P.111 Initial validation of symptom scores derived from the Orthostatic Discriminant and Severity Scale

Background: To develop a scale to quantify and discriminate orthostatic from non-orthostatic symptoms. We present initial validation and reliability of orthostatic and non-orthostatic symptom scores taken from the Orthostatic Discriminate and Severity Scale (ODSS). Methods: Validity and reliability were assessed in participants with and without orthostatic intolerance. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating symptoms scores with previously validated tools (Autonomic Symptom Profile (ASP) and the Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire (OHQ)). Clinical validity was assessed by correlating scores against standardized autonomic testing. Test-retest reliability was calculated using an intra-class correlation coefficient. Results:Convergent Validity: Orthostatic (OS) and Non-Orthostatic (NS) Symptom Scores from 77 controls and 67 patients with orthostatic intolerance were highly correlated with both the Orthostatic Intolerance index of the ASP (OS:r=0.903;NS:r=0.651; p<0.001) and the OHQ: (OS:r=0.800;NS:r=0.574; p<0.001). Clinical Validity: Symptom Scores were significantly correlated with the blood pressure change during head-up tilt (OS:r=-0.445;NS:r=-0.354; p<0.001). Patients with orthostatic intolerance had significantly higher symptom scores compared to controls (OS:66.5±18.1 vs. 17.4±12.9; NS:19.9±11.3 vs. 10.2±6.8; p<0.001, respectively). Test-retest reliability: Both symptom scores were highly reliable (OS:r=0.956;NS:r=0.574, respectively; p<0.001) with an internal consistency of 0.978 and 0.729, respectively. Conclusions: Our initial results demonstrate that the ODSS is capable of producing valid and reliable Orthostatic and Non-Orthostatic Symptom Scores.

Download Full-text

P.032 Development of a new instrument to discriminate orthostatic from non-orthostatic symptoms

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques ◽

10.1017/cjn.2016.136 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 43 (S2) ◽

pp. S29-S29

Author(s):

J Baker ◽

J Racosta ◽

K Kimpinski

Keyword(s):

Orthostatic Hypotension ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Orthostatic Intolerance ◽

Clinical Validity ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Symptom Profile ◽

New Instrument ◽

Orthostatic Symptoms ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Background: Orthostatic symptoms including dizziness, light-headedness and syncope can be major causes of disability in patients with dysautonomia. Currently there is no validated tool capable of discriminating orthostatic from non-orthostatic constitutional symptoms. Therefore, we developed the Orthostatic Discriminant and Severity Scale (ODSS) to help make this distinction. Objective: Demonstrate validity and reliability of the ODSS. Methods: Convergent and clinical validity were assessed by correlating Orthostatic scores with previously validated tools (Autonomic Symptom Profile (ASP), composite scores of the Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire and the total Composite Autonomic Severity Score (tCASS), respectively). Test-retest reliability was calculated using an intra-class correlation coefficient. Results: Orthostatic scores from 23 controls and 5 patients were highly correlated with both the Orthostatic Intolerance index of the ASP (r=0.724;p<0.01) and the composite OHDAS and OHSAS (r=0.552;p<0.01 and r=0.753;p<0.01, respectively), indicating good convergent validity. Orthostatic scores were significantly correlated with tCASS (r=0.568;p<0.01), and the systolic blood pressure change during head-up tilt (r=-0.472;p=0.013). In addition, patients with Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension had significantly higher Orthostatic scores than controls (p<0.01) indicating good clinical validity. Test-retest reliability was strong (r=0.954;p<0.01) with an internal consistency of 0.978. Conclusions: Our results, though preliminary, provide empiral evidence that the ODSS is capable of producing a valid and reliable orthostatic score.

