Morbidity, mortality and costs associated with venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. S112-S118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary H. Lyman ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
Marek S. Poniewierski ◽  
Nicole M. Kuderer
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (29) ◽  
pp. 4919-4926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Michael B. Streiff ◽  
Dominique Farge ◽  
Mario Mandala ◽  
Philippe Debourdeau ◽  
...  

PurposeVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is an increasingly frequent complication of cancer and its treatments, and is associated with worsened mortality and morbidity in patients with cancer.DesignThe Italian Association of Medical Oncology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the French National Federation of the League of Centers Against Cancer, and the European Society of Medical Oncology have recently published guidelines regarding VTE in patients with cancer. This review, authored by a working group of members from these panels, focuses on the methodology and areas of consensus and disagreement in the various clinical guidelines as well as directions for future research.ResultsThere is broad consensus regarding the importance of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with cancer, including prolonged prophylaxis in high-risk surgical patients. Prophylaxis is not currently recommended for ambulatory patients with cancer (with exceptions) or for central venous catheters. All of the panels agree that low molecular weight heparins are preferred for the long-term treatment of VTE in cancer. Areas that warrant further research include the benefit of prophylaxis in the ambulatory setting, the risk/benefit ratio of prophylaxis for hospitalized patients with cancer, an understanding of incidental VTE, and the impact of anticoagulation on survival.ConclusionWe call for a sustained research effort to investigate the clinical issues identified here to reduce the burden of VTE and its consequences in patients with cancer.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4751-4751
Author(s):  
Gary H. Lyman ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
Marek S. Poniewierski ◽  
Nicole M. Kuderer

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among hospitalized patients with cancer. Methods: Hospitalization data reported on adult cancer patients at US academic medical centers and affiliated hospitals between 1995 and 2012 were analyzed. Cancer diagnosis, presence of VTE, comorbidities and complications were based on ICD-9-CM codes. Major comorbidities considered were diabetes, and cerebrovascular, peripheral-vascular, heart, liver, and lung renal disease. In patients with multiple hospitalizations during the time period, a randomly selected hospitalization was utilized in the analysis. Hospitalization cost estimates were inflation adjusted to 2015 US dollars. Results: Nearly 6 million hospitalizations of 3,146,388 individual patients with cancer from more than 200 institutions were evaluated. VTE was reported in 8.4% of patients when all admissions are considered during the time period. When a single selected hospitalization is considered for each patient, VTE was reported in 166,547 (5.3%) of individual patients including 56,125 (1.8%) with pulmonary embolism (PE). The annual rate of VTE increased progressively from 3.5% in 1995 to over 6.5% in 2012 with the rate of PE nearly tripling from 0.8% in 1995 to 2.3% in 2012. For hospitalized patients receiving cancer chemotherapy, the annual rate of VTE more than doubled from 3.6% in 1995 to 8.3% in 2012. VTE was reported in 5.2%, 5.8% and 5.4% of patients with solid tumors, lymphoma, and leukemia, respectively (Table). Rates of VTE were greatest among patients with pancreatic (10.2%), gastric (7.1%) or other abdominal malignancies except colorectal cancer (9.2%) as well as those with ovarian (7.1%), lung (6.8%) and esophageal cancers (6.3%). The risk of VTE increased progressively from 2.3% in those with no comorbidities to over 11% for patients with 4 or more comorbid conditions. The strongest risk factors for VTE were infectious complications including sepsis (14%), invasive candidiasis (16%), pneumonia (11%) and IV line infections (14%).During this same time period, imaging related to VTE actually decreased with significantly lower rates of CT, vascular ultrasound and ventilation perfusion lung scans reported. In-hospital mortality was reported in 5.5% of cancer patients without VTE and in 15.0% of those with VTE including 19.4% of those with pulmonary embolism. In-hospital mortality during this time period decreased by approximately one-third in cancer patients both with and without VTE. While reported rates of VTE increased, the length of hospital stay shortened for patients with as well as without VTE during this period. Average costs per hospitalization adjusted to 2015 dollars for patients with and without VTE were $37,352 and $19,994, respectively. The estimated average inflation adjusted daily cost of hospitalization for patients with cancer and VTE increased nearly 50% between 1995 ($2,256) and 2012 ($3,297). Conclusions: VTE reported among hospitalized patients with cancer has increased significantly during the period of observation along with the cost of hospitalization while in-hospital mortality and imaging rates have decreased. However, patients with additional major medical comorbidities are at exceptionally high risk of serious complications including in-hospital mortality. Disclosures Lyman: Amgen: Research Funding. Kuderer:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria.


