Costs of potentially preventable emergency department use during cancer treatment: A regional study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2-2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Panattoni ◽  
Catherine R. Fedorenko ◽  
Karma L. Kreizenbeck ◽  
Stuart Greenlee ◽  
Julia Rose Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Inpatient Stay ◽  
Regional Study ◽  
Emergency Department Use ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Western Washington ◽  
Significant Opportunity

2 Background: There is growing recognition that many emergency department (ED) visits during cancer treatment may be related to poorly controlled disease or treatment-related symptoms and could be prevented. An RCT using the Symptom Tracking and Reporting (STAR) tool for proactive symptom management decreased the percentage of patients admitted to the ED (34% vs. 41%; p=0.02). Little is known about the costs of potentially preventable ED visits in a community setting. This study examined the number and costs of ED visits and their associated diagnoses. Methods: Cancer registry records for patients in Western Washington from 2011 to 2015 were linked with claims from two regional commercial insurers. Patients diagnosed with a solid tumor and treated with chemotherapy or radiation were selected. All ED utilization was tracked for 1 year after the start of treatment. ED-related diagnoses codes were labeled “Potentially Preventable” (PP) if they mapped to the 13 symptom categories targeted by STAR (e.g. pain, nausea) and non-PP otherwise. Costs of ED visits were inflation-adjusted and include claims with ED-related procedure, revenue, and place of service codes. All subsequent inpatient costs were excluded, likely under-estimating total costs. Results: Of the 7,075 eligible patients, 2,543 (35.9%) visited the ED an average of 1.79 times. Pain (720 visits), Dyspnea (279 visits), and Nausea (232 visits) were the most common potentially preventable diagnoses; Hypertension (506 visits), Fever (230 visits), and Diabetes (215 visits) were the most common non-PP diagnoses. $1,134,254 (25.2% of the total ED costs) was spent on PP ED visits. Of PP ED visits 20.3% (178/875) resulted in an inpatient stay. Conclusions: In our community setting, at least one quarter of ED costs were potentially the result of poor symptom management. An investment in better symptom management has a significant opportunity to both improve cancer care and lower total costs.[Table: see text]

The role of chronic disease in the costs of potentially preventable emergency department use during treatment: A regional study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6505-6505 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Elizabeth Panattoni ◽  
Catherine R. Fedorenko ◽  
Karma L. Kreizenbeck ◽  
Stuart Greenlee ◽  
Julia Rose Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Healthcare Research ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Regional Study ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
One Year

6505 Background: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a quality metric for potentially preventable chemotherapy-associated emergency department (ED) use, effective in 2020. This metric excludes diagnoses with emerging evidence for outpatient management, such as proactive symptom management (PSM) and those for ambulatory care sensitive chronic conditions. Little is known about the intersection between potentially preventable ED visits due to cancer vs. other chronic disease. This study characterized the number and costs of ED visits during treatment. Methods: Western Washington cancer registry records from 2011- 2015 were linked with claims from two commercial insurers. Patients with newly diagnosed solid tumors undergoing initial treatment with chemotherapy or radiation were eligible. ED use was tracked one year post treatment initiation. ED diagnosis codes for fields 1-10 from the CMS metric and the PSM literature were labeled “Potentially Preventable” (Pp). Codes from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s Prevention Quality Indicators (PQI) for Chronic Conditions were labeled “Potentially Preventable-Chronic Disease” (PpChronic). Costs were adjusted to $2016. Results: Of the 7,053 eligible patients, 2,543 (36.1%) visited the ED (median # visits [IQR]: 1 [1-2]). The most commonly listed codes included Pain (1,054 visits) and Dyspnea (279 visits) for Pp, Hypertension-PQI (652 visits) and COPD-PQI (206 visits) for PpChronic, and Diabetes (247 visits) and Hyperlipidemia (181 visits) for the other codes. Spending on ED visits including both potentially preventable cancer and chronic disease diagnoses totalled $706,552 (20% of ED costs). Conclusions: One fifth of ED costs potentially resulted from simultaneous poor cancer symptom and chronic disease management. Future research should explore the role of chronic illness in categorizing which ED visits are potentially preventable during cancer treatment. [Table: see text]

Utilization of support services, emergency department, and hospital in advanced cancer patients with severe disease in a community cancer institute.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
Caitlyn McNaughton ◽  
Emily Gehron ◽  
Shanthi Sivendran ◽  
Rachel Holliday ◽  
Michael Horst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Support Services ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Hospital Utilization ◽  
Palliative Care Consultation ◽  
Care Consultation ◽  
Ed Visits

