scholarly journals Cell fate clusters in ICM organoids arise from cell fate heredity and division: a modelling approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Liebisch ◽  
Armin Drusko ◽  
Biena Mathew ◽  
Ernst H. K. Stelzer ◽  
Sabine C. Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Chemical Signalling ◽  
Fate Decision

AbstractDuring the mammalian preimplantation phase, cells undergo two subsequent cell fate decisions. During the first decision, the trophectoderm and the inner cell mass are formed. Subsequently, the inner cell mass segregates into the epiblast and the primitive endoderm. Inner cell mass organoids represent an experimental model system, mimicking the second cell fate decision. It has been shown that cells of the same fate tend to cluster stronger than expected for random cell fate decisions. Three major processes are hypothesised to contribute to the cell fate arrangements: (1) chemical signalling; (2) cell sorting; and (3) cell proliferation. In order to quantify the influence of cell proliferation on the observed cell lineage type clustering, we developed an agent-based model accounting for mechanical cell–cell interaction, i.e. adhesion and repulsion, cell division, stochastic cell fate decision and cell fate heredity. The model supports the hypothesis that initial cell fate acquisition is a stochastically driven process, taking place in the early development of inner cell mass organoids. Further, we show that the observed neighbourhood structures can emerge solely due to cell fate heredity during cell division.

scholarly journals Cell Fate Clusters in ICM Organoids Arise from Cell Fate Heredity & Division – a Modelling Approach

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Liebisch ◽  
Armin Drusko ◽  
Biena Mathew ◽  
Ernst H. K. Stelzer ◽  
Sabine C. Fischer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Agent Based ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Fate Decision

ABSTRACTDuring the mammalian preimplantation phase, cells undergo two subsequent cell fate decisions. During the first cell fate decision, cells become either part of an outer trophectoderm or part of the inner cell mass. Subsequently, the inner cell mass (ICM) segregates into an embryonic and an extraembryonic lineage, giving rise to the epiblast and the primitive endoderm, respectively. Inner cell mass organoids represent an experimental model system for preimplantation development, mimicking the second cell fate decision taking place in in vivo mouse embryos. In a previous study, the spatial pattern of the different cell lineage types was investigated. The study revealed that cells of the same fate tend to cluster stronger than expected for purely random cell fate decisions. Three major processes are hypothesised to contribute to the final cell fate arrangements at the mid and late blastocysts or 24 h old and 48 h old ICM organoids, respectively: 1) intra- and intercellular chemical signalling; 2) a cell sorting process; 3) cell proliferation. In order to quantify the influence of cell proliferation on the emergence of the observed cell lineage type clustering behaviour, we developed an agent-based model. Hereby, cells are mechanically interacting with direct neighbours, and exert adhesion and repulsion forces. The model was applied to compare several current assumptions of how inner cell mass neighbourhood structures are generated. We tested how different assumptions regarding cell fate switches affect the observed neighbourhood relationships. The model supports the hypothesis that initial cell fate acquisition is a stochastically driven process, taking place in the early development of inner cell mass organoids. The model further shows that the observed neighbourhood structures can emerge due to cell fate heredity during cell division and allows the inference of a time point for the cell fate decision.STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCECell fate decisions in early embryogenesis have been considered random events, causing a random cell fate distribution. Using an agent-based mathematical model, fitted to ICM organoid data, we show that the assumed random distribution of cell fates occurs only for a short time interval, as cell fate heredity and cell division quickly lead to spatial cell fate clustering. Our results show that neighbourhood clustering can emerge without specific neighbourhood interactions affecting the cell fate decision. The approach indicates four consecutive phases of early development: 1) co-expression of cell fate markers, 2) cell fate decision, 3) division and local cell fate clustering, and 4) phase separation, whereby only the phases 1-3 occur in ICM organoids during the first 24h of growth.

scholarly journals Origin of cellular asymmetries in the pre-implantation mouse embryo: a hypothesis

2014 ◽  
Vol 369 (1657) ◽  
pp. 20130536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuyoshi Takaoka ◽  
Hiroshi Hamada
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Mouse Development ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Stage Embryo ◽  
A Cell ◽  
Fate Decision

