Research on Flow Classification Model Based on Similarity and Machine Learning Algorithm

Author(s):  
Meigen Huang ◽  
Lingling Wu ◽  
Xue Yuan
2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 498-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sho Murakami ◽  
◽  
Takuo Suzuki ◽  
Akira Tokumasu ◽  
Yasushi Nakauchi

This paper proposes cooking support using ubiquitous sensors. We developed a machine learning algorithm that recognizes cooking procedures by taking into account widely varying sensor information and user behavior. To provide appropriate instructions to users, we developed a Markov-model-based behavior prediction algorithm. Using these algorithms, we developed cooking support automatically displaying cooking instruction videos based on user progress. Experiments and experimental results confirmed the feasibility of our proposed cooking support.


2021 ◽  
pp. 089198872199355
Author(s):  
Anastasia Bougea ◽  
Efthymia Efthymiopoulou ◽  
Ioanna Spanou ◽  
Panagiotis Zikos

Objective: Our aim was to develop a machine learning algorithm based only on non-invasively clinic collectable predictors, for the accurate diagnosis of these disorders. Methods: This is an ongoing prospective cohort study ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT number NCT04448340) of 78 PDD and 62 DLB subjects whose diagnostic follow-up is available for at least 3 years after the baseline assessment. We used predictors such as clinico-demographic characteristics, 6 neuropsychological tests (mini mental, PD Cognitive Rating Scale, Brief Visuospatial Memory test, Symbol digit written, Wechsler adult intelligence scale, trail making A and B). We investigated logistic regression, K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NNs) Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes classifier, and Ensemble Model for their ability to predict successfully PDD or DLB diagnosis. Results: The K-NN classification model had an accuracy 91.2% of overall cases based on 15 best clinical and cognitive scores achieving 96.42% sensitivity and 81% specificity on discriminating between DLB and PDD. The binomial logistic regression classification model achieved an accuracy of 87.5% based on 15 best features, showing 93.93% sensitivity and 87% specificity. The SVM classification model had an accuracy 84.6% of overall cases based on 15 best features achieving 90.62% sensitivity and 78.58% specificity. A model created on Naïve Bayes classification had 82.05% accuracy, 93.10% sensitivity and 74.41% specificity. Finally, an Ensemble model, synthesized by the individual ones, achieved 89.74% accuracy, 93.75% sensitivity and 85.73% specificity. Conclusion: Machine learning method predicted with high accuracy, sensitivity and specificity PDD or DLB diagnosis based on non-invasively and easily in-the-clinic and neuropsychological tests.


Sensors ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (23) ◽  
pp. 5207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Gradišek ◽  
Marion van Midden ◽  
Matija Koterle ◽  
Vid Prezelj ◽  
Drago Strle ◽  
...  

We used a 16-channel e-nose demonstrator based on micro-capacitive sensors with functionalized surfaces to measure the response of 30 different sensors to the vapours from 11 different substances, including the explosives 1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazinane (RDX), 1-methyl-2,4-dinitrobenzene (DNT) and 2-methyl-1,3,5-trinitrobenzene (TNT). A classification model was developed using the Random Forest machine-learning algorithm and trained the models on a set of signals, where the concentration and flow of a selected single vapour were varied independently. It is demonstrated that our classification models are successful in recognizing the signal pattern of different sets of substances. An excellent accuracy of 96% was achieved for identifying the explosives from among the other substances. These experiments clearly demonstrate that the silane monolayers used in our sensors as receptor layers are particularly well suited to selecting and recognizing TNT and similar types of explosives from among other substances.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jang-Sik Choi ◽  
Nguyen Thanh Nguyen ◽  
Hyung-Gi Byun ◽  
Jaewoo Song ◽  
Tae-Hyun Yoon

AbstractIn this study, we developed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) classification model through Wilks’ lambda-based important marker-identification method and stepwise–forward selection approach, and spotted important decision-support range of flow-cytometry parameter using insights provided by machine-learning algorithm. AML flow-cytometry data released from FlowCAP-II challenge in 2011 was used. In FlowCAP-II challenge, several sample classification algorithms were able to effectively classify AML and non-AML. Most algorithms extracted features from high-dimensional flow-cytometry readout comprised of multiple fluorescent parameters for a large number of antibodies. Multiple parameters with forward scatter and side scatter increase computational complexity in the feature-extraction procedure as well as in the model development. Parameter-subset selection can decrease model complexity, improve model performance, and contribute to a panel design specific for target disease. With this motivation, we estimated importance of each parameter via Wilks’ lambda and then identified the best subset of parameters using stepwise–forward selection. In the importance-estimation process, histogram matrix of each parameter was used. As a result, parameters, which are associated with blasts gating and identification of immature myeloid cells, were identified as important descriptors in AML classification, and combination of these markers is more effective than an individual marker. A random-forest, supervised-classification machine-learning algorithm was used for the model development. We highlighted decision-support range of the fluorescent signal for the identified important parameters, which significantly contribute to AML classification, through a mean decrease in Gini supported in random forest. These specific ranges could help with establishing diagnosis criteria and elaborate the AML classification model. Because methodology proposed in this study can not only estimate the importance of each parameter but also identify the best subset and the specific ranges, we expect that it would contribute to in silico modeling using flow- and mass-cytometry readout as well as panel design for sample classification.Author summaryFlow cytometry is a widely used technique to analyze multiple physical characteristics of an individual cell and diagnose and monitor human disease as well as response to therapy. Recent developments in hardware (multiple lasers and fluorescence detectors), fluorochromes, and antibodies have facilitated the comprehensive and in-depth analysis of high numbers of cells on a single cell level and led to the creation of various computational analysis methods for cell type identification, rare cell identification, and sample classification. Flow cytometry typically uses panels with a large number of antibodies, leading to high-dimensional multiparameter flow cytometry readout. It increases computational complexity and makes interpretation difficult. In this study, we identified the best subset of the parameters for AML classification model development. The subset would contribute to panel design specific for the target disease and lead to easy interpretation of the results. In addition, we spotted important decision-support range of flow-cytometry parameter via insights provided by machine-learning algorithm. We expect that profiling information of fluorescence expression over the identified decision-support range would complement existing diagnosis criteria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document