Foreign body ingestion: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography versus endoscopy

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 535-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
W-H Luk ◽  
W C Fan ◽  
R Y Y Chan ◽  
S W W Chan ◽  
K H Tse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Foreign Body Ingestion ◽  
Persistent Symptoms ◽  
Computed Tomography Images

AbstractPurpose:To investigate and compare the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography and of endoscopy, as diagnostic tests for foreign body ingestion.Materials and methods:Over a two-year period, Asian patients with suspected foreign body ingestion were studied. The clinical findings, computed tomography images, endoscopic results, treatment and outcomes were prospectively analysed.Results:Over the study period, 193 patients were admitted for foreign body ingestion, complaining of a persistent foreign body sensation in the neck. The sensitivity and specificity of computed tomography were 78 and 96 per cent, respectively; the positive predictive value was 75 per cent and the negative predictive value 97 per cent. The diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography was 94 per cent.Conclusion:Our study showed that computed tomography had high negative predictive value and accuracy in the diagnosis of foreign body ingestion. It was useful if endoscopy showed negative findings but the patient still had persistent symptoms of foreign body ingestion.

Comparative study of frozen and permanent section for diagnosis of toxic epidermal necrolysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke Burnett ◽  
Chunyang Wang ◽  
Feng Zhang ◽  
Stephan Adams ◽  
Joan Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Frozen Section ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
P Value ◽  
Permanent Section ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a severe, life-threatening mucocutaneous reaction, causing widespread sloughing of skin and mucosal surfaces. Accurate and prompt diagnosis is essential for optimal management and subsequent outcome. In this study, frozen sections were used as a rapid examination for initial diagnosis of TEN, and the frozen section diagnoses were assessed compared with permanent sections. Methods One hundred patients of suspected TEN were referred to our burn unit, and 67 had sufficient clinical findings for frozen and permanent biopsies. The accuracy of frozen section relative to permanent section was evaluated by calculating diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). And McNemar’s tests were used to analyze the difference between the two methods. Results Fifty-two specimens were classified as TEN by frozen section, 51 of which were confirmed by permanent biopsy. The exception was diagnosed as bullous pemphigoid on permanent section. Fifteen specimens were read as negative for TEN on frozen slides but 4 were changed to positive by permanent biopsy. Overall, the diagnostic accuracy of frozen section was 92.5%, with sensitivity and specificity 92.7% and 91.7% respectively. The positive predictive value, or coherence of positive diagnosis between the two methods, was as high as 98.1%, and the negative predictive value was 73.3%. The p-value of McNemar’s tests was 0.375, indicating there was no significant difference between the two biopsy methods. Conclusion The data suggest that as a rapid histological assessment, frozen section is a reliable tool in the early diagnosis of TEN.

scholarly journals Computed Tomography-Aortography Versus Color-Duplex Ultrasound for Surveillance of Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elixène Jean-Baptiste ◽  
Patrick Feugier ◽  
Coralie Cruzel ◽  
Gabrielle Sarlon-Bartoli ◽  
Thierry Reix ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Morphological Abnormality ◽  
Aneurysm Repair

Background Color-duplex ultrasonography (DUS) could be an alternative to computed tomography-aortography (CTA) in the lifelong surveillance of patients after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), but there is currently no level 1 evidence. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of DUS as an alternative to CTA for the follow-up of post-EVAR patients. Methods Between December 16, 2010, and June 12, 2015, we conducted a prospective, blinded, diagnostic-accuracy study, in 15 French university hospitals where EVAR was commonly performed. Participants were followed up using both DUS and CTA in a mutually blinded setup until the end of the study or until any major aneurysm-related morphological abnormality requiring reintervention or an amendment to the follow-up policy was revealed by CTA. Database was locked on October 2, 2017. Our main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive and negative likelihood ratios of DUS against reference standard CTA. CIs are binomial 95% CI. Results This study recruited prospectively 659 post-EVAR patients of whom 539 (82%) were eligible for further analysis. Following the baseline inclusion visit, 940 additional follow-up visits were performed in the 539 patients. Major aneurysm-related morphological abnormalities were revealed by CTA in 103 patients (17.2/100 person-years [95% CI, 13.9–20.5]). DUS accurately identified 40 patients where a major aneurysm-related morphological abnormality was present (sensitivity, 39% [95% CI, 29–48]) and 403 of 436 patients with negative CTA (specificity, 92% [95% CI, 90–95]). The negative predictive value and positive predictive value of DUS were 92% (95% CI, 90–95) and 39% (95% CI, 27–50), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio was 4.87 (95% CI, 2.9–9.6). DUS sensitivity reached 73% (95% CI, 51–96) in patients requiring an effective reintervention. Conclusions DUS had an overall low sensitivity in the follow-up of patients after EVAR, but its performance improved meaningfully when the subset of patients requiring effective reinterventions was considered. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01230203.

