Recanalisation theraphy for acute ischemic stroke in cancer patients

AbstractTo date, very few studies focused their attention on efficacy and safety of recanalisation therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with cancer, reporting conflicting results. We retrospectively analysed data from our database of consecutive patients admitted to the Udine University Hospital with AIS that were treated with recanalisation therapy, i.e. intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and bridging therapy, from January 2015 to December 2019. We compared 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (SICH) occurrence of patients with active cancer (AC) and remote cancer (RC) with that of patients without cancer (WC) undergoing recanalisation therapy for AIS. Patients were followed up for 3 months. Among the 613 AIS patients included in the study, 79 patients (12.9%) had either AC (n = 46; 7.5%) or RC (n = 33; 5.4%). Although AC patients, when treated with IVT, had a significantly increased risk of 3-month mortality [odds ratio (OR) 6.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.42–20.07, p = 0.001] than WC patients, stroke-related deaths did not differ between AC and WC patients (30% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.939). There were no significant differences between AC and WC patients, when treated with MT ± IVT, regarding 3-month dependency, 3-month mortality and SICH. Functional independence, mortality, and SICH were similar between RC and WC patients. In conclusion, recanalisation therapy might be used in AIS patients with nonmetastatic AC and with RC. Further studies are needed to explore the outcome of AIS patients with metastatic cancer undergoing recanalisation therapy.

Download Full-text

Intravenous r-tPA Dose Influence on Outcome after Middle Cerebral Artery Ischemic Stroke Treatment by Mechanical Thrombectomy

Medicina ◽

10.3390/medicina56070357 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 56 (7) ◽

pp. 357

Author(s):

Marius Kurminas ◽

Andrius Berūkštis ◽

Nerijus Misonis ◽

Karmela Blank ◽

Algirdas Edvardas Tamošiūnas ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Middle Cerebral Artery ◽

Cerebral Artery ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Added Value ◽

University Hospital ◽

Bridging Therapy ◽

Stroke Treatment

Background and Objectives: Pretreatment with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is still recommended in all eligible acute ischemic stroke patients with large-vessel occlusion before mechanical thrombectomy (MTE). However, the added value and safety of bridging therapy versus direct MTE remains controversial. We aimed at evaluating the influence of r-tPA dose level in patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion treated with MTE. Materials and Methods: We prospectively compared clinical and radiological outcomes in 38 bridging patients, with 65 receiving direct MTE for MCA stroke admitted to Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics. Following our protocol, r-tPA infusion was stopped just before MTE in the operating room. Therefore, we divided all bridging patients into three groups according to the amount of r-tPA they received: bolus, partial dose or full dose. Functional independence at 90 days was assessed by a modified Rankin Scale score, i.e., from 0–2. The safety outcomes included 90-day mortality and any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Results: Baseline characteristics and functional outcome at 90 days did not differ between the bridging and direct MTE groups. Shorter MTE procedure and hospitalization time (p = 0.025 and p = 0.036, respectively) were observed in the direct MTE group. An IVT treatment subgroup analysis showed higher rates of symptomatic ICH (p < 0.001) and longer intervals between imaging to MTE (p = 0.005) in the full r-tPA dose group. Conclusions: In patients with an MCA stroke, direct MTE seems to be a safe and equally effective as bridging therapy. The optimal r-tPA dose remains unclear. Randomized trials are needed to accurately evaluate the added value of r-tPA in patients treated with MTE.

Download Full-text

Bridging Therapy and Direct Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study

Journal of Stroke Medicine ◽

10.1177/2516608520976275 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 3 (2) ◽

pp. 124-130

Author(s):

Trung Quoc Nguyen ◽

Anh Le Tuan Truong ◽

Hoang Thi Kim Phan ◽

Duan Duy Nguyen ◽

Khang Vinh Nguyen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Therapy Group ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Artery Occlusion ◽

Large Artery ◽

Bridging Therapy ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Reperfusion Rate

