College Students With Learning Difficulties: Emotional Effects on Cognitive Performance

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla E. Umpierre ◽  
Irene M. Bravo ◽  
Liane Dornheim
2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul T. Cirino ◽  
Marlyne K. Israelian ◽  
Mary K. Morris ◽  
Robin D. Morris

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elham Alshammari

Learning performance among patients with multiple sclerosis is one of the growing areas of research interest. The present study used the MSQOL-54 measure to examine data obtained from college students studying pharmacy. The collected data were meant to increase pharmacy students; awareness of the learning difficulties experienced by MS patients. The data consisted of students from years 2 to 6 of college. The findings showed that study year had no significant relationship with the knowledge level, Х2= 12.69, p > .05. However, year of study had a significant relationship with awareness about learning difficulties, Х2 = 17.61, p < .05. In total, 52.83% of students in study year 2 were not aware of the learning difficulties MS patients face and 51.72% of third year students were aware of the learning difficulties. By the fourth year, the number increased to 85.71%. After year 4, the percentage of students who were aware of learning difficulties seemed to decrease (82% in year 5 and 68% in year 6). These findings show that students tend to forget what they have learnt. Further studies need to be carried out to examine strategies for enhancing the experience of MS students.


Author(s):  
Jennifer R. Banas

Motivation to learn is difficult to generate when learners are uninterested in the topic. This quasi-experimental study explored behavioral construct tailoring as an instructional message design technique to generate motivation and improve cognitive performance. Ninety-eight college students pre- and post-appraised a lesson, completed a cognitive assessment, and attributed performance to affect or competence-related factors. A risk assessment was used to strategically assign experimental learners to one of three tailored lesson introductions. Results indicated that experimental group learners, on some subscales, were more motivated. Positive trends were found for some affective and competence-related performance attributions, as well as cognitive performance. These findings warrant additional research into behavioral construct tailoring.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 670-670
Author(s):  
Wilson J ◽  
Morelli N ◽  
Han DY ◽  
Hoch MC

Abstract Objective High-level cognitive performance is important for navigating the complex environment of sport. The executive function domain may be of particular importance because it focuses on flexible thinking and self-control. It is unclear if high-level athletes exhibit similar executive function compared to recreational athletes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare executive function between male and female Division-I collegiate athletes and recreationally active peers. Methods Thirty-seven Division-I athletes (16 females, 21 males) and 30 recreationally active college students (19 females, 11 males) participated. Participants completed the Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (FICA) and Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (DCCS) from the National Institute of Health Toolbox Cognitive Battery on a tablet to assess cognitive flexibility and attention and inhibitory control, respectively. Demographically-corrected T-scores were used for analysis. Two-way ANOVAs compared cognitive performance based on group and sex (p ≤ 0.05). Results There was a significant group-by-sex interaction for the FICA (p = 0.005). Female recreational athletes (50.68 ± 10.18) demonstrated higher FICA scores compared to female Division-I athletes (40.88 ± 7.35; p = 0.003, ES = 1.06). Male Division-I athletes (48.67 ± 10.39) also exhibited greater scores compared to female Division-I athletes (p = 0.015, ES = 0.83). There was no significant group-by-sex interaction (p = 0.84), group effect (p = 0.35), or sex effect (p = 0.43) for the DCCS. Conclusions Female Division-I athletes demonstrated poorer performance on the FICA compared to male Division-I athletes and recreational female athletes which may indicate a decreased ability to suppress motor responses caused by internal or external distractions. The significance of these findings for mitigating injury risk and improving athletic performance should be explored.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document