EBSD pattern simulations for an interaction volume containing lattice defects

The most well known application of the scanning microscope to the crystals is known as Coates pattern. The contrast of this image depends on the variation of the incident angle of the beam to the crystal surface. The defect in the crystal surface causes to make contrast in normal scanning image with constant incident angle. The intensity variation of the backscattered electrons in the scanning microscopy was calculated for the defect in the crystals by Clarke and Howie. Clarke also observed the defect using a scanning microscope.This paper reports the observation of lattice defects appears in thin crystals through backscattered, secondary and transmitted electron image. As a backscattered electron detector, a p-n junction detector of 0.9 π solid angle has been prepared for JSM-50A. The gain of the detector itself is 1.2 x 104 at 50 kV and the gain of additional AC amplifier using band width 100 Hz ∼ 10 kHz is 106.

Download Full-text

High Resolution Scanning Electron Microscopy

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100086696 ◽

1991 ◽

Vol 49 ◽

pp. 478-479

Author(s):

David Joy ◽

James Pawley

Keyword(s):

Electron Microscopy ◽

Scanning Electron Microscopy ◽

Electron Beam ◽

Electron Microscope ◽

High Resolution ◽

Scanning Electron Microscope ◽

Electron Probe ◽

Impact Point ◽

Interaction Volume ◽

Scanning Electron

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) builds up an image by sampling contiguous sub-volumes near the surface of the specimen. A fine electron beam selectively excites each sub-volume and then the intensity of some resulting signal is measured. The spatial resolution of images made using such a process is limited by at least three factors. Two of these determine the size of the interaction volume: the size of the electron probe and the extent to which detectable signal is excited from locations remote from the beam impact point. A third limitation emerges from the fact that the probing beam is composed of a finite number of discrete particles and therefore that the accuracy with which any detectable signal can be measured is limited by Poisson statistics applied to this number (or to the number of events actually detected if this is smaller).

Download Full-text

High-resolution topographic SEM and radiation damage: The rationale for using low beam voltage

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100131024 ◽

1992 ◽

Vol 50 (2) ◽

pp. 1278-1279

Author(s):

James Pawley ◽

David Joy

Keyword(s):

High Resolution ◽

Imaging Techniques ◽

Morphological Structure ◽

Radiation Sensitivity ◽

Beam Specimen ◽

Measured Signal ◽

Practical Consideration ◽

Interaction Volume ◽

Impact Area ◽

Signal Contrast

The scanning electron microscope (SEM) builds up an image by sampling contiguous sub-volumes near the surface of the specimen. A fine electron beam selectively excites each sub-volume and then the intensity of some resulting signal is measured and then plotted as a corresponding intensity in an image. The spatial resolution of such an image is limited by at least three factors. Two of these determine the size of the interaction volume: the size of the electron probe and the extent to which detectable signal is excited from locations remote from the beam impact area. A third limitation emerges from the fact that the probing beam is composed of a number of discrete particles and therefore that the accuracy with which any detectable signal can be measured is limited by Poisson statistics applied to this number (or to the number of events actually detected if this is smaller). As in all imaging techniques, the limiting signal contrast required to recognize a morphological structure is constrained by this statistical consideration. The only way to overcome this limit is to increase either the contrast of the measured signal or the number of beam/specimen interactions detected. Unfortunately, these interactions deposit ionizing radiation that may damage the very structure under investigation. As a result, any practical consideration of the high resolution performance of the SEM must consider not only the size of the interaction volume but also the contrast available from the signal producing the image and the radiation sensitivity of the specimen.

Download Full-text

Crystal structure-size relationship in ultrafine metallic particles

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100153300 ◽

1989 ◽

Vol 47 ◽

pp. 266-267

Author(s):

Jun Liu ◽

Mehmet Sarikaya ◽

Ilhan A. Aksay

Keyword(s):

Ultrafine Particles ◽

Carbon Film ◽

Lattice Defects ◽

Careful Examination ◽

Seeded Growth ◽

Gold Particles ◽

Metallic Particles ◽

Interfacial Structures ◽

Typical Particle ◽

Many Particles

Ultrafine particles usually have unique physical properties. This study illustrates how the lattice defects and interfacial structures between particles are related to the size of ultrafine crystalline gold particles.Colloidal gold particles were produced by reducing gold chloride with sodium citrate at 100°C. In this process, particle size can be controlled by changing the concentration of the reactant. TEM samples are prepared by transferring a small amount of solution onto a thin (5 nm) carbon film which is suspended on a copper grid. In this work, all experiments were performed with Philips 430T at 300 kV.With controlled seeded growth, particles of different sizes are produced, as shown in Figure 1. By a careful examination, it can be resolved that very small particles have lattice defects with complex interfaces. Some typical particle structures include multiple twins, resulting in a five-fold symmetry bicrystals, and highly disordered regions. Many particles are too complex to be described by simple models.

Download Full-text

Low-voltage EDS of magnesium ferrite Dendrites in a FEG-SEM

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100164854 ◽

1996 ◽

Vol 54 ◽

pp. 478-479

Author(s):

Matthew T. Johnson ◽

Ian M. Anderson ◽

Jim Bentley ◽

C. Barry Carter

Keyword(s):

Monte Carlo ◽

Quantitative Analysis ◽

Monte Carlo Simulations ◽

Cross Section ◽

Spatial Resolution ◽

Low Voltage ◽

Magnesium Ferrite ◽

X Ray ◽

Interaction Volume ◽

Ferrite Spinel

Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) performed at low (≤ 5 kV) accelerating voltages in the SEM has the potential for providing quantitative microanalytical information with a spatial resolution of ∼100 nm. In the present work, EDS analyses were performed on magnesium ferrite spinel [(MgxFe1−x)Fe2O4] dendrites embedded in a MgO matrix, as shown in Fig. 1. spatial resolution of X-ray microanalysis at conventional accelerating voltages is insufficient for the quantitative analysis of these dendrites, which have widths of the order of a few hundred nanometers, without deconvolution of contributions from the MgO matrix. However, Monte Carlo simulations indicate that the interaction volume for MgFe2O4 is ∼150 nm at 3 kV accelerating voltage and therefore sufficient to analyze the dendrites without matrix contributions.Single-crystal {001}-oriented MgO was reacted with hematite (Fe2O3) powder for 6 h at 1450°C in air and furnace cooled. The specimen was then cleaved to expose a clean cross-section suitable for microanalysis.

Download Full-text