P097: The emergency department experience for patients and caregivers referred from an outpatient oncology clinic

Introduction: Outpatient oncology clinics have become the mainstay of cancer treatment, but their limited services and hours of operation often lead to emergency department (ED) referrals. With Canada's aging population and cancer survival rates improving, cancer-related ED visits are becoming a significant aspect of emergency medicine. A cancer-related visit to the ED is associated with unique challenges for patients, their caregivers and clinicians. This study focuses on understanding the ED experience of patients and their caregivers sent from an outpatient oncology clinic to a separate affiliated large academic hospital. Methods: A descriptive, phenomenological study of interviews was conducted using the method of Giorgi. The sample included 12 participants (n = 9 patients, 3 caregivers) referred to the ED at a large academic hospital (i.e., Toronto General Hospital, TGH) following a same-day outpatient oncology appointment at an affiliated cancer centre (i.e., Princess Margaret Hospital, PMH). Interviews continued until thematic saturation. All transcripts were analyzed by 2 reviewers with bracketing to ensure accuracy. Results: Four themes were identified from analysis: (1) communication; (2) expectations; (3) care and symptom management and (4) potential improvements. Overall patients and caregivers felt communication between PMH and TGH, and from providers could have been better. Many felt there was a break-down in communication as they did not expect to go through the usual ED triage process, which caused additional anxiety and frustration with the wait times. The majority felt their symptoms were managed in a timely manner and reported the staff to be friendly, caring and professional; however, often felt forgotten and anxious due to a lack of “checking-in”. Their experience could have been improved by receiving more information on the process, a more welcoming environment and separate waiting area or private room for those who are immunocompromised. Conclusion: Although referral from an outpatient oncology clinic to the ED of an affiliated hospital is a common process within Canada, this is the first study to explore the patient and caregiver experience. Understanding the patient and caregiver experience is valuable for identifying quality improvement initiatives. Our analysis revealed the patient and caregiver experience could be improved with better communication and expectation setting regarding the ED process before and throughout the visit.

Download Full-text

Utilization of support services, emergency department, and hospital in advanced cancer patients with severe disease in a community cancer institute.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.31_suppl.112 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽

pp. 112-112

Author(s):

Caitlyn McNaughton ◽

Emily Gehron ◽

Shanthi Sivendran ◽

Rachel Holliday ◽

Michael Horst ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Palliative Care ◽

Advanced Cancer ◽

Support Services ◽

Symptom Management ◽

Severe Disease ◽

Hospital Utilization ◽

Palliative Care Consultation ◽

Care Consultation ◽

Ed Visits

112 Background: Patients with advanced cancer are at high risk for emergency department (ED) and hospital utilization, which is distressing and costly. Palliative care consultation and symptom management clinics have been shown to decrease ED and hospital utilization, but the frequency and composition of these interventions is still being delineated. More evaluation is needed to determine practical approaches to implementing interdisciplinary management of distress for patients with advanced cancer in the community setting. This retrospective review evaluates healthcare utilization with respect to support services provided in our community based cancer institute. Methods: 157 patients with advanced cancer of lung, gastrointestinal, genitourinary or gynecologic origin diagnosed January 2015-December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Descriptive data including demographics, disease characteristics, palliative care consultation, support services utilized and ED visits/hospitalizations were collected for 12 months, or to date of death. Support services included physician assistant–led symptom management, nurse navigator, social worker, nutrition, financial counselor, chaplain, and oncology clinical counselor. Support service referrals were made based on identified needs. Severe disease was defined as death within 6 months of diagnosis. Results: Patients with severe disease had a mean of 6 ED visits per year, significantly greater than patients with non-severe disease (p < 0.001). Patients with severe disease also had more contacts with support services per year (30.3 vs 9.1, p < 0.001). A palliative care consult was placed in 50% of patients with severe disease, and 23% in patients with non-severe disease (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with advanced cancer have evidence of significant needs as reflected by high healthcare utilization in the last 6 months of life. As needed involvement of support services correlated with severity of disease but did not result in decreased ED utilization or hospitalization. This suggests that availability of support services alone is not a feasible strategy to impact unplanned hospitalizations and ED visits.

