Emerging Risks of AML/MDS and Other Myeloid Neoplasms Following Chemotherapy for First Primary Malignancy, 2000-2012

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 562-562
Author(s):  
Lindsay M Morton ◽  
Graca M. Dores ◽  
Meredith S Shiels ◽  
Martha S Linet ◽  
Jop C Teepen ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction. Treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (tAML/MDS) is a rare but often fatal complication of systemic therapy for primary malignancy. Leukemogenicity of specific agents is variable, with particularly high risks associated with platinum-containing agents, certain alkylating agents, topoisomerase II inhibitors, and purine analogs. Current treatment practices increasingly include (neo)adjuvant and multiple courses of systemic therapy for a number of first primary malignancies. However, no large-scale study has quantified risks of tAML/MDS and other myeloid neoplasms after chemotherapy in the modern treatment era. Methods. We identified a cohort of 746,007 adults who were initially treated with chemotherapy and survived ≥1 year following diagnosis with first primary malignancy during 2000-2012, as reported to 17 US population-based cancer registries from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. Risks for second primary AML/MDS, chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and other myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and MDS/MPNs were compared to that expected in the general population (based on age-, race-, sex- and calendar period-specific incidence rates) using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). Results. tAML/MDS was identified in 2071 individuals following chemotherapy, four times more than expected based on general population rates (SIR=4.1, 95%CI=3.9-4.2). We identified novel elevations in tAML/MDS risk after chemotherapy for most gastrointestinal malignancies, including the oral cavity/pharynx (N=45, SIR=2.6, 95%CI=1.9-3.5), esophagus (N=28, SIR=4.3, 95%CI=2.9-6.2), liver (N=10, SIR=2.6, 95%CI=1.2-4.8), stomach (N=22, SIR=2.7, 95%CI=1.7-4.0), rectum (N=65, SIR=1.5, 95%CI=1.2-1.9), and anus (N=22, SIR=3.6, 95%CI=2.3-5.5), but not colon (N=67, SIR=1.1, 95%CI=0.8-1.3). Novel increased risks of tAML/MDS also were observed after chemotherapy for cancers of the pancreas (N=15, SIR=3.3, 95%CI=1.8-5.4), larynx (N=20, SIR=4.2, 95%CI=2.6-6.5), bladder (N=30, SIR=1.8, 95%CI=1.2-2.6), and melanoma (N=4, SIR=3.7, 95%CI=1.0-9.6) Similar to previous studies, tAML/MDS occurred most commonly after female breast cancer (N=543, SIR=4.1, 95%CI=3.8-4.5), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL; N=515, SIR=7.3, 95%CI=6.7-7.9), and lung cancer (N=185, SIR=4.1, 95%CI=3.5-4.7). We further confirmed previous observations of strikingly elevated risks of tAML/MDS after chemotherapy for cancers of the bone (N=10, SIR=35.1, 95%CI=16.9-64.6), testis (N=18, SIR=15.6, 95%CI=9.2-24.6), and soft-tissue (N=20, SIR=12.6, 95%CI=7.7-19.4), and more modestly elevated risks of tAML/MDS after chemotherapy for cancers of brain (N=18, SIR-7.8, 95%CI=4.6-12.4), ovary (N=84, SIR=5.5, 95%CI=4.3-6.7), endometrium (N=28, SIR=4.4, 95%CI=2.9-6.3), cervix (N=22, SIR=4.4, 95%CI=2.8-6.6), and prostate (N=15, SIR=2.7, 95%CI=1.5-4.4), as well as Hodgkin lymphoma (N=54, SIR=8.7, 95%CI=6.6-11.4), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (N=52, SIR=7.7, 95%CI=5.8-10.2), and myeloma (N=102, SIR=6.3, 95%CI=5.1-7.6). Risks were non-significantly heightened with radiotherapy plus chemotherapy for breast, lung, and stomach cancers compared with chemotherapy alone. Elevated risks also were observed for CML after chemotherapy for lung cancer (N=12, SIR=2.5, 95%CI=1.3-4.4), breast cancer (N=35, SIR=1.8, 95%CI=1.3-2.5), and NHL (N=16, SIR=2.1, 95%CI=1.2-3.4), and for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia after chemotherapy for breast cancer (N=15, SIR=3.0, 95%CI=1.7-5.0) and NHL (N=16, SIR=4.2, 95%CI=2.4-6.9). In contrast, risks were not increased for other MPNs after chemotherapy for any first primary malignancy. Conclusions. Despite the availability of modern cancer chemotherapy and targeted agents, risks of tAML/MDS are elevated across a broad spectrum of first primary cancers and extend to other myeloid neoplasms. Risks are consistent with those expected from expanded use of leukemogenic systemic therapy, particularly for specific cancers, such as cervical cancer, that are commonly treated with platinum-based regimens. More research is needed to quantify risks associated with specific agents and doses in the (neo)adjuvant and treatment setting. Risks for treatment-related myeloid neoplasms should be weighed against benefits of systemic therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 191-191
