Evaluating health utility in patients with melanoma, breast cancer, colon cancer, and lung cancer: a nationwide, population-based assessment

2003 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford Y Ko ◽  
Melinda Maggard ◽  
Edward H Livingston
Author(s):  
Robert D. Ficalora

Chapter 8 presents multiple-choice, board review questions on oncology including lung cancer, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. Full explanations are provided with the correct answers.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Chao Chu ◽  
Chia-Jung Hsieh ◽  
Tso-Fu Wang ◽  
Mun-Kun Hong ◽  
Tang-Yuan Chu

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 225-237
Author(s):  
Udo Schumacher ◽  
Dhia Mukthar ◽  
Thomas Schenker

A panel of monoclonal antibodies (n=72 including controls) directed against lung cancer antigens was screened immunohistochemically against a panel of seven human lung cancer cell lines (including small cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma and mesothelioma), six human breast cancer cell lines and one human colon cancer cell line, The majority of the antibodies (n=42) reacted also with antigens present on breast and colon cancer cell lines, This cross reactivity especially between lung and breast cancer cell lines is not altogether unexpected since antigens common to breast and lung tissue including their neoplasms such as MUC1 antigen have been described, Our results indicate that epitopes shared by lung and breast cancers are probably more common than previously thought. The relevance for prognosis and therapy of these shared antigens, especially as disease markers in breast cancer, has to be investigated.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000413
Author(s):  
Kasper Adelborg ◽  
Dóra Körmendiné Farkas ◽  
Jens Sundbøll ◽  
Lidia Schapira ◽  
Suzanne Tamang ◽  
...  

ObjectiveWe examined the risk of primary gastrointestinal cancers in women with breast cancer and compared this risk with that of the general population.DesignUsing population-based Danish registries, we conducted a cohort study of women with incident non-metastatic breast cancer (1990–2017). We computed cumulative cancer incidences and standardised incidence ratios (SIRs).ResultsAmong 84 972 patients with breast cancer, we observed 2340 gastrointestinal cancers. After 20 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal cancers was 4%, driven mainly by colon cancers. Only risk of stomach cancer was continually increased beyond 1 year following breast cancer. The SIR for colon cancer was neutral during 2–5 years of follow-up and approximately 1.2-fold increased thereafter. For cancer of the oesophagus, the SIR was increased only during 6–10 years. There was a weak association with pancreas cancer beyond 10 years. Between 1990–2006 and 2007–2017, the 1–10 years SIR estimate decreased and reached unity for upper gastrointestinal cancers (oesophagus, stomach, and small intestine). For lower gastrointestinal cancers (colon, rectum, and anal canal), the SIR estimate was increased only after 2007. No temporal effects were observed for the remaining gastrointestinal cancers. Treatment effects were negligible.ConclusionBreast cancer survivors were at increased risk of oesophagus and stomach cancer, but only before 2007. The risk of colon cancer was increased, but only after 2007.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrián González-Marrón ◽  
Juan Carlos Martín-Sánchez ◽  
Ferrán Garcia-Alemany ◽  
Encarna Martínez-Martín ◽  
Nuria Matilla-Santander ◽  
...  

Biomolecules ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barnali Deb ◽  
Pratyay Sengupta ◽  
Janani Sambath ◽  
Prashant Kumar

