scholarly journals Galactic Mass Density in the Vicinity of the Sun

1977 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-33
Author(s):  
M. Joeveer ◽  
J. Einasto

It is possible to estimate the galactic mass density in the solar neighbourhood either directly by summing up the mass densities of individual subsystems of stars and interstellar matter or indirectly from dynamical considerations.Observational data on the number density of visible stars lead to mutually consistent results on the stellar component of the mass density. The mean of different estimates is ⍴stars=0.052±0.010 Mʘpc−3. By adding the probable contributions of intrinsically faint undetected objects and of interstellar matter the value ⍴=0.09±0.02 Mʘpc−3 has been obtained for the total mass density.

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (S342) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Luca Ciotti ◽  
Silvia Pellegrini

AbstractThe fully analytical solution for isothermal Bondi accretion on a black hole (MBH) at the center of JJ two-component Jaffe (1983) galaxy models is presented. In JJ models the stellar and total mass density distributions are described by the Jaffe profile, with different scale-lengths and masses, and to which a central MBH is added; all the relevant stellar dynamical properties can also be derived analytically. In these new accretion solutions the hydrodynamical and stellar dynamical properties are linked by imposing that the gas temperature is proportional to the virial temperature of the stellar component. The formulae that are provided allow to evaluate all flow properties, and are then useful for estimates of the accretion radius and the mass flow rate when modeling accretion on MBHs at the center of galaxies.


1977 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-19
Author(s):  
W. Gliese

Twelve years ago, during the International Summer Course at Lagonissi, Bart Bok (1966) presented a paper “Desiderata for Future Galactic Research”. He pointed to the importance of studies in the galactic polar caps which would allow us, as he hoped, to determine some basic data for galactic structure.The significance of his statements was demonstrated already in the following years when the gradual increase of our knowledge of the objects in the solar neighbourhood was suddenly interrupted by new observational data from which diverging conclusions have been drawn. Never before have such controversial opinions on problems in the vicinity of the sun been so eagerly discussed: A formerly unknown numerous population of low-velocity red dwarfs, the mass density resulting from stars three times that formerly thought, a remarkably increased luminosity function - yes or no? Obviously, the controversies have smoothed down again during the last months. But what is the situation after this troubled period? Which problems are still unsolved? Which promising programmes will be proposed? I think this Joint Discussion is justified in 1976!


1968 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. 481-484
Author(s):  
F. L. Whipple