Download Full-text

Epidemiologic trends in cancer-related emergency department utilization in Korea from 2015 to 2019

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-021-01571-1 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Sun Young Lee ◽

Young Sun Ro ◽

Sang Do Shin ◽

Sungwoo Moon

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Incidence Rate ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Incidence Rates ◽

Emergency Department Utilization ◽

Cancer Type ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Ed Visits ◽

Age And Sex

AbstractIt is inevitable for cancer patients to visit the emergency department (ED) for symptoms of cancer itself and various treatment-related complications. As the prevalence of cancer increases along with cancer survival rates, the number of ED visits of cancer patients may increase. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiologic trends and characteristics of cancer-related ED visits. A cross-sectional study was conducted for all ED visits nationwide between 2015 and 2019. The characteristics of cancer- and non-cancer-related ED visits were compared, and the cancer type and primary reason for ED visits were investigated for cancer-related ED visits. The age- and sex-standardized incidence rate per 100,000 population was calculated. Among 44,983,523 ED visits for 5 years, 1,372,119 (3.1%) were cancer-related. Among cancer-related ED visits, 54.8% led to hospitalization including 5.1% in ICU, and 9.5% died in the hospital. The age- and sex-standardized incidence rates of cancer-related ED visits per 100,000 population increased from 521.8 in 2015 to 642.2 in 2019 (p-for-trends, < 0.01), and rates of cancer-related hospital admission via ED were 309.0 in 2015 and 336.6 in 2019 (p-for-trends, 0.75). The most common cancer types were lung cancer (14.7%), liver cancer (13.1%), and colorectal cancer (11.5%). The most common primary reasons of cancer-related ED visits were pneumonia (3.6%), gastroenteritis (2.7%), fever (2.6%), abdominal pain (2.4%), and ileus (2.1%). Cancer-related ED visits accounted for 3.1% of all ED visits, with 1.37 million cases over five years. The incidence rate of cancer-related ED visits has increased year by year, with high hospitalization and mortality rates, and the burden of cancer-related ED visits will continue to increase as the prevalence increases.

Download Full-text

Costs of potentially preventable emergency department use during cancer treatment: A regional study.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2017.35.8_suppl.2 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽

pp. 2-2 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Laura Panattoni ◽

Catherine R. Fedorenko ◽

Karma L. Kreizenbeck ◽

Stuart Greenlee ◽

Julia Rose Walker ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Cancer Treatment ◽

Symptom Management ◽

Community Setting ◽

Inpatient Stay ◽

Regional Study ◽

Emergency Department Use ◽

Ed Visits ◽

Western Washington ◽

Significant Opportunity

2 Background: There is growing recognition that many emergency department (ED) visits during cancer treatment may be related to poorly controlled disease or treatment-related symptoms and could be prevented. An RCT using the Symptom Tracking and Reporting (STAR) tool for proactive symptom management decreased the percentage of patients admitted to the ED (34% vs. 41%; p=0.02). Little is known about the costs of potentially preventable ED visits in a community setting. This study examined the number and costs of ED visits and their associated diagnoses. Methods: Cancer registry records for patients in Western Washington from 2011 to 2015 were linked with claims from two regional commercial insurers. Patients diagnosed with a solid tumor and treated with chemotherapy or radiation were selected. All ED utilization was tracked for 1 year after the start of treatment. ED-related diagnoses codes were labeled “Potentially Preventable” (PP) if they mapped to the 13 symptom categories targeted by STAR (e.g. pain, nausea) and non-PP otherwise. Costs of ED visits were inflation-adjusted and include claims with ED-related procedure, revenue, and place of service codes. All subsequent inpatient costs were excluded, likely under-estimating total costs. Results: Of the 7,075 eligible patients, 2,543 (35.9%) visited the ED an average of 1.79 times. Pain (720 visits), Dyspnea (279 visits), and Nausea (232 visits) were the most common potentially preventable diagnoses; Hypertension (506 visits), Fever (230 visits), and Diabetes (215 visits) were the most common non-PP diagnoses. $1,134,254 (25.2% of the total ED costs) was spent on PP ED visits. Of PP ED visits 20.3% (178/875) resulted in an inpatient stay. Conclusions: In our community setting, at least one quarter of ED costs were potentially the result of poor symptom management. An investment in better symptom management has a significant opportunity to both improve cancer care and lower total costs.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text

