The complex relationship between C4b Binding Protein, warfarin and antiphospholipid antibodies

Author(s):  
Giorgia Grosso ◽  
Kerstin Sandholm ◽  
Aleksandra M Antovic ◽  
Iva Gunnarsson ◽  
Agneta Zickert ◽  
...  

Background: Low levels of total C4b Binding Protein (C4BPt), a circulating inhibitor of the classical/lectin complement pathways, were observed in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and during warfarin treatment. Objectives: To investigate the associations between aPL and C4BPt in patients with persistently positive (++) aPL, with/without clinical manifestations and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and in controls. Furthermore, we explored the impact of anticoagulation on C4BPt and in relation to complement activation. Methods: In a cross-sectional design we investigated defined subgroups: primary (p) antiphospholipid syndrome (APS, N=67), aPL++ individuals without clinical manifestations (aPL carriers, N=15), SLE-aPL++ (N=118, among them, secondary (s) APS, N=56), aPL negative (-) SLE (SLE-aPL-, N=291) and 322 controls. Clinical characteristics, including treatment, were tabulated. C4BPt was determined with a magnetic bead method. Complement proteins (C1q, C2, C3, C4, C3a, C3dg, sC5b-9, Factor I) were measured. A mediation analysis was performed to decompose the total effect of aPL++ on C4BPt into the direct and indirect effects of aPL++ through warfarin. Results: Overall, C4BPt is 20% decreased in aPL++ patients, regardless SLE, APS, clinical manifestations and aPL profile. C4BPt levels associate positively with complement proteins C1q, C2, C3, C4, and negatively with complement activation product C3dg. In the SLE group, warfarin treatment contributes to approximately half of the C4BPt reduction (9%) Conclusion: Both antiphospholipid antibodies and warfarin are associated with C4BPt reduction. Complement activation in aPL ++ patients may partly be explained by impaired inhibition through depressed C4BPt levels. Further studies are needed to understand the clinical implication

2018 ◽  
pp. 52-58
Author(s):  
Le Thuan Nguyen ◽  
Bui Bao Hoang

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease involving multiple organ systems. The kidney appears to be the most commonly affected organ, especially nephrotic is a serious kidney injury. The clinical, laboratory manifestations and histopathology are very useful for diagnosis, provide the means of predicting prognosis and guiding therapy in nephrotic patients with lupus nephritis. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study of nephrotic patients with lupus treated in the Department of Nephrology Trung Vuong Hospital and Cho Ray Hospital between May/2014 and May/2017. Renal histopathological lesions were classified according to International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society - ISN/RPS ’s 2003. The clinical, laboratory manifestations and histopathological features were described. Results: Of 32 LN with nephritic range proteinuria cases studied, 93.7% were women. The 3 most common clinical manifestations were edema (93.8%), hypertension (96.8%) and pallor (68.9%), musculoskeletal manifestions (46.9%), malar rash (40.6%). There was significant rise in laboratory and immunological manifestions with hematuria (78.1%), Hb < 12g/dL (93.5%), increased Cholesterol (100%), and Triglycerid (87.5%), Creatinine > 1.4 mg/dL (87.5%), increased BUN 71.9%, ANA (+) 93.8%, Anti Ds DNA(+) 96.9%, low C3: 96.9%, low C4: 84.4%. The most various and severe features were noted in class IV with active tubulointerstitial lesions and high activity index. Conclusion: Lupus nephritis with nephrotic range proteinuria has the more severity of histopathological feature and the more severity of the more systemic organ involvements and laboratory disorders were noted. Key words: Systemic lupus, erythematosus (SLE) lupus nepphritis, clinical


Lupus ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 096120332110142
Author(s):  
Tamer A Gheita ◽  
Rasha Abdel Noor ◽  
Esam Abualfadl ◽  
Osama S Abousehly ◽  
Iman I El-Gazzar ◽  
...  

Objective The aim of this study was to present the epidemiology, clinical manifestations and treatment pattern of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Egyptian patients over the country and compare the findings to large cohorts worldwide. Objectives were extended to focus on the age at onset and gender driven influence on the disease characteristics. Patients and method This population-based, multicenter, cross-sectional study included 3661 adult SLE patients from Egyptian rheumatology departments across the nation. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were assessed for all patients. Results The study included 3661 patients; 3296 females and 365 males (9.03:1) and the median age was 30 years (17–79 years), disease duration 4 years (0–75 years) while the median age at disease onset was 25 years (4–75 years). The overall estimated prevalence of adult SLE in Egypt was 6.1/100,000 population (1.2/100,000 males and 11.3/100,000 females).There were 316 (8.6%) juvenile-onset (Jo-SLE) and 3345 adult-onset (Ao-SLE). Age at onset was highest in South and lowest in Cairo (p < 0.0001). Conclusion SLE in Egypt had a wide variety of clinical and immunological manifestations, with some similarities with that in other nations and differences within the same country. The clinical characteristics, autoantibodies and comorbidities are comparable between Ao-SLE and Jo-SLE. The frequency of various clinical and immunological manifestations varied between gender. Additional studies are needed to determine the underlying factors contributing to gender and age of onset differences.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1911.2-1911
Author(s):  
G. Grosso ◽  
K. Sandholm ◽  
I. Gunnarsson ◽  
A. Zickert ◽  
A. Vikerfors ◽  
...  

