scholarly journals COVID-19: Stroke Admissions, Emergency Department Visits, and Prevention Clinic Referrals

Author(s):  
Maria Bres Bullrich ◽  
Sebastian Fridman ◽  
Jennifer L. Mandzia ◽  
Lauren M. Mai ◽  
Alexander Khaw ◽  
...  

Abstract:We assessed the impact of the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic on code stroke activations in the emergency department, stroke unit admissions, and referrals to the stroke prevention clinic at London’s regional stroke center, serving a population of 1.8 million in Ontario, Canada. We found a 20% drop in the number of code strokes in 2020 compared to 2019, immediately after the first cases of COVID-19 were officially confirmed. There were no changes in the number of stroke admissions and there was a 22% decrease in the number of clinic referrals, only after the provincial lockdown. Our findings suggest that the decrease in code strokes was mainly driven by patient-related factors such as fear to be exposed to the SARS-CoV-2, while the reduction in clinic referrals was largely explained by hospital policies and the Government lockdown.

Author(s):  
Brenda Johnson ◽  
Binta Bojang ◽  
Jaime Butler ◽  
Victor C Urrutia

Background: While the incidence and mortality from stroke in the United States has declined in the past 20 years, there are still more than 795,000 strokes per year, of which 185,000 are recurrent events. There remains great disparity between racial groups -the incidence and mortality among African Americans, is two to four times higher than Non-Hispanic Whites. Despite great advances in drug therapies, the impact on stroke prevention has not been fully realized. There is a need for improved delivery of effective treatments. Several randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the effectiveness of a comprehensive; clinic based, navigator-assisted approach to disease management, although in the context of specific clinical situations. Examples are, SAMMPRIS, and Look AHEAD. We propose that learning from the development of the “stroke center” for acute stroke care, we may apply a similar model to stroke prevention. We have created a Stroke Prevention Clinic (SPC), organized like an outpatient “stroke center”, offering evaluation, treatment, and long-term follow up of patients for risk factor control and lifestyle interventions for secondary prevention. Our Stroke Prevention Nurse is an integral part of this model. In this abstract we report the impact of this program on follow up rates. Methods: In 2011 we launched our SPC. The specific elements of this program included: A Stroke Prevention Nurse: a. Meets the patient in the hospital. b. Facilitates scheduling of appointments, including in the SPC, which is given to the patient upon discharge. c. Calls the patient within 7 days to do medication reconciliation and answer questions. Also, at 90 days for a modified Rankin score and whenever it is necessary to follow up on blood pressure readings. d. Administers screening tools upon follow up, consents for research studies. e. Educates the patient on stroke prevention. Dedicated day for clinic. All providers in the same area. Use of Advance Practice Nurse and stroke fellows, as well as vascular neurology attending. Database. We assessed the proportion of completed appointments within 90 days after discharge from the hospital and compared it with the year prior to implementation. Results: A sample from July 2010 to February 2011 revealed completed follow up by 90 days of 28.3% (70/247), for the period July 2011 to February 2012 the proportion was 35.6% (89/250). During calendar year 2014, 54.3% (233/429) completed their appointments within 90 days. Conclusion: Implementation of the Stroke Prevention Clinic increased follow up completion within 90 days of discharge.


Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Cayley ◽  
Jemini Abraham ◽  
Libby Kalman ◽  
Cheryl Jaigobin ◽  
Martin del Campo ◽  
...  