P098: Patterns of utilization and time-course of events for cancer-related emergency department visits following same-day outpatient oncology appointments

CJEM ◽

10.1017/cem.2020.304 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (S1) ◽

pp. S100-S100

Author(s):

M. Freymond ◽

E. O'Connor

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Time Course ◽

Cancer Survival ◽

Retrospective Chart Review ◽

Time Frame ◽

Emergency Department Visits ◽

Initial Assessment ◽

Cancer Society ◽

Presenting Symptoms ◽

Ed Visits

Introduction: Nearly 50% of Canadians will develop cancer in their lifetime (1), and the vast majority of those with cancer will visit the emergency department (ED) in their last 6 months of life (2). Considering the aging population, improvement in cancer survival and current practice of managing cancer in outpatient settings, cancer-related emergencies are becoming a significant aspect of emergency medicine. The presenting symptoms and rates of hospitalization for cancer-related ED visits have largely been established. The current study characterizes the patterns of ED utilization and time-course of events for cancer-related ED visits following same-day outpatient oncology appointments resulting in admission to hospital compared to those not admitted. Methods: A retrospective chart-review was used to identify 231 adult patients who visited the ED at a large academic hospital (i.e., Toronto General Hospital) following a same-day outpatient oncology appointment at an affiliated cancer centre (i.e., Princess Margaret Hospital) from March to May 2019, using administrative data. Results: All visits occurred on weekdays (avg = 4 visits/d) and 57% of visits resulted in hospitalization. Between those admitted and not admitted to hospital, there was no difference in triage time [17:23 + 0:14 vs. 17:01 + 0:20 h, p = 0.47; mean(SD)]. Visits resulting in hospitalization were more urgent (median CTAS score = 2 vs. 3, p < 0.001) and required more consultation services (64 vs. 17 % of visits, p < 0.001), but did not differ for imaging (36 vs. 33 % of visits, p = 0.63). The length of stay in the ED was longer for those admitted [16.6(0.9) vs. 5.3(0.3) h, p < 0.01), they waited longer for their initial assessment [2.6(1.9) vs. 1.8(1.3) h, p < 0.01) and spent 10.1(9.9) h waiting for a bed on the ward. There was no difference in time from initial assessment to disposition, imaging or consult reports (p > 0.05) between groups. The patients transferred from oncology clinics were triaged at 17:13(0:11) h compared to 13:56(0:03) h for all ED visits during the same time frame. Conclusion: Most patients sent from oncology clinics to the ED are admitted, and when admitted they spend an additional 10 h waiting for a bed on the ward. These patients tend to arrive later in the day compared to other ED patients. Understanding utilization patterns and time-course of events allows for objective identification of quality improvement initiatives. 1 Canadian Cancer Society, 2015 2 Barbera et al. CMAJ, 2010

Download Full-text

Evaluating the utility of rule OP-35 to define preventability of ED visits for oncology patients at an academic cancer center.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.272 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽

pp. 272-272

Author(s):

