scholarly journals Task shifting from general practitioners to practice assistants and nurses in primary care: a cross-sectional survey in 34 countries

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter P. Groenewegen ◽  
Wienke G. W. Boerma ◽  
Peter Spreeuwenberg ◽  
Bohumil Seifert ◽  
Willemijn Schäfer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Professional Training ◽  
Institutional Development ◽  
Task Shifting ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Independent Variables ◽  
Nurse Prescribing ◽  
Number Of Patients

Abstract Aim: To describe variation in task shifting from general practitioners (GPs) to practice assistants/nurses in 34 countries, and to explain differences by analysing associations with characteristics of the GPs, their practices and features of the health care systems. Background: Redistribution of tasks and responsibilities in primary care are driven by changes in demand for care, such as the growing number of patients with chronic conditions, and workforce developments, including staff shortage. The need to manage an expanding range of services has led to adaptations in the skill mix of primary care teams. However, these developments are hampered by barriers between professional domains, which can be rigid as a result of strict regulation, traditional attitudes and lack of trust. Methods: Data were collected between 2011 and 2013 through a cross-sectional survey among approximately 7200 GPs in 34 countries. The dependent variable ‘task shifting’ is measured through a composite score of GPs’ self-reported shifting of tasks. Independent variables at GP and practice level are: innovativeness; part-time working; availability of staff; location and population of the practice. Country-level independent variables are: institutional development of primary care; demand for and supply of care; nurse prescribing as an indicator for professional boundaries; professionalisation of practice assistants/nurses (indicated by professional training, professional associations and journals). Multilevel analysis is used to account for the clustering of GPs in countries. Findings: Countries vary in the degree of task shifting by GPs. Regarding GP and practice characteristics, use of electronic health record applications (as an indicator for innovativeness) and age of the GPs are significantly related to task shifting. These variables explain only little variance at the level of GPs. Two country variables are positively related to task shifting: nurse prescribing and professionalisation of primary care nursing. Professionalisation has the strongest relationship, explaining 21% of the country variation.

scholarly journals Knowledge and attitudes of Australian general practitioners towards medicinal cannabis: a cross-sectional survey

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. e022101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily A Karanges ◽  
Anastasia Suraev ◽  
Natalie Elias ◽  
Ramesh Manocha ◽  
Iain S McGregor
Keyword(s):  
General Practitioners ◽  
Prescription Drugs ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Therapeutic Effects ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Perceived Knowledge ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Knowledge And Attitudes ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Medicinal Cannabis

ObjectivesTo examine the knowledge and attitudes of Australian general practitioners (GP) towards medicinal cannabis, including patient demand, GP perceptions of therapeutic effects and potential harms, perceived knowledge and willingness to prescribe.Design, setting and participantsA cross-sectional survey completed by 640 GPs (response rate=37%) attending multiple-topic educational seminars in five major Australian cities between August and November 2017.Main outcome measuresNumber of patients enquiring about medicinal cannabis, perceived knowledge of GPs, conditions where GPs perceived it to be beneficial, willingness to prescribe, preferred models of access, perceived adverse effects and safety relative to other prescription drugs.ResultsThe majority of GPs (61.5%) reported one or more patient enquiries about medicinal cannabis in the last three months. Most felt that their own knowledge was inadequate and only 28.8% felt comfortable discussing medicinal cannabis with patients. Over half (56.5%) supported availability on prescription, with the preferred access model involving trained GPs prescribing independently of specialists. Support for use of medicinal cannabis was condition-specific, with strong support for use in cancer pain, palliative care and epilepsy, and much lower support for use in depression and anxiety.ConclusionsThe majority of GPs are supportive or neutral with regards to medicinal cannabis use. Our results highlight the need for improved training of GPs around medicinal cannabis, and the discrepancy between GP-preferred models of access and the current specialist-led models.

