scholarly journals Commentary: Watchful waiting during visceral malperfusion in DeBakey type I aortic dissection: A possible paradigm shift?

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 81-82
Author(s):  
Aleksander Dokollari ◽  
Gianluigi Bisleri
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Paradigm Shift ◽  
Watchful Waiting ◽  
Type I ◽  
Visceral Malperfusion

Distal Malperfusion in Acute Type I Aortic Dissection: The Value of Endovascular Aortic Repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 63 (S 01) ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Tsagakis ◽  
R. Jánosi ◽  
D. Dohle ◽  
J. Benedik ◽  
P. Kahlert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Type I ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Aortic Repair

Health-related quality of life one year after surgical treatment of the type I chronic aortic dissection

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksana Kamenskaya ◽  
Asya Klinkova ◽  
Irina Loginova ◽  
Alexander Chernyavskiy ◽  
Dmitry Sirota ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type I ◽  
Health Related Quality ◽  
Chronic Aortic Dissection ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related ◽  
One Year

OC51 NEW TECHNIQUE IN TYPE I ACUTE AORTIC DISSECTION FOR ARCH STABILIZATION AND FUTURE LANDING ZONE CREATION WITHOUT ARCH REPLACEMENT

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. e3
Author(s):  
P. Masiello ◽  
A. Longobardi ◽  
A. Panza ◽  
G. Mastrogiovanni ◽  
F. Cafarelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
New Technique ◽  
Type I ◽  
Landing Zone

Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Treated Using a Tubular Stent-Graft in the Ascending Aorta and a Multibranched Stent-Graft in the Aortic Arch

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tilo Kölbel ◽  
Christian Detter ◽  
Sebastian W. Carpenter ◽  
Fiona Rohlffs ◽  
Yskert von Kodolitsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Stent Graft ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Type A ◽  
Ascending Aorta ◽  
Type I ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Stent Grafts ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Custom Made

Purpose: To describe the combined use of a tubular stent-graft for the ascending aorta and an inner-branched arch stent-graft for patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Technique: The technique to deploy these modular, custom-made stent-grafts is demonstrated in 2 patients with acute DeBakey type I aortic dissections and significant comorbidities precluding open surgery. Both emergent procedures were made possible by the availability of suitable devices manufactured for elective repair in other patients. After preliminary carotid-subclavian bypass, a long Lunderquist guidewire was introduced from the right femoral artery to the left ventricle for delivery of the Zenith Ascend and Zenith Branched Arch Endovascular Grafts under inflow occlusion. Bridging stent-grafts were delivered to the innominate and left common carotid arteries to connect to the 2 inner branches; the left subclavian artery was occluded. Both cases were technically successful and resulted in exclusion of the false lumen in the ascending aorta. The operating and fluoroscopy times did not exceed those of comparable elective procedures. The patients were rapidly extubated shortly after the procedure and without serious immediate complications. One patient survived 11 months with a satisfactory repair; the other succumbed to complications of recurrent pneumonia after 23 days. Conclusion: Endovascular treatment of patients with acute type A aortic dissection using a combination of tubular and branched stent-grafts in the ascending aorta is feasible and offers an alternative strategy to open surgery.

Surgical outcomes of total arch replacement with modified elephant trunk technique in type A aortic dissection: insights from single-center experience

2022 ◽  
pp. 021849232110701
Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Yueyun Zhou ◽  
Wei Qin ◽  
Cunhua Su ◽  
Fuhua Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type A ◽  
Total Arch Replacement ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Elephant Trunk ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Elephant Trunk Technique ◽  
Visceral Malperfusion ◽  
Cerebral Malperfusion

Background Total arch replacement with modified elephant trunk technique plays an important role in treating acute type A aortic dissection in China. We aim to summarize the therapeutic effects of this procedure in our center over a 17-year period. Methods Consecutive patients treated at our hospital due to type A aortic dissection from January 2004 to January 2021 were studied. Relevant data of these patients undergoing total arch replacement with modified elephant trunk technique were collected and analyzed. Results A total of 589 patients were included with a mean age of 53.1 ± 12.2 years. The mean of cardiopulmonary bypass, cross-clamping, and selected cerebral perfusion time were 199.6 ± 41.9, 119.0 ± 27.2, and 25.1 ± 5.0 min, respectively. In-hospital death occurred in 46 patients. Multivariate analysis identified four significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality: preexisting renal hypoperfusion (OR 5.43; 95% CI 1.31 – 22.44; P = 0.020), cerebral malperfusion (OR 11.87; 95% CI 4.13 – 34.12; P < 0.001), visceral malperfusion (OR 4.27; 95% CI 1.01 – 18.14; P = 0.049), and cross-clamp time ≥ 130 min (OR 3.26; 95% CI 1.72 – 6.19; P < 0.001). The 5, 10, and 15 years survival rates were 86.4%, 82.6%, and 70.2%, respectively. Conclusions Total arch replacement with modified elephant trunk technique is an effective treatment for acute type A aortic dissection with satisfactory perioperative results. Patients with preexisting renal hypoperfusion, cerebral malperfusion, visceral malperfusion, and long cross-clamp time are at a higher risk of in-hospital death.