scholarly journals Discriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis by ultrasound imaging, computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy

BJS Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
W J Bom ◽  
M D Bolmers ◽  
S L Gans ◽  
C C van Rossem ◽  
A A W van Geloven ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Ultrasound Imaging ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Complicated Appendicitis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Uncomplicated Appendicitis ◽  
Mean Sensitivity ◽  
Ct And Mri

Abstract Background Discriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis is crucial. Patients with suspected complicated appendicitis are best treated by emergency surgery, whereas those with uncomplicated appendicitis may be treated with antibiotics alone. This study aimed to obtain summary estimates of the accuracy of ultrasound imaging, CT and MRI in discriminating complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis Methods A systematic literature review was conducted by an electronic search in PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for studies describing the diagnostic accuracy of complicated versus uncomplicated appendicitis. Studies were included if the population comprised adults, and surgery or pathology was used as a reference standard. Risk of bias and applicability were assessed with QUADAS-2. Bivariable logitnormal random-effect models were used to estimate mean sensitivity and specificity. Results Two studies reporting on ultrasound imaging, 11 studies on CT, one on MRI, and one on ultrasonography with conditional CT were included. Summary estimates for sensitivity and specificity in detecting complicated appendicitis could be calculated only for CT, because of lack of data for the other imaging modalities. For CT, mean sensitivity was 78 (95 per cent c.i. 64 to 88) per cent, and mean specificity was 91 (85 to 99) per cent. At a median prevalence of 25 per cent, the positive predictive value of CT for complicated appendicitis would be 74 per cent and its negative predictive value 93 per cent. Conclusion Ultrasound imaging, CT and MRI have limitations in discriminating between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis. Although CT has far from perfect sensitivity, its negative predictive value for complicated appendicitis is high.

Diagnostic Accuracy of BISAP Score for Detecting Acute Pancreatitis Keeping Computed Tomography Severity Index as GS

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3164-3165
Author(s):  
Mohammad Iltaf ◽  
Sana Akhtar ◽  
Dilaram Khan
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Severe Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Cross Sectional

Objective: To establish the diagnostic accuracy of BISAP in detecting the severe acute pancreatitis keeping computed tomography severity index as gold standard. Study Design: Cross-sectional study Place and Duration of Study: Department of Gastroenterology, Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar from April 16th 2018 to 16th October 2018. Methodology: One hundred and twenty nine patients of age range of 18-60, of either gender having severe acute pancreatitis were included. While patients already diagnosed as severe acute pancreatitis and having known history of chronic pancreatitis were excluded. Patients were subjected to CT scan to confirm whether the severe acute pancreatitis is present or not. All CT scans were reported by single experiences radiologist. Results: There were 30.3% were males and 69.7% were females with mean age 42±11.03 years. BISAP had sensitivity 92.74%, specificity 80%, positive predictive value 99.13%, negative predictive value 20.76% and the overall diagnostic accuracy was 92.24%. Conclusion: BISAP had sensitivity 93.61%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 40% and the overall diagnostic accuracy was 93.87% in severe acute pancreatitis keeping CT severity index as gold standard. Keywords: Accuracy, Severe acute pancreatitis, Computed tomography

scholarly journals Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound and Plain X-Ray KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder) Compared to Non-Contrast CT (Computed Tomography) in Patients of Ureteric Calculi

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (47) ◽  
pp. 2762-2766
Author(s):  
N. Imdad Ali ◽  
Noor Elahi Pasha ◽  
Ravishankar T.H.S
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Ureteric Calculus ◽  
Ureteric Calculi ◽  
Ureteric Colic ◽  
Contrast Ct

