scholarly journals Radiosurgery and Accelerated Radiotherapy for Patients with Glioblastoma

Author(s):  
G. Shenouda ◽  
L. Souhami ◽  
E.B. Podgorsak ◽  
J.P Bahary ◽  
J.G. . Villemure ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT:Objective:To assess the feasibility, toxicity, and local control of stereotactic radiosurgery followed by accelerated external beam radiotherapy (AEBR) for patients with glioblastoma multiforme.Materials and methods:Six males and eight females, with a median age of 67.5 years (range 45-78 years), entered the study. Karnofsky performance status was 90 for five, 80 for six, and 60 for three patients. Following surgery, the patients were left with a residual mass 4 cm. Radiosurgery was delivered with a single dose of 20 Gy to the 90% isodose surface corresponding to the contrast-enhancing edge of the tumour. A total AEBR dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions was delivered using a concomitant boost technique over four weeks.Results:Median survival time was 40 weeks (range 17-80 weeks). Actuarial survivals at 12 and 18 months were 43% and 14%, respectively. The median time to progression was 25 weeks (range 2-77 weeks). One patient developed a seizure on the day of stereotactic radiosurgery. Two patients experienced somnolence at 47 and 67 days post-radiotherapy. Eight patients remained steroid-dependent. Radiological evidence of leukoencephalopathy was observed in one patient, and brain necrosis in two additional patients at 30 and 63 weeks. One of these two patients with brain necrosis developed complete loss of vision in one eye, and decreased vision in the contralateral eye at 63 weeks.Conclusion:Stereotactic radiosurgery followed by AEBR was feasible but was associated with late complications. The use of such radiosurgical boost for patients with glioblastoma multiforme should be reserved for those patients entering controlled clinical trials.

Neurosurgery ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
pp. 701-709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash J. Gabayan ◽  
Sylvan B. Green ◽  
Abhay Sanan ◽  
Joseph Jenrette ◽  
Christopher Schultz ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To review the cumulative experience of 10 institutions in treating recurrent malignant gliomas with the brachytherapy device, GliaSite Radiation Therapy System. METHODS: The patient population consisted of 95 patients with recurrent grade 3 or 4 gliomas, a median age of 51 years, and a median Karnofsky performance status score of 80. All patients had previously undergone resection and had received external beam radiotherapy as part of their initial treatment. After recurrence, each patient underwent maximal surgical debulking of their recurrent lesion and placement of an expandable balloon catheter (GliaSite) in the tumor cavity. The balloon was afterloaded with liquid 125I (Iotrex) to deliver a median dose of 60 Gy to an average depth of 1 cm with a median dose rate of 52.3 Gy/hr. Patients were carefully followed with serial magnetic resonance imaging and monthly examinations for tumor progression, side effects, and survival. RESULTS: The median survival for all patients, measured from date of GliaSite placement, was 36.3 weeks with an estimated 1 year survival of 31.1%. The median survival was 35.9 weeks for patients with an initial diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme and 43.6 weeks for those with non- glioblastoma multiforme malignant gliomas. Analysis of the influence of various individual prognostic factors on patient survival demonstrated that only Karnofsky performance status significantly predicted for improved survival. There were three cases of pathologically documented radiation necrosis. CONCLUSION: Reirradiation of malignant gliomas with the GliaSite Radiation Therapy System after reresection seems to provide a modest survival benefit above what would be expected from surgery alone. This report not only confirms the initial results of the feasibility study but provides evidence that similar outcomes can be obtained outside of a clinical trial.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel C. Nwokedi ◽  
Steven J. DiBiase ◽  
Salma Jabbour ◽  
Joseph Herman ◽  
Pradip Amin ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has become an effective therapeutic modality for the treatment of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). This retrospective review evaluates the impact of SRS delivered on a gamma knife (GK) unit as an adjuvant therapy in the management of patients with GBM. METHODS Between August 1993 and December 1998, 82 patients with pathologically confirmed GBM received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at the University of Maryland Medical Center. Of these 82 patients, 64 with a minimum follow-up duration of at least 1 month are the focus of this analysis. Of the 64 assessable patients, 33 patients were treated with EBRT alone (Group 1), and 31 patients received both EBRT plus a GK-SRS boost (Group 2). GK-SRS was administered to most patients within 6 weeks of the completion of EBRT. The median EBRT dose was 59.7 Gy (range, 28–70.2 Gy), and the median GK-SRS dose to the prescription volume was 17.1 Gy (range, 10–28 Gy). The median age of the study population was 50.4 years, and the median pretreatment Karnofsky performance status was 80. Patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related variables were analyzed by Cox regression analysis, and survival curves were generated by the Kaplan-Meier product limit. RESULTS Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 16 months, and the actuarial survival rate at 1, 2, and 3 years were 67, 40, and 26%, respectively. When comparing age, Karnofsky performance status, extent of resection, and tumor volume, no statistical differences where discovered between Group 1 versus Group 2. When comparing the overall survival of Group 1 versus Group 2, the median survival was 13 months versus 25 months, respectively (P = 0.034). Age, Karnofsky performance status, and the addition of GK-SRS were all found to be significant predictors of overall survival via Cox regression analysis. No acute Grade 3 or Grade 4 toxicity was encountered. CONCLUSION The addition of a GK-SRS boost in conjunction with surgery and EBRT significantly improved the overall survival time in this retrospective series of patients with GBM. A prospective, randomized validation of the benefit of SRS awaits the results of the recently completed Radiation Therapy Oncology Group's trial RTOG 93-05.


