Neuroscience findings are consistent with appraisal theories of emotion; but does the brain “respect” constructionism?
2012 ◽
Vol 35
(3)
◽
pp. 163-164
◽
AbstractI reject Lindquist et al.'s implicit claim that all emotion theories other than constructionist ones subscribe to a “brain locationist” approach. The neural mechanisms underlying relevance detection, reward, attention, conceptualization, or language use are consistent with many theories of emotion, in particular componential appraisal theories. I also question the authors' claim that the meta-analysis they report provides support for the specific assumptions of constructionist theories.
2015 ◽
Vol 112
(50)
◽
pp. 15456-15461
◽
Keyword(s):
2014 ◽
Vol 42
(1)
◽
pp. 7-18
◽
Keyword(s):
2019 ◽
pp. 758-770
Keyword(s):
2020 ◽
Keyword(s):
1989 ◽
Vol 155
(S7)
◽
pp. 93-98
◽
1995 ◽
Vol 7
(3)
◽
pp. 396-407
◽
2014 ◽
Vol 24
(2)
◽
pp. 64-73
◽