BACKGROUND Imaging plays a major role in the diagnosis and management of patients with urolithiasis. Non-Contrast Computed Tomography (NCCT) is generally accepted as the gold standard, but there are concerns over higher radiation exposure from NCCT to the patient population. Our prospective study compared the diagnostic accuracy of plain X-ray KUB (Kidney, Ureter, Bladder) and USG (Ultrasonography) with NCCT in the evaluation of patients with ureteric colic. METHODS This study conducted from December 2018 to January 2020 in the Department of Urology, Vijayanagar Institute of Medical Sciences, and attached Hospital. 230 patients with ureteric colic were evaluated for ureteric calculi with x-ray KUB, USG (Ultrasonography) abdomen and pelvis and NCCT (Non-Contrast Computed Tomography) KUB region. RESULTS Out of 230 patients, 168 (73 %) were males and 62 (26.9 %) were females. Ages of the study population ranged from 18 to 55 yrs. 198 of the 230 patients were confirmed to have ureteric calculus, with lower ureteric calculus 97 (48.9 %), upper ureteric 65 (32.8 %), middle ureteric 29 (14.6 %), and multiple 7 (3.5 %). X-ray and USG (Ultrasonography) group yielded a sensitivity of 86.3 %, a specificity of 87.5 %, positive predictive value 97 %, and negative predictive value 51 %. While On NCCT (Non-Contrast Computed Tomography), a total of 192 patients (96 %) demonstrated ureterolithiasis of the 198 patients confirmed to have ureteric calculi (Table 2). X-ray and USG group yielded a sensitivity of 96.9 %, specificity of 93.6 %, positive predictive value 98.9 %, and negative predictive value 83 %. CONCLUSIONS Combination of x-ray KUB and USG, and NCCT were found to be excellent imaging modalities for the detection of ureteric calculi. X-ray KUB and USG can be used as the first investigation of choice for patients with ureteric colic and for follow up of patients after treatment. KEYWORDS Ureteric Colic, Ureterolithiasis, Ultrasonography

Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts with 16-Slice Multidetector Computed Tomography

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Levent Sahiner ◽  
Ali Oto ◽  
Kudret Aytemir ◽  
Tuncay Hazirolan ◽  
Musturay Karcaaltincaba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Multidetector Computed Tomography ◽  
Coronary Artery Bypass ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Artery Bypass ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Mdct Angiography ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

<p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice multislice, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography for the evaluation of grafts in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).</p><p><b>Methods:</b> Fifty-eight consecutive patients with CABG who underwent both MDCT and conventional invasive coronary angiography were included. The median time interval between the 2 procedures was 10 days (range, 1-32 days). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MDCT for the detection of occluded grafts were calculated. The accuracy of MDCT angiography for detecting significant stenoses in patent grafts and the evaluability of proximal and distal anastomoses were also investigated.</p><p><b>Results:</b> Optimal diagnostic images could not be obtained for only 3 (2%) of 153 grafts. Evaluation of the remaining 150 grafts revealed values for sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of the MDCT angiography procedure for the diagnosis of occluded grafts of 87%, 97%, 94%, 93%, and 92%, respectively. All of the proximal anastomoses were optimally visualized. In 4 (8%) of 50 patent arterial grafts, however, the distal anastomotic region could not be evaluated because of motion and surgical-clip artifacts. The accuracy of MDCT angiography for the detection of significant stenotic lesions was relatively low (the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 67%, 98%, 50%, and 99%, respectively). The number of significant lesions was insufficient to reach a reliable conclusion, however.</p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Our study showed that MDCT angiography with 16-slice systems has acceptable diagnostic performance for the evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency.</p>

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Interview and Physical Examination in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis as the Cause of Chronic Pelvic Pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 6606
Author(s):  
Jolanta Nawrocka-Rutkowska ◽  
Iwona Szydłowska ◽  
Aleksandra Rył ◽  
Sylwester Ciećwież ◽  
Magdalena Ptak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Pelvic Pain ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Chronic Pelvic Pain ◽  
Reproductive Age ◽  
Pelvic Surgery ◽  
History Of Surgery ◽  
Previous Surgery ◽  
History Of

Background: Chronic pelvic pain affects approximately 15% of reproductive age women. It is mainly caused by adhesions (20–40%). Despite CPP being the main symptom of endometriosis, the disease is confirmed by laparoscopy only in 12–18% of cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of laparoscopy in women with CCP and to assess the sensitivity and specificity of elements of an interview and clinical examination. Materials and methods: The study included 148 women with CPP. Each patient underwent laparoscopy. In laparoscopy, the presence of endometriosis and/or peritoneal adhesions was confirmed. Then, the sensitivity and specificity and the positive and negative predictive value of endometriosis symptoms or abnormalities in the gynecological examination were statistically calculated. Results: After previous surgery, adhesions were found in almost half (47%) of patients. In patients without a history of surgery, adhesions were diagnosed in 6.34% of patients. Endometriosis without coexisting adhesions was more often diagnosed in women without previous surgery (34.9%), compared to 10.58% in the group with a history of surgery (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Intraperitoneal adhesions are most common in women after pelvic surgery and with chronic ailments. The best results for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value in the diagnosis of endometriosis are found in women with irregular menstruations during which the pain increases. Laparoscopy still remains the primary diagnostic and therapeutic method for these women.

