Multiplexed Signal Ion Emission Reactive Release Amplification (SIERRA) Assay for the Culture-Free Detection of Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacteria and Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

Author(s):  
Michael Pugia ◽  
Tiyash Bose ◽  
Marco Tjioe ◽  
Dylan Frabutt ◽  
Zane Baird ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Venere Cortazzo ◽  
Tiziana D’Inzeo ◽  
Liliana Giordano ◽  
Giulia Menchinelli ◽  
Flora Marzia Liotti ◽  
...  

Among molecular assays currently developed for detection and identification of pathogens (and their antimicrobial resistance genes) in positive blood cultures (BCs) (1), the BioFire FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel (bioMérieux, Marcy l’Étoile, France)—a multiplex PCR assay with less than 2 minutes of hands-on time and a ∼1-hour turnaround time—allows syndromic diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI) (2, 3). Previously, the panel could identify 24 etiological agents of BSI (11 Gram-negative bacteria, 8 Gram-positive bacteria, and 5 yeast species), as well as three antimicrobial resistance genes (mecA, vanA/B, and blaKPC, which encodes Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase). Now, the BioFire FilmArray BCID2 panel encompasses 43 molecular targets associated with BSI, including 15 Gram-negative bacteria, 11 Gram-positive bacteria, 7 yeast species, and 10 antimicrobial resistance genes (https://www.biomerieux-diagnostics.com/biofire-bcid-panel). The last targets include genes encoding for carbapenemases (IMP, KPC, OXA-48-like, NDM, and VIM), colistin resistance (mcr-1), ESBL (CTX-M), methicillin-resistance (mecA/C and, specifically for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA], mecA/C and MREJ [mec right-extremity junction]), or vancomycin resistance (vanA/B). Unlike BCID, no published studies to date reported on the BCID2 performance. This study evaluated and compared the accuracy of BCID2 with that of BCID to identify bacterial species and relative antimicrobial resistance genes directly from positive BCs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen C. Carroll ◽  
Jennifer L. Reid ◽  
Adam Thornberg ◽  
Natalie N. Whitfield ◽  
Deirdre Trainor ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Rapid identification from positive blood cultures is standard of care (SOC) in many clinical microbiology laboratories. The GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel is a multiplex nucleic acid amplification assay based on competitive DNA hybridization and electrochemical detection using eSensor technology. This multicenter study compared the investigational-use-only (IUO) BCID-GP Panel to other methods of identification of 20 Gram-positive bacteria, four antimicrobial resistance genes, and both Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets that are unique to the BCID-GP Panel. Ten microbiology laboratories throughout the United States collected residual, deidentified positive blood culture samples for analysis. Five laboratories tested both clinical and contrived samples with the BCID-GP Panel. Comparator identification methods included each laboratory’s SOC, which included matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and automated identification systems as well as targeted PCR/analytically validated real-time PCR (qPCR) with bidirectional sequencing. A total of 2,342 evaluable samples (1,777 clinical and 565 contrived) were tested with the BCID-GP Panel. The overall sample accuracy for on-panel organisms was 89% before resolution of discordant results. For pathogenic Gram-positive targets (Bacillus cereus group, Enterococcus spp., Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus lugdunensis, Listeria spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Streptococcus spp., Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus group, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Streptococcus pyogenes), positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) ranged from 93.1% to 100% and 98.8% to 100%, respectively. For contamination rule-out targets (Bacillus subtilis group, Corynebacterium, Cutibacterium acnes, Lactobacillus, and Micrococcus), PPA and NPA ranged from 84.5% to 100% and 99.9% to 100%, respectively. Positive percent agreement and NPA for the Pan Candida and Pan Gram-Negative targets were 92.4% and 95.7% for the former and 99.9% and 99.6% for the latter. The PPAs for resistance markers were as follows: mecA, 97.2%; mecC, 100%; vanA, 96.8%; and vanB, 100%. Negative percent agreement ranged from 96.6% to 100%. In conclusion, the ePlex BCID-GP Panel compares favorably to SOC and targeted molecular methods for the identification of 20 Gram-positive pathogens and four antimicrobial resistance genes in positive blood culture bottles. This panel detects a broad range of pathogens and mixed infections with yeast and Gram-negative organisms from the same positive blood culture bottle.


2017 ◽  
Vol 07 (04) ◽  
pp. 016-020
Author(s):  
Juliet Roshini Mohan Raj ◽  
Rajeshwari Vittal ◽  
Santosh Kogaluru Shivakumaraswamy ◽  
Vijaya Kumar Deekshit ◽  
Indrani Karunasagar

AbstractDownstream water systems provide for a conducive environment for horizontal gene transfer. The objective of this study was to determine the burden of antimicrobial resistance in waste water effluents from different sources and their impact on human health. Gram negative bacteria were isolated from 30 samples each of industrial, hospital and domestic effluents. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the 367 isolates from 90 effluent samples was determined by disc diffusion test and presence of antimicrobial resistance genes by polymerase chain reaction. Resistance to ampicillin was 62% in hospital effluents and was higher than that recorded for industrial and domestic effluents. While the highest percentage of resistance to tetracycline was observed in isolates from industrial effluents (42%) a low of 9.5% was observed in hospital effluents. Antimicrobial resistance determinants present on mobile genetic elements were observed in a small fraction (~10%) of the resistant isolates. The resistance profile of isolates in effluents reflect the practices of different industries. Resistant isolates in domestic effluents could be a reflection of the indiscriminate use of antibiotics andthat many of the contents of disinfectants and cleaning agents routinely used may contain structural analogs of antimicrobials used in therapy. Though by phenotypic test a higher prevalence of antimicrobial resistance was recorded the genotypic study revealed the prevalence to be low. This could be due to the limited number of antimicrobial resistance genes included in this study.