Tumor heterogeneity attributes substantial challenges in determining the treatment regimen. Along with the conventional treatment, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, targeted therapy has greater impact in cancer management. Owing to the recent advancements in proteomics, we aimed to mine and re-interrogate the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) data sets which contain deep scale, mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic and phosphoproteomic data sets conducted on human tumor samples. Quantitative proteomic and phosphoproteomic data sets of tumor samples were explored and downloaded from the CPTAC database for six different cancers types (breast cancer, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), colon cancer, lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), ovarian cancer, and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC)). We identified 880 phosphopeptide signatures for differentially regulated phosphorylation sites across five cancer types (breast cancer, colon cancer, LUAD, ovarian cancer, and UCEC). We identified the cell cycle to be aberrantly activated across these cancers. The correlation of proteomic and phosphoproteomic data sets identified changes in the phosphorylation of 12 kinases with unchanged expression levels. We further investigated phosphopeptide signature across five cancer types which led to the prediction of aurora kinase A (AURKA) and kinases-serine/threonine-protein kinase Nek2 (NEK2) as the most activated kinases targets. The drug designed for these kinases could be repurposed for treatment across cancer types.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 562-562
Author(s):  
Lindsay M Morton ◽  
Graca M. Dores ◽  
Meredith S Shiels ◽  
Martha S Linet ◽  
Jop C Teepen ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction. Treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (tAML/MDS) is a rare but often fatal complication of systemic therapy for primary malignancy. Leukemogenicity of specific agents is variable, with particularly high risks associated with platinum-containing agents, certain alkylating agents, topoisomerase II inhibitors, and purine analogs. Current treatment practices increasingly include (neo)adjuvant and multiple courses of systemic therapy for a number of first primary malignancies. However, no large-scale study has quantified risks of tAML/MDS and other myeloid neoplasms after chemotherapy in the modern treatment era. Methods. We identified a cohort of 746,007 adults who were initially treated with chemotherapy and survived ≥1 year following diagnosis with first primary malignancy during 2000-2012, as reported to 17 US population-based cancer registries from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Risks for second primary AML/MDS, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and other myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and MDS/MPNs were compared to that expected in the general population (based on age-, race-, sex- and calendar period-specific incidence rates) using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Results. tAML/MDS was identified in 2071 individuals following chemotherapy, four times more than expected based on general population rates (SIR=4.1, 95%CI=3.9-4.2). We identified novel elevations in tAML/MDS risk after chemotherapy for most gastrointestinal malignancies, including the oral cavity/pharynx (N=45, SIR=2.6, 95%CI=1.9-3.5), esophagus (N=28, SIR=4.3, 95%CI=2.9-6.2), liver (N=10, SIR=2.6, 95%CI=1.2-4.8), stomach (N=22, SIR=2.7, 95%CI=1.7-4.0), rectum (N=65, SIR=1.5, 95%CI=1.2-1.9), and anus (N=22, SIR=3.6, 95%CI=2.3-5.5), but not colon (N=67, SIR=1.1, 95%CI=0.8-1.3). Novel increased risks of tAML/MDS also were observed after chemotherapy for cancers of the pancreas (N=15, SIR=3.3, 95%CI=1.8-5.4), larynx (N=20, SIR=4.2, 95%CI=2.6-6.5), bladder (N=30, SIR=1.8, 95%CI=1.2-2.6), and melanoma (N=4, SIR=3.7, 95%CI=1.0-9.6) Similar to previous studies, tAML/MDS occurred most commonly after female breast cancer (N=543, SIR=4.1, 95%CI=3.8-4.5), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; N=515, SIR=7.3, 95%CI=6.7-7.9), and lung cancer (N=185, SIR=4.1, 95%CI=3.5-4.7). We further confirmed previous observations of strikingly elevated risks of tAML/MDS after chemotherapy for cancers of the bone (N=10, SIR=35.1, 95%CI=16.9-64.6), testis (N=18, SIR=15.6, 95%CI=9.2-24.6), and soft-tissue (N=20, SIR=12.6, 95%CI=7.7-19.4), and more modestly elevated risks of tAML/MDS after chemotherapy for cancers of brain (N=18, SIR-7.8, 95%CI=4.6-12.4), ovary (N=84, SIR=5.5, 95%CI=4.3-6.7), endometrium (N=28, SIR=4.4, 95%CI=2.9-6.3), cervix (N=22, SIR=4.4, 95%CI=2.8-6.6), and prostate (N=15, SIR=2.7, 95%CI=1.5-4.4), as well as Hodgkin lymphoma (N=54, SIR=8.7, 95%CI=6.6-11.4), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (N=52, SIR=7.7, 95%CI=5.8-10.2), and myeloma (N=102, SIR=6.3, 95%CI=5.1-7.6). Risks were non-significantly heightened with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy for breast, lung, and stomach cancers compared with chemotherapy alone. Elevated risks also were observed for CML after chemotherapy for lung cancer (N=12, SIR=2.5, 95%CI=1.3-4.4), breast cancer (N=35, SIR=1.8, 95%CI=1.3-2.5), and NHL (N=16, SIR=2.1, 95%CI=1.2-3.4), and for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia after chemotherapy for breast cancer (N=15, SIR=3.0, 95%CI=1.7-5.0) and NHL (N=16, SIR=4.2, 95%CI=2.4-6.9). In contrast, risks were not increased for other MPNs after chemotherapy for any first primary malignancy. Conclusions. Despite the availability of modern cancer chemotherapy and targeted agents, risks of tAML/MDS are elevated across a broad spectrum of first primary cancers and extend to other myeloid neoplasms. Risks are consistent with those expected from expanded use of leukemogenic systemic therapy, particularly for specific cancers, such as cervical cancer, that are commonly treated with platinum-based regimens. More research is needed to quantify risks associated with specific agents and doses in the (neo)adjuvant and treatment setting. Risks for treatment-related myeloid neoplasms should be weighed against benefits of systemic therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document