B.03 Clinical utility of critical care EEG monitoring in a Canadian paediatric centre

Background: Continuous electroencephalographic (cEEG) monitoring is essential to diagnosing non-convulsive seizures (NCS), reported to occur in 7-46% of at-risk critically ill patients. However, cEEG is labour-intensive, and given scarcity of resources at most centres cEEG is feasible in only selected patients. We aim to evaluate the clinical utility of cEEG at our centre in order to optimize further cEEG allocation among critically ill patients. Methods: Using a clinical database, we identified critically ill children who underwent cEEG monitoring in 2016, 2017 and 2018. We abstracted underlying diagnoses, indication for cEEG monitoring, cEEG findings, and associated changes in management. Results: Over this three year period, 928 cEEGs were performed. Among the 100 studies analyzed to date, primary indications for monitoring were characterization of events of unclear etiology (32%), diagnosis of NCS (30%), and monitoring of therapy for seizures (17%). Seizures were captured in 31% of patients (22% subclinical only, 5% electroclinical only, 4% both), which resulted in a treatment change in 90% of cases. Non-epileptic events were captured in 26% of patients. Conclusions: cEEG yielded clinically meaningful information in 57% of cases, frequently resulting in management changes. Subgroup analyses by cEEG indication and ICU location will be presented.

Download Full-text

P.046 Increasing EEG monitoring in the pediatric ICU - benefits and barriers

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques ◽

10.1017/cjn.2019.146 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 46 (s1) ◽

pp. S26

Author(s):

J Ghossein ◽

F Alnaji ◽

D Pohl

Keyword(s):

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Medical Records ◽

Consensus Statement ◽

Educational Interventions ◽

Critically Ill Children ◽

Eeg Monitoring ◽

Continuous Eeg ◽

Convulsive Seizures ◽

Pediatric Icu

Background: Non-convulsive seizures are common in critically ill patients and are best detected by continuous EEG (cEEG) monitoring. A recent consensus statement from the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS) outlines the indications for EEG monitoring in critically ill patients. Our aim was to assess adherence to these indications, barriers to cEEG utilization as well as to optimize cEEG monitoring in critically ill children. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of electronic medical records, analyzing patients admitted to the PICU from January 1st until June 23rd 2018, followed by an 8-week mentorship period, consisting of educational interventions as well as daily patient rounds to help identify patients meeting cEEG monitoring criteria. Results: Prevalence of patients meeting cEEG monitoring indications were similar in both the retrospective and mentorship period (18% vs. 23%). During the retrospective period, 23% of patients received cEEG monitoring, reaching 100% at the end of the mentorship period. The median delay for initiation of monitoring was 17 hours, largely due to restrictions in the availability of technologists. All cEEGs performed informed anti-convulsive management. Conclusions: An educational intervention was effective in increasing PICU cEEG monitoring. However, limited hours of technologist availability represented the largest barrier to timely cEEG monitoring.

Download Full-text

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Time to Weaning Off the Invasive Mechanical Ventilator among Patients with COVID-19 Pneumonia

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10132935 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (13) ◽

pp. 2935

Author(s):

Jose Bordon ◽

Ozan Akca ◽

Stephen Furmanek ◽

Rodrigo Silva Cavallazzi ◽

Sally Suliman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽

Critical Illness ◽

Respiratory Distress Syndrome ◽

Respiratory Distress ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Distress Syndrome ◽

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽

Overall Mortality

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia is the main cause of the pandemic’s death toll. The assessment of ARDS and time on invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) could enhance the characterization of outcomes and management of this condition. This is a city-wide retrospective study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia from 5 March 2020 to 30 June 2020. Patients with critical illness were compared with those with non-critical illness. We examined the severity of ARDS and other factors associated with (i) weaning patients off IMV and (ii) mortality in a city-wide study in Louisville, KY. Of 522 patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, 219 (41.9%) were critically ill. Among critically ill patients, the median age was 60 years; 53% were male, 55% were White and 32% were African American. Of all critically ill patients, 52% had ARDS, and 38% of these had severe ARDS. Of the 25% of patients who were weaned off IMV, those with severe ARDS were weaned within eleven days versus five days for those without severe ARDS, p = 0.023. The overall mortality for critically ill patients was 22% versus 1% for those not critically ill. Furthermore, the 14-day mortality was 31% for patients with severe ARDS and 12% for patients without severe ARDS, p = 0.019. Patients with severe ARDS versus non-severe ARDS needed twice as long to wean off IMV (eleven versus five days) and had double the 14-day mortality of patients without severe ARDS.

Download Full-text

Clinical utility of standard base excess in the diagnosis and interpretation of metabolic acidosis in critically ill patients

Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research ◽

10.1590/s0100-879x2006005000199 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 41 (3) ◽

pp. 241-249 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

M Park ◽

L.U Taniguchi ◽

D.T Noritomi ◽

A.B. Libório ◽

A.T Maciel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Metabolic Acidosis ◽

Critically Ill ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Clinical Utility ◽

Base Excess ◽

Standard Base Excess ◽

Standard Base

Download Full-text

Caracterização dos casos de COVID-19 em pacientes críticos: revisão de escopo/ Characterization of COVID-19 cases in critically ill patients: scoping review

Ciência Cuidado e Saúde ◽

10.4025/ciencuidsaude.v20i0.57572 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 20 ◽

Author(s):

Thatiane Monick De Souza Costa ◽

Kauanny Vitoria Gurgel dos Santos ◽

Eloysa Dos Santos Oliveira ◽

Bruna Vilar Soares da Silva ◽

Evelin Beatriz Bezerra de Melo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Critically Ill ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Scoping Review ◽

Critically Ill Patients ◽

Scoping Reviews ◽

Terapia Intensiva ◽

Population Concept

Introdução: A principal causa de mortalidade pelo novo coronavírus é a insuficiência respiratória. Assim, os cuidados intensivos devem ser prontamente prestados ao paciente crítico. Objetivo: Explorar as evidências acerca dos achados clínicos, tratamento e desfecho de pacientes infectados pelo Sars-CoV-2 internados em Unidades de Terapia Intensiva. Método: Revisão de escopo, realizada em abril de 2021, em oito fontes de dados nacionais e internacionais, conforme orientações do Instituto Joanna Briggs, seguindo o checklist Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysesextension for Scoping Reviews, sem restrição de idioma ou temporal. Adotou-se a estratégia Population, Concept and Contextpara a elaboração da questão de pesquisa. Resultados: Incluíram-se 15 artigos científicos, com predominância de publicações na China, Estados Unidos da América e Canadá. Dos estudos, 80% foram com adultos e idosos em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Os principais achados clínicos foram febre, tosse, Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório Agudo e lesão renal, tratamento com ventilação mecânica invasiva e não invasiva, oxigenoterapia de alto fluxo e corticoesteroides. Como principal desfecho, o óbito. Conclusão: A maioria dos pacientes apresentou febre, tosse e Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório Agudo, recebendo cuidados como ventilação mecânica, oxigenoterapia de alto fluxo e corticoesteroides, com alto índice de óbitos.

Download Full-text