scholarly journals The impact of infection complications after trauma differs according to trauma severity

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Komori ◽  
Hiroki Iriyama ◽  
Takako Kainoh ◽  
Makoto Aoki ◽  
Toshio Naito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Severe Trauma ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Trauma Severity ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
General Wards ◽  
The Impact

AbstractThe impact of infection on the prognosis of trauma patients according to severity remains unclear. We assessed the impact of infection complications on in-hospital mortality among patients with trauma according to severity. This retrospective cohort study used a nationwide registry of trauma patients. Patients aged ≥ 18 years with blunt or penetrating trauma who were admitted to intensive care units or general wards between 2004 and 2017 were included. We compared the baseline characteristics and outcomes between patients with and without infection and conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to investigate the impact of infection on in-hospital mortality according to trauma severity, which was classified as mild [Injury Severity Score (ISS) < 15], moderate (ISS 15–29), or severe (ISS ≥ 30). Among the 150,948 patients in this study, 10,338 (6.8%) developed infections. Patients with infection had greater in-hospital mortality than patients without infection [1085 (10.5%) vs. 2898 (2.1%), p < 0.01]. After adjusting for clinical characteristics, in-hospital mortality differed between trauma patients with and without infection according to trauma severity [17.1% (95% CI 15.2–18.9%) vs. 2.9% (95% CI 2.7–3.1%), p < 0.01, in patients with mild trauma; 14.8% (95% CI 13.3–16.3%) vs. 8.4% (95% CI 7.9–8.8%), p < 0.01, in patients with moderate trauma; and 13.5% (95% CI 11.2–15.7%) vs. 13.7% (95% CI 12.4–14.9%), p = 0.86, in patients with severe trauma]. In conclusion, the effect of infection complications in patients with trauma on in-hospital mortality differs by trauma severity.

scholarly journals Infection Complications After Trauma Contribute to Increased in-Hospital Mortality in Mild Patients Compared With Severe Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using a Nationwide Trauma Registry in Japan

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Komori ◽  
Hiroki Iriyama ◽  
Takako Kainoh ◽  
Makoto Aoki ◽  
Toshio Naito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Trauma Severity ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Infection is a very common but poor prognostic complication affecting trauma patients. However, the impact of infection on the prognosis of trauma patients according to severity remains unclear. We aimed to assess the impact of infection complications on in-hospital mortality among patients with trauma according to severity. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used a nationwide registry of trauma patients (Japan Trauma Data Bank). Patients aged ≥ 18 years with blunt or penetrating trauma who were admitted to intensive care units or general wards between 2004 and 2017 were included. We compared the baseline characteristics and outcomes between patients with and without infection and conducted a multivariable logistic regression analysis to investigate the impact of infection on in-hospital mortality according to trauma severity, which was classified as mild [Injury Severity Score (ISS) < 15], moderate (ISS 15–29), or severe (ISS ≥ 30). Results: Among the 150,948 patients in this study, 10,172 (6.7%) developed infections. The severity of trauma was greater in patients with infection than those without [mild, 3,837 (37.7%) vs. 84,106 (59.7%); moderate, 4,518 (44.4%) vs. 47,809 (34.0%); severe, 1,817 (17.9%) vs. 8,861 (6.3%), p < 0.01]. Patients with infection had greater in-hospital mortality than patients without infection [1,079 (10.6%) vs. 2,904 (2.1%), p < 0.01]. After adjusting for clinical characteristics, in-hospital mortality differed significantly between trauma patients with and without infection according to trauma severity [16.7% (95% CI; 14.6%–18.8%) vs. 3.6% (95% CI; 3.3%–3.9%), p < 0.01, in patients with mild trauma; 12.3% (95% CI; 11.0%–13.6%) vs. 7.3% (95% CI; 6.9%–7.7%), p < 0.01, in patients with moderate trauma; and 12.0% (95% CI; 9.8%–14.2%) vs. 11.1% (95% CI; 9.8%–12.4%), p = 0.41, in patients with severe trauma].Conclusion: The effect of infection complications in patients with trauma on in-hospital mortality differs by trauma severity.

scholarly journals An improved modified early warning score that incorporates the abdomen score for identifying multiple traumatic injury severity