Background:Complement plays a role in the Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS). C4b Binding Protein (C4BP) is a complement inhibitor with anticoagulant function (1). It belongs to the same protein family as β2GPI, the main antigen in APS. Its main isoform is bound to protein S in the circulation. Levels of both protein S and C4BP are known to be reduced by warfarin treatment (2) as well as by aPL, directly and indirectly.Objectives:To investigate the levels of C4BP in primary (p) and secondary (s) APS, also considering warfarin treatment.Methods:The total amount of C4BP (C4BPt) was measured by using magnetic carboxylated microspheres which were coupled with a monoclonal antibody against the α-chain of human-C4BP to capture the antigen. To detect C4BPt the same antibody was used, biotinylated. The binding of biotinylated antibodies was detected by streptavidin-phycoerythrin and data were collected using a MAGPIX Multiplex Reader. Using independent t-test, we compared C4BP in 118 SLE patients with repeated positivity for Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) (39/118 on warfarin), 291 aPL negative SLE patients (16/291 on warfarin), 67 pAPS (33/67 on warfarin), and 322 controls (none on warfarin). We then performed an interaction and a mediation analysis (3) in the SLE group to study the impact of warfarin on C4BP levels: since warfarin is mostly prescribed to aPL+ patients, it is considered a mediator in the reducing effect of aPL on C4BP. Therefore we compared individuals exposed and non-exposed to the presence of aPL with or without the mediator warfarin and calculated the percentage of reduction in C4BP that could be attributed to aPL or warfarin.Results:Overall C4BP is 20% reduced in aPL+ patients (fig 1), independently of SLE, past thrombotic events and nephritis. Warfarin treated patients have lower levels of C4BP (fig 2). According to mediation analysis 11% of C4BP reduction is due to aPL and 9% to warfarin.Figure 1.C4BP in different subgroups (67 pAPS, 118 SLEaPL+, 291 SLEaPL-, 322 controls)Figure 2.C4BP in 67 pAPS patients, 33/67 on warfarinConclusion:Both aPL and warfarin decrease levels of C4BP, a complement and coagulation regulator. Reduction of this complement inhibitor could contribute to complement activation and thrombosis in APS. Our results raise new questions regarding the effects of warfarin treatment on complement and coagulation in APS.References:[1]Dahlbäck B. C4b-binding protein: a forgotten factor in thrombosis and hemostasis. Seminars in thrombosis and hemostasis 2011; 37(4): 355.[2]Zöller B, García de Frutos P, Dahlbäck B. Evaluation of the relationship between protein S and C4b-binding protein isoforms in hereditary protein S deficiency demonstrating type I and type III deficiencies to be phenotypic variants of the same genetic disease. Blood 1995; 85(12): 3524.[3]Vanderweele TJ, Vansteelandt S. Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition. Statistics and Its Interface 2009; 2(4): 457-68.Disclaimer:AV is employed at the Swedish Medical Products Agency, the views expressed in this paper are the personal views of the authors and not necessarily the views of the Governement AgencyAcknowledgments:Thanks to the Biostatistics Core Facility, Karolinska UniversityDisclosure of Interests:None declared


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 92 (6) ◽  
pp. 849-853
Author(s):  
Charles Molta ◽  
Olivier Meyer ◽  
Christine Dosquet ◽  
Marcela Montes de Oca ◽  
Marie-Claude Babron ◽  
...  