Download Full-text

Validity and reliability of the Mandarin version of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire among stroke patients in Mainland China

Family Practice ◽

10.1093/fampra/cmab004 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Qi Zhang ◽

Ke Zhang ◽

Miao Li ◽

Jiaxin Gu ◽

Xintong Li ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Reliability And Validity ◽

Therapeutic Interventions ◽

Treatment Burden ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Objectives To examine the validity and reliability of the Mandarin version of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) among stroke patients. Background Stroke patients need long-term management of symptoms and life situation, and treatment burden has recently emerged as a new concept that can influence the health outcomes during the rehabilitation process. Methods The convenience sampling method was used to recruit 187 cases of stroke patients in a tertiary grade hospital in Tianjin for a formal investigation. Item analysis, reliability and validity tests were carried out. The reliability test included internal consistency and test–retest reliability. And as well as content, structure and convergent validity were performed for the validity test. Results Of the 187 completed questionnaires, only 180 (96.3%) were suitable for analysis. According to the experts’ evaluation, the I-CVI of each item was from 0.833 to 1.000, and the S-CVI was 0.967. The exploratory factor analysis yielded three-factor components with a cumulative variation of 53.054%. Convergent validity was demonstrated using measures of Morisky’s Medication Adherence Scale 8 (r = –0.450, P < 0.01). All correlations between items and global scores ranged from 0.403 to 0.638. Internal consistency reliability and test–retest reliability were found to be acceptable, as indicated by a Cronbach’s α of 0.824 and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.846, respectively. Conclusions The Mandarin TBQ had acceptable validity and reliability. The use of TBQ in the assessment of treatment burden of stroke survivor may benefit health resources allocation and provide tailor therapeutic interventions to construct minimally disruptive care.

Download Full-text

RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIOS FOR ESTIMATING WILLINGNESS TO PAY (WTP) PER QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR (QALY) IN INDONESIA SETTING

International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences ◽

10.22159/ijpps.2017v9i12.22657 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 9 (12) ◽

pp. 288

Author(s):

Susi Ari Kristina ◽

Dwi Endarti ◽

Tri Murti Andayani ◽

M. Rifqi Rokhman

Keyword(s):

Sensitivity And Specificity ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Terminal Illness ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Treatment Scenario ◽

Predictive Values ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Group Validity ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Objective: To estimate validity and reliability of WTP questionnaire which WTP value can be taken as an indication of the monetary value of health gains, which may carry information regarding the appropriate height of the cost-effectiveness threshold.Methods: Three hundred respondents, in Yogyakarta province, Indonesia, were interviewed during June 2017. We examine a value of WTP associated with the following scenarios: 1) improving moderate condition; 2) extending life during terminal illness, and 3) lifesaving. The interview ascertained maximum hypothetical WTP for one QALY using a dichotomous bidding format with an open-ended final question, along with questions about the socio-economic factors. Concerning validity, the WTP of the 3 versions of hypothetical scenarios were compared as known-group validity and analysis of the sensitivity and specificity was performed. Test-retest reliability and alpha Cronbach were employed to measure internal consistency.Results: Analysis generally confirmed the validity and reliability of the WTP hypothetical scenarios. In terms of known group validity, there was significant difference across two scenarios (treatment v. s lifesaving), but no significant difference between mean WTP for treatment and terminal illness was found. Mean WTP for terminal illness (38 Million IDR) and lifesaving scenario (16 Million IDR) was significantly higher than that of treatment scenario (14 Million IDR). The WTP instrument showed good convergent validity (r=0.784), when comparing correlation between WTP value and utility score. Estimation of scenario’s sensitivity and specificity in deriving expected WTP were 70.33 % and 38.98 %, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 64 % and 46 %. The test-retest reliability of WTP values indices excellent stability and reliability of the instrument with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient of 0.816 (p<0.001)Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the WTP instrument is feasible and relatively reliable for measuring the WTP values in Indonesia. For wider application of the instrument, its validity should be investigated further. Meanwhile, adoption of WTP as an empirical evidence of societal values is encouraged.

