scholarly journals National systems of technology transfer of BRICS countries: features of formation

2021 ◽  
Vol 114 ◽  
pp. 01023
Author(s):  
Yuliana Solovieva ◽  
Mingjun He

The article considers the features of creation and development of organizational systems of technology transfer in the BRICS member countries (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, China, South Africa), interaction of participants in the innovation process. The author identifies the significant role of the regional component in the formation of effective national innovation systems. The purpose of the article is to analyze the national innovation systems of the BRICS member countries, since each of these countries has gone its own way of innovative development, justified by regional characteristics. Based on the analysis of transfer systems operating in the BRICS countries, the author identifies key and most promising areas for the development of the integration of the scientific and educational, production spheres and the state in order to form special mechanisms for organizing innovative processes that ensure effective interaction between all its participants, contributing to the formation of competitive high-tech products.

Author(s):  
Igor Gusarov ◽  

The development of their national innovation systems has an important impact on increasing the competitiveness of countries in the global economy. The study revealed the insignificant role of universities in the creation and implementation of national innovation systems of the BRICS countries. At the same time, the leading role of the state in this process was revealed. An analysis of the innovative development of the BRICS countries made it possible to determine the main elements of its potential: state, scientific, production and financial potential. The analysis made it possible to identify important problems of the innovative development of the BRICS countries, as well as to determine the main directions for solving the problems associated with the coronavirus pandemic.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Carlos Salazar

As part of the Poznan Strategic Programme on Technology Transfer, which the Global Environmental Facility funded a regional project, implemented by the IDB. One of the components of this project was executed by Mexicos National Climate Change and Ecology Institute. It carried out two very relevant studies, one on recommendations to integrate climate change technologies into the national innovation systems, and the other on planning tools for climate change. The topics addressed on this document are i) The role of Environmentally Sound Technologies & National Innovation Systems (NIS) in the fight against Climate Change. ii) Greening NIS in LAC: Challenges and Opportunities. iii) Recommendations for the integration of ESTs into NIS.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1386-1402
Author(s):  
Pierre-Jean Barlatier ◽  
Eleni Giannopoulou ◽  
Julien Pénin

In the era of open innovation, companies that want to innovate can no more remain isolated, they have to interact and collaborate with diverse actors of the innovation process. The rise of open innovation practices resulted in an increase of intermediaries for innovation. This chapter aims to better understand why innovative companies use the services of such intermediaries. Two distinct types of open innovation intermediaries have been identified, whose roles are significantly different; while the first type help companies to reduce transaction costs related to open innovation, the second type may be implicated directly in the creation, transfer and diffusion of knowledge. This chapter illustrates both roles in the case of public research valorization and distinguish clearly “Technology Transfer Organizations” (TTOs), whose role is to reduce transaction costs related to technology transfer from “Research and Technology Organizations” (RTOs) that are actively involved in knowledge creation and transfer processes.


2020 ◽  
pp. 348-381
Author(s):  
B. Zorina Khan

Selective case studies of the post–World War II economy have given rise to claims that national innovation systems, or dirigiste linkages between the state, universities, and industry, are required for technological change and economic growth. The long-run patterns of innovation in the leading nations of Britain, France, and the United States suggest otherwise. Administered systems, where key economic decisions were made by elites, the state, and other privileged groups, typically were associated with monopsonies and the misallocation of resources and talent. By contrast, the American experience highlights the central role of markets in ideas and decentralized incentives for innovation, in concert with flexible open-access adjacent institutions, in promoting useful knowledge and sustained technological progress.


Author(s):  
Venni V. Krishna

Historically, universities and institutions of higher learning have gone through three academic revolutions, namely, teaching, research, and innovation. Universities and Higher Educational Institutions (HEIs) in the last two decades have come to occupy an important part in the national innovation systems (NIS), which is a complex of ‘all important economic, social, political, organizational, institutional and other factors that influence the development, diffusion and use of innovations’. From a broader perspective, universities, together with public Research and Development (R&D) labs and science agencies, public policies (on industry, research, innovation and higher education, etc.) and business enterprises are now considered as important actors in the NIS of Asia-Pacific economies. The rise of Asia in the global knowledge-based economy from mid-1990s is closely associated with the rise of knowledge institutions of higher learning and scientific research output. Every Asia-Pacific country embraced and introduced policies relating to innovation in varying forms. Consultancy and collaborative links with industry being traditional forms of engagement, new policy and institutional measures in technology transfer and innovation to engage with society and business enterprises are gaining prominence. Policies for incubation, start-ups, and spin-offs, technology transfer offices (TTOs), and science and technology parks have gained tremendous prominence in leading Asia-Pacific universities. Different national innovation systems in the Asia-Pacific region have given rise to varying roles of universities. Whilst universities in Southeast Asian countries and India continue to play a traditional role of teaching and generating human capital, there are countries such as Singapore, China, Taiwan, and Japan, wherein universities are being transformed as entrepreneurial universities. Science and innovation policies in these countries have orchestrated the goal direction of universities as frontiers of innovation. Universities in Australia and New Zealand have so far been quite successful in marketing higher education to neighboring Asian countries. They have in recent years begun to embark on innovation and commercialization of research. The paper focuses on South East Asia and draws some comparison with more dynamic university ecosystems in East Asia. In doing so, the paper brings into focus the emerging innovation landscapes across the region.


2020 ◽  
pp. 201-211
Author(s):  
Nilufar Ba

The aim of the article is the theoretical justifcation and development of the organizational and economic mechanism for the formation and development of a regional intentional complex, where innovative components dominate. It should be noted that in recent years in the region there have been trends in the deepening of the newest forms of relations and interconnections based on the expansion of inter-sectoral and sectoral integration of industrial enterprises, the progress of the formation of forms of regional industrial systems is traced, prerequisites are created for the emergence of new forms of integrated cooperation of the subjects of the innovation process. In modern conditions, the current model of the competitive development of the industrial complex of the region is based on the broad and effective interaction of various participants in the development and commercialization of innovations, which requires a search for forms and directions of its strengthening. The need to strengthen the innovative component of the industrial complex, contributing to its innovative development, involves the search for new modifed organizational and economic mechanisms for the innovative development of the industrial system based on the assessment of trends and development features of new system interactions. Meanwhile, the process of transition to a model of innovative development is objectively closely related to the need to concentrate efforts on the formation of a systematic methodology for managing the innovative development of the region. The article focuses on the development of organizational and economic mechanisms for the innovative development of the regional industrial complex. In particular, attention is paid to the intensive factors of industrial production growth. To achieve the goal, several main tasks were set and solved in the article.. The state of fxed assets for the development of industrial production in the region has been studied. The region was also evaluated based on the influence of innovation and investment factors. The current state and trends in the development of industry in the Tashkent region are analyzed, the basic prerequisites for the creation of an innovative industrial system in the region are studied, and trends in the innovative development of industry in the Tashkent region are evaluated. In conclusion, recommendations are given for eliminating the imbalance between the existing regions, as well as for accelerating the development of new high-tech industries of the industrial complex


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document