Candy-Plug Generation II for False Lumen Occlusion in Chronic Aortic Dissection: Feasibility and Early Results

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 782-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Eleshra ◽  
Tilo Kölbel ◽  
Nikolaos Tsilimparis ◽  
Giuseppe Panuccio ◽  
Martin Scheerbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
False Lumen ◽  
The Other ◽  
Type I ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Chronic Aortic Dissection ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Aortic Remodeling

Purpose: To present the early results of false lumen (FL) occlusion in chronic aortic dissection using the Candy-Plug generation II (CP II), which has a self-closing fabric channel that obviates the need for separate occlusion of its center. Materials and Methods: Fourteen consecutive patients (mean age 60±11 years; 10 men) with persistent FL backflow and aneurysm formation at the thoracic segment in chronic aortic dissection underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with FL occlusion using the refined CP II. Primary endpoints were technical success (successful deployment) and clinical success (no FL backflow at the CP II level). Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality and morbidity and aortic remodeling during follow-up. Results: Technical success was 100%. One patient required additional intraprocedural FL embolization at the CP II level due to persistent FL backflow on final angiography (clinical success 93%), though there was no flow through the CP II center. There were no intraprocedural complications. Immediate complete FL occlusion was achieved in 12 patients; the other 2 required reintervention. One had contrast enhancement in the distal FL proximal to the CP II and was treated with coil embolization. The other patient had persistent type I endoleak at the level of the left subclavian artery (LSA) and underwent left carotid–LSA bypass and proximal stent-graft extension. One patient died due to retrograde type A aortic dissection that was not related to CP II placement. Over a mean 8-month follow-up (range 3–12), 9 patients had computed tomography angiography; 8 patients had evidence of aortic remodeling, while 1 aneurysm sac was stable. Conclusion: The CP II reduces the number of procedural steps and offers good seal, with minimal morbidity and mortality and a high rate of aortic remodeling.

scholarly journals Comparison of outcomes in DeBakey type I versus DeBakey type II aortic dissection: a 17-year single center experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Mona Salehi Ravesh ◽  
Mohamed Salem ◽  
Georg Lutter ◽  
Christine Friedrich ◽  
Veronika Walter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Single Center Experience

scholarly journals Surgical Treatment of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection with 18-Litre Bleeding

Aorta ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 030-032
Author(s):  
Sergey Y. Boldyrev ◽  
Kirill O. Barbukhatty ◽  
Vladimir A. Porhanov
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Type A ◽  
Type I ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Type A Aortic Dissection ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Perioperative Bleeding

AbstractSurgical treatment of Type-A acute aortic dissection is associated with high mortality and morbidity. One of the reasons is perioperative bleeding, which may lead to worse outcomes. We present a case of successful treatment of a patient with 18-litre perioperative blood loss in DeBakey Type-I acute aortic dissection with drug-induced hypocoagulation and malperfusion of a lower extremity.

scholarly journals Surgical outcomes of DeBakey type I and type II acute aortic dissection: a propensity score-matched analysis in 599 patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Yu Lin ◽  
Tao-Hsin Tung ◽  
Meng-Yu Wu ◽  
Chi-Nan Tseng ◽  
Feng-Chun Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Propensity Score ◽  
Aortic Dissection ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Aortic Dissection ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Type I ◽  
Acute Type ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Reoperation Rates

Abstract Background The DeBakey classification divides Stanford acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) into DeBakey type I (D1) and type II (D2) according to the extent of acute aortic dissection (AAD). This retrospective study aimed to compare the early and late outcomes of D1-AAD and D2-AAD through a propensity score-matched analysis. Methods Between January 2009 and April 2020, 599 consecutive patients underwent ATAAD repair at our institution, and were dichotomized into D1 (n = 543; 90.7%) and D2 (n = 56; 9.3%) groups. Propensity scoring was performed with a 1:1 ratio, resulting in a matched cohort of 56 patients per group. The clinical features, postoperative complications, 5-year cumulative survival and freedom from reoperation rates were compared. Results In the overall cohort, the D1 group had a lower rate of preoperative shock and more aortic arch replacement with longer cardiopulmonary bypass time. The D1 group had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than the D2 group in overall (15.8% vs 5.4%; P = 0.036) and matched cohorts (19.6% vs 5.4%; P = 0.022). For patients that survived to discharge, the D1 and D2 groups demonstrated similar 5-year survival rates in overall (77.0% vs 85.2%; P = 0.378) and matched cohorts (79.1% vs 85.2%; P = 0.425). The 5-year freedom from reoperation rates for D1 and D2 groups were 80.0% and 97.1% in overall cohort (P = 0.011), and 93.6% and 97.1% in matched cohort (P = 0.474), respectively. Conclusions Patients with D1-AAD had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality than those with D2-AAD. However, for patients who survived to discharge, the 5-year survival rates were comparable between both groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document