Author(s):  
Thierry Muanza ◽  
George Shenouda ◽  
Luis Souhami ◽  
Robert Corns ◽  
Richard Leblanc ◽  
...  

Purpose:To assess the feasibility and the toxicity of adjuvant high dose tamoxifen (TAM) and postoperative brain irradiation for patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).Material and Methods:Twelve patients with histopathologically confirmed GBM entered the study. There were nine males and three females, with median age of 48.8 years (range 30-75 years). Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 60-70% for four patients and 80-100% for eight patients. Based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partition analysis, there were three class III patients, six class IV, one class V, and two class VI. Eleven patients underwent partial surgical tumor resection and one patient had a near complete resection. Two weeks post surgery, the patients were started on high dose TAM (120mg/m2 P.O. BID for three months). Two weeks from date of starting TAM, external beam radiotherapy (RT) was given at a dose of 59.4 Gy/33 qd fractions/6.5 weeks. Patients were assessed weekly for toxicity during treatment. Imaging studies were done at the end of two weeks of TAM, then monthly.Results:Median follow-up was 40 weeks (range 22-84 weeks). In one patient, TAM was associated with significant vomiting, necessitating the TAM dose to be decreased at three weeks and then stopped at two months. One other patient had bilateral deep venous thrombosis after 51/2 weeks on TAM, although the relationship to TAM was not firmly established. There were no radiological responses after two weeks of TAM or at the end of RT. The median time to progression was 17.7 weeks (range 5.1- 43.8 weeks). Median survival time was 33.4 weeks (range 10-79.7). Actuarial survival at 48 and 74 weeks was 40% and 15%, respectively.Conclusion:Our study shows that adjuvant high dose TAM is feasible and relatively well-tolerated. Furthermore, the combined use of high dose TAM and RT postoperatively was not associated with any significant increase in radiation-induced neurological toxicity. However, high dose TAM does not appear to improve treatment results.


Author(s):  
Sergej Telentschak ◽  
Daniel Ruess ◽  
Stefan Grau ◽  
Roland Goldbrunner ◽  
Niklas von Spreckelsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The introduction of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (hSRS) extended the treatment modalities beyond the well-established single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and side effects of hSRS using Cyberknife® (CK-hSRS) for the treatment of patients with critical brain metastases (BM) and a very poor prognosis. We discuss our experience in light of current literature. Methods All patients who underwent CK-hSRS over 3 years were retrospectively included. We applied a surface dose of 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Rates of local control (LC), systemic progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Treatment-related complications were rated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results We analyzed 34 patients with 75 BM. 53% of the patients had a large tumor, tumor location was eloquent in 32%, and deep seated in 15%. 36% of tumors were recurrent after previous irradiation. The median Karnofsky Performance Status was 65%. The actuarial rates of LC at 3, 6, and 12 months were 98%, 98%, and 78.6%, respectively. Three, 6, and 12 months PFS was 38%, 32%, and 15%, and OS was 65%, 47%, and 28%, respectively. Median OS was significantly associated with higher KPS, which was the only significant factor for survival. Complications CTCAE grade 1–3 were observed in 12%. Conclusion Our radiation schedule showed a reasonable treatment effectiveness and tolerance. Representing an optimal salvage treatment for critical BM in patients with a very poor prognosis and clinical performance state, CK-hSRS may close the gap between surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, conventional radiotherapy, and palliative care.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (02) ◽  
pp. 080-090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Nikdad ◽  
Farshid Farhan ◽  
Milad Shafizadeh ◽  
Atefeh Mirmohseni ◽  
Mohsen Afarideh ◽  
...  