Author(s):  
Binay Kumar Shah ◽  
Amit Khanal

191 Background: Risk of second primary malignancies (SPM) is not known in gastric cancer. In this population based study, we analyzed rates of SPM in gastric cancer. Methods: We selected adult (≥18 years) patients with gastric cancer as first primary malignancy diagnosed from January 1992 to December 2011 from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result 13 database. We used SEER*stat’s multiple primary standardized incidence ratio (MP-SIR) session to calculate the risk of SPM diagnosed 6 months after the diagnosis of index gastric cancer. Results: Among 31,818 patients with first primary gastric cancer, 1674 (5.26%) developed 1,839 SPM with observed/expected (O/E) ratio of 1.09 (95% CI = 1.05-1.15, p<0.0001) and excess risk of 16.15 per 10,000 population. The median time to first SPM from the time of diagnosis of stomach cancer was 49 months (range 6 months to 19.08 years). There was significantly increased risk of gastrointestinal malignancies [O/E ratio 1.65 (CI=1.53-1.79, p<0.001)], thyroid cancer [O/E ratio 1.98 (CI=1.32-2.84, p<0.01)] and myeloid leukemia [O/E ratio 1.47(CI=1-2.09, p<0.05)]. Interestingly, there was significantly decreased risk of melanoma, breast cancer and prostate cancer. Conclusions: Our study showed that patients with gastric cancer are at higher risk of gastrointestinal malignancies, thyroid cancer and myeloid leukemia. Similarly, risk of melanoma, breast cancer and prostate cancer in patients with gastric cancer is lower than general population.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 2659-2659
Author(s):  
Luana Fianchi ◽  
Maria Teresa Voso ◽  
Anna Candoni ◽  
Gianluca Gaidano ◽  
Marianna Criscuolo ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In 2001, the World Health Organization (WHO) recognized therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) as a distinct entity including acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodisplastic syndromes (MDS). At present, about 10% of all AML patients have a previous history of exposure to chemotherapy and/or radiation for a primary malignancy or autoimmune disease. In 2009, we initiated a Web-based epidemiological registry, with the purpose of collecting t-MN diagnosed at Italian Hematological or Oncological Divisions. Methods Demographic and clinical information on t-MN patients were included in the database whose access was restricted to selected users and was password-protected. Between May 2009 and June 2013, 279 t-MN patients [121 males and 158 females; median age 64 years (range 23-88 years)], observed at 22 Italian Centers between 1999 and 2012, were registered in the web-database. Results The primary malignancy (PM) was a hematological neoplasm (HM) in 123 cases (44%), a solid tumor in 145 cases (52%), and an autoimmune disease in 11 patients (4%). Twenty patients (7%) had a history of two or more previous cancers. Among hematological malignancies, the most frequent PM were lymphoproliferative diseases (92/122 cases), while breast cancer (65/146 cases) was the most frequent primary solid tumor. In particular, hematological PM were: 92 lymphoprolipherative diseases (68 Non Hodgkin and 18 Hodgkin lymphoma, 6 chronic lymphocytic leukemia); 12 Multiple myeloma; 14 myeloproliferative neoplasms (7 Myelofibrosis; 3 polycitemia vera; 3 essential thrombocythemia; 1 Hypereosinophilic syndrome.); 1 Acute lymphoblastic leukemia; 4 Acute myeloid leukemia (acute promielocytic leukemia in 2 cases). Sites of primary solid tumors were: 65 Breast; 32 Uro-genital (14 prostate; 5 bladder; 8 uterus; 5 ovarium); 17 Colon-rectal; 8 Lung; 8 Thyroid; 15 others (2 stomach; 5 CNS; 2 skin, 4 oropharynx; 2 sarcoma). Eleven patients had previously received immunosuppressive therapy for an autoimmune disease (5 with mitoxantrone, 5 with methotrexate, 1 with chlorambucil). Two-hundred-thirty-six patients had previously received chemotherapy for their primary