112 Background: Patients with advanced cancer are at high risk for emergency department (ED) and hospital utilization, which is distressing and costly. Palliative care consultation and symptom management clinics have been shown to decrease ED and hospital utilization, but the frequency and composition of these interventions is still being delineated. More evaluation is needed to determine practical approaches to implementing interdisciplinary management of distress for patients with advanced cancer in the community setting. This retrospective review evaluates healthcare utilization with respect to support services provided in our community based cancer institute. Methods: 157 patients with advanced cancer of lung, gastrointestinal, genitourinary or gynecologic origin diagnosed January 2015-December 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Descriptive data including demographics, disease characteristics, palliative care consultation, support services utilized and ED visits/hospitalizations were collected for 12 months, or to date of death. Support services included physician assistant–led symptom management, nurse navigator, social worker, nutrition, financial counselor, chaplain, and oncology clinical counselor. Support service referrals were made based on identified needs. Severe disease was defined as death within 6 months of diagnosis. Results: Patients with severe disease had a mean of 6 ED visits per year, significantly greater than patients with non-severe disease (p < 0.001). Patients with severe disease also had more contacts with support services per year (30.3 vs 9.1, p < 0.001). A palliative care consult was placed in 50% of patients with severe disease, and 23% in patients with non-severe disease (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with advanced cancer have evidence of significant needs as reflected by high healthcare utilization in the last 6 months of life. As needed involvement of support services correlated with severity of disease but did not result in decreased ED utilization or hospitalization. This suggests that availability of support services alone is not a feasible strategy to impact unplanned hospitalizations and ED visits.

scholarly journals Causes of early postpartum complications that result in visits to the emergency department

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e0260101
Author(s):  
Prabhpreet Hundal ◽  
Rahim Valani ◽  
Cassandra Quan ◽  
Shayan Assaie-Ardakany ◽  
Tanmay Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health System ◽  
Wound Care ◽  
Group B Streptococcus ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Postpartum Visit ◽  
Early Postpartum ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Group B

Objective This study aimed to review the reasons why postpartum women present to the emergency department (ED) over a short term (≤10 days post-delivery) and to identify the risk factors associated with early visits to the ED. Methods This retrospective chart review included all women who delivered at a regional health system (William Osler Health System, WOHS) in 2018 and presented to the WOHS ED within 10 days after delivery. Baseline descriptive statistics were used to examine the patient demographics and identify the timing of the postpartum visit. Univariate tests were used to identify significant predictors for admission. A multivariate model was developed based on backward selection from these significant factors to identify admission predictors. Results There were 381 visits identified, and the average age of the patients was 31.22 years (SD: 4.83), with median gravidity of 2 (IQR: 1–3). Most patients delivered via spontaneous vaginal delivery (53.0%). The median time of presentation to the ED was 5.0 days, with the following most common reasons: abdominal pain (21.5%), wound-related issues (12.6%), and urinary issues (9.7%). Delivery during the weekend (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.00–3.65, P = 0.05) was predictive of admission while Group B Streptococcus positive patients were less likely to be admitted (OR 0.22, CI 0.05–0.97, P<0.05) Conclusions This was the first study in a busy community setting that examined ED visits over a short postpartum period. Patient education on pain management and wound care can reduce the rate of early postpartum ED visits.

scholarly journals P097: The emergency department experience for patients and caregivers referred from an outpatient oncology clinic

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S99-S100
Author(s):  
M. Freymond ◽  
E. O'Connor
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Symptom Management ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Phenomenological Study ◽  
Toronto General Hospital ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Academic Hospital ◽  
Timely Manner ◽  
Common Process ◽  
Ed Visits