Steven Manobianco ◽

Zachary L. Quinn ◽

Valerie Pracilio Csik ◽

Adam F Binder ◽

Nathan Handley

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

New York ◽

Outpatient Setting ◽

Cancer Center ◽

New York University ◽

Timely Manner ◽

Oncology Patients ◽

Outpatient Chemotherapy ◽

Treatment Models ◽

Ed Visits

272 Background: Rule OP-35, which characterizes treatment-related complications of patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy that result in a potentially avoidable emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization, was developed to encourage practices to build treatment models that reduce such events. However, defining visits as potentially avoidable based on symptoms may not capture the complexity of caring for oncology patients. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of OP-35 in identifying preventable ED visits by real world standards at an academic institution. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed reviewing ED visits at the Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center (SKCC) at Thomas Jefferson University for oncology patients from 10/1/2020 to 1/31/2021. Each patient received care at SKCC had received intravenous or oral chemotherapy in the preceding 30 days, and each encounter was classified as potentially avoidable by OP-35 criteria. Two investigators independently conducted chart reviews to determine whether these visits were potentially avoidable, recording whether the patient attempted to contact their care team prior to the ED encounter and assessing if the concern could have been managed in a timely manner in an outpatient setting. The two records were then compared, and the principal investigator served as an arbiter for determining if a visit was potentially avoidable in instances where the investigators disagreed. Results: We reviewed 144 total encounters and excluded events from patients with either acute leukemia or breast cancer on hormone therapy only, leaving 107 encounters for analysis. After evaluating the clinical circumstances, we determined that 29% of these ED encounters were potentially avoidable. Applying New York University Emergency Department Algorithm (NYU-EDA) criteria, 69% of encounters were considered potentially avoidable. Patients called for advice before seeking ED care in 53% of unavoidable encounters compared to 26% of potentially avoidable encounters. An additional 14% of visits deemed unavoidable were from patients sent directly from clinic. For potentially avoidable encounters, 60% of patients were discharged directly from the ED. In comparison, 8% of unavoidable encounters led to discharge from the ED. Pain was the most common reason for encounters and 53% of these visits were considered potentially avoidable. Conclusions: We found that approximately 30% of ED encounters deemed avoidable by OP-35 criteria were considered potentially avoidable following clinician review. In the majority of cases patients were referred to the ED following initial outpatient attempts at management. NYU-EDA criteria for preventability did not correlate with OP-35 nor clinician consensus regarding potentially avoidable encounters. More work remains in refining tools to identify potentially avoidable ED visits for oncology patients.

Download Full-text

Divergence in the epidemiological estimates of traumatic brain injury in the United States: comparison of two national databases

Journal of Neurosurgery ◽

10.3171/2020.7.jns201896 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 1-10

Author(s):

Brittany M. Stopa ◽

Maya Harary ◽

Ray Jhun ◽

Arun Job ◽

Saef Izzy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Traumatic Brain Injury ◽

Emergency Department ◽

Brain Injury ◽

Data Bank ◽

The United States ◽

National Sample ◽

Population Based ◽

Weighted Estimates ◽

True Incidence ◽

Ed Visits

OBJECTIVETraumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US, but the true incidence of TBI is unknown.METHODSThe National Trauma Data Bank National Sample Program (NTDB NSP) was queried for 2007 and 2013, and population-based weighted estimates of TBI-related emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and deaths were calculated. These data were compared to the 2017 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report on TBI, which used the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project’s National (“Nationwide” before 2012) Inpatient Sample and National Emergency Department Sample.RESULTSIn the NTDB NSP the incidence of TBI-related ED visits was 59/100,000 in 2007 and 62/100,000 in 2013. However, in the CDC report there were 534/100,000 in 2007 and 787/100,000 in 2013. The CDC estimate for ED visits was 805% higher in 2007 and 1169% higher in 2013. In the NTDB NSP, the incidence of TBI-related deaths was 5/100,000 in 2007 and 4/100,000 in 2013. In the CDC report, the incidence was 18/100,000 in both years. The CDC estimate for deaths was 260% higher in 2007 and 325% higher in 2013.CONCLUSIONSThe databases disagreed widely in their weighted estimates of TBI incidence: CDC estimates were consistently higher than NTDB NSP estimates, by an average of 448%. Although such a discrepancy may be intuitive, this is the first study to quantify the magnitude of disagreement between these databases. Given that research, funding, and policy decisions are made based on these estimates, there is a need for a more accurate estimate of the true national incidence of TBI.

Download Full-text

Handling coarsened age information in the analysis of emergency department presentations

BMC Medical Research Methodology ◽

10.1186/s12874-020-01181-x ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Rhonda J. Rosychuk ◽