malignancy, associated to radiotherapy (RT) in 94 cases. RT represented the only primary treatment in 43 cases. Median latency between PM and t-MN was 5.6 years (range 0.5-48). There were no differences between t-MN after lymphoprolipherative diseases or after breast cancer when considering patients’ age (p=0.09) or median latency (p 0.20) between PM and t-MN. According to morphology, t-MN were classified as 164 AML, 108 MDS and 7 ALL. Karyotype was available for 204 patients and was unfavorable in 81 patients (complex in 54 patients including del(7) in 19 cases; 15 cases with isolated del(7)]. A recurrent chromosomal translocation was present in 13 patients [1 t(8;21), 8 t(15;17) and 1 inv(16); 3 t(9;22)], while 75 patients had a normal karyotype. One-hundred-thirty-five patients received chemotherapy for t-MN, while the hypomethylating drug Azacitidine was administered to 63 patients. Fifty-six patients underwent bone marrow transplantation (45 allogeneic and 11 autologous). Median OS from the t-MN diagnosis was 7.7 months (range 0.2-158+). Conclusions The incidence of t-MN is rising as a result of the increasing number of cancer survivors. Lymphoprolipherative diseases and breast cancer are the most common primary malignancies at risk of developing a therapy-related myeloid neoplasm. Disclosures: Santini: Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen : Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; gsk: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
Renata Abrahao ◽  
Ann M Brunson ◽  
Justine M. Kahn ◽  
Qian Li ◽  
Aaron S Rosenberg ◽  
...  

Introduction Second primary malignancy (SPM) is one of the most devastating late complications following Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) treatment. Historically, the most common SPMs in patients treated for HL are solid tumors, which are largely related to radiation exposure during initial therapy. For the last three decades, efforts to address the risk of SPM after HL therapy have focused on reducing exposure to radiation, as well as refining the approach for patients where radiation is indicated. To date, few population-based studies in the United States have quantified the burden of SPMs and evaluated the potential effect of changes in therapeutic management over time. Additionally, to our knowledge, no study has compared SPM risk between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected and HIV-uninfected HL survivors. Methods We used data from the California Cancer Registry on 21,043 patients diagnosed with primary HL between 1988 and 2015 with follow-up through 2017. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and absolute excess risks (AERs) to compare SPM incidence in our HL cohort with the expected number of first primary cancer incidence in the general California population, based on patient's age at diagnosis (5-year categories), sex, calendar year (3-year intervals), cancer site, and race/ethnicity. SIRs are presented by HIV status, SPM latency, treatment era, and cancer type. P-values for trends were used to examine whether SPM risk changed over time. Findings Among 20,303 HIV-uninfected patients (median follow-up of 14.1 years), overall SPM risk was increased 1.95-fold compared with the general population (SIR=1.95, 95% CI 1.86-2.04). In 740 HIV-infected patients (median follow-up of 11.7 years), overall risk was increased 2.68-fold compared with the general population (SIR=2.68, 95% CI 2.0-3.40), translating to an 37% higher incidence of SPM in HIV-infected vs. HIV-uninfected patients. The AER (per 10,000 person-years) of SPM was 43.1 in HIV-uninfected and 76.5 in HIV-infected patients, resulting in a 33.4 excess SPM per 10,000 person-years in HL survivors with HIV. Malignancies that contributed the most to overall AER were non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), female breast and lung cancers in HIV-uninfected patients; and Kaposi sarcoma, NHL, anorectal and head & neck (HNC) cancers in HIV-infected patients. Notably, among HIV-uninfected patients, the highest overall risk of SPM occurred ≥20 years after diagnosis (SIR= 2.27, 95% CI 1.99-2.58) (Figure). In contrast, the highest overall risk in HIV-infected patients was observed &lt;2 years after diagnosis (SIR=4.42, 95% CI 2.53-7.19). Radiation used decreased from 46.9% in 1988-1996 to 29.5% in 2007-2015. Among HIV-uninfected