Introduction: Outpatient oncology clinics have become the mainstay of cancer treatment, but their limited services and hours of operation often lead to emergency department (ED) referrals. With Canada's aging population and cancer survival rates improving, cancer-related ED visits are becoming a significant aspect of emergency medicine. A cancer-related visit to the ED is associated with unique challenges for patients, their caregivers and clinicians. This study focuses on understanding the ED experience of patients and their caregivers sent from an outpatient oncology clinic to a separate affiliated large academic hospital. Methods: A descriptive, phenomenological study of interviews was conducted using the method of Giorgi. The sample included 12 participants (n = 9 patients, 3 caregivers) referred to the ED at a large academic hospital (i.e., Toronto General Hospital, TGH) following a same-day outpatient oncology appointment at an affiliated cancer centre (i.e., Princess Margaret Hospital, PMH). Interviews continued until thematic saturation. All transcripts were analyzed by 2 reviewers with bracketing to ensure accuracy. Results: Four themes were identified from analysis: (1) communication; (2) expectations; (3) care and symptom management and (4) potential improvements. Overall patients and caregivers felt communication between PMH and TGH, and from providers could have been better. Many felt there was a break-down in communication as they did not expect to go through the usual ED triage process, which caused additional anxiety and frustration with the wait times. The majority felt their symptoms were managed in a timely manner and reported the staff to be friendly, caring and professional; however, often felt forgotten and anxious due to a lack of “checking-in”. Their experience could have been improved by receiving more information on the process, a more welcoming environment and separate waiting area or private room for those who are immunocompromised. Conclusion: Although referral from an outpatient oncology clinic to the ED of an affiliated hospital is a common process within Canada, this is the first study to explore the patient and caregiver experience. Understanding the patient and caregiver experience is valuable for identifying quality improvement initiatives. Our analysis revealed the patient and caregiver experience could be improved with better communication and expectation setting regarding the ED process before and throughout the visit.

scholarly journals Association of Patients’ Perception of Primary Care Provider Listening With Emergency Department Use

PRiMER ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie Hinderaker ◽  
Amanda Weinmann
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
California Health Interview Survey ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Emergency Department Use ◽  
Younger Age ◽  
Interview Survey ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
African American Race

Introduction: This study examined whether patients’ perceptions of their primary care providers’ (PCP) listening frequency were associated with emergency department (ED) utilization, including a comparison to patients without PCPs. Methods: Data were obtained from the 2015 California Health Interview Survey. Respondents were asked if they had a PCP and how often their PCPs listened, resulting in five groups: patients without a PCP (n=4,407), and patients with a PCP who perceived the PCP’s listening frequency to be never (n=254), sometimes (n=1,282), usually (n=3,440), or always (n=11,651). Multiple linear regression was performed to determine if patient-perceived listening frequency of the PCP was associated with the patient’s number of ED visits in the prior year, adjusting for various demographic, social, and health factors. Results: Compared to patients without a PCP, patients with a PCP had on average 0.15 more ED visits in a year, highest among those whose PCPs were perceived as listening the least: never=0.55 more visits per year (95% CI: 0.09-1.02, P=.02), sometimes=0.26 (0.01-0.51, P=.04), usually=0.03 (-0.17-0.24, P=.73), and always=0.16 (-0.05-0.36, P=.13). Other significant increases in ED visits were associated with public insurance, African-American race, English proficiency, younger age, self-rated fair-to-poor health, asthma, and hypertension. Conclusions: Patients who perceived their PCP as listening less frequently had more ED visits than patients whose PCPs were perceived as listening more frequently, and compared to patients without a PCP.

A solution to reducing avoidable emergency department visits: Implementation of an outpatient oncology acute care clinic.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13517-e13517
Author(s):  
Sadaf Charania ◽  
Judy Devlin ◽  
Edie Brucker ◽  
Shayna Simon ◽  
Christine Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Ed Visits