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e10242
Author(s):  
Xiaobin Jiang
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Trauma ◽  
Early Warning ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Severe Trauma ◽  
Early Warning Score ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Injury Site ◽  
Trauma Severity ◽  
Multiple Trauma Patients

Background Rapid identification of trauma severity is essential for the timely triage of multiple trauma patients. Tools such as the modified early warning score (MEWS) are used for determining injury severity. Although the conventional MEWS is a good predictor of mortality, its performance assessing injury severity is moderate. This study hypothesized that adding an injury site severity-related score (e.g., abdomen score) may enhance the capability of the MEWS for identifying severe trauma. Method To validate the hypothesis, we propose an improved modified early warning score called MEWS-A, which incorporates an injury site-specific severity-related abdomen score to MEWS. The utility of MEWS and MEWS-A were retrospectively evaluated and compared for identifying trauma severity in adult multiple trauma patients admitted to the emergency department. Results We included 1,230 eligible multiple trauma patients and divided them into minor and severe trauma groups based on the injury severity score. Results of logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses showed that the MEWS-A had a higher area under the ROC curve (AUC: 0.81 95% CI [0.78–0.83]) than did the MEWS (AUC: 0.77 95% CI [0.74–0.79]), indicating that the MEWS-A is superior to the MEWS in identifying severe trauma. The optimal MEWS-A cut-off score is 4, with a specificity of 0.93 and a sensitivity of 0.54. MEWS-A ≥ 4 can be used as a protocol for decision-making in the emergency department. Conclusions Our study suggests that while the conventional MEWS is sufficient for predicting mortality risk, adding an injury site-specific score (e.g., abdomen score) can enhance its performance in determining injury severity in multiple trauma patients.

scholarly journals Incidence and prognosis of myocardial injury in patients with severe trauma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Stroda ◽  
Simon Thelen ◽  
René M’Pembele ◽  
Antony Adelowo ◽  
Carina Jaekel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Myocardial Injury ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Severe Trauma ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Resuscitation Room ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose Severe trauma can lead to end organ damages of varying severity, including myocardial injury. In the non-cardiac surgery setting, there is extensive evidence that perioperative myocardial injury is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The impact of myocardial injury on outcome after severe trauma has not been investigated adequately yet. We hypothesized that myocardial injury is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with severe trauma. Materials/methods This retrospective cohort study included patients ≥ 18 years with severe trauma [defined as injury severity score (ISS) ≥ 16] that were admitted to the resuscitation room of the Emergency Department of the University Hospital Duesseldorf, Germany, between 2016 and 2019. The main endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Main exposure was myocardial injury at arrival [defined as high-sensitive troponin T (hsTnT) > 14 ng/l]. For statistical analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and multivariate binary logistic regression were performed. Results Out of 368 patients, 353 were included into statistical analysis (72.5% male, age: 55 ± 21, ISS: 28 ± 12). Overall in-hospital mortality was 26.1%. Myocardial injury at presentation was detected in 149 (42.2%) patients. In-hospital mortality of patients with and without myocardial injury at presentation was 45% versus 12.3%, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for hsTnT and mortality was 0.76 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71–0.82]. The adjusted odds ratio of myocardial injury for in-hospital mortality was 2.27 ([95%CI 1.16–4.45]; p = 0.017). Conclusion Myocardial injury after severe trauma is common and independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Thus, hsTnT might serve as a new prognostic marker in this cohort.

scholarly journals Early experience of a regional trauma center in Gangwon province: First step toward organizing a regional trauma system

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 202-210
Author(s):  
Kwangmin Kim ◽  
Hongjin Shim ◽  
Pil Young Jung ◽  
Seongyup Kim ◽  
Hui-Jae Bang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Trauma System ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Impact