Background: It remains controversial if intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MTE) is superior to MTE alone in patients with acute ischemic stroke caused by large vessel occlusion. We aim to compare functional outcomes, mortality, reperfusion, and intracranial hemorrhage rates in bridging therapy (IVT prior thrombectomy) and MTE alone groups within 6 h from symptom onset. Materials and Methods: Consecutive hospitalized patients (September 2017 and July 2018) with acute large artery occlusion within the anterior cerebral circulation eligible for MTE with or without prior IVT were included. A modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2 was considered as good functional outcome at 90 days. Successful reperfusion was defined as a Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale of 2b to 3. Results: Of the 124 patients included, 56 (45.2%) received bridging therapy and 68 (54.8%) received MTE alone. Patients receiving bridging therapy were younger (median, 56 vs 63, P = .045) and had shorter onset-to-groin time (median, 270 vs 370 min, P < .001) than those receiving MTE alone. Successful reperfusion rate was significantly greater in the bridging therapy group (87.5% vs 72.1%, P = 0.03). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in functional independence (bridging 58.9% vs 75.0%, P = 0.07), mortality at 90 days (bridging 14.3% vs 7.4%, P = 0.22), parenchymal hematoma type 2 (bridging 3.6% vs 2.9%, P > .99), and any hemorrhage (bridging 42.3% vs 26.5%, P = 0.07). Conclusion: Compared to MTE alone, bridging therapy with IVT improved the reperfusion rate but not other outcomes. Further clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.

Download Full-text

Association of admission leukocyte count with clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator

Current Neurovascular Research ◽

10.2174/1567202617999201125201616 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 17 ◽

Author(s):

Jie Chen ◽

Fu-Liang Zhang ◽

Shan Lv ◽

Hang Jin ◽

Yun Luo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Plasminogen Activator ◽

Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽

Leukocyte Count ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Tissue Plasminogen ◽

Poor Outcomes

Objective:: Increased leukocyte count are positively associated with poor outcomes and all-cause mortality in coronary heart disease, cancer, and ischemic stroke. The role of leukocyte count in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains important. We aimed to investigate the association between admission leukocyte count before thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and 3-month outcomes in AIS patients. Methods:: This retrospective study included consecutive AIS patients who received intravenous (IV) rt-PA within 4.5 h of symptom onset between January 2016 and December 2018. We assessed outcomes including short-term hemorrhagic transformation (HT), 3-month mortality, and functional independence (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0–2 or 0–1). Results:: Among 579 patients who received IV rt-PA, 77 (13.3%) exhibited HT at 24 h, 43 (7.4%) died within 3 months, and 211 (36.4%) exhibited functional independence (mRS score: 0–2). Multivariable logistic regression revealed admission leukocyte count as an independent predictor of good and excellent outcomes at 3 months. Each 1-point increase in admission leukocyte count increased the odds of poor outcomes at 3 months by 7.6% (mRS score: 3–6, odds ratio (OR): 1.076, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.003–1.154, p=0.041) and 7.8% (mRS score: 2–6, OR: 1.078, 95% CI: 1.006–1.154, p=0.033). Multivariable regression analysis revealed no association between HT and 3-month mortality. Admission neutrophil and lymphocyte count were not associated with 3-month functional outcomes or 3-month mortality. Conclusion:: Lower admission leukocyte count independently predicts good and excellent outcomes at 3 months in AIS patients undergoing rt-PA treatment.

Download Full-text

Abstract T P48: Intravenous Thrombolysis Using Low-Dose Alteplase for Nonagenarians with Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SAMURAI rtPA Registry

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.tp48 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Mikito Hayakawa ◽

Masatoshi Koga ◽

Shoichiro Sato ◽

Shoji Arihiro ◽

Yoshiaki Shiokawa ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Low Dose ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Multivariate Adjustment ◽