The first cell fate decision during mouse development concerns whether a blastomere will contribute to the inner cell mass (ICM; which gives rise to the embryo proper) or to trophectoderm (TE; which gives rise to the placenta). The position of a cell within an 8- to 16-cell-stage embryo correlates with its future fate, with outer cells contributing to TE and inner cells to the ICM. It remains unknown, however, whether an earlier pre-pattern exists. Here, we propose a hypothesis that could account for generation of such a pre-pattern and which is based on epigenetic asymmetry (such as in histone or DNA methylation) between maternal and paternal genomes in the zygote.

scholarly journals insideOutside: an accessible algorithm for classifying interior and exterior points, with applications in embryology

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley E. Strawbridge ◽  
Agata Kurowski ◽  
Elena Corujo-Simon ◽  
Alexander G. Fletcher ◽  
Jennifer Nichols
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Spatial Information ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Mathematical Framework ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Machine Learning Approach ◽  
Quantitative Immunofluorescence ◽  
Fate Decision

AbstractA crucial aspect of embryology is relating the position of individual cells to the broader geometry of the embryo. A classic example can be seen in the first cell-fate decision of the mouse embryo, where interior cells become inner cell mass and exterior cells become trophectoderm. Advances in image acquisition and processing technology used by quantitative immunofluorescence have resulted in the production of embryo images with increasingly rich spatial information that demand accessible analytical methods. Here, we describe a simple mathematical framework and an unsupervised machine learning approach for classifying interior and exterior points of a three-dimensional point-cloud. We benchmark our method to demonstrate that it yields higher classification rates for pre-implantation mouse embryos and greater accuracy when challenged with local surface concavities. This method should prove useful to experimentalists within and beyond embryology, with broader applications in the biological and life sciences.

When and how does cell division order influence cell allocation to the inner cell mass of the mouse blastocyst?

Development ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 325-332
Author(s):  
C.L. Garbutt ◽  
M.H. Johnson ◽  
M.A. George
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Cell Population ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
The Other ◽  
Mouse Blastocyst ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Cell Stage ◽  
Cell Embryo

Aggregate 8-cell embryos were constructed from four 2/8 pairs of blastomeres, one of which was marked with a short-term cell lineage marker and was also either 4 h older (derived from an early-dividing 4-cell) or 4 h younger (derived from a late-dividing 4-cell) than the other three pairs. The aggregate embryos were cultured to the 16-cell stage, at which time a second marker was used to label the outside cell population. The embryos were then disaggregated and each cell was examined to determine its labelling pattern. From this analysis, we calculated the relative contributions to the inside cell population of the 16-cell embryo of older and younger cells. Older cells were found to contribute preferentially. However, if the construction of the aggregate 8-cell embryo was delayed until each of the contributing 2/8 cell pairs had undergone intercellular flattening and then had been exposed to medium low in calcium to reverse this flattening immediately prior to aggregation, the advantage possessed by the older cells was lost. These results support the suggestion that older cells derived from early-dividing 4-cell blastomeres contribute preferentially to the inner cell mass as a result of being early-flattening cells.

scholarly journals The first cell-fate decision of mouse preimplantation embryo development: integrating cell position and polarity

Open Biology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 170210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandar I. Mihajlović ◽  
Alexander W. Bruce
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Embryo Development ◽  
Preimplantation Embryo ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Preimplantation Embryo Development ◽  
Cell Lineages ◽  
Mouse Preimplantation Embryo ◽  
Fate Decision ◽  
Mouse Preimplantation Embryo Development

During the first cell-fate decision of mouse preimplantation embryo development, a population of outer-residing polar cells is segregated from a second population of inner apolar cells to form two distinct cell lineages: the trophectoderm and the inner cell mass (ICM), respectively. Historically, two models have been proposed to explain how the initial differences between these two cell populations originate and ultimately define them as the two stated early blastocyst stage cell lineages. The ‘positional’ model proposes that cells acquire distinct fates based on differences in their relative position within the developing embryo, while the ‘polarity’ model proposes that the differences driving the lineage segregation arise as a consequence of the differential inheritance of factors, which exhibit polarized subcellular localizations, upon asymmetric cell divisions. Although these two models have traditionally been considered separately, a growing body of evidence, collected over recent years, suggests the existence of a large degree of compatibility. Accordingly, the main aim of this review is to summarize the major historical and more contemporarily identified events that define the first cell-fate decision and to place them in the context of both the originally proposed positional and polarity models, thus highlighting their functional complementarity in describing distinct aspects of the developmental programme underpinning the first cell-fate decision in mouse embryogenesis.