Download Full-text

Validity and Reliability of the Community Balance and Mobility Scale in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis

Physical Therapy ◽

10.2522/ptj.20130385 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 94 (6) ◽

pp. 866-874 ◽

Cited By ~ 32

Author(s):

Judit Takacs ◽

S. Jayne Garland ◽

Mark G. Carpenter ◽

Michael A. Hunt

Keyword(s):

Knee Osteoarthritis ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Dynamic Balance ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Correlation Coefficients ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Knee Oa ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Background There is a high incidence of falls in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Adequate dynamic balance and mobility reduce the risk of falls; however, there are currently no validated, advanced tests of dynamic balance and mobility for individuals with knee OA. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine the convergent validity, known-groups validity, and test-retest reliability of a dynamic test of balance and mobility, the Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB&M), in a knee OA population. Design A cross-sectional design was used. Methods Twenty-five individuals aged 50 years and older with medial knee OA and an equal number of healthy controls completed the CB&M and other tests of balance and mobility, including the Berg Balance Scale, the Timed “Up & Go” Test, a test of maximal single-leg stance time, and the 10-Meter Walk Test (self-selected and fast walking speed). Convergent validity of balance tests with the CB&M was assessed using Pearson product moment correlation coefficients, and known-groups validity was assessed using independent t tests. Test-retest reliability of the CB&M was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Results Scores on the CB&M were significantly correlated with all measures of balance and mobility for those with knee OA. There were significant differences in CB&M scores between groups. Scores on the CB&M were highly reliable in people with knee OA (ICC=.95, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]=0.70 to 0.99; SEM=3, 95% CI=2.68 to 4.67). Limitations Few participants had severe knee OA. Conclusions The CB&M displayed moderate convergent validity, excellent known-groups validity, and high test-retest reliability. The CB&M can be used as a valid and reliable tool to assess dynamic balance and mobility deficits in people with knee OA.

Download Full-text

Validity and reliability of the novel thyroid-specific quality of life questionnaire, ThyPRO

Acta Endocrinologica ◽

10.1530/eje-09-0521 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 162 (1) ◽

pp. 161-167 ◽

Cited By ~ 80

Author(s):

Torquil Watt ◽

Laszlo Hegedüs ◽

Mogens Groenvold ◽

Jakob Bue Bjorner ◽

Åse Krogh Rasmussen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Life Questionnaire ◽

Clinical Validity ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Good Test ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Test Retest Reliability

BackgroundAppropriate scale validity and internal consistency reliability have recently been documented for the new thyroid-specific quality of life (QoL) patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for benign thyroid disorders, the ThyPRO. However, before clinical use, clinical validity and test–retest reliability should be evaluated.AimTo investigate clinical (‘known-groups’) validity and test–retest reliability of the Danish version of the ThyPRO.MethodsFor each of the 13 ThyPRO scales, we defined groups expected to have high versus low scores (‘known-groups’). The clinical validity (known-groups validity) was evaluated by whether the ThyPRO scales could detect expected differences in a cross-sectional study of 907 thyroid patients. Test–retest reliability was evaluated by intra-class correlations of two responses to the ThyPRO 2 weeks apart in a subsample of 87 stable patients.ResultsOn all 13 ThyPRO scales, we found substantial and significant differences between the groups expected to have high versus low scores. Test–retest reliability was above 0.70 (range 0.77–0.89) for all scales, which is usually considered necessary for comparisons among patient groups, but below 0.90, which is the usual threshold for use in individual patients.ConclusionWe found support for the clinical validity of the new thyroid-specific QoL questionnaire, ThyPRO, and evidence of good test–retest reliability. The questionnaire is now ready for use in clinical studies of patients with thyroid diseases.

