VP172 Clinical Effectiveness Of A Predictive Risk Model In Primary Care

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 229-229
Author(s):  
Helen Snooks ◽  
Alison Porter ◽  
Mark Kingston ◽  
Alan Watkins ◽  
Hayley Hutchings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Risk Model ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Emergency Admissions ◽  
Intervention Phase ◽  
Predictive Risk ◽  
The Impact

INTRODUCTION:New approaches are needed to safely reduce emergency admissions to hospital by targeting interventions effectively in primary care. A predictive risk stratification tool (PRISM) identifies each registered patient's risk of an emergency admission in the following year, allowing practitioners to identify and manage those at higher risk. We evaluated the introduction of PRISM in primary care in one area of the United Kingdom, assessing its impact on emergency admissions and other service use.METHODS:We conducted a randomized stepped wedge trial with cluster-defined control and intervention phases, and participant-level anonymized linked outcomes. PRISM was implemented in eleven primary care practice clusters (total thirty-two practices) over a year from March 2013. We analyzed routine linked data outcomes for 18 months.RESULTS:We included outcomes for 230,099 registered patients, assigned to ranked risk groups.Overall, the rate of emergency admissions was higher in the intervention phase than in the control phase: adjusted difference in number of emergency admissions per participant per year at risk, delta = .011 (95 percent Confidence Interval, CI .010, .013). Patients in the intervention phase spent more days in hospital per year: adjusted delta = .029 (95 percent CI .026, .031). Both effects were consistent across risk groups.Primary care activity increased in the intervention phase overall delta = .011 (95 percent CI .007, .014), except for the two highest risk groups which showed a decrease in the number of days with recorded activity.CONCLUSIONS:Introduction of a predictive risk model in primary care was associated with increased emergency episodes across the general practice population and at each risk level, in contrast to the intended purpose of the model. Future evaluation work could assess the impact of targeting of different services to patients across different levels of risk, rather than the current policy focus on those at highest risk.

VP132 Cost Effectiveness Of A Predictive Risk Model In Primary Care

2017 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 209-210
Author(s):  
Helen Snooks ◽  
Alison Porter ◽  
Mark Kingston ◽  
Bridie Evans ◽  
Deborah Burge-Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Emergency Admissions ◽  
Predictive Risk ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners

INTRODUCTION:Emergency admissions to hospital are a major financial burden on health services. In one area of the United Kingdom (UK), we evaluated a predictive risk stratification tool (PRISM) designed to support primary care practitioners to identify and manage patients at high risk of admission. We assessed the costs of implementing PRISM and its impact on health services costs. At the same time as the study, but independent of it, an incentive payment (‘QOF’) was introduced to encourage primary care practitioners to identify high risk patients and manage their care.METHODS:We conducted a randomized stepped wedge trial in thirty-two practices, with cluster-defined control and intervention phases, and participant-level anonymized linked outcomes. We analysed routine linked data on patient outcomes for 18 months (February 2013 – September 2014). We assigned standard unit costs in pound sterling to the resources utilized by each patient. Cost differences between the two study phases were used in conjunction with differences in the primary outcome (emergency admissions) to undertake a cost-effectiveness analysis.RESULTS:We included outcomes for 230,099 registered patients. We estimated a PRISM implementation cost of GBP0.12 per patient per year.Costs of emergency department attendances, outpatient visits, emergency and elective admissions to hospital, and general practice activity were higher per patient per year in the intervention phase than control phase (adjusted δ = GBP76, 95 percent Confidence Interval, CI GBP46, GBP106), an effect that was consistent and generally increased with risk level.CONCLUSIONS:Despite low reported use of PRISM, it was associated with increased healthcare expenditure. This effect was unexpected and in the opposite direction to that intended. We cannot disentangle the effects of introducing the PRISM tool from those of imposing the QOF targets; however, since across the UK predictive risk stratification tools for emergency admissions have been introduced alongside incentives to focus on patients at risk, we believe that our findings are generalizable.

scholarly journals An Effectiveness Trial of STEADI in an Outpatient, Primary Care Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 774-774
Author(s):  
David Rein ◽  
Madeleine Hackney ◽  
Michele Dougherty ◽  
Camille Vaughan ◽  
Laurie Imhof ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medication Review ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Strength Assessment ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Study Team ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact

Abstract The STEADI Options trial uses a randomized, controlled-trial design to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the STEADI Initiative . Beginning March, 2020, we will randomize 3,000 adults ≥ 65 years of age at risk for falls seen in an Emory Clinic primary care practice to: (1) full STEADI; (2) a STEADI-derived gait, balance, and strength assessment with physical therapy referrals; (3) a STEADI-derived medication review and management; or (4) usual care. This presentation will discuss decisions made by the study team to facilitate implementation of STEADI including electronically conducting screening prior to the date of encounter, the use of dedicated nursing staff to conduct assessments, implementation of strength, balance, orthostatic hypotension, and vision testing, methods to facilitate medication review, and communication of assessment information to providers. The results from this study will be used to estimate the impact of STEADI on falls, service utilization, and costs over one year.

scholarly journals The Impact of Primary Care: A Focused Review

Scientifica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leiyu Shi
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
The United States ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Quality Healthcare ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Impact

Primary care serves as the cornerstone in a strong healthcare system. However, it has long been overlooked in the United States (USA), and an imbalance between specialty and primary care exists. The objective of this focused review paper is to identify research evidence on the value of primary care both in the USA and internationally, focusing on the importance of effective primary care services in delivering quality healthcare, improving health outcomes, and reducing disparities. Literature searches were performed in PubMed as well as “snowballing” based on the bibliographies of the retrieved articles. The areas reviewed included primary care definitions, primary care measurement, primary care practice, primary care and health, primary care and quality, primary care and cost, primary care and equity, primary care and health centers, and primary care and healthcare reform. In both developed and developing countries, primary care has been demonstrated to be associated with enhanced access to healthcare services, better health outcomes, and a decrease in hospitalization and use of emergency department visits. Primary care can also help counteract the negative impact of poor economic conditions on health.

The physical activity counselling (PAC) randomized controlled trial: rationale, methods, and interventions

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 1170-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle S. Fortier ◽  
William Hogg ◽  
Tracey L. O’Sullivan ◽  
Christopher Blanchard ◽  
Robert D. Reid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Physical Activity Counselling ◽  
Metabolic Outcomes ◽  
Motivation And Confidence ◽  
The Impact

Primary care is a promising venue to build patient motivation and confidence to increase physical activity (PA). Physician PA counselling has demonstrated some success; however, maintenance of behaviour change appears to require more intensive interventions. In reality, most physicians do not have the necessary training nor the time for this type of counselling. The purpose of this paper is to outline the rationale, methods, and interventions for the ongoing physical activity counselling (PAC) randomized controlled trial (RCT), which aims to assess the impact of integrating a PA counsellor into a primary care practice. This RCT has 2 arms: (i) brief PA counselling (2–4 min) from a health care provider and (ii) brief PA counselling + intensive PA counselling from a PA counsellor (3 months). The impact of this intervention is being evaluated using the comprehensive RE-AIM framework. One hundred twenty insufficiently active adult patients, aged 18 to 69 y and recruited during regular primary care visits have been randomized. Dependent measures include psychological mediators, PA participation, quality of life, and physical and metabolic outcomes. The PAC project represents an innovative, theoretically-based approach to promoting PA in primary care, focusing on psychological mediators of change. We anticipate that key lessons from this study will be useful for shaping future public health interventions, theories, and research.

scholarly journals Exploring Pharmacy Trainee Experiential Learning in a Full Scope Collaborative Rural Primary Care Practice: A Retrospective Chart Review

Pharmacy ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 155
Author(s):  
Sara Robinson ◽  
Feng Chang
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Drug Level ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Patient Transfers ◽  
Rural Primary Care ◽  
Time Basis ◽  
Acceptance Rates ◽  
The Impact

Despite reported benefits of pharmacy trainees (e.g., pharmacy students, pharmacy residents) in hospital settings, limited research on the impact of these trainees has been conducted in rural primary care. To explore the potential benefits and impact of pharmacy trainees practicing in a supervised collaborative rural primary care setting, a retrospective chart review was conducted. Drug therapy problems (DTPs) were classified using the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe (PCNE V9) system. Valuation was measured using a validated tool developed by Overhage and Lukes (1999). Over 16 weeks on a part-time basis, pharmacy trainees (n = 3) identified 366 DTPs during 153 patient encounters. The most common causes for DTPs were related to patient transfers and the need for education. Drug level interventions carried out directly by trainees under supervision accounted for 13.1% of total interventions. Interventions that required prescriber authorization had an acceptance rate of 83.25% higher than previous acceptance rates found in urban primary care settings. About half (51%) of the interventions proposed and made by pharmacy trainees were classified as significant or very significant, suggesting these trainees added significant value to the pharmacy service provided to rural community residents. This study suggests that pharmacy trainees can be effective resources and contribute meaningfully to patient care in a collaborative rural primary care team setting.