Background: The Korean Ministry of Health and Welfare decided to establish a trauma medical service system to reduce preventable deaths. OO hospital in Gangwon Province was selected as a regional trauma center and was inaugurated in 2015. Objectives: This study examines the impact of this center, comparing mortality and other variables before and after inaugurating the center. Methods: Severely injured patients (injury severity score > 15) presenting to OO hospital between January 2014 and December 2016 were enrolled and categorized into two groups: before trauma center (n = 365) and after trauma center (n = 904). Patient characteristics, variables, and patient outcomes (including mortality rate) before and after the establishment of trauma centers were compared accordingly for both groups. Risk factors for in-hospital mortality were also identified. Results: Probability of survival using trauma and injury severity score (%) method was significantly lower in the after trauma center group (81.3 ± 26.1) than in the before trauma center group (84.7 ± 21.0) (p = 0.014). In-hospital mortality rates were similar in both groups (before vs after trauma center group: 13.2% vs 14.2%; p = 0.638). The Z and W statistics revealed higher scores in the after trauma center group than in the before trauma center group (Z statistic, 4.69 vs 1.37; W statistic, 4.52 vs 2.10); 2.42 more patients (per 100 patients) survived after trauma center establishment. Conclusion: Although the mortality rates of trauma patients remained unchanged after the trauma center establishment, the Z and W statistics revealed improvements in the quality of care.

scholarly journals P058: Impact of an early mobilization protocol on outcomes in trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study

CJEM ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (S1) ◽  
pp. S84
Author(s):  
J. Coles ◽  
M. Erdogan ◽  
S. Higgins ◽  
R. Green
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Transition Period ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Implementation Period ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Long-term immobility has detrimental effects for critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) including ICU-acquired weakness. Early mobilization of patients admitted to ICU has been demonstrated to be a safe, feasible and effective strategy to improve patient outcomes. The optimal mobilization of trauma ICU patients has not been extensively studied. Our objective was to determine the impact of an early mobilization protocol on outcomes among trauma patients admitted to the ICU. Methods: We analyzed all adult trauma patients ( &gt; 18 years old) admitted to ICU over a 2-year period prior to and following implementation of an early mobilization protocol, allowing for a 1-year transition period. Data were collected from the Nova Scotia Trauma Registry. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes (mortality, length of stay [LOS], ventilator days) between the pre- and post-implementation groups. Associations between early mobilization and clinical outcomes were estimated using binary and linear regression models. Results: Overall, there were 526 patients included in the analysis (292 pre-implementation, 234 post-implementation). The study population ranged in age from 18 to 92 years (mean age 49.0 ± 20.4 years) and 74.3% of all patients were male. The pre- and post-implementation groups were similar in age, sex, and injury severity. In-hospital mortality was reduced in the post-implementation group (25.3% vs. 17.5%; p = 0.031). In addition, there was a reduction in ICU mortality in the post-implementation group (21.6% vs. 12.8%; p = 0.009). We did not observe any difference in overall hospital LOS, ICU LOS, or ventilator days between the two groups. Compared to the pre-implementation period, trauma patients admitted to the ICU following protocol implementation were less likely to die in-hospital (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.30-0.91; p = 0.021) or in the ICU (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.21- 0.76, p = 0.005). Results were similar following a sensitivity analysis limited to patients with blunt or penetrating injuries. There was no difference between the pre- and post-implementation groups with respect to in-hospital LOS, ICU LOS, or the number of ventilator days. Conclusion: We found that trauma patients admitted to ICU during the post-implementation period had decreased odds of in-hospital mortality and ICU mortality. Ours is the first study to demonstrate a significant reduction in trauma mortality following implementation of an ICU mobility protocol.

scholarly journals Prevalence and outcome of abdominal vascular injury in severe trauma patients based on a TraumaRegister DGU international registry analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Esmaeil Barbati ◽  
Frank Hildebrand ◽  
Hagen Andruszkow ◽  
Rolf Lefering ◽  
Michael J. Jacobs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Vascular Injury ◽  
Arterial Injury ◽  
Severe Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Vascular Injuries ◽  
Comparable Rate ◽  
Venous Injury ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Abdominal Vascular Injuries

