International Arbitral Tribunal: Award on the Merits in Dispute Between Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company/California Asiatic Oil Company and the Government of the Libyan Arab Republic (Compensation For Nationalized Property)

1978 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-133

One of the most important tasks entrusted to the Preparatory Commission under paragraph C.l(o) of its Statute, was to prepare, for submission to the Governing Council, a Working Papar on the policies and criteria to govern financing by the Fund.

1978 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-37 ◽  

The following arbitral award was rendered by a sole arbitrator in connection with disputes reen the Libyan Arab Republic ("Libya") and two international oil companies arising out of rees of nationalization promulgated by Libya. This award is being reproduced herewith in entirety . The award not only considers many fundamental principles and doctrines of international law but is also unique in two major respects . For the first time in the history of international arbitration relating to economic development contracts , an arbitral tribunal held ; the injured parties were entitled to restitutio in integrum and that the sovereign s t a te obliged to perform specifically its contractual obligations with private foreign investors, iddition, the arbitral tribunal , after reviewing the legal effect in international law of the :ed Nations General Assembly resolutions concerning permanent sovereignty over natural wealth resources, concluded that such resolutions could not be used by the state to violate its :ractual obligations in commercial transactions . The remaining portion of this Introductory : will briefly describe the steps leading to arbitration , the arbitral proceedings and the ilution of the disputes.


1981 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. 476-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert B. von Mehren ◽  
P. Nicholas Kourides

On November 29 and 30, 1971, Iran occupied three islands, which were nominally under British protection, in the Persian Gulf. As a result of Britain’s failure to prevent the occupation, the Government of the Libyan Arab Republic, on December 7, 1971, announced the nationalization of all of the interests and properties in Libya of BP Exploration Company (Libya) Limited (BP), a subsidiary of British Petroleum Company Limited. On September 1, 1973, on the fourth anniversary of the military takeover of Libya led by Colonel Muammar el-Qaddafi, the Government of Libya announced the nationalization of 51 percent of the interests and properties in Libya of nine international oil companies. Approximately 5½ months later, on February 11, 1974, on the eve of the opening of the Washington conference of major oil-importing nations, the Government of Libya announced the nationalization of the remaining 49 percent of the interests and properties in Libya of three of those nine companies: Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company (TOPCO), a subsidiary of Texaco Inc.; California Asiatic Oil Company (CALASIATIC), a subsidiary of Standard Oil Company of California; and the Libyan American Oil Company (LIAMCO), a subsidiary of Atlantic Richfield Company.


1990 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 601-623

In Its briefs dated September 15 And November E, 19E5, N.O.C. did not Invoke as being a withdrawal, any action from SDN-OIL In ceasing performance before the Request for Arbitration was filed, other than the “force mejeure” excuse. Its argumentation was different. N.O.C. considered that, assuming that SUN-OIL had not withdrawn from the EPS* In 1962, there would be withdrawal If SUM-OIL does not resume, or does not show that it intends to resume, the Exploration Operations in spite of the Arbitral Tribunal's award regarding the Invalidity of the force majeure excuses. In such case, SUN-OIL would have to pay N.O.C. the costs of the uncompleted portion of the Exploration Program, as provided under Art. 3.4. of the EPSA.


Tempo ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-173
Author(s):  
Nuno Carlos de Fragoso Vidal

Abstract: Proximate to a Weberian perspective, this article argues that the resilience of the Angolan regime is mainly owed to an ethos structured on top of a specific socio-cultural historical matrix (minority at start), evolving since the 16th century. Such matrix was structured on a prevailing Weltanschauung (world and national vision), that has been progressively self-presented, self-assumed, imposed/assimilated as national and modern within a project of identity and power hegemony, even though still and constantly ridden by several internal contradictions and tensions. Dynamics of this process is central to understand the intricacies of the relationship between rulers and ruled, evolving identities as well as the still significant social support to the party in power after more than four decades in the government. The regime’s resilience lays on such ethos in support of hegemonic power and identity project, above and beyond the president and all his political management abilities, beyond the central instrumentality of the national oil company (SONANGOL), beyond the media spotlight on influential names surrounding the presidency, including the president’s men, generals, and beyond authoritarianism.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Gerali ◽  
Jenny Gregory