scholarly journals Screening for aneurysms of the abdominal aorta using a simple screening device

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Brakel ◽  
T. A. Berendsen ◽  
P. M. C. Callenbach ◽  
J. van der Burgh ◽  
R. J. Hissink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Abdominal Aorta ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Abdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Bladder Scan ◽  
Health Council ◽  
Screening Device

Abstract Introduction Several countries advocate screening for aneurysms of the abdominal aorta (AAA) in selected patients. In the Netherlands, routine screening is currently under review by the National Health Council. In any screening programme, cost-efficiency and accuracy are key. In this study, we evaluate the Aorta Scan (Verathon, Amsterdam, Netherlands), a cost-effective and easy-to-use screening device based on bladder scan technology, which enables untrained personnel to screen for AAA. Methods We subjected 117 patients to an Aorta Scan and compared the results to the gold standard (abdominal ultrasound). We used statistical analysis to determine sensitivity and specificity of the Aorta Scan, as well as the positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and inter-test agreement (Kappa). Results Sensitivity and specificity were 0.86 and 0.98, respectively. Positive predictive value was 0.98 and negative predictive value was 0.88. Accuracy was determined at 0.92 and the Kappa value was 0.85. When waist–hip circumferences (WHC) of > 115 cm were excluded, sensitivity raised to 0.96, specificity stayed 0.98, positive and negative predictive value were 0.98 and 0.96, respectively, accuracy to 0.97, and Kappa to 0.94. Conclusion Herein, we show that the Aorta Scan is a cost-effective and very accurate screening tool, especially in patients with WHC below 115 cm, which makes it a suitable candidate for implementation into clinical practice, specifically in the setting of screening selected populations for the presence of AAA.

Influence of lesion location on the accuracy of CT derived FFR: head-to-head comparison with invasive FFR

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Moshage ◽  
S Smolka ◽  
S Achenbach ◽  
F Ammon ◽  
P Ferstl ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Invasive Coronary Angiography ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Jude Medical ◽  
Lesion Location ◽  
Distal Vessel

Abstract Background The accuracy of CT-derived FFR (FFRCT) has been repeatedly reported. However, the influence of lesion location on accuracy is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT to detect lesion-specific ischemia and determined the influence of lesion location (proximal vs. distal vessel segments) compared to invasively measured FFR in patients with suspected CAD. Methods A total of 136 vessels in which “Dual-Source”-CT coronary angiography had been performed due to suspected CAD and who were further referred for invasive coronary angiography with invasive FFR measurement within three months of the index CT examination were retrospectively identified and screened for inclusion in this analysis. Patients with either left main coronary artery stenoses, bifurcation or ostial stenoses were excluded. Invasive FFR was measured using a pressure wire (CERTUS®, St. Jude Medical, Minnesota, USA or Verrata®, Volcano, San Diego, USA). FFRCT was calculated using an on-site prototype (cFFR Version 3.0, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany). All vessels were analyzed by an experienced observer blinded to the results of invasive FFR. Stenoses with invasively measured FFR ≤0.80 were classified as hemodynamically significant. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FFRCT in proximal vs. non-proximal vessel segments. Proximal lesions included stenoses located in segment one, six, eleven and twelve. All other stenoses were categorized as distal lesions. Results Out of 136 coronary stenoses, 47 (35%) were located in proximal segments and 89 (65%) lesions were located in distal segments. Compared to invasive FFR, the sensitivity of FFRCT to correctly identify/exclude hemodynamically significant stenoses in proximal vessel segments was 93% (95% CI: 68–99.8%) and the specificity was 100% (95% CI: 89–100%), compared to a sensitivity of 72% (95% CI: 46.5–90%) and a specificity of 87% (95% CI: 77–94%) for FFRCT in distal lesions. The positive predictive value was 100% and the negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI: 82.8–99.5%) compared to a positive predictive value of 59% (95% CI: 42–93.9%) and a negative predictive value of 93% (95% CI: 85.4–96.3%) for proximal vs. distal vessel segment, respectively. This corresponds to an accuracy of 98% vs. 84%, respectively (p=0.02). ROC-Curve analysis showed a slightly higher – albeit non-significant – area under the curve for FFRCT to detect hemodynamic relevance in proximal lesions compared to distal lesions (AUC 0.95, p&lt;0.001 vs. AUC: 0.86, p&lt;0.001, respectively, p=0.2). Conclusion FFRCT obtained using an on-site prototype shows overall a high diagnostic accuracy for detecting lesions causing ischemia as compared to invasive FFR with a trend towards better diagnostic performance in proximal vessel segments. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document