The basic material of this discussion is being published under the title ‘On Maintaining the Meteoritic Complex’.* The assumed meteoritic influx on the Earth is derived from measurements of penetration of space vehicles, radio and photographic meteors, meteorite falls, Apollo asteroids, lunar craters, and comets (see Figure 1). I assume that the much higher impact rates from acoustic measures of dust and from collections do not measure the true influx rate. The total flux is some 2 × 10−16 g cm−2 sec−1 on the surface of a corresponding non-gravitating sphere. I take the equivalent space density of some 2 × 10−22 gm cm−3 as applicable over a volume of some 3·5 AU radius about the Sun and i<20° of the ecliptic, giving a total mass of 4·5 × 1019 gm for particles of mass < 102gm. For Earth-crossing orbits the total mass is some 1·3 × 1019 gm. I adopt 2·5 × 1019 gm for the total mass.All known dissipating or destructive factors are included in determining the ‘ecology’ of the meteoritic material. Direct light pressure quickly eliminates particles of the order of 1μ or less in dimension while the solar wind drives away all gases. The Poynting-Robertson effect (PR-effect) is effectively increased by some 22% because of the pseudo PR-effect of the solar wind. Direct sublimation of earthy solids is significant only near the Sun while sputtering losses produced by the solar wind are real but effectively small (~ 10%) compared to spiralling rates by the PR-effect. Magnetic-field, charge and rotation effects may quite possibly be significant but are not yet subject to precise calculations.Space erosion has been demonstrated for stony meteorites and cometary meteoroids (see Table 1). A totally destructive collision is assumed to occur when a particle of mass m is struck by another with mass ≥m/3200. Gravitational elimination effects for the Earth and Venus (time ~ 108 yr), Mars (time ~ 6 × 109 yr) and Jupiter (time ~ 106 yr) are, following öpik, assumed to be negligible for the small Zodiacal Cloud particles, compared to the dissipative effects included above.The mean lifetimes for small particles of mass m are calculated crudely and presented in Table 2 along with the assumed distribution function in mass. The corrected (factor 1/1·3) PR-lifetime is indicated by τPR, erosion by particles of mass < m/3200 by τe, collisional destruction by particles of mass ≥ m/3200 by τc, and the mean lifetime including all these effects by τ.The mean lifetime is much less dependent on mass than might be expected. Averaging all the particles according to mass distribution and τ, the weighted mean lifetime for all material of m< 102gm comes out 8 × 104 yr. Combining this mean lifetime with a total mass of 2·5 × 1019 gm, the average total-input rate to maintain the Zodiacal Cloud in quasi-equilibrium becomes some 10 tons sec−1. Note that this input rate may be considerably overestimated because I have not included the contributions to the cloud by broken fragments.It appears quite possible that comets can supply the needed 10 tons sec−1 injected into orbits totally within that of Jupiter. Fragile carbonaceous chondrites and ‘half-baked asteroids’ (see Appendix), however, may compete with comets in contributing to the fireballs and possibly to the visual meteors. The stony meteorites may be maintained by collisional spallation from Earth-crossing asteroids induced by smaller bodies, the Apollo asteroids being derived from the asteroid belt by the gravitational effects of Mars. The data and theory are not yet adequate to provide a definitive solution to the problem of asteroidal vs. cometary origin for the Apollo asteroids.One asks whether McCrosky's fireballs might have originated directly from comets, not primarily from Apollo asteroids. Jupiter crossings (τ ~ 106 yr) might have eliminated most of the orbits with aphelia beyond Jupiter's. A rough calculation failed by a factor of 3–5 in accounting for the reduction in numbers of orbits with large aphelion distances among McCrosky's fireballs as compared to the number among photographic meteors. This leaves the question essentially unsolved but also allows the possibility that a considerable fraction of McCrosky's fireballs may be of direct cometary origin, in typical short-period comet orbits, rather than Apollo-asteroid fragments.


Author(s):  
yin zhu

It is discovered that the gravitational field on the surface of a neutron star is with a relativistic mass density of 2.65*1016~5.87*1018kgm-3 which can be larger than the mass density of the neutron star (~1017kgm-3). And, the total relativistic mass of the gravitational field of the Sun is ~107 times the mass of the Sun. For different stars, the relativistic mass of the gravitational field is larger as the mass density of the star is larger. In the Milky Way, the total relativistic mass of the gravitational fields is much larger than the total mass of the stars, planets and gas. And, the relativistic mass density of the observed strongest magnetic field is 2.17*108kgm-3. This discovery should be a new frame to understand the fundamental problem of physics.


Author(s):  
M. K. Lamvik ◽  
A. V. Crewe

If a molecule or atom of material has molecular weight A, the number density of such units is given by n=Nρ/A, where N is Avogadro's number and ρ is the mass density of the material. The amount of scattering from each unit can be written by assigning an imaginary cross-sectional area σ to each unit. If the current I0 is incident on a thin slice of material of thickness z and the current I remains unscattered, then the scattering cross-section σ is defined by I=IOnσz. For a specimen that is not thin, the definition must be applied to each imaginary thin slice and the result I/I0 =exp(-nσz) is obtained by integrating over the whole thickness. It is useful to separate the variable mass-thickness w=ρz from the other factors to yield I/I0 =exp(-sw), where s=Nσ/A is the scattering cross-section per unit mass.