AbstractThis study details the etiology, frequency and effect of abdominal vascular injuries in patients after polytrauma based on a large registry of trauma patients. The impact of arterial, venous and mixed vascular injuries on patients’ outcome was of interest, as in particular the relevance of venous vessel injury may be underestimated and not adequately assessed in literature so far. All patients of TraumaRegister DGU with the following criteria were included: online documentation of european trauma centers, age 16–85 years, presence of abdominal vascular injury and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) ≥ 3. Patients were divided in three groups of: arterial injury only, venous injury only, mixed arterial and venous injuries. Reporting in this study adheres to the STROBE criteria. A total of 2949 patients were included. All types of abdominal vessel injuries were more prevalent in patients with abdominal trauma followed by thoracic trauma. Rate of patients with shock upon admission were the same in patients with arterial injury alone (n = 606, 33%) and venous injury alone (n = 95, 32%). Venous trauma showed higher odds ratio for in-hospital mortality (OR: 1.48; 95% CI 1.10–1.98, p = 0.010). Abdominal arterial and venous injury in patients suffering from severe trauma were associated with a comparable rate of hemodynamic instability at the time of admission. 24 h as well as in-hospital mortality rate were similar in in patients with venous injury and arterial injury. Stable patients suspected of abdominal vascular injuries should be further investigated to exclude or localize the possible subtle venous injury.

scholarly journals Expression of HO1 and PER2 can predict the incidence of delirium in trauma patients with concomitant brain injury

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti Steimer ◽  
Sandra Kaiser ◽  
Felix Ulbrich ◽  
Johannes Kalbhenn ◽  
Hartmut Bürkle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Injury ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Heme Oxygenase 1 ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Equal Distribution ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Trauma Severity

AbstractIntensive care unit (ICU)-acquired delirium is associated with adverse outcome in trauma patients with concomitant traumatic brain injury (TBI), but diagnosis remains challenging. Quantifying circadian disruption by analyzing expression of the circadian gene period circadian regulator 2 (PER2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO1), which determines heme turnover, may prove to be potential diagnostic tools. Expression of PER2 and HO1 was quantified using qPCR from blood samples 1 day and 7 days after trauma. Association analysis was performed comparing mRNA expression levels with parameters of trauma (ISS—injury severity score), delirium, acute kidney injury (AKI) and length of ICU stay. 48 polytraumatized patients were included (equal distribution of TBI versus non-TBI) corrected for ISS, age and gender using a matched pairs approach. Expression levels of PER2 and HO1 were independent of age (PER2: P = 0.935; HO1: P = 0.988), while expression levels were significantly correlated with trauma severity (PER2: P = 0.009; HO1: P < 0.001) and longer ICU length of stay (PER2: P = 0.018; HO1: P < 0.001). High expression levels increased the odds of delirium occurrence (PER2: OR = 4.32 [1.14–13.87]; HO1: OR = 4.50 [1.23–14.42]). Patients with TBI showed a trend towards elevated PER2 (OR = 3.00 [0.84–9.33], P = 0.125), but not towards delirium occurrence (P = 0.556). TBI patients were less likely to develop AKI compared to non-TBI (P = 0.022). Expression levels of PER2 and HO1 correlate with the incidence of delirium in an age-independent manner and may potentially improve diagnostic algorithms when used as delirium biomarkers.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register (Trial-ID DRKS00008981; Universal Trial Number U1111-1172-6077; Jan. 18, 2018).

scholarly journals Validation of the BATT score for prehospital risk stratification of traumatic haemorrhagic death: usefulness for tranexamic acid treatment criteria

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francois-Xavier Ageron ◽  
Timothy J. Coats ◽  
Vincent Darioli ◽  
Ian Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Tranexamic Acid ◽  
Acid Treatment ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
External Validation ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Brier Score ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Using Data ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Tranexamic acid reduces surgical blood loss and reduces deaths from bleeding in trauma patients. Tranexamic acid must be given urgently, preferably by paramedics at the scene of the injury or in the ambulance. We developed a simple score (Bleeding Audit Triage Trauma score) to predict death from bleeding. Methods We conducted an external validation of the BATT score using data from the UK Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) from 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2018. We evaluated the impact of tranexamic acid treatment thresholds in trauma patients. Results We included 104,862 trauma patients with an injury severity score of 9 or above. Tranexamic acid was administered to 9915 (9%) patients. Of these 5185 (52%) received prehospital tranexamic acid. The BATT score had good accuracy (Brier score = 6%) and good discrimination (C-statistic 0.90; 95% CI 0.89–0.91). Calibration in the large showed no substantial difference between predicted and observed death due to bleeding (1.15% versus 1.16%, P = 0.81). Pre-hospital tranexamic acid treatment of trauma patients with a BATT score of 2 or more would avoid 210 bleeding deaths by treating 61,598 patients instead of avoiding 55 deaths by treating 9915 as currently. Conclusion The BATT score identifies trauma patient at risk of significant haemorrhage. A score of 2 or more would be an appropriate threshold for pre-hospital tranexamic acid treatment.