patients, there was a trend towards decreased risk over time of overall and selected solid SPMs (lung, female breast, and gastrointestinal cancers) (Table). In an analysis restricted to HIV-uninfected patients who received radiation irrespective of chemotherapy, findings also suggested a declined risk of overall and selected solid SPMs over time: any solid (SIR=2.15 in 1988-1996 and SIR=1.30 in 2007-2015, p&lt;0.0001), lung (SIR=3.69 in 1988-1996 and SIR=1.81 in 2007-2015, p=0.0031), and female breast (SIR=2.95 in 1988-1996 and SIR=0.63 in 2007-2015, p&lt;0.0001). Conclusion Compared with the general population, the risk of developing a SPM following HL treatment was significantly higher among both HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected patients, with the absolute excess risk greater for those with HIV infection. There were different temporal patterns and types of SPM between HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected patients. These findings prompt the question on whether earlier and/or more intensive cancer screening should be pursued for HIV-infected survivors. The trend towards decreased risk for selected solid SPMs among HIV-uninfected patients, especially lung and female breast cancers, suggest that strategies to reduce radiation in HL survivors may be working. Despite promising trends in this group, the observation that SPM risk was highest ≥20 years after initial therapy further highlights the need for long-term surveillance and survivorship care in this at-risk population. Disclosures Rosenberg: Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wun:Glycomimetics, Inc.: Consultancy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 48 ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung-Chao Chu ◽  
Chia-Jung Hsieh ◽  
Tso-Fu Wang ◽  
Mun-Kun Hong ◽  
Tang-Yuan Chu

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Bergqvist ◽  
François Hemery ◽  
Arnaud Jannic ◽  
Salah Ferkal ◽  
Pierre Wolkenstein

AbstractNeurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is an inherited, autosomal-dominant, tumor predisposition syndrome with a birth incidence as high as 1:2000. A patient with NF1 is four to five times more likely to develop a malignancy as compared to the general population. The number of epidemiologic studies on lymphoproliferative malignancies in patients with NF1 is limited. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence rate of lymphoproliferative malignancies (lymphoma and leukemia) in NF1 patients followed in our referral center for neurofibromatoses. We used the Informatics for Integrated Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) platform to extract information from the hospital’s electronic health records. We performed a keyword search on clinical notes generated between Jan/01/2014 and May/11/2020 for patients aged 18 years or older. A total of 1507 patients with confirmed NF1 patients aged 18 years and above were identified (mean age 39.2 years; 57% women). The total number of person-years in follow-up was 57,736 (men, 24,327 years; women, 33,409 years). Mean length of follow-up was 38.3 years (median, 36 years). A total of 13 patients had a medical history of either lymphoma or leukemia, yielding an overall incidence rate of 22.5 per 100,000 (0.000225, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.000223–0.000227). This incidence is similar to that of the general population in France (standardized incidence ratio 1.07, 95% CI 0.60–1.79). Four patients had a medical history leukemia and 9 patients had a medical history of lymphoma of which 7 had non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 2 had Hodgkin lymphoma. Our results show that adults with NF1 do not have an increased tendency to develop lymphoproliferative malignancies, in contrast to the general increased risk of malignancy. While our results are consistent with the recent population-based study in Finland, they are in contrast with the larger population-based study in England whereby NF1 individuals were found to be 3 times more likely to develop both non-Hodgkin lymphoma and lymphocytic leukemia. Large-scale epidemiological studies based on nationwide data sets are thus needed to confirm our findings.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jia Hong ◽  
Rongrong Wei ◽  
Chuang Nie ◽  
Anastasiia Leonteva ◽  
Xu Han ◽  
...  

