P12.40 Impact of an Infection Control Program (ICP) on the Rate of Nosocomial Infections (Nl) in a Tertiary Care Center

2006 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. S71
Author(s):  
B. Tanner ◽  
I. Heinzer ◽  
V. La Rocca ◽  
T. Bregenzer ◽  
C. Ebnother
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Tertiary Care Center ◽  
Infection Control Program

scholarly journals Impact of an Infection Control Program on the Prevalence of Nosocomial Infections at a Tertiary Care Center in Switzerland

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corina Ebnöther ◽  
Beate Tanner ◽  
Flavia Schmid ◽  
Vittoria La Rocca ◽  
Ivo Heinzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Tertiary Care Center ◽  
Infection Control Program ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

Objective.To study the impact of a multimodal infection control program on the rate of nosocomial infections at a 550-bed tertiary care center.Methods.Before and after the implementation of an infection control program, the rate of nosocomial infection was recorded in time-interval prevalence studies. Hand hygiene compliance was studied before and after the intervention. As a surrogate marker of compliance, the amount of alcohol-based hand rub consumed before the intervention was compared with the amount consumed after the intervention. The intervention included additional staff for infection control, repeated instructions for hand hygiene, new guidelines for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, and isolation of patients infected or colonized with multidrug-resistant bacteria.Results.The rate of nosocomial infection decreased from approximately 11.7% to 6.8% in 2 years. The rate of hand hygiene compliance increased by 20.0%; it was 59.0% before the intervention and increased to 79.0% afterward. These results correlate with data on the consumption of alcohol-based hand rub, but not with data on the use of antibiotics.Conclusion.Within 2 years, a multimodal infection control program intervention such as this one may reduce the rate of nosocomial infection at a tertiary care center by more than one-third and improve both the quality of care and patient outcomes. It may also generate considerable savings. Therefore, such programs should be promoted not only by hospital epidemiologists but also by hospital administrators.

Infection Control Violations

1991 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 672-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda A. Homing ◽  
Philip W. Smith
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Peer Pressure ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Medical Director ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Infection Control Program ◽  
Policies And Procedures ◽  
State And Local

The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations UCAHO) mandates a hospital-wide infection control program.' National, state, and local healthcare guidelines and resources address infection control issues including asepsis, handwashing, isolation precautions, Universal Precautions (UP), and waste disposal. One important aspect of an infection control program is the monitoring of compliance with policies and procedures. We report a system of monitoring compliance with infection control policies and procedures through the use of confidential infection control violation reports.Bishop Clarkson Memorial Hospital is a 550-bed tertiary care center that has an epidemiology services department consisting of a medical director, associate medical director, and two nurse epidemiologists. Hospital personnel have been encouraged through formal and informal educational sessions to report infection control violations to the service. Prior to 1986, infection control violations usually were noted through special studies such as isolation precautions monitors and surveillance activities. Occasionally, employees told Epidemiology Services about a witnessed violation but were very hesitant to document the incident because of fear of retaliation, harassment, and job loss. Peer pressure appeared to play a role in this hesitation.

Prevention of Infections Associated With Permanent Cardiac Antiarrhythmic Devices by Implementation of a Comprehensive Infection Control Program

2004 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 492-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abraham Borer ◽  
Jacob Gilad ◽  
Eytan Hyam ◽  
Francisc Schlaeffer ◽  
Pnina Schlaeffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Pacemaker Implantation ◽  
Relative Weight ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Cardiac Device ◽  
Infection Control Program

AbstractObjective:To implement a comprehensive infection control (IC) program for prevention of cardiac device-associated infections (CDIs).Design:Prospective before-after trial with 2 years of follow-up.Setting:A tertiary-care, university-affiliated medical center.Patients:A consecutive sample of all adults undergoing cardiac device implantation between 1997 and 2002.Intervention:An IC program was implemented during late 2001 and included staff education, preoperative modification of patient risk factors, intraoperative control of strict aseptic technique, surgical scrubbing and attire, control of environmental risk factors, optimization of antibiotic prophylaxis, postoperative wound care, and active surveillance. The clinical endpoint was CDI rates.Results:Between 1997 and 2000, there were 7 CDIs among 725 procedures (mean annual CDI incidence, 1%). During the first 9 months of 2001, there were 7 CDIs among 167 procedures (4.2%; P = .007): CDIs increased from 7 among 576 to 3 among 124 following pacemaker implantation (P = .39) and from 0 among 149 to 4 among 43 following cardioverter-defibrillator implantation (P = .002). Of the 14 CDIs, 5 involved superficial wounds, 7 involved deep wounds, and 2 involved endocarditis. Following intervention, there were no cases of CDI among 316 procedures during 24 months of follow-up (4.2% reduction; P = .0005).Conclusions:We observed a high CDI rate associated with substantial morbidity. IC measures had an impact on CDI. Although the relative weight of each measure in the prevention of CDI remains unknown, our results suggest that implementation of a comprehensive IC program is feasible and efficacious in this setting.