Download Full-text

Translation and Validation of The EORTC QLQ-BR45 Among Ethiopian Breast Cancer Patients

10.21203/rs.3.rs-871640/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Mikiyas Amare Getu ◽

Panpan Wang ◽

Eva Johanna Kantelhardt ◽

Edom Seife ◽

Changying Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Scaling Analysis ◽

Breast Cancer Patients ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Internal Reliability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Eortc Qlq ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Objective This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the EORTC QLQ-BR45 questionnaire.Methods This study included 248 breast cancer patients who completed the QLQ-BR45 and QLQ-C30 questionnaires. The internal reliability, test-retest reliability, and the content, concurrent, convergent, divergent, and clinical validity of the tool were examined. The statistical analyses included Cronbach’s α coefficient, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, standardised response mean residual (SRMR), comparative fit index (CFI), t-test, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). Result All items were marked as relevant, and item-level content validity index (I-CVI) scores ranged from 0.83 to 1. The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.80 for all domains. All subscales met the minimal standards of reliability except the arm symptom scale (0.66). The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.77 for all domains. Seven out of the 12 hypothesised scales showed positive correlations (r > 0.40) between the QLQ-BR45 and QLQ-C30 scales. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that the item-scale correlations exceeded the 0.40 criterion for item-convergent validity for 11 of the 12 hypothesised scales. The correlation coefficients between an item and its own subscale were significantly higher than with other subscales.Conclusion The EORTC QLQ-BR45 had good reliability and validity, and it can be used to measure the quality of life of breast cancer patients in Ethiopia.

Download Full-text

Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale-2

Parkinson s Disease ◽

10.1155/2021/2015123 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 2021 ◽

pp. 1-5

Author(s):

Mohammad Taghi Joghataei ◽

Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad ◽

Maryam Mehdizadeh ◽

Sepideh Goudarzi ◽

Sayed Amir Hasan Habibi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Parkinson’S Disease ◽

Parkinson's Disease ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Convergent Validity ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Depression Scale ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Persian Version ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Objective. Sleep problems are nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease that should be carefully evaluated for better management and treatment. Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS-2) is one of the most reliable tools for measuring sleep difficulties in people with Parkinson’s disease. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Persian version of PDSS-2. Methods. Four hundred and fifty-six people with Parkinson’s disease with a mean age ±standard deviation of 60.7 ± 11.3 years were engaged in this study. Acceptability was assessed by floor and ceiling effects. Dimensionality was measured by exploratory factor analysis. The convergent validity of PDSS-2 with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was assessed. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed with Cronbach’s alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Results. No noticeable ceiling and floor effect was detected. The dimensionality analysis showed three factors. A high correlation was obtained between PDSS-2 and HADS (anxiety subscale). Excellent internal consistency with α = 0.94, and good test-retest reliability with ICC = 0.89 were obtained. Conclusion. This study showed that the Persian version of Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale has acceptable validity and reliability for measuring sleep disturbances in people with Parkinson’s disease.

Download Full-text

Test–retest reliability and convergent validity of the test of nonverbal intelligence-fourth edition in patients with schizophrenia

BMC Psychiatry ◽

10.1186/s12888-021-03041-4 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Kuan-Wei Chen ◽

Ya-Chen Lee ◽

Tzu-Ying Yu ◽

Li-Jung Cheng ◽

Chien-Yu Chao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Convergent Validity ◽

Fluid Intelligence ◽

Stable Condition ◽

Practice Effect ◽

Minimal Detectable Change ◽

Nonverbal Intelligence ◽

Fourth Edition ◽

Random Measurement Error ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background Fluid intelligence deficits affect executive functioning and social behaviors in patients with schizophrenia. To help clinicians manage fluid intelligence deficits, a psychometrically sound measure is needed. The purposes of this study were to examine the test–retest reliability and convergent validity of the Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-Fourth Edition (TONI-4) assessing fluid intelligence in patients with schizophrenia. Methods A total of 103 patients with stable condition were assessed with the TONI-4 twice with a 4-week interval to examine the test–retest reliability. We further used the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Tablet-Based Symbol Digit Modalities Test (T-SDMT) to examine the convergent validity of the TONI-4. Results The intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.73 for the TONI-4. The percentages of standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change for the TONI-4 were 5.1 and 14.2%, respectively. The practice effect of the TONI-4 was small (Cohen’s d = − 0.03). Convergent validity showed small to moderate significant correlations between the TONI-4 and the MoCA as well as the T-SDMT (r = 0.35, p = .011 with the T-SDMT and r = 0.61, p < .001 with the MoCA). The results demonstrated that the TONI-4 had good test–retest reliability, limited random measurement error, and a trivial practice effect. The convergent validity of the TONI-4 was good. Conclusions These findings indicate that the TONI-4 has potential to be a reliable and valid assessment of fluid intelligence in patients with schizophrenia.