2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 454-460
Author(s):  
Yuehong Hu ◽  
Xiaoqian Li ◽  
Haixia Zhou ◽  
Ping Lin ◽  
Jiarui Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES This study aimed to evaluate the optimal risk assessment model (RAM) to stratify the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized patients with cancer. We examined and compared the VTE predictive ability of the Khorana score (KS) and the Caprini RAM in hospitalized cancer patients. METHODS We performed a retrospective case–control study among hospitalized cancer patients admitted to a comprehensive hospital in China from January 2015 to December 2016. A total of 221 cases were confirmed to have VTE during hospitalization and 221 controls were selected randomly. The Caprini RAM and KS were implemented and the individual scores of each risk factor were summed to generate a cumulative risk score. Meanwhile, the sensitivity, specificity, areas under curve of the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration of these 2 models were analysed. RESULTS Significant differences were observed in risk factors between VTE and non-VTE hospitalized cancer patients and the VTE risk increased significantly with an increase in the cumulative KS or Caprini RAM score. A classification of ‘high risk’ according to KS and Caprini RAM was associated with 2.272-fold and 3.825-fold increases in VTE risk, respectively. However, the Caprini RAM could identify 82.4% of the VTE cases that required preventive anticoagulant therapy according to American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, whereas the KS could only identify 35.3% of the VTE cases. In addition, the areas under curve of Caprini RAM were significantly higher than those of the KS (0.705 ± 0.024 vs 0.581 ± 0.025, P < 0.001), with a best cut-off value of 5 score, which happened to be the cut-off value for high risk of VTE in Caprini RAM. Both Caprini RAM and KS showed an excellent calibration curve (0.612 vs 0.141, P > 0.05), but the risk of VTE events predicted by Caprini seemed closer to the observed risk of VTE events. CONCLUSIONS The Caprini RAM was found to be more effective than the KS in identifying hospitalized patients with cancer at risk of VTE.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (29) ◽  
pp. 4874-4880 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles W. Francis

This is a literature review of the frequency of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer and of the available evidence supporting the use of thromboprophylaxis. Patients with cancer are at particularly high risk of venous thromboembolism and account for almost 20% of patients in the population. Hospitalization is an important risk factor in patients with cancer, with rates reported between 0.6% and 7.8%. The incidence has been increasing over the past decade. Three randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses indicate that prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin, heparin, or fondaparinux significantly reduces the rate of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients who are at high risk. Patients with cancer were included in these studies, but prospective trials specifically focused on patients with cancer are not available. Evidence indicates that appropriate thromboprophylaxis is provided to a minority of hospitalized patients with cancer and that targeted educational efforts and computerized prompt systems can increase appropriate use. Guidelines developed by both oncology and thrombosis organizations support the use of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients with cancer. In conclusion, most patients hospitalized with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism, and thromboprophylaxis should be provided in the absence of active bleeding or a high bleeding risk.


