scholarly journals Distribution of genetic alterations in high-risk early-stage cervical cancer patients treated with postoperative radiation therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoya Murakami ◽  
Yuka Asami ◽  
Hiroshi Yoshida ◽  
Daisuke Takayanagi ◽  
Sou Hirose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Uterine Cervical Cancer ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Postoperative Radiation Therapy

AbstractSomatic genetic alteration analysis was performed for post-hysterectomy high-risk early-stage uterine cervical cancer patients who underwent post-operative radiation therapy. Post-operative radiation therapy was performed for patients with pathological features of pelvic lymph node metastasis, parametrium invasion, or positive vaginal margin, which corresponded to the post-operative high-risk category. DNA was extracted from paraffin-embedded surgical specimens, and 50 somatic hotspot genetic alternations were detected using Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panel. The existence of actionable mutation was assessed based on OncoKB evidence level > 3A. Between January 2008 and November 2019, 89 patients who underwent abdominal radical hysterectomy followed by post-operative radiation therapy were identified. The follow-up period for living patients was 82.3 months (range 9.3–153.9), and the 5-year relapse-free survival and overall survival rates were 72.6% and 85.9%, respectively. The most frequently detected somatic mutation was PIK3CA (26 [29.2%] patients); however, no prognostic somatic genetic alterations were identified. Actionable mutations were detected in 30 (33.7%) patients. Actionable mutations were detected in approximately one-third of patients, suggesting that precision medicine can be offered to patients with post-operative high-risk uterine cervical cancer in the near future.

scholarly journals Predictive factors of posttreatment fracture by definitive radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuki Ishikawa ◽  
Tsuneo Yamashiro ◽  
Takuro Ariga ◽  
Takafumi Toita ◽  
Wataru Kudaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Uterine Cervical Cancer

Abstract Purpose Fractures are known to shorten life expectancy and worsen the quality of life. The risk of fractures after radiation therapy in cervical cancer patients is known to be multifactorial. In this study, we examined risk factors for fractures in cervical cancer patients, especially by evaluating bone densities and DVH parameters for fractured bones. Materials and Methods For 42 patients, clinical characteristics, pretreatment CT bone densities, and radiation dose were compared between patients with and without fractures. Results Posttreatment fractures occurred in 25 bones among ten patients. Pretreatment CT bone densities were significantly lower in patients with fractures (P < 0.05–0.01 across sites, except for the ilium and the ischium). Although DVH parameters were also significantly associated with fractures in univariate analysis, only CT densities were significantly associated with fractures in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Pretreatment CT densities of spinal and pelvic bones, which may reflect osteoporosis, have a significant impact on the risk for posttreatment fractures.

Self-Reported Sexual, Bowel and Bladder Function in Cervical Cancer Patients Following Different Treatment Modalities: Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (9) ◽  
pp. 1717-1725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quirine D. Pieterse ◽  
Gemma G. Kenter ◽  
Cornelis P. Maas ◽  
Cor D. de Kroon ◽  
Carien L. Creutzberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Unexpected Finding ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Sexual Symptoms ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Early Stage Cervical Cancer

ObjectiveConventional radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RHL) for early-stage cervical cancer is associated with significant bladder, anorectal, and sexual dysfunction. Nerve-sparing modification of RHL (NS-RHL) has been developed with the aim to reduce surgical treatment-related morbidity. Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is offered to patients with unfavorable prognostic features to improve local control. The aim of the study was to assess self-reported morbidity of various types of treatment in cervical cancer patients.MethodsSelf-reported symptoms were prospectively assessed before and 1 and 2 years after treatment by the Dutch Gynaecologic Leiden Questionnaire.ResultsIncluded were 229 women (123 NS-RHL and 106 conventional RHL). Ninety-four (41%) received RT. Up to 2 years (response rate, 81%), women reported significantly more bowel, bladder, and sexual symptoms compared with the pretreatment situation. No significant difference was found between the conventional RHL and NS-RHL with the exception of the unexpected finding that a smaller percentage in the NS-RHL group (34% vs 68%) complained about numbness of the labia and/ or thigh. Radiation therapy had a negative impact on diarrhea, urine incontinence, lymphedema, and sexual symptoms (especially a narrow/short vagina).ConclusionsIn the current longitudinal cohort study, treatment for early-stage cervical cancer was associated with worse subjective bladder, anorectal, and sexual functioning, irrespective of the surgical procedure used. Postoperative RT resulted in a significant deterioration of these functions. The results have to be interpreted with caution in view of the study design and method used.