scholarly journals Impact of Interprofessional Primary Care Practice on Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review

SAGE Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 215824402093589
Author(s):  
Livia R. M. McCutcheon ◽  
Stuart T. Haines ◽  
Ruta Valaitis ◽  
Deborah A. Sturpe ◽  
Grant Russell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Collaborative Practice ◽  
Economic Outcomes ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Interprofessional Collaborative Practice ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
The Impact

Systematic reviews have provided some insight into the impact of interprofessional collaborative practice on patient outcomes. Despite strong interest in interprofessional collaborative practice, relatively little is known about its impact in primary care settings. This scoping literature review describes the essential elements of an interprofessional primary care practice and explores what is known about its impact on patient care including clinical, humanistic, and economic outcomes. We completed a review of the literature examining the breadth of knowledge related to interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care settings. A search was conducted to identify studies based on predefined criteria. A total of 51 studies met the criteria. A total of 27 studies reported a significantly positive clinical outcome with the interprofessional collaborative practice model, 27 studies reported no difference, and one study reported negative outcome in mortality. A total of 15 studies reported a significantly positive humanistic outcome. There was little to no difference in economic outcomes. This study provides new insights for future research that examines the impact of interprofessional primary care practice.

scholarly journals Dental Practice Integration into Primary Care: A Microsimulation of Financial Implications for Practices

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 2154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Eun Choi ◽  
Lisa Simon ◽  
Jane R. Barrow ◽  
Nathan Palmer ◽  
Sanjay Basu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
First Year ◽  
Dental Practice ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Net Revenue ◽  
Publicly Insured ◽  
The Impact

Given the widespread lack of access to dental care for many vulnerable Americans, there is a growing realization that integrating dental and primary care may provide comprehensive care. We sought to model the financial impact of integrating dental care provision into a primary care practice. A microsimulation model was used to estimate changes in net revenue per practice by simulating patient visits to a primary dental practice within primary care practices, utilizing national survey and un-identified claims data from a nationwide health insurance plan. The impact of potential changes in utilization rates and payer distributions and hiring additional staff was also evaluated. When dental care services were provided in the primary care setting, annual net revenue changes per practice were −$92,053 (95% CI: −93,054, −91,052) in the first year and $104,626 (95% CI: 103,315, 105,316) in subsequent years. Net revenue per annum after the first year of integration remained positive as long as the overall utilization rates decreased by less than 25%. In settings with a high proportion of publicly insured patients, the net revenue change decreased but was still positive. Integrating primary dental and primary care providers would be financially viable, but this viability depends on demands of dental utilization and payer distributions.

The Impact of Medical Scribes on Relative Value Units in a Pediatric Primary Care Practice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy A. Phillips ◽  
Kasey A. Foley ◽  
Benjamin H. Levi ◽  
Pooja Jhaveri ◽  
Cynthia H. Chuang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Practice ◽  
Pediatric Primary Care ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Relative Value ◽  
Medical Scribes ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals What happened and why? A programme theory-based qualitative evaluation of a healthcare-academia partnership reform in primary care

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Håkan Uvhagen ◽  
Henna Hasson ◽  
Johan Hansson ◽  
Mia von Knorring
Keyword(s):  
Professional Development ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Empirical Studies ◽  
Qualitative Evaluation ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Programme Theory ◽  
Research Student ◽  
Student Education ◽  
Primary Care Practitioners ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background There is increasing interest in and demands for partnerships between academia and healthcare practices. Few empirical studies have described the influence of such partnerships from a practice perspective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a reform launched to increase integration between primary care and academia and to identify potential reasons for why the observed impact occurred in three areas targeted by the reform: research, student education, and continued professional development. Methods The study was conducted in Stockholm County, the largest healthcare region in Sweden, at the introduction of a partnership between primary care and academia, including eight coordinating centres and approximately 500 surrounding primary care units. A programme theory-based qualitative approach to evaluation was used, building on document analysis, and in-depth interviews with the centre managers (n = 6) and coordinators (n = 8) conducted 42–66 months after the initiation of the reform. Results The analysis showed that the reform had some impact on all three areas targeted by the reform: research, student education, and continued professional development. The input that contributed most extensively to the impact was the establishment of facilitating roles. Most changes occurred at the coordinating centres and primarily in the area of student education. The effect on student education was primarily due to having prior experience in this area and perceptions of timely benefits of students to care practice. Conclusions Partnerships between primary care and academia hold the potential of practice impact. To increase integration between primary care and academia, the components of the integration must be understandable and relevant for primary care practitioners, and importantly, compliant with delivery of primary care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document