e13517 Background: Emergency Department (ED) utilization by oncology patients accounts for more than 4.5 million visits in the United States annually, leading to hospitalization four times the rate of the general population.1,2 Many ED visits are the result of symptoms related to cancer or cancer treatment that can be managed on an outpatient basis. Unnecessary admissions lead to possible delays in cancer treatment and increased burden on healthcare resources.3 Simmons Acute Care (SAC), an advanced practice provider (APP)-led clinic, was established in August 2020 to provide an alternative model of oncology care to address these issues. Methods: A multidisciplinary team of key stakeholders was formed to develop an action plan. Institutional data was reviewed to identify the timing and volume of ED visits by oncology patients. Clinic hours were set Monday through Friday, 7:00am – 7:00pm, and referrals were made from primary oncology providers. Evidence-based clinical pathways were developed to standardize patient management, and a data collection plan was implemented to measure outcomes. Internal communications to patients and presentations at staff and faculty meetings occurred to inform patients and clinical staff/providers. Results: From August to December 2020, 165 patient visits were completed in SAC, 141 patients discharged home, 14 patients directly admitted to the hospital, and 10 patients transferred to the ED for a higher level of care. Based on data from 2020, the average cost of an ED visit for an oncology patient was $5,500 and increased to $28,500 if the patient is admitted. Patients with hematologic and gastrointestinal malignancies represented approximately 30% of all visits. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most frequent presenting chief complaint. Conclusions: Supporting oncology patients in the ambulatory setting provided a reduction in admissions and unnecessary ED visits, leading to cost savings/avoidance to the patient and health system. Based on internal cost analyses, there are potential savings of over $2 million to the organization during this 5-month period. Additional studies are underway to assess patient satisfaction, as well as the economic impact for patients. 1. Rui PKK. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2015 emergency department summary tables. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web_tables/2015_ed_web_tables.pdf 2. Hong AS, Froehlich T, Clayton Hobbs S, Lee SJC, Halm EA. Impact of a Cancer Urgent Care Clinic on Regional Emergency Department Visits. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15(6):e501-e509. doi:10.1200/JOP.18.00743 3. Roy M, Halbert B, Devlin S, Chiu D, Graue R, Zerillo JA. From metrics to practice: identifying preventable emergency department visits for patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer. Published online November 7, 2020. doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05874-3

Clinic level variation in emergency department and inpatient utilization in a community setting.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 226-226
Author(s):  
Laura Panattoni ◽  
Catherine R. Fedorenko ◽  
Karma L. Kreizenbeck ◽  
Stuart Greenlee ◽  
Julia Rose Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Score Test ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Level Variation ◽  
Practice Characteristics ◽  
Inpatient Utilization ◽  
Specific Stage ◽  
Western Washington

226 Background: Early studies of the oncology medical home suggest that intensive outpatient care (e.g. 24-hour phone triage, same-day infusion) reduces emergency department (ED) and inpatient (IP) use during cancer treatment. Little is known about which services are most cost-effective. One strategy is to measure observed variation in ED and IP rates to pinpoint care features associated with low-use clinics. This study examined clinic-level variation in ED and IP use in a community setting. Methods: Cancer registry records for Western Washington from 2011 to 2015 were linked with claims from two regional commercial insurers. Included patients were diagnosed with breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer and treated with chemotherapy or radiation. All ED and IP use was tracked 1 year after treatment start using claims data. Observed clinic rates were measured as the percentage of patients with 1 or more visits. Expected clinic rates were determined from regional average rates weighted by clinic’s cancer-specific stage mix. Observed-to-expected clinic ratios were calculated and the Wilson Score test (95% CI) was used to determine statistically different rates. Results: The 18 clinics included 4,558 eligible patients (median 196 pts/clinic; range: 35-859). Unstaged lung patients had the highest ED rates (38.5%); unstaged breast had the lowest (13.3%). The highest IP rate was among unstaged colorectal (66.7%); the lowest in local breast (11.1%). One clinic had an observed rate that was significantly above its expected rate in both ED only and ED to IP. One clinic was significantly below its expected rate in both ED to IP and IP only. Conclusions: Even after adjusting for cancer-specific stage, there was sizable clinic-level variation in the percentage of patients visiting the ED or IP. Investigation into care delivery features and practice characteristics, along with further risk adjustment, may yield insights into best practices and identify clinics for intervention. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Characterizing Potentially Preventable Cancer- and Chronic Disease–Related Emergency Department Use in the Year After Treatment Initiation: A Regional Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. e176-e185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Panattoni ◽  
Catherine Fedorenko ◽  
Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman ◽  
Karma Kreizenbeck ◽  
Julia R. Walker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Treatment Initiation ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Regional Study ◽  
Cancer Symptoms ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Ed Visits

