scholarly journals Open Innovation Implementation to Sustain Indonesian SMEs

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 223-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jahja Hamdani ◽  
Christina Wirawan
2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 57-84
Author(s):  
Rosita Capurro ◽  
Raffaele Fiorentino ◽  
Stefano Garzella ◽  
Rosa Lombardi

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to investigate the role of boundary management when firms should implement open innovation.Design/methodology/approachThe relevant literature on strategic management, firm boundaries and open innovation fields is revised and critically assessed. An interpretive-qualitative methodology is applied to analyse empirical data obtained from a questionnaire and subsequent interviews of a sample of Italian listed firms. By critically integrating literature review and empirical analysis, a framework is provided with the objective of supporting open innovation implementation.FindingsThe study shows that on the one hand, open innovation and many modern paths of growth are connected to a firm's boundaries and that on the other hand, boundary management plays a key role in the implementation of open innovation.Practical implicationsThe paper has implications for practitioners by driving them to shift the focus of open innovation implementation towards the management of boundaries, in which boundary capabilities and activities play a key role.Originality/valueThis paper sheds light on the advantages and risks that can jeopardize a successful opening up innovation processes without the effective management of boundary studies. Thus, the authors identify and propose causes for reflection and tools maximizing potentiality and reducing risks in the implementation of such processes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950002 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROMAN TEPLOV ◽  
EKATERINA ALBATS ◽  
DARIA PODMETINA

Since the first appearance of ‘open innovation’ as a theoretical concept in 2003, the debates on its essence still continue among academics, while its interpretations within the business community also seem to differ from one company to another. Using a survey of 251 companies operating in Europe, in this research, we compare the perceptions of open innovation that exist within both the academic and business worlds, to assist in the conceptual development of the phenomenon. Our research reveals a mismatch in these perceptions, as only a few activities counted as ‘open’ by innovation scholars appear to affect companies’ self-reported state of open innovation implementation. Moreover, our research has shown differences in the interpretation of open innovation among companies of different sizes. Only free revealing, acknowledged by scholars as one of the open innovation practices, has been recognised as such a practice by all the studied firms. This paper contributes to conceptualisation of ‘open innovation’ and shares practical insights on bridging academia and business perceptions of it.


Author(s):  
Patricia P. Iglesias-Sánchez ◽  
Marisol B. Correia ◽  
Carmen Jambrino-Maldonado

This chapter analyzes the implementation of open innovation supported by social media, aiming to make it more effective in the tourism sector. Regression analysis is used to verify the relationships between competitive environment, research and development (R&D)/innovation level, external openness, and open innovation implementation using a sample of 135 tourism companies in the south of Spain and Portugal. The potential of social media as an instrument for customer involvement in innovation processes is verified, as is the ongoing adoption of open innovation as a competitiveness strategy in the tourism industry. Regarding the practical implications, open innovation is becoming established and there is strategic support from social media. However, there is a lack of models to give structure to this new paradigm and allow its management. The originality of this chapter lies in combining the models proposed by Narver and Slater and Atuahene-Gima regarding the ways in which companies can approach open innovation.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindomar Subtil de Oliveira ◽  
Márcia Elisa Soares Echeveste ◽  
Marcelo Nogueira Cortimiglia ◽  
César Giovani Colini Gonçalves

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-20
Author(s):  
Lindomar Subtil de Oliveira ◽  
Márcia Elisa Soares Echeveste ◽  
Marcelo Nogueira Cortimiglia

Author(s):  
P. Naruetharadhol ◽  
W.A. Srisathan ◽  
C. Ketkaew

Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face limited resource capability to implement open innovation. Understanding a robust mechanism of knowledge management, organisational structure, and networks can benefit managerial and organisational drivers to achieve open innovation in general. The paper sheds the new light in developing the open innovation implementation as a latent endogenous variable influence inbound OI and outbound OI. We used structural equation modelling (SEM) on a data set of 636 Thai SMEs. The results reveal that open innovation implementation reflected by managerial and organisational dimensions has a positive impact on contributing to both inbound and outbound OI. A key finding is that open innovation’s diffusion helps SMEs to overcome their technological capabilities to implement OI.


2018 ◽  
Vol 61 (4) ◽  
pp. 16-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Zynga ◽  
Kathleen Diener ◽  
Christoph Ihl ◽  
Dirk Lüttgens ◽  
Frank Piller ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1283-1294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindomar Subtil de Oliveira ◽  
Márcia Elisa Echeveste ◽  
Marcelo Nogueira Cortimiglia

Purpose A comprehensive understanding about open innovation implementation is still lacking. In particular, a compilation of drivers and barriers for OI implementation is absent from the literature. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to identify critical success factors (CSFs) for OI implementation at the firm level. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was conducted in order to identify CSFs for OI implementation in previously published literature. A total of 2,894 papers were identified, 156 of which were subjected to full independent analysis by the three authors. The following aspects were considered: research strategy, approach (empirical or theoretical) and objectives; theoretical background; methodological procedures; main results; and contributions to the literature. If the paper reported empirical research that included a description of actual OI implementation, additional aspects were analyzed: industry or sector of application; firm characteristics; success of OI implementation and OI tools and techniques reported. Findings A synthetizing framework with six thematic categories of CSFs was proposed: leadership, internal innovation capability, network and relationships, strategy, technology management, and culture. A total of 22 CSFs for OI implementation were identified within these categories. Originality/value The proposed framework is an attempt to systematically generate a comprehensive list of factors that impact OI implementation. As such, it can support the theoretical development of OI-related capabilities, and serve as basis for future research that investigates operationalization and measurement of such capabilities.


2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malgorzata Ciesielska

This case study explores the origins of Nokia’s decline in the mobile technology market, as an unsuccessful attempt to introduce an open-source strategy into the business. Nokia created a hybrid model, which codified conflicting principles taken from closed and open mode of collaboration. A series of implementation problems resulted in Nokia struggling to attract open-source partners, growing issues with managing in-house staff and ultimately failing to develop a new mobile operating system fast enough to stay competitive. Key learning outcomes: At the completion of the case study, students will understand the complexity of open innovation implementation when paradigmatic differences between businesses and/or partners are not resolved.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document