. While CS pts had worse outcomes, ENZA was consistently superior to PBO regardless of on study CS use. The inferior outcomes in CS pts may be due to unmeasured confounders or the biologic properties of CS use itself. Clinical trial information: NCT00974311. [Table: see text]

Comparison of outcomes with pembrolizumab monotherapy (P) versus combination with chemotherapy (P+C) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21579-e21579
Author(s):  
Kartik Sehgal ◽  
Ritu R. Gill ◽  
Poorva Bindal ◽  
Anita Geevarghese Koshy ◽  
Danielle C McDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

e21579 Background: P and P+C are standard-of-care (SOC) treatment options for advanced NSCLC. However, they have not yet been directly compared in clinical trials. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with advanced NSCLC who initiated treatment with SOC P±C at our center from 2/11/16 to 10/15/19 (data cutoff 1/15/20). Patient demographic, clinicopathologic, therapeutic and outcomes data were extracted. All radiographic scans were independently evaluated by a thoracic radiologist using iRECIST. Survival time was defined from the start of P±C. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model were utilized. Results: Of 103 patients with median follow up of 17.7 months, 74 (71.8%) had received P, while 29 (28.2%) had received P+C. In PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) unselected population, there were no significant differences in age, sex, smoking status, driver mutation, tumor mutational burden (TMB), line of therapy, ECOG performance status (PS) or immune-related adverse events (irAE) between P and P+C groups. 71.6% in P vs 13.8% in P+C had PD-L1 TPS ≥50% (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), unadjusted progression-free survival (PFS) or unadjusted overall survival (OS) (Table). Multivariable adjustment for confounding factors between P+C vs P revealed no differences in OS [hazard ratio (HR) for death, 1.53, 95% CI 0.55 – 4.25] or PFS [HR for progression/death, 1.75, 95% CI 0.63 – 4.91]. Further stratification into PD-L1 TPS ≥50% and < 50% showed no significant differences between P+C vs. P in adjusted OS [HR for death, TPS < 50%- 1.54 (95% CI 0.59 – 4.03); TPS ≥50%- 0.71 (95% CI 0.11 – 4.52)] or PFS [HR for progression/death, TPS < 50%- 1.58 (95% CI 0.72 – 3.48); TPS ≥50%- 0.64 (95% CI 0.06 – 6.93)]. ECOG PS and development of irAE influenced OS in all groups, while TMB was relevant in PD-L1 ≥50% only. Conclusions: Our study shows no significant differences in outcomes with P vs P+C in advanced NSCLC in a real-world setting, albeit with limitations of single-center design, limited sample size, different line settings and lack of disease burden stratification. Ongoing phase III trials comparing front line P vs P+C will definitively address the long-term clinical benefits -if any- of combining cytotoxic chemotherapy with anti-PD-1 drugs. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document