Purpose: As new quality metrics and interventions for potentially preventable emergency department (ED) visits are implemented, we sought to compare methods for evaluating the prevalence and costs of potentially preventable ED visits that were related to cancer and chronic disease among a commercially insured oncology population in the year after treatment initiation. Methods: We linked SEER records in western Washington from 2011 to 2016 with claims from two commercial insurers. The study included patients who were diagnosed with a solid tumor and tracked ED utilization for 1 year after the start of chemotherapy or radiation. Cancer symptoms from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services metric and a patient-reported outcome intervention were labeled potentially preventable (PpCancer). Prevention Quality Indicators of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality were labeled potentially preventable–chronic disease (PpChronic). We reported the primary diagnosis, all diagnosis field coding (1 to 10), and 2016 adjusted reimbursements. Results: Of 5,853 eligible patients, 27% had at least one ED visit, which yielded 2,400 total visits. Using primary diagnosis coding, 49.8% of ED visits had a PpCancer diagnosis, whereas 3.2% had a PpChronic diagnosis. Considering all diagnosis fields, 45.0%, 9.4%, and 18.5% included a PpCancer only, a PpChronic only, and both a PpCancer and a PpChronic diagnosis, respectively. The median reimbursement per visit was $735 (interquartile ratio, $194 to $1,549). Conclusion: The prevalence of potentially preventable ED visits was generally high, but varied depending on the diagnosis code fields and the group of codes considered. Future research is needed to understand the complex landscape of potentially preventable ED visits and measures to improve value in cancer care delivery.

scholarly journals A 5 year retrospective study of emergency department use in Northwest Ontario: a measure of mental health and addictions needs

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 381-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai-lei Matsumoto ◽  
Terry O’Driscoll ◽  
Jennifer Lawrance ◽  
Andre Jakubow ◽  
Sharen Madden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health Centre ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Emergency Department Use ◽  
Diagnostic Categories ◽  
Frequency Of Use ◽  
Ed Visits

AbstractObjectiveThe main objective of this study was to understand the five-year trend in total emergency department (ED) visits, frequency of use, and diagnoses and disposition of patients. Since the region has experienced a profound increase in opioid use disorder since 2009, we were particularly interested in changes in the volume of mental health and addiction (MHA) ED presentations.MethodsRetrospective aggregate data analysis of ED visits to the Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre 2010-2014.ResultsED visit volume increased 29% over the five-year study period, while MHA ED visits increased 73%. The admission rate remained stable at 6.9% of ED visits. Five-year trends in clinically grouped diagnostic categories identified respiratory, MHA, and abdominal/pelvic complaints as the three most common ED presentations. In 2014, MHA presentations accounted for 10.3% of ED visits, 8.7% of admissions, and 20.0% of inter-hospital transfers.ConclusionThe dramatic increase in MHA ED visits mirrors the opioid epidemic the region is experiencing. MHA may soon become the commonest ED presentation. If reasons for ED visits serve as a proxy for unmet outpatient needs, increased efforts at developing community MHA services and addressing the related social determinants of health are required.

scholarly journals Healthcare Use After Buprenorphine Prescription in a Community Emergency Department: A Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1270-1275
Author(s):  
Tinh Le ◽  
Parker Cordial ◽  
Mackenzie Sankoe ◽  
Charlotte Purnode ◽  
Ankur Parekh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Physician ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Similar Time ◽  
Initiation Point ◽  
Medication Assisted Treatment ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Ed Visits

Introduction: Recent studies from urban academic centers have shown the promise of emergency physician-initiated buprenorphine for improving outcomes in opioid use disorder (OUD) patients. We investigated whether emergency physician-initiated buprenorphine in a rural, community setting decreases subsequent healthcare utilization for OUD patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a community hospital emergency department (ED) who received a prescription for buprenorphine from June 15, 2018–June 15, 2019. Demographic and opioid-related International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, (ICD-10) codes were documented and used to create a case-matched control cohort of demographically matched patients who presented in a similar time frame with similar ICD-10 codes but did not receive buprenorphine. We recorded 12-month rates of ED visits, all-cause hospitalizations, and opioid overdoses. Differences in event occurrences between groups were assessed with Poisson regression. Results: Overall 117 patients were included in the study: 59 who received buprenorphine vs 58 controls. The groups were well matched, both roughly 90% White and 60% male, with an average age of 33.4 years for both groups. Controls had a median two ED visits (range 0-33), median 0.5 hospitalizations (range 0-8), and 0 overdoses (range 0-3), vs median one ED visit (range 0-8), median 0 hospitalizations (range 0-4), and median 0 overdoses (range 0-3) in the treatment group. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for counts of ED visits was 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49, 0.75, favoring medication-assisted treatment (MAT). For hospitalizations, IRR was 0.34, 95% CI, 0.22, 0.52 favoring MAT, and for overdoses was 1.04, 95% CI, 0.53, 2.07. Conclusion: Initiation of buprenorphine by ED providers was associated with lower 12-month ED visit and all-cause hospitalization rates with comparable overdose rates compared to controls. These findings show the ED’s potential as an initiation point for medication-assisted treatment in OUD patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document