Download Full-text

Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Patient Dignity Inventory

Palliative & Supportive Care ◽

10.1017/s1478951521000948 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-8

Author(s):

Yasemin Eskigülek ◽

Sultan Kav

Keyword(s):

Palliative Care ◽

Factor Analysis ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Turkish Version ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Fit Index ◽

Turkish Society

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and reliability of the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) in the Turkish society, which was developed to evaluate dignity-related distress in palliative care patients. Methods One hundred and twenty-seven adults with advanced cancer hospitalized in several clinics of two university hospitals were included in the study. The patients whose Palliative Performance Scale score was at least 40% were recruited to study. The data were collected with a patient demographic form, the Turkish version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-TR), and the Turkish version of the PDI (PDI-TR). The PDI-TR was finalized and back-translated after translating into Turkish and obtaining 10 expert opinions. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, concurrent validity, and test–retest reliability analysis were performed. Results The Cronbach's α coefficient of PDI-TR was 0.94. Factor analysis resulted in a five-factor solution, and all items were loaded on factors. Factors were labeled as symptom distress, existential distress, self-confidence, dependency, and supportive care needs and accounted for 68.70% of the overall variance. The model's normed fit index, comparative fit index, and X2/SD were found between acceptable range (0.90, 0.93, and 2.64, respectively). A positive and strong correlation was found between subdimension scores of HADS-TR and the total score of PDI-TR (r = 0.70 for anxiety subdimension; r = 0.73 for depression subdimension). The test–retest reliability was conducted with 32 patients within the sample two weeks after the first application, and no significant difference was found between the two application scores as the result of paired-sample t-test (p > 0.05). An intraclass correlation coefficient of test–retest reliability was r = 0.855. Significance of results PDI-TR was found to be a valid and reliable tool in palliative care patients in Turkish society.

Download Full-text

Criterion validity and reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire – Hungarian short form against the RM42 accelerometer

BMC Public Health ◽

10.1186/s12889-021-10372-0 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (S1) ◽

Author(s):

Pongrác Ács ◽

Réka Veress ◽

Paulo Rocha ◽

Tamás Dóczi ◽

Bence László Raposa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Physical Activity ◽

Concurrent Validity ◽

International Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽

Short Form ◽

Sitting Time ◽

Validity And Reliability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Activity Questionnaire

Abstract Background Physical inactivity is a global phenomenon in European welfare countries. Proper monitoring is essential to measure the physical activity level of the population. Methods In the Hungarian cohort of the European Physical Activity and Sport Monitoring System (EUPASMOS) project, our participants (N = 598) completed sociodemographic questions and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire – short form (IPAQ-SF) survey. The validity and reliability of the subjective measurement tool were examined, IPAQ-SF outcomes were contrasted against triaxial RM42 accelerometer wore for 7 consecutive days. Results The IPAQ-SF showed moderate internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha = 0.647). The concurrent validity of the IPAQ-SF to triaxial accelerometer indicated a significant weak-to-moderate correlation (R = 0.111–0.338, p = 0.042; p < 0.001). The test-retest reliability showed a significant correlation between two measurements (R = 0.788–0.981, p < 0.001). Conclusion The Hungarian version of the IPAQ-SF had excellent test-retest reliability, but low-to-fair concurrent validity for moderate and vigorous physical activity, walking and sitting time, as compared to the objective criterion measure among Hungarian adults.

Download Full-text