scholarly journals Variability in β-catenin pulse dynamics in a stochastic cell fate decision in C. elegans

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason R. Kroll ◽  
Jasonas Tsiaxiras ◽  
Jeroen S. van Zon
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Fusion ◽  
Precursor Cell ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Absolute Level ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Pulse Dynamics ◽  
Significant Variability ◽  
Fate Decision

AbstractDuring development, cell fate decisions are often highly stochastic, but with the frequency of the different possible fates tightly controlled. To understand how signaling networks control the cell fate frequency of such random decisions, we studied the stochastic decision of the Caenorhabditis elegans P3.p cell to either fuse to the hypodermis or assume vulva precursor cell fate. Using time-lapse microscopy to measure the single-cell dynamics of two key inhibitors of cell fusion, the Hox gene LIN-39 and Wnt signaling through the β-catenin BAR-1, we uncovered significant variability in the dynamics of LIN-39 and BAR-1 levels. Most strikingly, we observed that BAR-1 accumulated in a single, 1-4 hour pulse at the time of the P3.p cell fate decision, with strong variability both in pulse slope and time of pulse onset. We found that the time of BAR-1 pulse onset was delayed relative to the time of cell fusion in mutants with low cell fusion frequency, linking BAR-1 pulse timing to cell fate outcome. Overall, a model emerged where animal-to-animal variability in LIN-39 levels and BAR-1 pulse dynamics biases cell fate by modulating their absolute level at the time cell fusion is induced. Our results highlight that timing of cell signaling dynamics, rather than its average level or amplitude, could play an instructive role in determining cell fate.Article summaryWe studied the stochastic decision of the Caenorhabditis elegans P3.p cell to either fuse to the hypodermis or assume vulva precursor cell fate. We uncovered significant variability in the dynamics of LIN-39/Hox and BAR-1/β-catenin levels, two key inhibitors of cell fusion. Surprisingly, we observed that BAR-1 accumulated in a 1-4 hour pulse at the time of the P3.p cell fate decision, with variable pulse slope and time of pulse onset. Our work suggests a model where animal-to-animal variability in LIN-39 levels and BAR-1 pulse dynamics biases cell fate by modulating their absolute level at the time cell fusion is induced.

scholarly journals Dynamic changes in Sox2 spatio-temporal expression promote the second cell fate decision through Fgf4/Fgfr2 signaling in preimplantation mouse embryos

2018 ◽  
Vol 475 (6) ◽  
pp. 1075-1089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tapan Kumar Mistri ◽  
Wibowo Arindrarto ◽  
Wei Ping Ng ◽  
Choayang Wang ◽  
Leng Hiong Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Inner Cell Mass ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Correlation Spectroscopy ◽  
Binding Interaction ◽  
Regulatory Motifs ◽  
Sox2 Expression ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
Fate Decision

Oct4 and Sox2 regulate the expression of target genes such as Nanog, Fgf4, and Utf1, by binding to their respective regulatory motifs. Their functional cooperation is reflected in their ability to heterodimerize on adjacent cis regulatory motifs, the composite Sox/Oct motif. Given that Oct4 and Sox2 regulate many developmental genes, a quantitative analysis of their synergistic action on different Sox/Oct motifs would yield valuable insights into the mechanisms of early embryonic development. In the present study, we measured binding affinities of Oct4 and Sox2 to different Sox/Oct motifs using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy. We found that the synergistic binding interaction is driven mainly by the level of Sox2 in the case of the Fgf4 Sox/Oct motif. Taking into account Sox2 expression levels fluctuate more than Oct4, our finding provides an explanation on how Sox2 controls the segregation of the epiblast and primitive endoderm populations within the inner cell mass of the developing rodent blastocyst.