About four centuries passed between the first appearance of pamphlets in which the medical uses of petroleum were discussed (for example, the Tegernsee (southern Bavaria, 1430), Geneva (Swiss Confederacy, 1480), Nurnberg (northern Bavaria, 1500), and the Antwerp (Duchy of Brabant, today Flanders, 1540–1550) pamphlets), and Michael Faraday's discovery in 1825 of the chemical composition of benzene derived from bituminous oil as a compound of carbon and hydrogen. During this long time span, studies of oil, carried out between alchemy and chemistry, benefited from rapid advances and brilliant insights, much as they had moments of stagnation, and disappointing regressions. In 1855 the chemist Benjamin Silliman Jr., of Yale University, proved that crude oil could be decomposed through a process of fractional distillation into a range of fuels and lubricants cheaper than the oils, greases and waxes rendered by animal fats and vegetal matter (Silliman 1855; Forbes 1948 Forbes 1958). In the course of the early 1860s, oil became the main source of illumination first in North America, then in Europe and Australia. This transformation of oil from a substance of limited use into a commodity of mass consumption radically changed the pattern of oil finding and production. Crude was no longer collected just from natural springs or draining seepages, but was pumped out of the ground from wells drilled by machines using steam power. This was the first step toward the modern oil industry, and a breakthrough in the history of energy: the beginning of an oil society. The first part of this article provides an introduction to the early uses and production of petroleum in Europe, and advances in understanding the nature, the physical properties, and the composition of hydrocarbons. It provides a brief analysis of the interaction between technology, society and the environmental context in northwestern Pennsylvania, where, between 1858 and 1859, a new successful pattern developed to produce oil in commercial quantity. From 1861, that innovative process put the United States in the position to gain increasing shares in the young European mineral oil markets and, subsequently, to jeopardize the position of local oil (vegetal, animal and mineral) producers. The second part, using a national case study approach, explores the history of a British oil company operating in Romania since 1863, the Wallachian Oil Company. This venture by London stockholders—short, difficult, and abortive—is a mirror of the nature of the business implemented by emerging oil companies, not only from Europe, and therefore exemplifies the challenges of setting the modern oil sector in motion in the nineteenth century.


2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 387-396
Author(s):  
Minas Khatchadourian

This article deals with the concession contracts for the exploration and the production of oil and gas in Egypt. Such tripartite contracts are concluded between the Government of Egypt (GOE) as the host country, a National Oil Company (NOC) as the concession holder and an international oil company (IOC) as the foreign contractor who receives a part of the oil or gas production on a production sharing agreement (PSA). From an Egyptian legal perspective, this contract is qualified as a State contract which is supposed to give the Government some exorbitant powers towards its counterparts. However, in order to attract foreign investors into this kind of agreement and encourage international oil companies to explore natural resources, several legal safeguards are incorporated in the concession agreement. Examples of this include placing the contract in the framework of a legislative act, granting the contract a supremacy on any contrary legislation, stabilization clause, adaptation of the contract through renegotiation, arbitration clause, etc.


ZOOTEC ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
A. H. S. Salendu ◽  
F. H. Elly

ABSTRAKKabupaten Minahasa Selatan merupakan daerah yang direncanakan untuk pengembangan agropolitan. Ternak sapi sebagai ternak andalan dikembangkan dengan cara digembalakan di bawah pohon kelapa. Permasalahannya seberapa besar alokasi tenaga kerja dan pendapatan kelapa-usaha ternak sapi di kecamatan Tenga. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis alokasi tenaga kerja dan pendapatan kelapa usaha ternak sapi. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kegiatan untuk pengolahan kopra yang dialokasi oleh tenaga keluarga adalah 480 jam. Sedangkan penggunaan tenaga kerja luar keluarga (sewa) adalah untuk kegiatan pengolahan kopra yaitu 1.440 jam lebih besar dari jam kerja untuk keluarga. Tenaga kerja yang digunakan untuk usaha ternak sapi adalah tenaga kerja keluarga dengan alokasinya untuk kegiatan pindahkan sapi, mencari rumput, memberi makan, minum dan memandikan sapi. Alokasi jam yang terbesar untuk pindahkan sapi. Pendapatan dari penjualan kopra tergantung dari harga kopra. Harga kopra yang dijual di tempat petani lebih rendah dibanding dijual di perusahaan minyak goreng. Rata-rata pendapatan ternak sapi sebesar Rp 1.621.854,06 per tahun per responden. Pendapatan ini diperoleh tanpa perhitungan tenaga kerja keluarga. Saran penelitian ini adalah perlu intervensi dari pemerintah untuk pengembangan ternak sapi karena dengan penjualan ternak sapi sejumlah 1,42 ekor dalam setahun sangat merugikan petani.Kata Kunci : Pendapatan, kelapa, ternak sapiABSTRACTINCOME ANALYSIS OF COCONUT-CATTLE FARMER’S IN AGROPOLITAN AREA SUBDISTRICT TENGA SOUTH MINAHASA REGENCY. South Minahasa district is an area planned for agropolitan development. Cattle as a main ruminant livestock was developed by grazing method under coconut plantation. The problems are how big the allocation of labor and the income of coconut-cattle farming in the district of Tenga. The purpose of this study was to analyze the allocation of labor and income of coconut-cattle farming. The result showed that the activities for the processing of copra allocated by the family labor were 480 hours. While the use of hired labor (rent) for copra processing activity were 1,440 hours greater than work allocation time for the family. Family labors used for the cattle farming were including to move the cattle for grazing and drinking, to collect grass, to feed and to cleanse animals. The largest time allocation by household family was move cattle for grazing and drinking. Income of the copra earned by haousehold family was depend on the price of copra. Price of copra earned by households at their location was lower than the price accepted at the cooking oil company. The average income of cattle household farmers was Rp 1,621,854.06 per year per respondent. This income was obtained without including family labor. It was suggested in this study that the government policy was crucial for cattle development due to low sale of cattle per year with the average of 1.42 head. This case inflicted a loss upon the household farmers.Keywords: income, coconut-cattle farmer,


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document