scholarly journals Turning the Mre11/Rad50 DNA repair complex on its head: lessons from SMC protein hinges, dynamic coiled-coil movements and DNA loop-extrusion?

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 2359-2376
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Zabolotnaya ◽  
Ioanna Mela ◽  
Robert M. Henderson ◽  
Nicholas P. Robinson

The bacterial SbcC/SbcD DNA repair proteins were identified over a quarter of a century ago. Following the subsequent identification of the homologous Mre11/Rad50 complex in the eukaryotes and archaea, it has become clear that this conserved chromosomal processing machinery is central to DNA repair pathways and the maintenance of genomic stability in all forms of life. A number of experimental studies have explored this intriguing genome surveillance machinery, yielding significant insights and providing conceptual advances towards our understanding of how this complex operates to mediate DNA repair. However, the inherent complexity and dynamic nature of this chromosome-manipulating machinery continue to obfuscate experimental interrogations, and details regarding the precise mechanisms that underpin the critical repair events remain unanswered. This review will summarize our current understanding of the dramatic structural changes that occur in Mre11/Rad50 complex to mediate chromosomal tethering and accomplish the associated DNA processing events. In addition, undetermined mechanistic aspects of the DNA enzymatic pathways driven by this vital yet enigmatic chromosomal surveillance and repair apparatus will be discussed. In particular, novel and putative models of DNA damage recognition will be considered and comparisons will be made between the modes of action of the Rad50 protein and other related ATPases of the overarching SMC superfamily.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1389-1389
Author(s):  
Mary Mohrin ◽  
Emer Bourke ◽  
Ciaran Morrison ◽  
Emmanuelle Passegue

Abstract DNA damage can be caused by intrinsic and extrinsic sources, and unrepaired or imprecisely repaired DNA can lead to mutagenesis, cell death, or malignant transformation. Here, we have used highly purified hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) and myeloid progenitor populations (MP: CMP & GMP) to understand how they respond to ionizing radiation (IR) and to establish how they recognize and repair damaged DNA. Our overall goal is to determine whether HSC and MP differ in their ability to deal with genotoxic stress and to identify the type of deregulations that each population requires for accumulating mutations and becoming transformed. By following their ability to form colonies in methylcellulose and to grow in liquid culture, we found that HSC are more capable of withstanding increasing doses of IR than MP. BrdU incorporation pulses revealed that irradiated HSC have an initial and transient pause in proliferation, while irradiated MP cycled faster than untreated MP. By monitoring apoptosis with AnnexinV/7AAD and cleaved caspase 3 staining, we showed that both irradiated HSC and MP have an immediate apoptotic response but that HSC quickly recover and restore low baseline levels of apoptosis while MP maintain high levels of apoptosis. These results suggest that HSC may pause cycling to repair damaged DNA while MP increase cycling to replenish cells cleared by apoptosis. At the molecular level, irradiated HSC displayed a strong and transient induction of several pro-apoptotic genes (bax, puma, noxa) but minimal change in expression of pro-survival genes, which are already high in those cells. In contrast, irradiated MP displayed minimal induction of pro-apoptotic genes (except for puma) but decreased expression of pro-survival genes, which are already low in those cells. Taken together, these results suggest that HSC can withstand genotoxic stress better than MP due to differences in the regulation of their apoptotic machinery leading to protection of HSC and elimination of MP. To monitor the ability of HSC and MP to recognize and repair damaged DNA, we used immunofluorescence techniques to study IR-induced DNA damage foci. Irradiated HSC and MP displayed similar kinetics of DNA damage recognition as monitored by the formation and resolution of gamma-H2AX and 53BP1 foci. In contrast, the kinetics of Rad51 foci – which signal the initiation of homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair – significantly differed between these populations. While Rad51 foci were immediately induced and quickly resolved in MP, very few Rad51 foci were formed in HSC up to 12 hours post-IR. Since HR only occurs during S/G2/M phases of the cell cycle, it is possible that the largely quiescent HSC can not utilize HR and instead use the more error prone DNA repair mechanism non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). At the molecular level, both HSC and MP displayed similar levels of genes associated with DNA damage recognition and repair (atm, rad50) and specific to HR (brca1), while MP display significantly lower levels of genes specifically involved in NHEJ (ku80) compared to HSC. These results indicate that both HSC and MP can recognize damaged DNA but might preferentially use different repair mechanisms. They also suggest that to become transformed and drive leukemia development, HSC might only require DNA damage, while MP might also need deregulation affecting both DNA repair mechanisms and apoptosis machinery. These findings provide insights into the mechanisms that maintain homeostatic function of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in normal tissues, and the deregulations that can occur during aging and cancer development. Ultimately, they could identify molecular targets to prevent therapy-related organ damage or secondary leukemia.