Potential Efficacy ◽

Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Baseline Characteristics

Objective: Although intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) using alteplase for octogenarians with acute ischemic stroke becomes relatively familiar, it is unclear whether IVT for nonagenarians is a futile intervention. The purpose of this study is to clarify the efficacy and safety of IVT using low-dose alteplase (0.6 mg/kg) for nonagenarians compared with octogenarians. Methods: Stroke Acute Management with Urgent Risk-factor Assessment and Improvement (SAMURAI) rtPA registry retrospectively collected 600 consecutive acute stroke patients receiving IVT from 10 Japanese stroke centers between October 2005 and July 2008. We extracted all octogenarians (O group) and nonagenarians (N group) from the registry. We compared baseline characteristics, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH), and 3-month outcomes between the groups. 3-month outcomes include; functional independence (FI) defined as a mRS score 0-2, good outcome (GO) as a mRS score 0-2 or same as the premorbid mRS, poor outcome (PO) defined as a mRS score 5-6, and death. Results: Twenty-five nonagenarians (mean age, 93 years) and 124 octogenarians (mean age, 84 years) were included. N group was more female-predominant (76% versus 56%, p=0.06) and premorbidly dependent (44% versus 14%, p<0.001) than O group. There were no significant differences of median baseline NIHSS score (16 versus 14, p=0.95) and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (9 versus 9, p=0.36) between the groups. The rate of FI tended to be lower in N group than O group (16% versus 36%, p=0.06), otherwise, the differences of the rates of GO (28% versus 37%, p=0.39), PO (40% versus 36%, p=0.73), death (20% versus 11%, p=0.23) and SICH (0% versus 2.4%, p=1.00) were not significant between the groups. In comparison with O group, N group was not associated with 3-month clinical outcomes (FI; OR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.15-2.42, GO; 0.98; 0.31-3.07, PO; 0.63; 0.15-2.70, death; 3.18; 0.62-16.3) and SICH (0.68; 0.17-2.69) after multivariate adjustment. Conclusions: IVT using low-dose alteplase for N group resulted in less frequent achievement of FI mainly because of more premorbid dependency than O group, however, showed at least a similar safety and a potential efficacy.

Download Full-text

Abstract P12: Alteplase Reduces Mortality in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the IAC Study

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p12 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Shadi Yaghi ◽

Eva Mistry ◽

Adam H De Havenon ◽

Christopher Leon Guerrero ◽

Amre Nouh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Infarct Volume ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

The United States ◽

Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Significant Difference

Background and Purpose: Multiple studies have established that intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase improves outcome after acute ischemic stroke. However, assessment of thrombolysis’ efficacy in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has yielded mixed results. We sought to determine the association of alteplase with mortality, hemorrhagic transformation (HT), infarct volume, and mortality in patients with AF and acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with AF included in the Initiation of Anticoagulation after Cardioembolic stroke (IAC) study, which pooled data from 8 comprehensive stroke centers in the United States. 1889 (90.6%) had available 90-day follow up data and were included. For our primary analysis we used a cohort of 1367/1889 (72.4%) patients who did not undergo mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Secondary analyses were repeated in the patients that underwent MT (n=522). Binary logistic regression was used to determine whether alteplase use was independently associated with risk of HT, final infarct volume, and 90-day mortality, respectively, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: In our primary analyses we found that alteplase use was independently associated with an increased risk for HT (adjusted OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.49 - 3.07, p <0.001) but overall reduced risk of 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39 - 0.87, p = 0.009). Among patients undergoing MT, alteplase use was associated with a trend towards a reduction in 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.68 95% CI 0.45 - 1.04, p = 0.077). In the subgroup of patients prescribed DOAC treatment (n = 327; 24 received alteplase), alteplase treatment was associated with a trend towards smaller infarct size (< 10 mL), (adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.15 - 1.12, p = 0.082) without a significant difference in the odds of 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.12 - 2.13, p = 0.357) or hemorrhagic transformation (adjusted OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.03 - 2.07, p = 0.206). Conclusion: Thrombolysis with intravenous alteplase was associated with reduced 90-day mortality in AF patients with acute ischemic stroke not undergoing MT. Further study is required to assess the safety and efficacy of alteplase in AF patients undergoing MT and those on DOACs.

Download Full-text

Abstract TP315: D-dimer is Associated With 30-day Mortality in Acute Ischemic Stroke With Active Cancer

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.tp315 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Ki Woong Nam ◽

Chi Kyung Kim ◽

Tae Jung Kim ◽

Sang Joon An ◽

Kyungmi Oh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Infarct Volume ◽

Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Nihss Score ◽

Patients With Cancer ◽

Advanced Stages ◽

D Dimer ◽

Active Cancer

Background: Stroke in cancer patients is not rare, but is a devastating event with high mortality. However, the predictors of mortality in stroke patients with cancer have not been well addressed. D-dimer could be a useful predictor because it can reflect both thromboembolic events and advanced stages of cancer. In this study, we evaluate the possibility of D-dimer as a predictor of 30-day mortality in stroke patients with active cancer. Methods: We included 210 ischemic stroke patients with active cancer. The data of 30-day mortality were collected by reviewing medical records. We also collected follow-up D-dimer levels in 106 (50%) participants to evaluate the effects of treatment response on D-dimer levels. Results: Of the 210 participants, 30-day mortality occurred in 28 (13%) patients. Higher initial NIHSS score, D-dimer levels, CRP levels, frequent cryptogenic mechanism, systemic metastasis, multiple vascular territory lesion, hemorrhagic transformation, and larger infarct volume were related to 30-day mortality. In the multivariate analysis, D-dimer [adjusted OR (aOR) = 2.19; 95% CI, 1.46-3.28, P < 0.001] predicted 30-day mortality after adjusting for confounders. Initial NIHSS score (aOR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.00-1.14, P = 0.043) and hemorrhagic transformation (aOR = 3.02; 95% CI, 1.10-8.29, P = 0.032) were also significant independently from D-dimer levels. In the analysis of D-dimer changes after treatment, the mortality group showed no significant decrease of D-dimer levels, despite treatment, while the survivor group showed opposite responses. Conclusions: D-dimer levels may predict 30-day mortality in acute ischemic stroke patients with active cancer.

