Carcass compositional changes in beef cattle during the grazing season

1986 ◽  
Vol 1986 ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
C E Hinks ◽  
E A Hunter ◽  
B G Lowman ◽  
D R Neilson
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Compositional Data ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Carcass Composition ◽  
Stocking Rate ◽  
Grazing Season ◽  
Statistical Confidence ◽  
Compositional Changes ◽  
Quantitative Changes ◽  
The Uk

Information relating to the carcass composition of grass-fattened beef cattle in the UK is not only limited in extent, but is also frequently uni-dimensional, in that the quantitative changes in carcass composition with time cannot be readily assessed. Furthermore, the methods used in selecting animals for slaughter (the visual appraisal of condition) introduces a source of non-random variation that cannot be removed with statistical confidence.The primary objective of the analysis reported here, therefore, was to evaluate the effects of time on carcass composition and thereby provide information upon which objective production strategies could be based.48 fattening steers and heifers (16-19 months old and 355 kg liveweight) of two contrasting breed types (Charolais x Hereford x Friesian and Hereford x Friesian) were summer grazed at a stocking rate of 5 animals per hectare. The animals were randomly allocated (at the start of the grazing season) to three slaughter points covering a 12 week period from early July to early October. The commercial saleable meat yield of the left side of each animal was measured together with compositional data from rib sample joints.

Endocannabinoid concentrations in plasma during the finishing period are associated with feed efficiency and carcass composition of beef cattle

2017 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
V. M. Artegoitia ◽  
A. P. Foote ◽  
R. G. Tait ◽  
L. A. Kuehn ◽  
R. M. Lewis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Feed Efficiency ◽  
Carcass Composition

A comparison of wheat and barley as supplements to grass silage for finishing beef cattle

1993 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. W. J. Steen
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Spring Barley ◽  
Live Weight ◽  
Ammonia Nitrogen ◽  
Carcass Composition ◽  
Metabolizable Energy ◽  
Crude Fibre ◽  
Grass Silage ◽  
Soya Bean Meal ◽  
Finishing Beef Cattle

AbstractTwo randomized-block experiments were carried out to examine the relative value of wheat and barley as supplements to grass silage for finishing beef cattle. In each experiment unwilted, formic acid-treated silage was offered ad libitum and supplemented with 500 g soya-bean meal and 50 g minerals and vitamins to 44 12-month-old bulls for 157 and 172 days in experiments 1 and 2 respectively. Twelve of the animals also received 2·5 kg rolled spring barley (LB), 12 received 4·0 kg barley (HB) and 20 received 3·25 kg rolled wheat (W). For experiments 1 and 2 respectively the barley contained 796 and 787 g dry matter (DM) per kg; 118 and 105 g crude protein (CP) per kg DM; 47 and 57 g crude fibre per kg DM; the wheat contained 845 and 800 g DM per kg; 112 and 116 g CP per kg DM; 23 and 25 g crude fibre per kg DM; and the silages contained 190 and 177 g DM per kg; 153 and 176 g CP per kg DM; 80 and 104 g ammonia-nitrogen per kg total nitrogen. On average over the two experiments, for treatments LB, HB and W respectively, silage DM intakes were 5·4, 4·7 (s.e. 0·14) and 4·9 (s.e. 0·11) kg/day; total DM intakes 7·9, 8·3 (s.e. 0·14) and 8·1 (s.e. 0·11) kg/day; metabolizable energy intakes 91·4, 97·8 and 94·2 MJ/day; live-weight gains 1·04,1·19 (s.e. 0·029) and 1·10 (s.e. 0·023) kg/day and carcass gams 0·65, 0·77 (s.e. 0·017) and 0·70 (s.e. 0·013) kg/day. It is concluded that the feeding value of wheat was proportionately 0·98 of that of barley for finishing beef cattle when given as a supplement to grass silage, and that the type of cereal offered did not affect silage intake or carcass composition.

scholarly journals Assessing the Progression of Alzheimer’s Disease in Real-World Settings in Three European Countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 749-759
Author(s):  
Albert Lladó ◽  
Lutz Froelich ◽  
Rezaul K. Khandker ◽  
Montserrat Roset ◽  
Christopher M. Black ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Behavioral Changes ◽  
The Uk ◽  
State Examination ◽  
Study Inclusion

Background: There exists considerable variation in disease progression rates among patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Objective: The primary objective of this observational study is to assess the progression of AD by characterizing cognitive, functional, and behavioral changes during the follow-up period between 6 and 24 months. Methods: A longitudinal prospective study with community-dwelling patients with an established clinical diagnosis of AD of mild to moderate severity was conducted in Germany, Spain and the UK. A sample of 616 patients from 69 sites was included. Results: Patients had a mean of 1.9 years (SD = 1.9) since AD diagnosis at study inclusion. Cognitive symptoms were reported to have first occurred a mean of 1.1 years (SD = 1.7) prior to AD diagnosis and 1.4 (SD = 1.8) years prior to AD treatment. Patients initially diagnosed with mild and moderate AD spent a median (95%CI) of 3.7 (2.8; 4.4) and 11.1 (6.1, ‘not reached’) years until progression to moderate and severe AD, respectively, according to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores. A mixed model developed for cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric scores, obtained from study patients at baseline and during follow-up period, showed progressive deterioration of AD patients over time. Conclusion: The study showed a deterioration of cognitive, functional, and neuropsychiatric functions during the follow-up period. Cognitive deterioration was slightly faster in patients with moderate AD compared to mild AD. The duration of moderate AD can be overestimated due to the use of retrospective data, lack of availability of MMSE scores in clinical charts and exclusion of patients at time of institutionalization.