Jeff W.N. Bachman ◽

Anqi Chen ◽

X. Joan Hu

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Sample Size ◽

Uniform Distribution ◽

Empirical Distribution ◽

Data Access ◽

Recurrent Event ◽

Fiscal Year ◽

Recurrent Event Data ◽

Higher Ed ◽

Ed Visits

Abstract Background Administrative databases offer vast amounts of data that provide opportunities for cost-effective insights. They simultaneously pose significant challenges to statistical analysis such as the redaction of data because of privacy policies and the provision of data that may not be at the level of detail required. For example, ages in years rather than birthdates available at event dates can pose challenges to the analysis of recurrent event data. Methods Hu and Rosychuk provided a strategy for estimating age-varying effects in a marginal regression analysis of recurrent event times when birthdates are all missing. They analyzed emergency department (ED) visits made by children and youth and privacy rules prevented all birthdates to be released, and justified their approach via a simulation and asymptotic study. With recent changes in data access rules, we requested a new extract of data for April 2010 to March 2017 that includes patient birthdates. This allows us to compare the estimates using the Hu and Rosychuk (HR) approach for coarsened ages with estimates under the true, known ages to further examine their approach numerically. The performance of the HR approach under five scenarios is considered: uniform distribution for missing birthdates, uniform distribution for missing birthdates with supplementary data on age, empirical distribution for missing birthdates, smaller sample size, and an additional year of data. Results Data from 33,299 subjects provided 58,166 ED visits. About 67% of subjects had one ED visit and less than 9% of subjects made over three visits during the study period. Most visits (84.0%) were made by teenagers between 13 and 17 years old. The uniform distribution and the HR modeling approach capture the main trends over age of the estimates when compared to the known birthdates. Boys had higher ED visit frequencies than girls in the younger ages whereas girls had higher ED visit frequencies than boys for the older ages. Including additional age data based on age at end of fiscal year did not sufficiently narrow the widths of potential birthdate intervals to influence estimates. The empirical distribution of the known birthdates was close to a uniform distribution and therefore, use of the empirical distribution did not change the estimates provided by assuming a uniform distribution for the missing birthdates. The HR approach performed well for a smaller sample size, although estimates were less smooth when there were very few ED visits at some younger ages. When an additional year of data is added, the estimates become better at these younger ages. Conclusions Overall the Hu and Rosychuk approach for coarsened ages performed well and captured the key features of the relationships between ED visit frequency and covariates.

Download Full-text

Emergency Department Visits During Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy: A Cohort Study

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofx163.791 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽

pp. S333-S334

Author(s):

So Lim Kim ◽

Angela Everett ◽

Susan J Rehm ◽

Steven Gordon ◽

Nabin Shrestha

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Emergency Department ◽

Hospital Admission ◽

Vascular Access ◽

Antimicrobial Therapy ◽

Cleveland Clinic ◽

Emergency Department Visits ◽

Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy ◽

Ed Visits ◽

Access Complications

Abstract Background Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) carries risk of vascular access complications, antimicrobial adverse effects, and worsening of infection. Both OPAT-related and unrelated events may lead to emergency department (ED) visits. The purpose of this study was to describe adverse events that result in ED visits and risk factors associated with ED visits during OPAT. Methods OPAT courses between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2016 at Cleveland Clinic were identified from the institution’s OPAT registry. ED visits within 30 days of OPAT initiation were reviewed. Reasons and potential risk factors for ED visits were sought in the medical record. Results Among 11,440 OPAT courses during the study period, 603 (5%) were associated with 1 or more ED visits within 30 days of OPAT initiation. Mean patient age was 58 years and 57% were males. 379 ED visits (49%) were OPAT-related; the most common visit reason was vascular access complication, which occurred in 211 (56%) of OPAT-related ED visits. The most common vascular access complications were occlusion and dislodgement, which occurred in 99 and 34 patients (47% and 16% of vascular access complications, respectively). In a multivariable logistic regression model, at least one prior ED visit in the preceding year (prior ED visit) was most strongly associated with one or more ED visits during an OPAT course (OR 2.96, 95% CI 2.38 – 3.71, p-value < 0.001). Other significant factors were younger age (p 0.01), female sex (p 0.01), home county residence (P < 0.001), and having a PICC (p 0.05). 549 ED visits (71%) resulted in discharge from the ED within 24 hours, 18 (2%) left against medical advice, 46 (6%) were observed up to 24 hours, and 150 ED visits (20%) led to hospital admission. Prior ED visit was not associated with hospital admission among patients who visited the ED during OPAT. Conclusion OPAT-related ED visits are most often due to vascular access complications, especially line occlusions. Patients with a prior ED visit in the preceding year have a 3-fold higher odds of at least one ED visit during OPAT compared with patients without a prior ED visit. A strategy of managing occlusions at home and a focus on patients with prior ED visits could potentially prevent a substantial proportion of OPAT-related ED visits. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Download Full-text