Palliative care consultations in primary care: a cross-sectional survey among Dutch general practitioners

2016 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2015-000967 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D Hoek ◽  
Henk J Schers ◽  
Jan C M Hendriks ◽  
Kris C P Vissers ◽  
Jeroen G J Hasselaar
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Management of Common Infections in German Primary Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Knowledge and Confidence among General Practitioners and Outpatient Pediatricians

Antibiotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 1131
Author(s):  
Peter Konstantin Kurotschka ◽  
Elena Tiedemann ◽  
Dominik Wolf ◽  
Nicola Thier ◽  
Johannes Forster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Antimicrobial Treatment ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

Outpatient antibiotic use is closely related to antimicrobial resistance and in Germany, almost 70% of antibiotic prescriptions in human health are issued by primary care physicians (PCPs). The aim of this study was to explore PCPs, namely General Practitioners’ (GPs) and outpatient pediatricians’ (PDs) knowledge of guideline recommendations on rational antimicrobial treatment, the determinants of confidence in treatment decisions and the perceived need for training in this topic in a large sample of PCPs from southern Germany. Out of 3753 reachable PCPs, 1311 completed the survey (overall response rate = 34.9%). Knowledge of guideline recommendations and perceived confidence in making treatment decisions were high in both GPs and PDs. The two highest rated influencing factors on prescribing decisions were reported to be guideline recommendations and own clinical experiences, hence patients’ demands and expectations were judged as not influencing treatment decisions. The majority of physicians declared to have attended at least one specific training course on antibiotic use, yet almost all the participating PCPs declared to need more training on this topic. More studies are needed to explore how consultation-related and context-specific factors could influence antibiotic prescriptions in general and pediatric primary care in Germany beyond knowledge. Moreover, efforts should be undertaken to explore the training needs of PCPs in Germany, as this would serve the development of evidence-based educational interventions targeted to the improvement of antibiotic prescribing decisions rather than being focused solely on knowledge of guidelines.

scholarly journals The use of ultrasound in primary care: Longitudinal billing and cross-sectional survey study in Switzerland

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dima Touhami ◽  
Christoph Merlo ◽  
Joachim Hohmann ◽  
Stefan Essig
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Survey Data ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Billing Data ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Clinical Indications ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Wide Range

Abstract Background Ultrasound imaging is utilized in Swiss primary care; however, little is known regarding the extent to which it is performed. With this study, we aim to (1) provide an overview of ultrasound use by general practitioners (GPs), and (2) determine the clinical indications of ultrasound in Swiss general practice.Methods This is a quantitative study, analyzing fifteen years of billing data from 213 GPs in Central Switzerland, and cross-sectional survey data completed by 61 GPs attending 26 certification and refresher courses offered by the Swiss Society of Ultrasound in Medicine (SGUM).Results According to billing data, 49% of the GPs used ultrasound and provided 130,245 exams to 67,180 patients between 2004 and 2018. Over the years, ultrasound use became more frequent among GPs. Male GPs provide more ultrasound exams than female GPs. Patients that are female, ≥65 years, and multi-morbid had more ultrasound exams compared to males, patients <65 years, and those with only one morbidity, respectively. GPs provided a mean of 129 ultrasound exams per physician-year. Abdominal ultrasound comprised almost 69% of all exams. According to survey data, indications covered many organ systems and clinical conditions, with abdominal indications being most frequent among them.Conclusions The use of ultrasound is high among general practitioners and it covers a wide range of clinical indications. Ultrasound is utilized primarily in the diagnosis of clinical indications of the abdomen, and more often for female than male patients.

scholarly journals The Frequency and Content of Discussions About Alcohol Use in Primary Care and Application of the Chief Medical Officer’s Low-Risk Drinking Guidelines: A Cross-Sectional Survey of General Practitioners and Practice Nurses in the UK

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack M Birch ◽  
Nathan Critchlow ◽  
Lynn Calman ◽  
Robert Petty ◽  
Gillian Rosenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Practice Nurses ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Do So