scholarly journals A single-cell resolved cell-cell communication model explains lineage commitment in hematopoiesis

Development ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan K. Rommelfanger ◽  
Adam L. MacLean
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Communication ◽  
Communication Model ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Cell Coupling ◽  
Environmental Signals ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Fate Decision ◽  
Cell Cell

ABSTRACT Cells do not make fate decisions independently. Arguably, every cell-fate decision occurs in response to environmental signals. In many cases, cell-cell communication alters the dynamics of the internal gene regulatory network of a cell to initiate cell-fate transitions, yet models rarely take this into account. Here, we have developed a multiscale perspective to study the granulocyte-monocyte versus megakaryocyte-erythrocyte fate decisions. This transition is dictated by the GATA1-PU.1 network: a classical example of a bistable cell-fate system. We show that, for a wide range of cell communication topologies, even subtle changes in signaling can have pronounced effects on cell-fate decisions. We go on to show how cell-cell coupling through signaling can spontaneously break the symmetry of a homogenous cell population. Noise, both intrinsic and extrinsic, shapes the decision landscape profoundly, and affects the transcriptional dynamics underlying this important hematopoietic cell-fate decision-making system. This article has an associated ‘The people behind the papers’ interview.

Suppressors of a lin-12 hypomorph define genes that interact with both lin-12 and glp-1 in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Genetics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 135 (3) ◽  
pp. 765-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Sundaram ◽  
I Greenwald
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Gene Dosage ◽  
Egg Laying ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Cell Fates ◽  
Cell Fate Decisions ◽  
Suppressor Mutations ◽  
Fate Decision

Abstract The lin-12 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans is thought to encode a receptor which mediates cell-cell interactions required to specify certain cell fates. Reversion of the egg-laying defective phenotype caused by a hypomorphic lin-12 allele identified rare extragenic suppressor mutations in five genes, sel-1, sel-9, sel-10, sel-11 and sel(ar40) (sel = suppressor and/or enhancer of lin-12). Mutations in each of these sel genes suppress defects associated with reduced lin-12 activity, and enhance at least one defect associated with elevated lin-12 activity. None of the sel mutations cause any obvious phenotype in a wild-type background. Gene dosage experiments suggest that sel-1 and sel(ar40) mutations are reduction-of-function mutations, while sel-9 and sel-11 mutations are gain-of-function mutations. sel-1, sel-9, sel-11 and sel(ar40) mutations do not suppress amorphic lin-12 alleles, while sel-10 mutations are able to bypass partially the requirement for lin-12 activity in at least one cell fate decision. sel-1, sel-9, sel-10, sel-11 and sel(ar40) mutations are also able to suppress the maternal-effect lethality caused by a partial loss-of-function allele of glp-1, a gene that is both structurally and functionally related to lin-12. These sel genes may therefore function in both lin-12 and glp-1 mediated cell fate decisions.

scholarly journals Epigenetic control of cell fate - an interview with Prof. Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesús Chimal-Monroy ◽  
Diana María Escalante-Alcalde
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Cell Lineage ◽  
Cellular Reprogramming ◽  
Cell Fate Decision ◽  
Cell Embryo ◽  
Founding Director ◽  
Fate Decision ◽  
The One ◽  
New Generation

Dr. Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla's research is focused on how cell fate arises from a single-cell embryo, the fertilized egg or zygote. After the initial divisions, cell potency becomes restricted, originating the first cell lineage fates. She studies how epigenetic information controls transitions in cell identity and cellular reprogramming during embryonic development. Currently, she is the founding Director of the Institute of Epigenetics and Stem Cells, Helmholtz Centre, and Professor of Stem Cell Biology at the LMU in Munich. In this interview, Dr. Maria-Elena Torres-Padilla talks to us about her beginnings in the biology field in Mexico. She also tells us about how she became interested in the control of genome regulation within the nucleus during the transition from totipotency to pluripotency and how the control of gene regulation and chromatin organization during the early stages of cell fate decision in the one-cell embryo occurs. She considers that science has no borders; visiting Mexico gives her the possibility to discuss her work with colleagues and the new generation of students trained in Mexico.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document