Download Full-text

Endovascular stroke therapy may be safe in patients with elevated international normalized ratio

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012757 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 9 (12) ◽

pp. 1187-1190 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Sibu Mundiyanapurath ◽

Anne Tillmann ◽

Markus Alfred Möhlenbruch ◽

Martin Bendszus ◽

Peter Arthur Ringleb

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Endovascular Therapy ◽

Tertiary Care ◽

Multivariable Analysis ◽

International Normalized Ratio ◽

Unfavorable Outcome ◽

Favorable Outcome ◽

University Hospital ◽

Increased Risk

IntroductionEndovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke is safe and efficient. However, patients receiving oral anticoagulation were excluded in the larger trials.ObjectiveTo analyze the safety of endovascular therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and elevated international normalized ratio (INR) values.MethodsRetrospective database review of a tertiary care university hospital for patients with anterior circulation stroke treated with endovascular therapy. Patients with anticoagulation other than vitamin K antagonists were excluded. The primary safety endpoint was defined as symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH; ECASS II definition). The efficacy endpoint was the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score after 3 months, dichotomized into favorable outcome (mRS 0–2) and unfavorable outcome (mRS 3–6).Results435 patients were included. 90% were treated with stent retriever. 27 (6.2%) patients with an INR of 1.2–1.7 and 21 (4.8%) with an INR >1.7. 33 (7.6%) had sICH and 149 patients (34.3%) had a favorable outcome. Patients with an elevated INR did not have an increased risk for sICH or unfavorable outcome in multivariable analysis. The additional use of IV thrombolysis in patients with an INR of 1.2–1.7 did not increase the risk of sICH or unfavorable outcome. These results were replicated in a sensitivity analysis introducing an error of the INR of ±5%. They were also confirmed using other sICH definitions (Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke (SITS), National Institute of neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), Heidelberg bleeding classification).ConclusionsEndovascular therapy in patients with an elevated INR is safe and efficient. Patients with an INR of 1.2–1.7 may be treated with combined IV thrombolysis and endovascular therapy.

Download Full-text

Functional Outcome of Hemorrhagic Transformation after Thrombolysis for Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Study

Cerebrovascular Diseases Extra ◽

10.1159/000440737 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 5 (3) ◽

pp. 103-106 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Mariam Annan ◽

Marie Gaudron ◽

Jean-Philippe Cottier ◽

Xavier Cazals ◽

Maelle Dejobert ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽

University Hospital ◽

3 Tesla ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Increased Risk ◽

3 Tesla Mri

Background/Aims: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is usually taken into account when symptomatic, but the role of asymptomatic HT is not well known. The aim of our study was to evaluate the link between HT after thrombolysis for ischemic stroke and functional outcome at 3 months, with particular emphasis on asymptomatic HT. Methods: Our study was performed prospectively between June 2012 and June 2013 in the Stroke Unit of the University Hospital Center of Tours (France). All patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis were consecutively included. HT was classified on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) with 3-tesla MRI at 7 ± 3 days after treatment. We evaluated functional outcome at 3 months using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Dependency was defined as an mRS score of ≥3. Results: After 1 year, 128 patients had received thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke, of whom 90 patients underwent both 3-tesla MRI and SWI at day 7. Fifty-two had HT, including 8 symptomatic cases. At 3 months, 68% of those patients were dependent compared to 31% of patients without HT [OR 4.6 (1.9-11.4), p = 0.001]. In asymptomatic HT, the rate was 62% [OR 3.5 (1.4-8.9), p = 0.007], but did not reach significance after adjustment for stroke severity. Discussion: Our study found no statistically significant effect of HT on outcome after adjustment for initial stroke severity. However, the innocuousness of HT is not certain, and only few studies have already highlighted the increased risk of dependency. Using 3-tesla MRI with SWI allows us to increase the detection rate of small hemorrhage. Conclusion: HT after thrombolysis is very frequent on SWI, but the initial stroke severity is an important predictor to assess the role of HT for patient outcome.