Abstract Aims To examine how often general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) working in primary care discuss alcohol with patients, what factors prompt discussions, how they approach patient discussions and whether the Chief Medical Officers’ (CMO) revised low-risk drinking guidelines are appropriately advised. Methods Cross-sectional survey with GPs and PNs working in primary care in the UK, conducted January–March 2017 (n = 2020). A vignette exercise examined what factors would prompt a discussion about alcohol, whether they would discuss before or after a patient reported exceeded the revised CMO guidelines (14 units per week) and whether the CMO drinking guidelines were appropriately advised. For all patients, participants were asked how often they discussed alcohol and how they approached the discussion (e.g. used screening tool). Results The most common prompts to discuss alcohol in the vignette exercise were physical cues (44.7% of participants) or alcohol-related symptoms (23.8%). Most practitioners (70.1%) said they would wait until a patient was exceeding CMO guidelines before instigating discussion. Two-fifths (38.1%) appropriately advised the CMO guidelines in the vignette exercise, with PNs less likely to do so than GPs (odds ratio [OR] = 0.77, P = 0.03). Less than half (44.7%) reportedly asked about alcohol always/often with all patients, with PNs more likely to ask always/often than GPs (OR = 2.22, P &lt; 0.001). Almost three-quarters said they would enquire by asking about units (70.3%), compared to using screening tools. Conclusion Further research is required to identify mechanisms to increase the frequency of discussions about alcohol and appropriate recommendation of the CMO drinking guidelines to patients.

scholarly journals General practitioners’ views on use of patient reported outcome measures in primary care: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace M Turner ◽  
Ian Litchfield ◽  
Sam Finnikin ◽  
Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi ◽  
Melanie Calvert
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Clinical Systems

Abstract Background Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to assess impact of disease and treatment on quality of life and symptoms; however, their use in primary care is fragmented. We aimed to understand the current use of PROMs in primary care, barriers and facilitators, and how their use might be optimised. Methods Cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews among general practitioners (GPs) in England. GPs’ opinions were explored using an electronic, self-completed questionnaire disseminated to 100 GPs via an online doctors’ community and semi-structured qualitative interviews with 25 GPs. Results Most GPs surveyed (77/100; 77%) reported using one or more PROM, primarily to aid clinical management (n=66) or as screening/diagnostic tools (n=62). Qualitative interviews highlighted challenges in identifying and selecting PROMs; however, some GPs valued PROMs for shared decision making and to direct patient discussions. The interviews identified key barriers to PROM use including: time constraints; insufficient knowledge; lack of integration into clinical systems; and PROMs being mandated without consultation or explanation. Evidence of the benefit of PROMs is required to promote uptake and use of PROMs in primary care. Conclusion Implementation of PROMs in primary care requires integration with clinical systems, a bottom-up approach to PROM selection and system design involving meaningful consultation with patients and primary care clinicians and training/support for use.

scholarly journals Association of GP wellbeing and burnout with patient safety in UK primary care: a cross-sectional survey

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (684) ◽  
pp. e507-e514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise H Hall ◽  
Judith Johnson ◽  
Ian Watt ◽  
Daryl B O’Connor
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Improve Patient Safety ◽  
Near Miss ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Safety Outcomes ◽  
Administrative Tasks

BackgroundGPs have particularly high levels of burnout and poor wellbeing. Although both are associated with poorer safety outcomes within secondary care, there have been no quantitative studies investigating this within primary care. Furthermore, little is known about how occupational demands, burnout and wellbeing, and patient safety are all associated.AimTo investigate whether occupational variables (demands and support) are associated with patient safety outcomes in general practice through their influence on GP burnout and wellbeing.Design and settingCross-sectional survey in the UK between March 2016 and August 2017.MethodA total of 232 practising GPs completed an online or paper survey measuring burnout, wellbeing, occupational demands and support, and patient safety.ResultsIn all, 93.8% of GPs were classed as likely to be suffering from a minor psychiatric disorder, 94.7% as suffering from mild (22.0%) or severe (72.7%) exhaustion, and 86.8% as having mild (37.9%) or severe (48.9%) disengagement. Structural equation modelling (SEM) analyses showed that spending a higher number of hours on administrative tasks and on call, and feeling less supported in their practice, was associated with lower wellbeing, which in turn was associated with a higher likelihood of having reported a near miss in the previous 3 months. A higher number of hours spent on administrative tasks, a higher number of patients seen per day, and feeling less supported were associated with higher burnout levels, which in turn was associated with worse perceptions of safety.ConclusionTo improve patient safety within general practice changes could be made at both practice and individual levels to promote a healthier work environment for staff and patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document