Background: About one in four ischemic strokes are preceded by a TIA; 43% of TIAs occur within one week before stroke. Patients with a TIA require urgent assessment, risk stratification, and preventative treatment, but often cannot access a Stroke Prevention Clinic in a timely fashion. Therefore, these patients are often admitted to hospital for evaluation but it is unclear if inpatient evaluation is optimal or specifically necessary for this patient population. Methods: We developed a novel high-risk TIA and Minor Stroke (TAMS) day-unit to provide rapid access to patient assessment, investigations, initiation of prevention strategies, and stroke prevention education. The TAMS Unit patient assessments were based on a collaborative model led by stroke Nurse Practitioners and an attending stroke Neurologist. All patients had cerebrovascular imaging (CT angiography, MR angiography, or carotid Doppler if there were exclusions to CT or MR angiography), and as appropriate, echocardiography and Holter monitoring initiated at the TAMS Unit visit. We evaluated the feasibility of this novel care model. Outcomes including time to assessment, investigations, and treatment for high-risk TIA/stroke etiologies and stroke risk factors, as well as return emergency department visits or readmissions within 30 days were assessed. Results: Between Sept. 6, 2011 and Aug. 8, 2012, 142 patients were seen in the TAMS Unit. Median time from emergency department visit to TAMS Unit assessment was 1 day. The final diagnosis was TIA in 41% of patients and minor stroke (NIHSS < 4) in 27.5% of patients. Atrial fibrillation was diagnosed in 8 (5.6%) patients; anticoagulation was initiated promptly upon diagnosis. High-grade carotid stenosis was diagnosed in 4 (2.8%) patients and these patients were referred for urgent endarterectomy. There were 12 (8.5%) patients that had a return visit to the emergency department within 30 days; 2 (1.4%) with stroke, 8 (5.6%) with recurrent TIA or fluctuating symptoms, and 2 (1.4%) with other diagnoses. Conclusion: Our novel TAMS Unit is a feasible care model that provides rapid access to assessment and treatment of high-risk TIA and minor stroke patients, and is another level of care between hospital admission and the outpatient Stroke Prevention Clinic.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Kaehne ◽  
Paula Keating

Abstract Background Emergency department (ED) attendances are contributing to rising costs of the National Health Service (NHS) in England. Critically assessing the impact of new services to reduce emergency department use can be difficult as new services may create additional access points, unlocking latent demand. The study evaluated an Acute Visiting Scheme (AVS) in a primary care context. We asked if AVS reduces overall ED demand and whether or not it changed utilisation patterns for frequent attenders. Method The study used a pre post single cohort design. The impact of AVS on all-cause ED attendances was hypothesised as a substitution effect, where AVS duty doctor visits would replace emergency department visits. Primary outcome was frequency of ED attendances. End points were reduction of frequency of service use and increase of intervals between attendances by frequent attenders. Results ED attendances for AVS users rose by 47.6%. If AVS use was included, there was a more than fourfold increase of total service utilisation, amounting to 438.3%. It shows that AVS unlocked significant latent demand. However, there was some reduction in the frequency of ED attendances for some patients and an increase in time intervals between ED attendances for others. Conclusion The study demonstrates that careful analysis of patient utilisation can detect a differential impact of AVS on the use of ED. As the new service created additional access points for patients and hence introduces an element of choice, the new service is likely to unlock latent demand. This study illustrates that AVS may be most useful if targeted at specific patient groups who are most likely to benefit from the new service.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Alexis De Crescenzo ◽  
Barbara Alison Gabella ◽  
Jewell Johnson

Abstract Background The transition in 2015 to the Tenth Revision of the International Classification of Disease, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) in the US led the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to propose a surveillance definition of traumatic brain injury (TBI) utilizing ICD-10-CM codes. The CDC’s proposed surveillance definition excludes “unspecified injury of the head,” previously included in the ICD-9-CM TBI surveillance definition. The study purpose was to evaluate the impact of the TBI surveillance definition change on monthly rates of TBI-related emergency department (ED) visits in Colorado from 2012 to 2017. Results The monthly rate of TBI-related ED visits was 55.6 visits per 100,000 persons in January 2012. This rate in the transition month to ICD-10-CM (October 2015) decreased by 41 visits per 100,000 persons (p-value < 0.0001), compared to September 2015, and remained low through December 2017, due to the exclusion of “unspecified injury of head” (ICD-10-CM code S09.90) in the proposed TBI definition. The average increase in the rate was 0.33 visits per month (p < 0.01) prior to October 2015, and 0.04 visits after. When S09.90 was included in the model, the monthly TBI rate in Colorado remained smooth from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM and the transition was no longer significant (p = 0.97). Conclusion The reduction in the monthly TBI-related ED visit rate resulted from the CDC TBI surveillance definition excluding unspecified head injury, not necessarily the coding transition itself. Public health practitioners should be aware that the definition change could lead to a drastic reduction in the magnitude and trend of TBI-related ED visits, which could affect decisions regarding the allocation of TBI resources. This study highlights a challenge in creating a standardized set of TBI ICD-10-CM codes for public health surveillance that provides comparable yet clinically relevant estimates that span the ICD transition.