Download Full-text

Intravenous fibrinolysis plus endovascular thrombectomy versus direct endovascular thrombectomy for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke: clinical and infarct volume results.

10.21203/rs.2.482/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Massimo Gamba ◽

Nicola Gilberti ◽

Enrico Premi ◽

Angelo Costa ◽

Michele Frigerio ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Safety Profile ◽

Infarct Volume ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Abstract Background and Purpose endovascular therapy (ET) is the standard of care for anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by large vessel occlusion (LVO). The role of adjunctive intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in these patients is still unclear. The present study aims to test whether IVT plus ET (CoT, combined therapy) provides additional benefits over direct ET for anterior circulation AIS by LVO. Methods we performed a single center retrospective observational study of patients with AIS caused by anterior circulation LVO, referred to our center between January 2014 and January 2017 and treated with ET. The patients were divided in 2 groups based on the treatment they received: CoT and, if IVT contraindicated, direct ET. We compared functional recovery (modified Rankin at 3-months follow-up), recanalization rate (thrombolysis in cerebral infarction [TICI] score) and time, early follow-up infarct volume (EFIV) (for recanalized patients only) as well as safety profile, defined as symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and 3-month mortality, between groups. Results 145 subjects were included in the study, 70 in direct ET group and 75 in CoT group. Patients who received CoT presented more frequently a functional independence at 3-months follow-up compared to patients who received direct ET (mRS score 0-1: 48.5% vs 18.6%; P<0.001. mRS score 0-2: 67.1% vs 37.3%; P<0.001), higher first-pass success rate (62.7% vs 38.6%, P<0.05), higher recanalization rate (84.3% vs 65.3%; P=0.009) and, in recanalized subjects, smaller EFIV (16.4ml vs 62.3ml; P=0.003). The safety profile was similar for the 2 groups. In multivariable regression analysis, low baseline NIHSS score (P<0.05), vessel recanalization (P=0.05) and CoT (P=0.03) were indipendent predictors of 3-month favorable outcome. Conclusions CoT appears more effective than ET alone for anterior circulation AIS with LVO, with similar safety profile.

Download Full-text

Abstract WMP1: Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy: the THRACE Randomized Trial

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.wmp1 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Hamza Achit ◽

Francis guillemin ◽

Marc Soudant ◽

Kossar Hosseini ◽

Aurelie Bannay ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischemic Stroke ◽

Randomized Trial ◽

Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Cost Effective ◽

Functional Independence ◽

Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Quality Adjusted Life

Background and purpose: The benefit of mechanical thrombectomy added to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke has been largely demonstrated. However, evidence on economic incentive of this strategy is still limited, especially in the context of randomized trial. The purpose of this study is to analyze whether the combination of mechanical thrombectomy with intravenous thrombolysis is more cost-effective than implementing intravenous thrombolysis alone. Patients and methods: Individual-level cost and outcome data were collected in the THRACE randomized clinical trial, including patients with acute ischaemic stroke and proximal cerebral artery occlusion. Patients were assigned to either intravenous thrombolysis (IVT; n = 208) or intravenous thrombolysis plus intra-arterial thrombectomy (IVMT; n=204). The primary outcomes were both modified Rankin scale of functional independence at 90 days (score 0-2) and the EuroQol-5D score of quality of life. This study considered the perspective of the National Health Security System in France. Results: Bridging therapy increased by 10.9% the rate of functional independence compared to IVT (53% vs 42,1%) at an increased cost of 1909 є, with no significant difference in mortality (12% vs 13%) or symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (2% vs 2%). Cost per one averted case of disability was consequently estimated at 17,480 є. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained was 13,423 є. Sensitivity analysis showed that combined approach had 84.1% probability of being cost-effective regarding cases of averted disability and 92.2% probability regarding quality-adjusted life year outcome. The national implementation of this new strategy would result in additional cost of 12.9 million є and avoid about 737 cases of death or disability. Conclusions: Based on randomized trial, this study demonstrates that intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical intra-arterial thrombectomy for treating acute ischemic stroke is more cost-effective than intravenous thrombolysis alone.

Download Full-text