2019 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa M. Corley ◽  
Malachy J. Sullivan ◽  
Scott E. Friedman ◽  
Daniel J. O'Rourke ◽  
Robert T. Palac ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 1321-1326 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Parker ◽  
E. Peterson ◽  
A. Y. Y. Lee ◽  
C. de Wit ◽  
M. Carrier ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2613-2613
Author(s):  
Gary H. Lyman ◽  
Eva Culakova ◽  
Marek S. Poniewierski ◽  
Nicole M. Kuderer

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs commonly in patients with cancer and is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. While the risk of VTE is greater in hospitalized patients and those undergoing active treatment, less is known about factors associated with increased risk of mortality and costs in this setting. The study presented here evaluates the risk of mortality among hospitalized cancer patients with VTE and the association of patient comorbidities and infectious complications on duration of hospitalization, in-hospital mortality and costs. Methods: Data on hospitalization of adult patients (age≥18) with cancer between 2004 and 2012 from 239 US academic medical centers reporting to the University Health Consortium were analyzed. For patients with multiple hospitalizations, the first admission during the time period studied was utilized. Primary outcomes consisted of length of stay, in-hospital mortality and estimated cost of hospitalization. Stratified analyses were performed based on patient characteristics, year of hospitalization, cancer type, major comorbidities and infectious complications. Costs were adjusted to 2014 dollars. Results: Among more than 3.8 million admissions of adult patients with cancer, 246,653 included a diagnostic code for VTE representing 198,173 individual patients with both cancer and VTE. Overall, 41% of patients with cancer and VTE were hospitalized for 10 days or longer with an in-hospital mortality rate of 11.3% and estimated average costs per hospitalization of $37,039. While length of stay and mortality rates remained relatively stable over the 9 years of observation, 2014-adjusted costs per day hospitalization increased from $2,600 in 2004 to $3,200 in 2012. In-hospital mortality was greatest in patients with lung (15.8%) and gastric (14.1%) cancers and leukemia (14.2%). Medical comorbidities associated with the highest rates of mortality included congestive heart failure (19.8%), cerebrovascular disease (20.4%), and major disorders of the lung (20.6%), liver (20.0%), and kidney (21.4%) with mortality increasing in direct proportion to the number of comorbidities. Likewise, comorbidities associated with the greatest average costs per hospitalization included congestive heart failure ($51,885), cerebrovascular disease ($55,815), and major disorders of the lung ($53,899), liver ($51,332), and kidney ($55,774) with estimated costs increasing from $22,622 with no medical comorbidity to over $70,000 with four or more. Alternatively, infectious complications associated with the highest rates of mortality and greatest average costs were sepsis (38.1%; $90,529) and pneumonia (26.0%; $69,024). Conclusions: Hospitalized patients with cancer and VTE are at considerable risk for prolonged hospitalization and in-patient mortality accompanied by considerable hospital costs. Patients with additional major comorbidities and infectious complications are at even greater risk of in-hospital mortality and substantially greater costs. Additional efforts to identify cancer patients at greater risk for VTE and its complications including prolonged hospitalization and in-hospital mortality are needed as well as better strategies and agents for reducing the risk and consequences of VTE. Disclosures Lyman: Amgen: Research Funding.


2012 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 121-125
Author(s):  
I. Pabinger ◽  
C. Ay

SummaryCancer is a major and independent risk factor of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In clinical practice, a high number of VTE events occurs in patients with cancer, and treatment of cancerassociated VTE differs in several aspects from treatment of VTE in the general population. However, treatment in cancer patients remains a major challenge, as the risk of recurrence of VTE as well as the risk of major bleeding during anticoagulation is substantially higher in patients with cancer than in those without cancer. In several clinical trials, different anticoagulants and regimens have been investigated for treatment of acute VTE and secondary prophylaxis in cancer patients to prevent recurrence. Based on the results of these trials, anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) has become the treatment of choice in cancer patients with acute VTE in the initial period and for extended and long-term anticoagulation for 3-6 months. New oral anticoagulants directly inhibiting thrombin or factor Xa, have been developed in the past decade and studied in large phase III clinical trials. Results from currently completed trials are promising and indicate their potential use for treatment of VTE. However, the role of the new oral thrombin and factor Xa inhibitors for VTE treatment in cancer patients still has to be clarified in further studies specifically focusing on cancer-associated VTE. This brief review will summarize the current strategies of initial and long-term VTE treatment in patients with cancer and discuss the potential use of the new oral anticoagulants.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document