Aim: To assess and predict risk and prognosis of lung cancer (LC) patients with second primary malignancy (SPM). Methods: LC patients diagnosed from 1992 to 2016 were obtained through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Standardized incidence ratios were calculated to evaluate SPM risk. Cox regression and competing risk models were applied to assess the factors associated with overall survival, SPM development and LC-specific survival. Nomograms were built to predict SPM probability and overall survival. Results & conclusion: LC patients remain at higher risk of SPM even though the incidence declines. Patients with SPM have a better prognosis than patients without SPM. The consistency indexes for nomograms of SPM probability and overall survival are 0.605 (95% CI: 0.598–0.611) and 0.644 (95% CI: 0.638–0.650), respectively.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 133 (10) ◽  
pp. 1130-1139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemieke W. J. Opstal-van Winden ◽  
Hugoline G. de Haan ◽  
Michael Hauptmann ◽  
Marjanka K. Schmidt ◽  
Annegien Broeks ◽  
...  

Abstract Female Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated with chest radiotherapy (RT) have a very high risk of breast cancer. The contribution of genetic factors to this risk is unclear. We therefore examined 211 155 germline single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for gene-radiation interaction on breast cancer risk in a case-only analysis including 327 breast cancer patients after chest RT for HL and 4671 first primary breast cancer patients. Nine SNPs showed statistically significant interaction with RT on breast cancer risk (false discovery rate, &lt;20%), of which 1 SNP in the PVT1 oncogene attained the Bonferroni threshold for statistical significance. A polygenic risk score (PRS) composed of these SNPs (RT-interaction-PRS) and a previously published breast cancer PRS (BC-PRS) derived in the general population were evaluated in a case-control analysis comprising the 327 chest-irradiated HL patients with breast cancer and 491 chest-irradiated HL patients without breast cancer. Patients in the highest tertile of the RT-interaction-PRS had a 1.6-fold higher breast cancer risk than those in the lowest tertile. Remarkably, we observed a fourfold increased RT-induced breast cancer risk in the highest compared with the lowest decile of the BC-PRS. On a continuous scale, breast cancer risk increased 1.4-fold per standard deviation of the BC-PRS, similar to the effect size found in the general population. This study demonstrates that genetic factors influence breast cancer risk after chest RT for HL. Given the high absolute breast cancer risk in radiation-exposed women, these results can have important implications for the management of current HL survivors and future patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrián González-Marrón ◽  
Juan Carlos Martín-Sánchez ◽  
Ferrán Garcia-Alemany ◽  
Encarna Martínez-Martín ◽  
Nuria Matilla-Santander ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (22) ◽  
pp. 4945-4953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Volker Arndt ◽  
Henrike Merx ◽  
Christa Stegmaier ◽  
Hartwig Ziegler ◽  
Hermann Brenner

Purpose To assess whether detriments in quality of life (QOL) among women with breast cancer persist over years. Patients and Methods QOL was assessed in a population-based cohort of 314 women with breast cancer from Saarland (Germany) 1 and 3 years after diagnosis and compared internally and with reference data from the general population. Results Three years after diagnosis, deficits in QOL were still apparent for role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning and for the symptoms of insomnia, fatigue, dyspnea, and financial difficulties. Differences between breast cancer patients and women from the general population were predominantly found in younger ages. Compared with the QOL scores measured 1 year after diagnosis, only minor functional changes were observed, but recurrence of breast cancer during the follow-up interval had a deleterious effect on QOL. Conclusion Deficits in role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning persist over years in women with breast cancer and predominantly affect younger patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document