Objective Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an aggressive primary tumor with frequent recurrences that leaves patients with a short survival time and a low quality of life. The aim of this study was to review the prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. Material and Methods The focus of this retrospective study was a group of 153 patients with supratentorial GBM tumors, who were admitted to a tertiary-care referral academic center from 2005 to 2013. The factors associated with survival and local recurrence were assessed using the hazard ratio (HR) function of Cox proportional hazards regression and neural network analysis. Results Out of the 153 patients, 99 (64.7%) were male. The average age of the patients was 55.69 ± 15.10 years. The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 14.0 and 7.10 months respectively. In the multivariate analysis, age (HR = 2.939, p < 0.001), operative method (HR = 7.416, p < 0.001), temozolomide (TMZ, HR = 11.723, p < 0.001), lomustine (CCNU, HR = 8.139, p < 0.001), occipital lobe involvement (HR = 3.088, p < 0.001) and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS, HR = 4.831, p < 0.001) scores were shown to be significantly associated with a higher OS rate. Furthermore, higher KPS (HR = 7.292, p < 0.001) readings, the operative method (HR = 0.493, p = 0.005), the use of CCNU (HR = 2.047, p = 0.003) and resection versus chemotherapy (HR = 0.171, p < 0.001) were the significant factors associated with the local recurrence of the tumor. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the use of CCNU and TMZ, the operative method and higher KPS readings are associated with both higher survival and lower local recurrence rates.


2006 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manolo Piccirilli ◽  
Simona Bistazzoni ◽  
Franco Maria Gagliardi ◽  
Alessandro Landi ◽  
Antonio Santoro ◽  
...  

We report our remarks on 22 patients, 80 years of age and older, who were treated for glioblastoma multiforme. The 16 patients who underwent a multimodality treatment (surgery + radiotherapy + chemotherapy) had an average survival of 16.7 months versus the 5.8 months of the 8 patients treated with biopsy followed by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy (log-rank test, P <0.001). Moreover, we point out the importance of MGMT hypermethylation as a significant prognostic factor: the 9 patients with nonmethylated MGMT had a mean survival of 7.7 months vs 17.9 months of the 13 patients with the MGMT promoter methylated (log-rank test, P = 0.0006). Several studies have pointed out age as an important negative factor for the outcome of elderly patients affected by glioblastoma multiforme. Elderly patients with a diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme are thus generally excluded from clinical trials of treatment for the neoplasm, because it is a common opinion that the prognosis for such patients is particularly poor. On the contrary, according to our clinical and surgical experience, we firmly believe that patients older than 80 years with a histologically proven diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme and in good health conditions (Karnofsky performance status >60) should be treated in the same way as younger patients.


2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (04) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonardo Welling ◽  
José Carlos Lynch ◽  
Celestino Pereira ◽  
Ricardo Andrade ◽  
Fabiana Polycarpo Hidalgo ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective: To study if the prognosis variables such as age, the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), extension of tumor removal by surgery, radiotherapy and tumor volume influenced the survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Method: Retrospective analysis of GBM patients operated at Hospital dos Servidores do Estado between 1998 and 2008. Results: We could observe that age, the KPS and radiotherapy influenced the survival. The other variables did not have any prognosis implications. Conclusions: Despite many researches and many improvements regarding the diagnosis and the surgical techniques, the survival of patients with GBM has not changed in the last 30 years and is a therapeutic challenge. The surgical resection followed by radiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with GBM. The importance of each variable in the patient's prognosis is still to be established in the multivariate analyzes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Hamel-Perreault ◽  
D. Mathieu ◽  
L. Masson-Cote

Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (srs) for patients with 5 or more brain metastases (bmets) is a matter of debate. We report our results with that approach and the factors influencing outcome.Methods In the 103 patients who underwent srs for the treatment of 5 or more bmets, primary histology was nonsmall- cell lung cancer (57% of patients). All patients were grouped by Karnofsky performance status and recursive partitioning analysis (rpa) classification. In our cohort, 72% of patients had uncontrolled extracranial disease, and 28% had stable or responding systemic disease. Previous irradiation for 1–4 bmets had been given to 56 patients (54%). The mean number of treated bmets was 7 (range: 5–19), and the median cumulative bmets volume was 2 cm3 (range: 0.06–28 cm3).Results Multivariate analyses showed that stable extracranial disease (p < 0.001) and rpa (p = 0.022) were independent prognostic factors for overall survival (os). Moreover, a cumulative treated bmets volume of less than 6 cm3 (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.54; p = 0.006; 95% confidence interval: 1.30 to 4.99) was associated with better os. The total number of bmets had no effect on survival (p = 0.206). No variable was found to be predictive of local control. The rpa was significant (p = 0.027) in terms of distant recurrence.Conclusions Our study suggests that srs is a reasonable option for the management of patients with 5 or more bmets, especially with a cumulative treatment volume of less than 6 cm3.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Emily Bennett ◽  
Michael A Vogelbaum ◽  
Gene H Barnett ◽  
Lilyana Angelov ◽  
Samuel Chao ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used commonly for patients with brain metastases (BM) to improve intracranial disease control. However, survival of these patients is often dictated by their systemic disease course. The value of SRS becomes less clear in patients with anticipated short survival. OBJECTIVE To evaluate prognostic factors, which may predict early death (within 90 d) after SRS. METHODS A total of 1427 patients with BM were treated with SRS at our institution (2000-2012). There were 1385 cases included in this study; 1057 patients underwent upfront SRS and 328 underwent salvage SRS. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality within 90 d after first SRS. Multivariate analyses were performed to develop prognostic indices. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-six patients (19%, 95% confidence interval 17%-21%) died within 90 d after SRS. Multivariate analysis of upfront SRS patients showed that Karnofsky Performance Status, primary tumor type, extracranial metastases, age at SRS, boost treatment, total tumor volume, prior surgery, and interval from primary to BM were independent prognostic factors for 90-d mortality. The first 4 factors were also independent predictors in patients treated with salvage SRS. Based on these factors, an index was defined for each group that categorized patients into 3 and 2 prognostic groups, respectively. Ninety-day mortality was 5% to 7% in the most favorable cohort and 36% to 39% in the least favorable. CONCLUSION Indices based on readily available patient, clinical, and treatment factors that are highly predictive of early death in patients treated with upfront or salvage SRS can be calculated and used to define well-separated prognostic groups.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 69 (6) ◽  
pp. 1232-1239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Kano ◽  
Aditya Iyer ◽  
Douglas Kondziolka ◽  
Ajay Niranjan ◽  
John C. Flickinger ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Although whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) has been a standard palliative management for brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma, its benefit has been elusive because of radiobiological resistance. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. METHODS We reviewed records from 158 consecutive patients (men = 111, women = 47) who underwent SRS for 531 brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma. The median patient age was 61 years (range, 38-83 years), and the median number of tumors per patient was 1 (range, 1–10). Seventy-nine patients (50%) had solitary brain metastasis. Fifty-seven patients (36%) underwent prior WBRT. The median total tumor volume for each patient was 3.0 cm3 (range, 0.09-47 cm3). RESULTS The overall survival after SRS was 60%, 38%, and 19% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively, with a median survival of 8.2 months. Factors associated with longer survival included younger age, longer interval between primary diagnosis and brain metastases, lower recursive partitioning analysis class, higher Karnofsky performance status, smaller number of brain metastases, and no prior WBRT. Median survival for patients with &gt; 2 brain metastases, higher Karnofsky performance status (&gt; 90), and no prior WBRT was 12 months after SRS. Sustained local tumor control was achieved in 92% of patients. Symptomatic adverse radiation effects occurred in 7%. Overall, 70% of patients improved or remained neurologically stable. CONCLUSION Stereotactic radiosurgery is an especially valuable option for patients with higher Karnofsky performance status and smaller number of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document