2021 ◽  
Vol 56 (S2) ◽  
pp. 64-64
Author(s):  
Sandra Decker ◽  
Michael Dworsky ◽  
Teresa Gibson ◽  
Rachel Henke ◽  
Kimberly McDermott

2008 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 120-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph S. Guarisco ◽  
Stefoni A. Bavin

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a case study testing the Primary Provider Theory proposed by Aragon that states that: disproportionate to any other variables, patient satisfaction is distinctly and primarily linked to physician behaviors and secondarily to waiting times.Design/methodology/approachThe case study began by creating incentives motivating physicians to reflect and improve behaviors (patient interactions) and practice patterns (workflow efficiency). The Press Ganey Emergency Department Survey was then utilized to track the impact of the incentive programs and to ascertain any relationship between patient satisfaction with the provider and global patient satisfaction with emergency department visits by measuring patient satisfaction over an eight quarter period.FindingsThe findings were two‐fold: firstly, the concept of “pay for performance” as a tool for physician motivation was valid; and secondly, the impact on global patient satisfaction by increases in patient satisfaction with the primary provider was significant and highly correlated, as proposed by Aragon.Practical implicationsThese findings can encourage hospitals and physician groups to place a high value on the performance of primary providers of patient care, provide incentives for appropriate provider behaviors through “pay for performance” programs and promote physician understanding of the links between global patient satisfaction with physician behaviors and business growth, malpractice reduction, and other key measures of business success.Originality/valueThere are no other case studies prior to this project validating the Primary Provider Theory in an urban medical center; this project adds to the validity and credibility of the theory in this setting.


CJEM ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (06) ◽  
pp. 467-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pat G. Camp ◽  
Seamus P. Norton ◽  
Ran D. Goldman ◽  
Salomeh Shajari ◽  
M. Anne Smith ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: Communication between emergency department (ED) staff and parents of children with asthma may play a role in asthma exacerbation management. We investigated the extent to which parents of children with asthma implement recommendations provided by the ED staff. Method: We asked questions on asthma triggers, ED care (including education and discharge recommendations), and asthma management strategies used at home shortly after the ED visit and again at 6 months. Results: A total of 148 children with asthma were recruited. Thirty-two percent of children were not on inhaled corticosteroids prior to their ED visit. Eighty percent of parents identified upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) as the primary trigger for their child’s asthma. No parent received or implemented any specific asthma strategies to reduce the impact of URTIs; 82% of parents did not receive any printed asthma education materials. Most (66%) parents received verbal instructions on how to manage their child’s future asthma exacerbations. Of those, one-third of families were told to return to the ED. Parents were rarely advised to bring their child to their family doctor in the event of a future exacerbation. At 6 months, parents continued to use the ED services for asthma exacerbations in their children, despite reporting feeling confident in managing their child’s asthma. Conclusion: Improvements are urgently needed in developing strategies to manage pediatric asthma exacerbations related to URTIs, communication with parents at discharge in acute care, and using alternate acute care services for parents who continue to rely on EDs for the initial care of mild asthma exacerbations.


Author(s):  
Tô Thị Kim Hồng ◽  
Trần Thị Diễm Thúy

Nowadays, environmental protection is an urgent problem which raises top concerns. Besides, green consumption is a trend encouraged to be widely implemented in many countries in the world, including Vietnam. However, in the reality of Vietnam, changing green consumer behavior in choosing products has been negligible and insignificant. With a diversified and varied population structure, Ho Chi Minh City is selected to analyze the impacts of demography and other related factors on green consumption behavior in the market. The quantitative research method is mainly used with the analysis of multiple correlation and linear regression. The results retrieved from 312 survey samples show that regarding demography, educational level, and marital status influence green consumption behavior. Besides, the results also show and measure the impacts of other factors, namely attitudes, subjective standards, environmental concerns, unavailability of green products on the green consumption behavior of consumers in Ho Chi Minh city. With the aim at promoting green consumer behavior in Ho Chi Minh City, there is a need for a change requiring the cooperation of all the Government, Enterprises, and consumers in stepping up propaganda, raising public awareness; simultaneously, orienting economic development activities associated with sustainable environmental protection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document