Splanchnic Hypoperfusion-Directed Therapies in Trauma: A Prospective, Randomized Trial

2005 ◽  
Vol 71 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Cohn ◽  
Stephen M. Cohn ◽  
Orlando Kirton ◽  
Margaret Brown ◽  
S. Morad Hameed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Ischemia Reperfusion ◽  
Unit Group ◽  
Severe Trauma ◽  
Prospective Randomized Trial ◽  
Gastric Tonometry ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Splanchnic Perfusion ◽  
Splanchnic Hypoperfusion

Splanchnic hypoperfusion as reflected by gastric intramucosal acidosis has been recognized as an important determinant of outcome in shock. A comprehensive splanchnic hypoperfusion-ischemia reperfusion (IRP) protocol was evaluated against conventional shock management protocols in critical trauma patients. The study was a prospective randomized trial comparing three therapeutic approaches to hypoperfusion after severe trauma in 151 trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Group 1 patients received hemodynamic support based on conventional indicators of hypoperfusion. In group 2, resuscitation was further guided by gastric tonometry-derived estimates of splanchnic hypoperfusion and included more invasive hemodynamic monitoring and additional administration of colloid or crystalloid solutions, or inotropic support. Group 3 patients additionally received therapies specifically aimed at optimizing splanchnic perfusion and minimizing oxidant-mediated damage from reperfusion. The three groups were similar based on age, Injury Severity Score, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II Scores. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality rates, organ dysfunction, ventilator days, or length of stay between any of the interventions. Techniques of optimization of splanchnic perfusion and minimization of oxidant-mediated reperfusion injury evaluated in this study were not advantageous relative to standard resuscitation measures guided by conventional or tonometric measures of hypoperfusion in the therapy of occult and clinical shock in trauma patients.

Evaluation of Microvascular Perfusion and Resuscitation after Severe Injury

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 1272-1278 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yann-Leei L. Lee ◽  
Jon D. Simmons ◽  
Mark N. Gillespie ◽  
Diego F. Alvarez ◽  
Richard P. Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Capillary Flow ◽  
Severe Trauma ◽  
Dark Field ◽  
Serum Lactate ◽  
Microvascular Perfusion ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Sidestream Dark Field ◽  
Trauma Population ◽  
Severity Scores

Achieving adequate perfusion is a key goal of treatment in severe trauma; however, tissue perfusion has classically been measured by indirect means. Direct visualization of capillary flow has been applied in sepsis, but application of this technology to the trauma population has been limited. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the efficacy of standard indirect measures of perfusion to direct imaging of the sublingual microcirculatory flow during trauma resuscitation. Patients with injury severity scores >15 were serially examined using a handheld sidestream dark-field video microscope. In addition, measurements were also made from healthy volunteers. The De Backer score, a morphometric capillary density score, and total vessel density (TVD) as cumulative vessel area within the image, were calculated using Automated Vascular Analysis (AVA3.0) software. These indices were compared against clinical and laboratory parameters of organ function and systemic metabolic status as well as mortality. Twenty severely injured patients had lower TVD (X = 14.6 ± 0.22 vs 17.66 ± 0.51) and De Backer scores (X = 9.62 ± 0.16 vs 11.55 ± 0.37) compared with healthy controls. These scores best correlated with serum lactate (TVD R2 = 0.525, De Backer R2 = 0.576, P < 0.05). Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, pH, bicarbonate, base deficit, hematocrit, and coagulation parameters correlated poorly with both TVD and De Backer score. Direct measurement of sublingual microvascular perfusion is technically feasible in trauma patients, and seems to provide real-time assessment of micro-circulatory perfusion. This study suggests that in severe trauma, many indirect measurements of perfusion do not correlate with microvascular perfusion. However, visualized perfusion deficiencies do reflect a shift toward anaerobic metabolism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document