Energy, environmental and feasibility evaluation of tractor-mounted biomass gasifier for flame weeding

2022 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 101823
Author(s):  
Nicoló Morselli ◽  
Marco Puglia ◽  
Simone Pedrazzi ◽  
Alberto Muscio ◽  
Paolo Tartarini ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tayana Soukup ◽  
Ged Murtagh ◽  
Ben W Lamb ◽  
James Green ◽  
Nick Sevdalis

Background Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are a standard cancer care policy in many countries worldwide. Despite an increase in research in a recent decade on MDTs and their care planning meetings, the implementation of MDT-driven decision-making (fidelity) remains unstudied. We report a feasibility evaluation of a novel method for assessing cancer MDT decision-making fidelity. We used an observational protocol to assess (1) the degree to which MDTs adhere to the stages of group decision-making as per the ‘Orientation-Discussion-Decision-Implementation’ framework, and (2) the degree of multidisciplinarity underpinning individual case reviews in the meetings. MethodsThis is a prospective observational study. Breast, colorectal and gynaecological cancer MDTs in the Greater London and Derbyshire (United Kingdom) areas were video recorded over 12-weekly meetings encompassing 822 case reviews. Data were coded and analysed using frequency counts.Results Eight interaction formats during case reviews were identified. case reviews were not always multi-disciplinary: only 8% of overall reviews involved all five clinical disciplines present, and 38% included four of five. The majority of case reviews (i.e. 54%) took place between two (25%) or three (29%) disciplines only. Surgeons (83%) and oncologists (8%) most consistently engaged in all stages of decision-making. While all patients put forward for MDT review were actually reviewed, a small percentage of them (4%) either bypassed the orientation (case presentation) and went straight into discussing the patient, or they did not articulate the final decision to the entire team (8%). Conclusions Assessing fidelity of MDT decision-making at the point of their weekly meetings is feasible. We found that despite being a set policy, case reviews are not entirely MDT-driven. We discuss implications in relation to the current eco-political climate, and the quality and safety of care. Our findings are in line with the current national initiatives in the UK on streamlining MDT meetings, and could help decide how to re-organise them to be most efficient.


2018 ◽  
pp. 66-68
Author(s):  
V. B. Tikhonov

Modern radio-electronic systems (RES) of weapons and military equipment (WME) are more functionally and structurally sophisticated that results in high requirements for their effective operation organisation. Insufficient level of technical knowledge among RES WME operational and maintenance personnel often results in increase of operability restoration period of these items in case of failures. This, in its turn, results in decrease of the readiness level of the RES WME pieces. In order to reduce duration of the RES WME restoring repair in case of failures, methods and tools of the auto-mated informational support of the operational and maintenance personnel activities related to the WME operation and restoring repair are developed. This article is devoted to development of a model of the automated informational support of the personnel activities in order to find rational options of the RES WME maintenance and repair organisation. The study results related to feasibility evaluation and development of the automated technical operation system model for the radio-electronic equipment incorporated in the AD WME are provided.


1999 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoping Du ◽  
Wei Chen

In robust design, it is important not only to achieve robust design objectives but also to maintain the robustness of design feasibility under the effect of variations (or uncertainties). However, the evaluation of feasibility robustness is often a computationally intensive process. Simplified approaches in existing robust design applications may lead to either over-conservative or infeasible design solutions. In this paper, several feasibility-modeling techniques for robust optimization are examined. These methods are classified into two categories: methods that require probability and statistical analyses and methods that do not. Using illustrative examples, the effectiveness of each method is compared in terms of its efficiency and accuracy. Constructive recommendations are made to employ different techniques under different circumstances. Under the framework of probabilistic optimization, we propose to use a most probable point (MPP) based importance sampling method, a method rooted in the field of reliability analysis, for evaluating the feasibility robustness. The advantages of this approach are discussed. Though our discussions are centered on robust design, the principles presented are also applicable for general probabilistic optimization problems. The practical significance of this work also lies in the development of efficient feasibility evaluation methods that can support quality engineering practice, such as the Six Sigma approach that is being widely used in American industry. [S1050-0472(00)00904-1]


1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 363-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Rahkonen ◽  
J. Pietikäinen ◽  
H. Jokela

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i12-i42
Author(s):  
N Paul ◽  
A Xyrichis

Abstract   This study aimed to better understand appropriate interventions aimed at reducing hospital ward noise and the subsequent impact this would have on inpatient experience. Service users consistently reported that noise pollution was the most detrimental factor in their recovery in hospital, principally due to its effects on sleep. Methods To aid usability and data collection the Richards- Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) was adapted into an electronic format with a sliding Likert scale using QuestionPro Software3. Qualitative patient interviews, the RCSQ and ward decibel measurements were recorded on Henry and Anne wards at St. Thomas’ Hospital, London. 20 patients were interviewed (12F, 8 M), with 3 being ultimately discounted due to severe cognitive impairment. Results were collated and will be presented as part of a pre-feasibility evaluation of the tools to measure patient sleep and experience of ward noise. Results: The mean of the responses from the 17 patients interviewed were calculated and graphically displayed. Of interest, 87.5% found the questionnaire straightforward to understand, but only 18.75% found it easy to complete (due to technological unfamiliarity). Conclusion and discussion Patients reported a consistently reported a less than optimal night’s sleep on the ward, with light sleep and increased time to fall asleep being key factors. Although visits were restricted to the “quietest” times on the ward, noise measurements consistently exceeded WHO recommendations of 40 dB. Subsequently excessive night-time noise created by other patients as well as staff was cited as the principal causes of poor sleep, with ward lighting being another cause. Results from this study have provided the justification for sound-masking technology to be trialled on inpatient wards, with the view of decreasing unpleasant ward noise and improving patient rest and recovery.


Energy ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 239 ◽  
pp. 122163
Author(s):  
Xianshan Li ◽  
Mingfang Lu ◽  
Fei Li ◽  
Wei Xiong ◽  
Zhenxing Li

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document