Epidemiology of Nosocomial Outbreaks: 14-Year Experience at a Tertiary-Care Center

2000 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 527-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner ◽  
Rosa Baez-Martinez ◽  
M. Sigfrido Rangel-Frausto ◽  
Samuel Ponce-de-León
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Tertiary Care Center ◽  
Common Organism ◽  
Overall Mortality

Twelve nosocomial outbreaks over 14 years at a tertiary-care center in Mexico are described. Overall mortality was 25.8%, one half due to pneumonia. The most common organism was Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Incidence was three outbreaks per 10,000 discharges; outbreak-related infections comprised 1.56% of all nosocomial infections. Incidence in the intensive care unit was 10-fold higher.

scholarly journals 1196. Is the Weekend Staff Really to Blame? Challenges in Isolation Compliance at an Academic Tertiary Care Center

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S429-S429
Author(s):  
Sonia Bassett ◽  
Kelley M Boston ◽  
Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Significant Variation ◽  
Normal Approximation ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Visual Observation ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Tertiary Care Center

Abstract Background Transmission-based isolation precautions are implemented in an effort to decrease the risk of transmission of pathogens. Weekend staff are perceived to have lower compliance. Methods Visual observation of healthcare worker (HCW) compliance with an institutional isolation precautions practices was done at an academic tertiary care center. In the first quarter of 2019, observations were completed for 894 patients who required contact, droplet or airborne isolation precautions. Observations included patients with infection or colonization with multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO) or highly transmissible infections. Observations focused on availability of appropriate supplies, compliance with infection control practices, and documentation. Audits were performed on workdays and weekends, and results were communicated to unit leadership via email. Comparison of proportions was calculated using the normal approximation in Minitab18. Results Compliance with the different elements of the audit can be seen in Table 1. HCW compliance with the use of personal protective equipment and hand hygiene on exit from the room had the lowest compliance and was statistically lower on weekends than on weekdays, and compliance was significantly lower than all other categories for both weekday and weekend measurements. Fifty-seven percent of all patients had missed compliance on one or more elements. There was not a statistically significant variation in practice between weekends and weekdays in overall compliance. Conclusion There is opportunity for improvement in all compliance on isolation practices facility-wide, and elements that require changes in behavior had the lowest compliance, and were lower on weekend shifts. We did not find other differences in performance for weekend staff vs. weekday staff. Educational measures should focus on all individual staff across all shifts. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Observations of Cleaning Techniques at a Tertiary Care Center during Observational Infection Control Rounds

2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. E72
Author(s):  
Lori Coddington ◽  
Dianne DeAngelis ◽  
Jackie Sanner ◽  
Rashida A. Khakoo
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Tertiary Care Center

Training of Personnel for Infection Control

1984 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Crow
Keyword(s):  
Infection Control ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Infection Control Program ◽  
Policies And Procedures ◽  
Infection Control Practitioner ◽  
The Us ◽  
National Organizations ◽  
Ultimate Responsibility ◽  
And Control

AbstractThe overall objectives for implementing an infection control program are to make hospital personnel aware of nosocomial infections and to educate these persons in their role in decreasing the risk of these infections. The infection control practitioner (ICP) implements these objectives by performing surveillance to determine problem areas and by developing policies and procedures that prevent and control nosocomial infections. Appropriate qualities for an ICP include initiative, leadership, communication skills, commitment, and charisma. Expertise in patient care practices, aseptic principles, sterilization practices, education, research, epidemiology, microbiology, infectious diseases, and psychology are acquired skills.Local, state, and national organizations, as well as universities, are responsible for ICP training. In the US the Centers for Disease Control have established a training program for the beginning ICP and the Association of Practitioners in Infection Control (APIC) has developed a study guide for developing infection control skills. The ultimate responsibility for education is an individual obligation, however. Certification of the ICP would insure a minimum level of knowledge, thereby standardizing and upgrading the practice of infection control.

scholarly journals Outbreak of Postoperative Endophthalmitis in a Thai Tertiary Care Center

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 564-566
Author(s):  
Anucha Apisarnthanarak ◽  
Supanee Jirajariyavej ◽  
Kanokporn Thongphubeth ◽  
Chananart Yuekyen ◽  
David K. Warren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Postoperative Endophthalmitis ◽  
Tertiary Care Center ◽  
Associated Risk Factors

We performed a study with a 1:3 ratio of case patients (n = 11) to control patients (n = 33) to evaluate risk factors for postoperative endophthalmitis in a Thai tertiary care center. Multivariate analysis revealed that diabetes mellitus and surgeon A were associated risk factors. Preoperative diabetes mellitus control and the improvement of infection control practices led to the termination of the outbreak.

Nosocomial Infection Surveillance in the United States: Historical Perspective

1987 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 450-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Hughes
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Control Program ◽  
The United States ◽  
National Database ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Infection Control Program ◽  
Infection Surveillance

AbstractDuring the past 30 years, many important strides have been made in the prevention of nosocomial infections in the United States. Infection control programs have been established in hospitals throughout the country. Techniques for surveillance of nosocomial infections have been developed and utilized extensively. Results of the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control (SENIC Project) and the experience with surveillance of surgical wound infections have documented the fact that surveillance is an integral component of an effective nosocomial infection control program. In recent years, a number of approaches to nosocomial infection surveillance have been proposed as alternatives to comprehensive or hospital-wide surveillance. In 1986, four surveillance components were introduced in the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system to provide participating institutions the option to tailor their surveillance program to their local needs and priorities while continuing to provide information to the national database on nosocomial infections. Infection control practitioners currently face a challenge to develop more meaningful nosocomial infection rates to permit identification of new infection control priorities for their institution and to assess progress toward specific prevention objectives.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document