1992 ◽  
Vol 282 (1) ◽  
pp. 203-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
C C K Chao

We have previously identified damage-recognition proteins that bind to cisplatin[cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II), a DNA cross-linking agent]- or u.v.-modified DNA in HeLa cells [Chao, Huang, Huang & Lin-Chao (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol. 11, 2075-2080; Chao, Huang, Lee & Lin-Chao (1991) Biochem. J. 277, 875-878]. In the present study we compared damage-recognition proteins in cells expressing different sensitivities to DNA damage. An increase in damage-recognition proteins and an enhancement of plasmid re-activation were detected in HeLa cells resistant to cisplatin and u.v. However, repair-defective cells derived from xeroderma-pigmentosum (a rare skin disease) patients did not express less cisplatin damage-recognition proteins than repair-competent cells, suggesting that damage-recognition-protein expression may not be related to DNA repair. By contrast, cells resistant to DNA damage consistently expressed high levels of u.v.-modified-DNA damage-recognition proteins. The results support the notion that u.v. damage-recognition proteins are different from those that bind to cisplatin. These findings also suggest that the damage-recognition proteins identified could be used as potential indicators of the sensitivity or resistance of cells to u.v.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 1652-1668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corina Gsell ◽  
Holger Richly ◽  
Frédéric Coin ◽  
Hanspeter Naegeli

Abstract The excision of mutagenic DNA adducts by the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway is essential for genome stability, which is key to avoiding genetic diseases, premature aging, cancer and neurologic disorders. Due to the need to process an extraordinarily high damage density embedded in the nucleosome landscape of chromatin, NER activity provides a unique functional caliper to understand how histone modifiers modulate DNA damage responses. At least three distinct lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) targeting histones have been shown to facilitate the detection of ultraviolet (UV) light-induced DNA lesions in the difficult to access DNA wrapped around histones in nucleosomes. By methylating core histones, these KMTs generate docking sites for DNA damage recognition factors before the chromatin structure is ultimately relaxed and the offending lesions are effectively excised. In view of their function in priming nucleosomes for DNA repair, mutations of genes coding for these KMTs are expected to cause the accumulation of DNA damage promoting cancer and other chronic diseases. Research on the question of how KMTs modulate DNA repair might pave the way to the development of pharmacologic agents for novel therapeutic strategies.


Author(s):  
A. M. Shamayev ◽  
M. D. Ozersky

The results of experimental studies of the effect of electron irradiation on K-208 and CMG glasses used for manufacturing protective coatings of solar batteries and thermal control coatings of space vehicles are analyzed. It is shown that the caused electrostatic discharges lead to structural changes in the surfaces of the glasses studied. The goals of further studies of the influence of proton and electronproton effects on the properties of such coatings are outlined. 


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry Silva McPherson ◽  
Dmitry Korzhnev

Cellular DNA damage response (DDR) is an extensive signaling network that orchestrates DNA damage recognition, repair and avoidance, cell cycle progression and cell death. DDR alternation is a hallmark of...


Blood ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 130 (24) ◽  
pp. 2631-2641 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenton G. Mar ◽  
S. Haihua Chu ◽  
Josephine D. Kahn ◽  
Andrei V. Krivtsov ◽  
Richard Koche ◽  
...  

Key Points Alterations of SETD2, a histone 3 lysine 36 trimethyl (H3K36me3) transferase leads to resistance to DNA damaging-chemotherapy in leukemia. Low H3K36me3 levels impair DNA damage response and increase mutation rate, which may be targeted by H3K36me3 demethylase inhibition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document