F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 878
Author(s):  
Gerald Mboowa ◽  
Ivan Sserwadda ◽  
Dickson Aruhomukama

Background: Antimicrobial resistance threatens the achievements of modern medicine as well as the sustainability of effective global public health responses to the threat posed by infectious diseases. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in bacteria provides the main mechanism of resistance in gram-negative bacteria, particularly those belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family as well as gram-positive bacteria. This study hence aimed at providing insights into the potential role of in-patients, their immediate hospital environments, out-patients, and their communities in the transmission of antimicrobial resistance via identifying gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria commonly isolated in samples collected from each of these patients/sites as well as their antimicrobial susceptibility profiles using extended-spectrum β-lactamase production in the same as the basis. Methods: Our study reviewed four cross-sectional studies conducted at national and regional referral hospitals in Uganda. Data on bacterial aetiology and antimicrobial susceptibility testing retrieved from the studies was imported into Microsoft Excel, cleaned, sand then exported to IBM SPSS statistics (version 16) for statistical analysis. The databases used were PubMed and Embase.  Results: We report that; Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are the most prevalent Enterobacteriaceae species in the samples that were collected in the studies reviewed; these species account for the highest proportions of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers; Staphylococcus aureus is the most prevalent of the gram-positive bacteria isolated from the same samples, and accounts for the highest proportions of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers in the gram-positive bacteria isolated, and similar Enterobacteriaceae species and gram-positive bacteria, are predominant in samples from in-patients, their immediate hospital environments, and out-patients. Conclusion: The insights provided indicate antimicrobial resistance transmission dynamics be re-thought and more comprehensive studies aimed at investigating the same be done to ascertain the source and transmission routes of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in clinical settings.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Seok Kim ◽  
Go-Eun Kang ◽  
Han-Sung Kim ◽  
Hyun Soo Kim ◽  
Wonkeun Song ◽  
...  

The performance of molecular tests using the Verigene Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Blood Culture nucleic acid tests (BC-GP and BC-GN, resp.; Naosphere, Northbrook, IL, USA) was evaluated for the identification of microorganisms detected from blood cultures. Ninety-nine blood cultures containing Gram-positive bacteria and 150 containing Gram-negative bacteria were analyzed using the BC-GP and BC-GN assays, respectively. Blood cultures were performed using the Bactec blood culture system (BD Diagnostic Systems, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and conventional identification and antibiotic-susceptibility tests were performed using a MicroScan system (Siemens, West Sacramento, CA, USA). When a single strain of bacteria was isolated from the blood culture, Verigene assays correctly identified 97.9% (94/96) of Gram-positive bacteria and 93.8% (137/146) of Gram-negative bacteria. Resistance genesmecAandvanAwere correctly detected by the BC-GP assay, while the extended-spectrumβ-lactamase CTX-M and the carbapenemase OXA resistance gene were detected from 30 cases cultures by the BC-GN assay. The BC-GP and BC-GN assays showed high agreement with conventional identification and susceptibility tests. These tests are useful for rapid identification of microorganisms and the detection of clinically important resistance genes from positive Bactec blood cultures.


Author(s):  
Hornel Koudokpon ◽  
Victorien Dougnon ◽  
Christelle Lougbegnon ◽  
Esther Deguenon ◽  
Wassiyath Mousse ◽  
...  

Background: The environment plays an important role in the dissemination of multidrug resistant bacteria, especially through the aquatic ecosystem, including hospital effluents, rivers, but also spring water and drinking water. This study aims to determine selected antimicrobial resistance genes in some aquatic matrices in southern Benin. Methods: Collected water samples were filtered through a membrane 0.22 µm thick. After filtration, the membrane was deposited on Muëller Hinton agar. Then the colonies resulting from this subculture were subjected to a microbiological examination by the conventional method. The antibiotic sensitivity test was carried out by the Kirby Bauer method according to the recommendations of the French Society of Microbiology. Resistance genes were looked for by PCR. Results: Of the 222 water samples collected, 265 bacterial strains were isolated, the majority of which were strains of Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CNS) with 37.74% (n = 100), followed by strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae (21.89%; n = 58), Escherichia coli (10.57%; n = 28). All isolated gram-negative bacilli strains are multidrug resistant with resistance of all strains to amoxicillin, ampicillin and amoxicillin + clavulanic acid. Of the 15 resistance genes searched in the genome of Gram-negative bacilli strains, 8 were detected, namely the TEM, SHV, CTX-M15, VIM, NDM, SUL1, SUL2 and AADA genes. Resistance of CNS strains to amoxicillin, oxacillin and cefoxitin was observed. The meca gene was detected in all CNS strains. The vanA and VanB genes were only detected in strains isolated from drinking water in sachets collected from producers and street sellers. Conclusion: These results show the dissemination of resistance genes in Benin and once again confirms the urgency of a global fight against antimicrobial resistance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document