2019 ◽  
Vol 489 (1) ◽  
pp. 842-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dandan Xu ◽  
Ling Zhu ◽  
Robert Grand ◽  
Volker Springel ◽  
Shude Mao ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Motivated by the recently discovered kinematic ‘Hubble sequence’ shown by the stellar orbit-circularity distribution of 260 CALIFA galaxies, we make use of a comparable galaxy sample at z = 0 with a stellar mass range of $M_{*}/\mathrm{M}_{\odot }\in [10^{9.7},\, 10^{11.4}]$ selected from the IllustrisTNG simulation and study their stellar orbit compositions in relation to a number of other fundamental galaxy properties. We find that the TNG100 simulation broadly reproduces the observed fractions of different orbital components and their stellar mass dependences. In particular, the mean mass dependences of the luminosity fractions for the kinematically warm and hot orbits are well reproduced within model uncertainties of the observed galaxies. The simulation also largely reproduces the observed peak and trough features at $M_{*}\approx 1\rm {-}2\times 10^{10}\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$ in the mean distributions of the cold- and hot-orbit fractions, respectively, indicating fewer cooler orbits and more hotter orbits in both more- and less-massive galaxies beyond such a mass range. Several marginal disagreements are seen between the simulation and observations: the average cold-orbit (counter-rotating) fractions of the simulated galaxies below (above) $M_{*}\approx 6\times 10^{10}\, \mathrm{M}_{\odot }$ are systematically higher than the observational data by $\lesssim 10{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$ (absolute orbital fraction); the simulation also seems to produce more scatter for the cold-orbit fraction and less so for the non-cold orbits at any given galaxy mass. Possible causes that stem from the adopted heating mechanisms are discussed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (S330) ◽  
pp. 148-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard J. Bernard

AbstractWe took advantage of the Gaia DR1 to combine TGAS parallaxes with Tycho-2 and APASS photometry to calculate the star formation history (SFH) of the solar neighbourhood within 250 pc using the colour-magnitude diagram fitting technique. We present the determination of the completeness within this volume, and compare the resulting SFH with that calculated from the Hipparcos catalogue within 80 pc of the Sun. We also show how this technique will be applied out to ~5 kpc thanks to the next Gaia data releases, which will allow us to quantify the SFH of the thin disc, thick disc and halo in situ, rather than extrapolating based on the stars from these components that are today in the solar neighbourhood.


2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark J. van der Laan ◽  
Alexander R. Luedtke ◽  
Iván Díaz

AbstractYoung, Hernán, and Robins consider the mean outcome under a dynamic intervention that may rely on the natural value of treatment. They first identify this value with a statistical target parameter, and then show that this statistical target parameter can also be identified with a causal parameter which gives the mean outcome under a stochastic intervention. The authors then describe estimation strategies for these quantities. Here we augment the authors’ insightful discussion by sharing our experiences in situations where two causal questions lead to the same statistical estimand, or the newer problem that arises in the study of data adaptive parameters, where two statistical estimands can lead to the same estimation problem. Given a statistical estimation problem, we encourage others to always use a robust estimation framework where the data generating distribution truly belongs to the statistical model. We close with a discussion of a framework which has these properties.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uwe Berger ◽  
Gerd Baumgarten ◽  
Jens Fiedler ◽  
Franz-Josef Lübken

Abstract. In this paper we present a new description about statistical probability density distributions (pdfs) of Polar Mesospheric Clouds (PMC) and noctilucent clouds (NLC). The analysis is based on observations of maximum backscatter, ice mass density, ice particle radius, and number density of ice particles measured by the ALOMAR RMR-lidar for all NLC seasons from 2002 to 2016. From this data set we derive a new class of pdfs that describe the statistics of PMC/NLC events which is different from previously statistical methods using the approach of an exponential distribution commonly named g-distribution. The new analysis describes successfully the probability statistic of ALOMAR lidar data. It turns out that the former g-function description is a special case of our new approach. In general the new statistical function can be applied to many kinds of different PMC parameters, e.g. maximum backscatter, integrated backscatter, ice mass density, ice water content, ice particle radius, ice particle number density or albedo measured by satellites. As a main advantage the new method allows to connect different observational PMC distributions of lidar, and satellite data, and also to compare with distributions from ice model studies. In particular, the statistical distributions of different ice parameters can be compared with each other on the basis of a common assessment that facilitate, for example, trend analysis of PMC/NLC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document