scholarly journals Kernel-based Joint Feature Selection and Max-Margin Classification for Early Diagnosis of Parkinson’s Disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Adeli ◽  
Guorong Wu ◽  
Behrouz Saghafi ◽  
Le An ◽  
Feng Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Margin Classification

scholarly journals A Simple and Effective Approach Based on a Multi-Level Feature Selection for Automated Parkinson’s Disease Detection

2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Fatih Demir ◽  
Kamran Siddique ◽  
Mohammed Alswaitti ◽  
Kursat Demir ◽  
Abdulkadir Sengur
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Neurodegenerative Disorder ◽  
Bayesian Optimization ◽  
L1 Norm ◽  
Bayesian Optimization Algorithm ◽  
Knn Classifier ◽  
Multi Level

Parkinson’s disease (PD), which is a slowly progressing neurodegenerative disorder, negatively affects people’s daily lives. Early diagnosis is of great importance to minimize the effects of PD. One of the most important symptoms in the early diagnosis of PD disease is the monotony and distortion of speech. Artificial intelligence-based approaches can help specialists and physicians to automatically detect these disorders. In this study, a new and powerful approach based on multi-level feature selection was proposed to detect PD from features containing voice recordings of already-diagnosed cases. At the first level, feature selection was performed with the Chi-square and L1-Norm SVM algorithms (CLS). Then, the features that were extracted from these algorithms were combined to increase the representation power of the samples. At the last level, those samples that were highly distinctive from the combined feature set were selected with feature importance weights using the ReliefF algorithm. In the classification stage, popular classifiers such as KNN, SVM, and DT were used for machine learning, and the best performance was achieved with the KNN classifier. Moreover, the hyperparameters of the KNN classifier were selected with the Bayesian optimization algorithm, and the performance of the proposed approach was further improved. The proposed approach was evaluated using a 10-fold cross-validation technique on a dataset containing PD and normal classes, and a classification accuracy of 95.4% was achieved.

Early diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease from multiple voice recordings by simultaneous sample and feature selection

2019 ◽  
Vol 137 ◽  
pp. 22-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liaqat Ali ◽  
Ce Zhu ◽  
Mingyi Zhou ◽  
Yipeng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Early Diagnosis

Current Therapeutic Strategies and Perspectives for Neuroprotection in Parkinson’s Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (37) ◽  
pp. 4738-4746
Author(s):  
Mohan K. Ghanta ◽  
P. Elango ◽  
Bhaskar L. V. K. S.
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Neurodegenerative Disorder ◽  
Therapeutic Strategies ◽  
Neuroprotective Agents ◽  
Striatal Neurons ◽  
The Status ◽  
Advanced Stages ◽  
Dopaminergic Pathways

Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder of dopaminergic striatal neurons in basal ganglia. Treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) through dopamine replacement strategies may provide improvement in early stages and this treatment response is related to dopaminergic neuronal mass which decreases in advanced stages. This treatment failure was revealed by many studies and levodopa treatment became ineffective or toxic in chronic stages of PD. Early diagnosis and neuroprotective agents may be a suitable approach for the treatment of PD. The essentials required for early diagnosis are biomarkers. Characterising the striatal neurons, understanding the status of dopaminergic pathways in different PD stages may reveal the effects of the drugs used in the treatment. This review updates on characterisation of striatal neurons, electrophysiology of dopaminergic pathways in PD, biomarkers of PD, approaches for success of neuroprotective agents in clinical trials. The literature was collected from the articles in database of PubMed, MedLine and other available literature resources.

scholarly journals The Role of Salivary Biomarkers in the Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease and Parkinson’s Disease

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 371
Author(s):  
Patrycja Pawlik ◽  
Katarzyna Błochowiak
Keyword(s):  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Early Diagnosis ◽  
Neurodegenerative Diseases ◽  
Diagnostic Tool ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Early Screening ◽  
Salivary Biomarkers

Many neurodegenerative diseases present with progressive neuronal degeneration, which can lead to cognitive and motor impairment. Early screening and diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Parkinson’s disease (PD) are necessary to begin treatment before the onset of clinical symptoms and slow down the progression of the disease. Biomarkers have shown great potential as a diagnostic tool in the early diagnosis of many diseases, including AD and PD. However, screening for these biomarkers usually includes invasive, complex and expensive methods such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling through a lumbar puncture. Researchers are continuously seeking to find a simpler and more reliable diagnostic tool that would be less invasive than CSF sampling. Saliva has been studied as a potential biological fluid that could be used in the diagnosis and early screening of neurodegenerative diseases. This review aims to provide an insight into the current literature concerning salivary biomarkers used in the diagnosis of AD and PD. The most commonly studied salivary biomarkers in AD are β-amyloid1-42/1-40 and TAU protein, as well as α-synuclein and protein deglycase (DJ-1) in PD. Studies continue to be conducted on this subject and researchers are attempting to find correlations between specific biomarkers and early clinical symptoms, which could be key in creating new treatments for patients before the onset of symptoms.

scholarly journals Kinematic and Kinetic Patterns Related to Free-Walking in Parkinson’s Disease

Sensors ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 4224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martín Martínez ◽  
Federico Villagra ◽  
Juan Castellote ◽  
María Pastor
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Feature Selection ◽  
Clinical Status ◽  
Automatic Classification ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Double Support ◽  
Gait Asymmetry ◽  
Double Support Time ◽  
Support Time

The aim of this study is to compare the properties of free-walking at a natural pace between mild Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients during the ON-clinical status and two control groups. In-shoe pressure-sensitive insoles were used to quantify the temporal and force characteristics of a 5-min free-walking in 11 PD patients, in 16 young healthy controls, and in 12 age-matched healthy controls. Inferential statistics analyses were performed on the kinematic and kinetic parameters to compare groups’ performances, whereas feature selection analyses and automatic classification were used to identify the signature of parkinsonian gait and to assess the performance of group classification, respectively. Compared to healthy subjects, the PD patients’ gait pattern presented significant differences in kinematic parameters associated with bilateral coordination but not in kinetics. Specifically, patients showed an increased variability in double support time, greater gait asymmetry and phase deviation, and also poorer phase coordination. Feature selection analyses based on the ReliefF algorithm on the differential parameters in PD patients revealed an effect of the clinical status, especially true in double support time variability and gait asymmetry. Automatic classification of PD patients, young and senior subjects confirmed that kinematic predictors produced a slightly better classification performance than kinetic predictors. Overall, classification accuracy of groups with a linear discriminant model which included the whole set of features (i.e., demographics and parameters extracted from the sensors) was 64.1%.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document