Outcome of High-Risk Stage IC, Grade 3, Compared With Stage I Endometrial Carcinoma Patients: The Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma Trial

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 1234-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carien L. Creutzberg ◽  
Wim L.J. van Putten ◽  
Carla C. Wárlám-Rodenhuis ◽  
Alfons C.M. van den Bergh ◽  
Karin A.J. De Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Postoperative Radiotherapy ◽  
Risk Category ◽  
Postoperative Radiation ◽  
Postoperative Radiation Therapy ◽  
Stage Ib ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Stage IC, grade 3 endometrial cancer is regarded as a high-risk category. Stage IC, grade 3 patients were not eligible for the randomized Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma (PORTEC) trial, but were registered and received postoperative radiotherapy. Patients and Methods The PORTEC trial included 715 patients with stage IC, grade 1 or 2, and stage IB, grade 2 or 3 endometrial cancer. Patients were randomly assigned after surgery to receive pelvic radiotherapy (RT) or no further treatment. A total of 104 patients with stage IC, grade 3 endometrial cancer were registered, of whom 99 could be evaluated. Patterns of relapse and survival were compared with PORTEC patients receiving RT. Median follow-up was 83 months. Results The actuarial 5-year rates of locoregional relapse were 1% to 3% for PORTEC patients who received RT, compared with 14% for stage IC, grade 3 patients. Five-year distant metastases rates were 3% to 8% for grade 1 and 2 tumors; 20% for stage IB, grade 3 tumors; and 31% for stage IC, grade 3 tumors. Overall survival rates were 83% to 85% for grades 1 and 2; 74% for stage IB, grade 3; and 58% for stage IC, grade 3 patients (P < .001). In multivariate analysis grade 3 was the most important adverse prognostic factor for relapse and death as a result of endometrial cancer (hazard ratios, 5.4 and 5.5; P < .0001). Conclusion Patients with stage IC, grade 3 endometrial carcinoma are at high risk of early distant spread and endometrial carcinoma-related death. Novel strategies for adjuvant therapy should be explored to improve survival for this patient group.

scholarly journals Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Radical Hysterectomy Followed By Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Intermediate- or High-Risk Early-Stage Cancer of The Cervix: A Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi-ying Zhang ◽  
Zi Liu ◽  
Ya-li Wang ◽  
Jing Zhang ◽  
Wen Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Radical Hysterectomy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) improves outcomes of cervical cancer patients with risk factors. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has an inferior survival than open radical hysterectomy (ORH), however, the impact of MIS on postoperative RT remains uncertain. The study compared the impacts of MIS versus ORH on delivering of adjuvant RT or CRT for intermediate- or high-risk early-stage cervical cancer. Methods Data on stage IB1-IIA2 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy and postoperative RT/CRT in our institution, from 2014 to 2017, were retrospectively collected. Patients with high or intermediate-risk factors who met the Sedlis criteria received postoperative pelvic external beam radiotherapy (50Gy/25f) with platinum-based chemotherapy (0–6 cycles) according to guidelines. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in the two surgical groups. Results One hundred and twenty-nine patients eligible for the study (68 in ORH; 61 in MIS groups) had similar clinicopathologic features except for the stage (highest in MIS was IB1; IIA1 in ORH) and presence of lymph vascular space invasion (higher in MIS group). The median time interval from surgery to chemotherapy and to RT was shorter in the MIS group. Three-year DFS and OS were similar in both groups. Further sub-analysis indicated that the DFS and OS in intermediate/high-risk groups had no significant difference. Cox-multivariate analyses found that tumor size > 4 cm and time interval from surgery to RT beyond seven weeks were adverse independent prognostic factors for DFS. Conclusions In early-stage (IB1-IIA2) cervical cancer patients with intermediate or high-risk factors who received postoperative RT or CRT, no matter they received ORH or MIS as their primary treatment, the DFS and OS had no significant difference, despite TI from surgery to postoperative adjuvant therapy being shorter in the MIS group than ORH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document