National Trends in Emergency Department Care Processes for Acute Myocardial Infarction in the United States, 2005 to 2015

Journal of the American Heart Association ◽

10.1161/jaha.120.017208 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (20) ◽

Author(s):

Akshay Pendyal ◽

Craig Rothenberg ◽

Jean E. Scofi ◽

Harlan M. Krumholz ◽

Basmah Safdar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myocardial Infarction ◽

Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽

Emergency Department ◽

Length Of Stay ◽

Real World ◽

The United States ◽

Emergency Department Care ◽

Care Processes ◽

Ed Visits

Background Despite investments to improve quality of emergency care for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), few studies have described national, real‐world trends in AMI care in the emergency department (ED). We aimed to describe trends in the epidemiology and quality of AMI care in US EDs over a recent 11‐year period, from 2005 to 2015. Methods and Results We conducted an observational study of ED visits for AMI using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a nationally representative probability sample of US EDs. AMI visits were classified as ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non‐STEMI. Outcomes included annual incidence of AMI, median ED length of stay, ED disposition type, and ED administration of evidence‐based medications. Annual ED visits for AMI decreased from 1 493 145 in 2005 to 581 924 in 2015. Estimated yearly incidence of ED visits for STEMI decreased from 1 402 768 to 315 813. The proportion of STEMI sent for immediate, same‐hospital catheterization increased from 12% to 37%. Among patients with STEMI sent directly for catheterization, median ED length of stay decreased from 62 to 37 minutes. ED administration of antithrombotic and nonaspirin antiplatelet agents rose for STEMI (23%–31% and 10%–27%, respectively). Conclusions National, real‐world trends in the epidemiology of AMI in the ED parallel those of clinical registries, with decreases in AMI incidence and STEMI proportion. ED care processes for STEMI mirror evolving guidelines that favor high‐intensity antiplatelet therapy, early invasive strategies, and regionalization of care.

Download Full-text

Emergency Department and Radiological Cost of Delayed Diagnosis of Cannabinoid Hyperemesis

Journal of Addiction ◽

10.1155/2019/1307345 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-4 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

David I. Zimmer ◽

Ross McCauley ◽

Varun Konanki ◽

Joseph Dynako ◽

Nuha Zackariya ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Emergency Department ◽

Delayed Diagnosis ◽

The United States ◽

Clinical Syndrome ◽

Cannabis Use ◽

Diagnostic Challenge ◽

High Clinical Suspicion ◽

Ed Visits ◽

Inappropriate Utilization ◽

Utilization Of Healthcare

Background. Chronic cannabis use has become prevalent with decriminalization, medical prescription, and recreational legalization in numerous US states. With this increasing incidence of chronic cannabis use a new clinical syndrome has become apparent in emergency departments and hospitals across the country, termed Cannabinoid Hyperemesis (CH). CH has been described as cyclical vomiting and abdominal pain in the setting of chronic cannabis use, which is often temporarily relieved by hot showers. CH presents a diagnostic challenge to clinicians who do not have a high clinical suspicion for the syndrome and can result in high costs and resource utilization for hospitals and patients. This study investigates the expenditures associated with delayed CH evaluation and delayed diagnosis. Methods. This is a retrospective observational study of 17 patients diagnosed with CH at three medical centers in the United States from 2010 to 2015, consisting of two academic centers and a community hospital. Emergency department (ED) costs were calculated and analyzed for patients eventually diagnosed with CH. Results. For the 17 patients treated, the total cost for combined ED visits and radiologic evaluations was an average of $76,920.92 per patient. On average these patients had 17.9 ED visits before the diagnosis of CH was made. Conclusion. CH provides a diagnostic challenge to clinicians without a high suspicion of the syndrome and may become increasingly prevalent with current trends toward cannabis legalization. The diagnosis of CH can be made primarily through a thorough history and physical examination. Awareness of this syndrome can save institutions money, prevent inappropriate utilization of healthcare resources, and save patients from unnecessary diagnostic tests.

Download Full-text