scholarly journals Binary classification model based on machine learning algorithm for the DC serial arc detection in electric vehicle battery system

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kun Xia ◽  
Haotian Guo ◽  
Sheng He ◽  
Wei Yu ◽  
Jingjun Xu ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Murakami ◽  
◽  
Takuo Suzuki ◽  
Akira Tokumasu ◽  
Yasushi Nakauchi

This paper proposes cooking support using ubiquitous sensors. We developed a machine learning algorithm that recognizes cooking procedures by taking into account widely varying sensor information and user behavior. To provide appropriate instructions to users, we developed a Markov-model-based behavior prediction algorithm. Using these algorithms, we developed cooking support automatically displaying cooking instruction videos based on user progress. Experiments and experimental results confirmed the feasibility of our proposed cooking support.


2021 ◽  
pp. 089198872199355
Author(s):  
Anastasia Bougea ◽  
Efthymia Efthymiopoulou ◽  
Ioanna Spanou ◽  
Panagiotis Zikos

Objective: Our aim was to develop a machine learning algorithm based only on non-invasively clinic collectable predictors, for the accurate diagnosis of these disorders. Methods: This is an ongoing prospective cohort study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT number NCT04448340) of 78 PDD and 62 DLB subjects whose diagnostic follow-up is available for at least 3 years after the baseline assessment. We used predictors such as clinico-demographic characteristics, 6 neuropsychological tests (mini mental, PD Cognitive Rating Scale, Brief Visuospatial Memory test, Symbol digit written, Wechsler adult intelligence scale, trail making A and B). We investigated logistic regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NNs) Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes classifier, and Ensemble Model for their ability to predict successfully PDD or DLB diagnosis. Results: The K-NN classification model had an accuracy 91.2% of overall cases based on 15 best clinical and cognitive scores achieving 96.42% sensitivity and 81% specificity on discriminating between DLB and PDD. The binomial logistic regression classification model achieved an accuracy of 87.5% based on 15 best features, showing 93.93% sensitivity and 87% specificity. The SVM classification model had an accuracy 84.6% of overall cases based on 15 best features achieving 90.62% sensitivity and 78.58% specificity. A model created on Naïve Bayes classification had 82.05% accuracy, 93.10% sensitivity and 74.41% specificity. Finally, an Ensemble model, synthesized by the individual ones, achieved 89.74% accuracy, 93.75% sensitivity and 85.73% specificity. Conclusion: Machine learning method predicted with high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity PDD or DLB diagnosis based on non-invasively and easily in-the-clinic and neuropsychological tests.


Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (23) ◽  
pp. 5207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Gradišek ◽  
Marion van Midden ◽  
Matija Koterle ◽  
Vid Prezelj ◽  
Drago Strle ◽  
...  

We used a 16-channel e-nose demonstrator based on micro-capacitive sensors with functionalized surfaces to measure the response of 30 different sensors to the vapours from 11 different substances, including the explosives 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazinane (RDX), 1-methyl-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNT) and 2-methyl-1,3,5-trinitrobenzene (TNT). A classification model was developed using the Random Forest machine-learning algorithm and trained the models on a set of signals, where the concentration and flow of a selected single vapour were varied independently. It is demonstrated that our classification models are successful in recognizing the signal pattern of different sets of substances. An excellent accuracy of 96% was achieved for identifying the explosives from among the other substances. These experiments clearly demonstrate that the silane monolayers used in our sensors as receptor layers are particularly well suited to selecting and recognizing TNT and similar types of explosives from among other substances.


IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 224224-224234
Author(s):  
Jianping Lin ◽  
Ping Dong ◽  
Mingbo Liu ◽  
Xuewei Huang ◽  
Wenli Deng

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document