Parasitic control at housing in cattle: a modern rationale

Livestock ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 270-273
Author(s):  
Jennifer Allan
Keyword(s):  
Infection Risk ◽  
Anthelmintic Treatment ◽  
Parasitic Disease ◽  
Grazing Season ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Disease Complexes

Anthelmintic treatment at housing remains the cornerstone of common nematode and trematode management in the UK, taking advantage of the low re-infection risk once away from pasture. Treatment removes any endoparasite burdens acquired during the grazing season and reduces effects on productivity through the winter, as well as levels of larvae and eggs shed onto the pasture at spring turnout. This article covers the four most common parasitic disease complexes encountered in the UK that benefit from treatment at housing.

The effect of metabolisable protein supply at constant energy intake on the liveweight gain of bovines

1995 ◽  
Vol 1995 ◽  
pp. 154-154
Author(s):  
P N Johnson ◽  
E R Deaville
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Theoretical Basis ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Official Method ◽  
Constant Energy ◽  
Protein Requirements ◽  
Metabolisable Energy ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Protein Supply ◽  
Degradable Protein

The metabolisable protein (MP) system (AFRC, 1992), adopted as the official method of describing the protein requirements of ruminants in the UK, introduces the concepts of effective rumen degradable protein (ERDP), digestible undegradable protein (DUP) and fermentable metabolisable energy (FME). For effective protein rationing, the aim is to match the supply of FME and ERDP, and to supply further protein requirements as DUP. This should lead to a better balance of energy and protein to meet the requirements of the animal. Diets are likely to have lower total protein contents than those presently available, leading to reductions in diet costs and nitrogen (N) excretion. The MP system was constructed primarily on a theoretical basis and this experiment was an initial step in validating it for beef cattle.

PSXIII-15 Impact of forage allowance on performance and reproductive parameters in Nellore heifers

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 467-468
Author(s):  
Igor M Ferreira ◽  
Iorrano A Cidrini ◽  
Karla Oliveira ◽  
Luciana Sousa ◽  
Laura F Prados ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Average Daily Gain ◽  
Experimental Period ◽  
Fixed Time ◽  
Carcass Composition ◽  
Stocking Rate ◽  
Treatment Conditions ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Daily Gain

Abstract The objective was to evaluate the effects of forage allowance on the performance and pregnancy rate of Nellore heifers submitted to the fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) at 14±1 months. The experimental period was divided into the growing phase (GP; 173d) and breeding season (83d). Ninety weaned Nellore heifers [169±19 kg of body weight (BW); 210±28 days of age] were blocked by initial BW and randomly assigned to receive different forage allowance: (1) High (HFA; 7.17 kgDM/kgBW; and (2) Low (LFA; 3.27 kgDM/kgBW); and divided into 6 paddocks (2.15 to 2.4 ha each one). The grazing method used was continuous stocking with a variable stocking rate where treatment conditions were established varying the stocking rate on pasture (put-and-take). The supplement consisted of corn, soybean meal, urea, monensin, sodium chloride and minerals mix (80% TDN and 24% CP) and was provided daily (ad libitum; expected intake around 1% of BW). The final pregnancy rate was determined after two FTAI (d256). Heifers BW at the end of the GP was greater (P < 0.01) for HFA vs. LFA (268 vs. 255 kg). The overall average daily gain (ADG) was greater 68 g/d for animals maintained in HFA than LFA (P < 0.01; 0.713 vs. 0.645 kg/d). Supplement intake (kg/animal/d) had no treatment effect (P = 0.117). On d173, forage allowance affected (P < 0.01) the backfat thickness obtained by real-time carcass ultrasound (HFA = 3.08 vs. LFA = 2.85 mm). The pregnancy rate had no treatment effect (P = 0.223; on average 61%). However, the pregnant heifers per hectare had treatment effect (P = 0.036; HFA = 3.78 vs. LFA = 2.72 pregnant heifers/ha). In conclusion, the low forage allowance reduces the animal performance and affects the carcass composition but provides a greater number of pregnant heifers per hectare.

Predicting carcass composition of beef cattle using ultrasound technology.

1999 ◽  
Vol 77 (4) ◽  
pp. 889 ◽  
Author(s):  
D B Griffin ◽  
J W Savell ◽  
H A Recio ◽  
R P Garrett ◽  
H R Cross
Keyword(s):  
Beef Cattle ◽  
Carcass Composition ◽  
Ultrasound Technology
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document