Objective. Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) are noted with increased frequency in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The main manifestations found to be associated with aPL are arterial and venous thrombotic events, thrombocytopenia, and recurrent pregnancy loss This study is an attempt to define the incidence of aPL in patients with childhood-onset SLE and in their relatives and to correlate their presence with clinical manifestations, and especially, to evaluate the risk of thrombosis in aPL-positive subjects. Methodology. We studied 37 unrelated patients and 107 of their first-degree relatives. VDRL, IgG and IgM anticardiolipin, and IgG antiphosphatidylethanolamine antibodies were studied in all probands during periods of clinical remission and in first-degree relatives at the time of interview. Lupus anticoagulant had only been studied in probands during an SLE flare-up. Results. Thirty-eight percent of probands and 19% of relatives were positive for at least one aPL, with little over-lap between the different aPL studied. -No aPL-negative proband developed thrombosis. Two of the aPL-positive probands had thrombotic events before testing, and a third one showed thrombosis after testing. Only two probands had high levels of IgG aCL and showed thrombosis. The occurrence of aPL positivity in relatives was not always related to its presence in probands. None of the aPL-positive relatives had hadthrombosis, but recurrent fetal loss was noted in one aPL-positive mother with SLE. Although there was a high frequency of SLE, SLE-like disease, auto-immune disorders or positive serological findings for lupus in first-degree relatives, many of these relativew did not test positive for aPL. Conclusion. The high levels of IgG aCL may be considered a risk factor for thrombosis. Findings in relatives suggest a multifactorial origin for autoimmune disease and antibody production.


1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (02) ◽  
pp. 282-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josep Ordi-Ros ◽  
Francesc Monegal-Ferran ◽  
Nuria Martinez ◽  
Fina Cortes-Hernandez ◽  
Miquel Vilardell-Tarres ◽  
...  

SummaryObjective: To evaluate the usefulness of IgA antiphospholipid antibodies as markers of thrombosis and/or antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study design in a tertiary, university-based, autoimmune reference hospital. Seven-hundred ninety-five patients classified into five different groups – autoimmune diseases (255), deep vein thrombosis (153), transitory ischemic attacks (108), obstetric complications (196), infectious diseases (83) and controls (81) – were tested for IgA, IgG and IgM aPL, and lupus anticoagulant. Plasma and serum samples were drawn for detection of aPL using an internationally standardized ELISA method and LA was carried out using coagulometric assays. Results: True IgA aPL were found only in two patients with systemic lupus erythematosus; these patients were also positive to IgG aPL. Conclusion: The incidence of true positivity to IgA anticardiolipin antibodies is extremely low. Their determination was not helpful in diagnosing the antiphospholipid syndrome or in explaining thrombotic events or aPL related manifestations – fetal loss – in the groups studied.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shimol JB ◽  

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is more frequent in women, with a female-to-male ratio ranging from 2-6:1 prior to puberty and 3-8:1 following menopause up to 8-15:1 during their fertile years [1]. SLE commonly begins when women are in their 20s, during the prime of their child-bearing years when they are often beginning to plan their families [2], and may have enormous impact on their childrearing. Although rates of infertility are not felt to be elevated among women with SLE, secondary amenorrhea has been identified in 13-17% of women with SLE who are naïve to cyclophosphamide, compared with a prevalence 1-5% in a healthy population [3]. One reason may be related lower levels of anti-Mullerian hormone [4] and higher levels of elevated anti-corpus luteum antibody levels in female patients with SLE [5]. According to one study, 64% women with SLE had fewer children than originally planned. This is likely a result of many factors including disease and medication impact on fertility and fear of disease flare-up with pregnancy. Moreover, many socioeconomic challenges accompany the disease, particularly concerns about the impact of SLE on child welfare and family life, a feature shared by many other chronic illnesses. One study reported that patients with SLE who chose to have less children than they had previously desired described concerns about inability to care for a child, damage from medications, and genetic transmission of their disease leading to the decision to pursue fewer pregnancies [6,7]. Anxieties regarding transmission and impaired ability to take care of children are among the primary worries of patients with lupus [8]. Nevertheless, this generally does not reflect a major concern of medical practitioners, leading to gaps in communication and discordant goals of care [9]. Despite intact fertility among SLE patients, there is morbidity associated with pregnancy. One study of 13,555 participants illustrated a maternal mortality 20-fold higher among women with SLE compared with healthy age-matched controls [10]. The rate of miscarriage is reported as 21.2% compared with 14% in a normal population. While the percentage of live births ranges from 85 to 90, pregnancy is considered a high-risk situation for female SLE patients [11]. Rate of stillbirth is 5 to 10 fold higher in patients with SLE than in the general population [12]. Preeclampsia is more common in SLE and may occur in up to 20% of lupus related pregnancies [13]. There is also increased risk for fetal morbidity, particularly preterm birth (12%) among SLE pregnancies compared with 4% in controls), intrauterine growth restriction, and neonatal lupus [11,14]. One third of pregnancies end in caesarian section [15]. Pregnancy morbidity is most strongly associated with increased disease activity in the six to 12 months prior to and during pregnancy, especially in cases with renal involvement [16,17]. Other risk factors in pregnancy include presence of hypocomplementemia, elevated levels of anti-DNA antibodies, antiphospholipid antibodies, and thrombocytopenia [18,19]. Moreover, pregnancy and the period immediate following delivery is a well-known time for lupus flare-ups [20]. While the hormonal influence on pregnancy is not fully understood due to the complicated interwoven hormonalinflammatory pathways, a disruption in the balance of Treg’s and Th17 helper cells and elevated IFN-γ appear to be players in generating poorer pregnancy outcomes [21,22]. Other maternal complications are related to the hypercoagulability of pregnancy augmented to the increased coagulation risk in SLE in general. During pregnancy, the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with SLE is 62 out of 10,000 compared with 7.22 of 10,000 in the general population. Moreover, the risk of pulmonary embolism is significantly increased with an odds ratio of 9.76 [23]. In addition, the risk for stroke is 6.5-fold higher than that of healthy pregnant women [24]. In addition to the effect that SLE itself may impose on pregnancy and delivery, certain related medications are teratogenic. Moreover, cyclophosphamide can actually impair fertility, primarily by causing premature ovarian failure [25,26]. Accordingly, providers are advised to offer child-bearing women GnRH analogue therapy prior to initiation of cyclophosphamide [27]. Furthermore, observational studies have shown that most assisted reproductive techniques are safe and equally effective among women with SLE. There are no official guidelines regarding any specific protocol to be used among SLE patients aside from antithrombotic prophylaxis among women with antiphospholipid antibodies [28,29]. Among those patients who seek contraception, most options are available to women with SLE. Women with antiphospholipid lipid antibodies, even without a history of clotting or obstetric complication, and women with additional clotting risk factors including migraines and smoking, should be advised against use of combined hormones. However, aside from this advisement, most other contraceptive methods have proven to be safe in patients with SLE [30]. Nonetheless, despite vigorous research demonstrated the safety and benefits of contraception in patients with SLE, effective methods of birth control are widely underused. One study reported 55% of SLE patients had unprotected sex occasionally and another 23% engaged in unprotected sex most of the time [31]. Another glaring study found that 55% of patients with SLE using contraceptives regularly were using less-effective barrier methods only, even while on teratogenic medications [32]. These findings highlight the immense obstacle that patients with SLE face in receiving comprehensive care that meets their needs during their fertile years. Over the last decade, there is a growing understanding of the importance of early, open, and continual discussions on the topic of family planning between providers and patients. The ACR and EULAR have devised recommendations for providers to help stratify patients and offer appropriate counseling regarding contraception, conception, and assisted reproduction [33,34]. Despite the progress that has been achieved, future studies are warranted to determine how to best approach these patients and best counsel them through the complicated, interrelated pyschologic and medical issues that accompany SLE during the child-bearing stage.


Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 1216-1226
Author(s):  
Beatriz Frade-Sosa ◽  
Javier Narváez ◽  
Tarek Carlos Salman-Monte ◽  
Raul Castellanos-Moreira ◽  
Vera Ortiz-Santamaria ◽  
...  

Background The concomitant presence of two autoimmune diseases – systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) – in the same patient is known as rhupus. We evaluated a group of patients with rhupus to clarify further their clinical, serological and immunogenic features in a multi-centre cohort. In addition, the study aimed to explore the utility of the 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) SLE classification criteria in our group of patients with rhupus. Methods This was a cross-sectional study. We included rhupus patients from 11 different rheumatology departments, and compared them to SLE and RA patients at a ratio of 2:1. All information was recorded following a pre-established protocol. Results A total of 200 patients were included: 40 rhupus patients and 80 each of SLE and RA patients as controls. Disease duration was similar among SLE and rhupus groups (around 13 years), but the RA group had a significantly lower disease duration. Main clinical manifestations were articular (94.2%), cutaneous (77.5%) and haematological (72.5%). Rhupus patients had articular manifestations similar to those expected in RA. Only 10% of rhupus patients had renal involvement compared with 25% of those with SLE ( p < 0.05), while interstitial lung disease was more common in patients affected by RA. The 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE criteria were met in 92.5% of the rhupus patients and in 96.3% of the SLE cohort ( p > 0.05). Excluding the joint domain, there were no differences between the numbers of patients who met the classification criteria. Conclusion Rhupus patients follow a particular clinical course, with full expression of both SLE and RA in terms of organ involvement, except for a lower prevalence of kidney affection. The new 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE criteria are not useful for differentiating SLE and rhupus patients. A new way of classifying autoimmune diseases is needed to identify overlapping clusters.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 4736-4736
Author(s):  
Jeyanthi Ramanarayanan ◽  
Alan N. Baer ◽  
Minoo Battiwalla ◽  
Laurie A. Ford ◽  
Meir Wetzler ◽  
...  

Abstract Autoimmune disease (AD) can manifest uncommonly either at the time of diagnosis of MDS or during its course. When present, AD generally responds to immunosuppressive therapies, but cytopenias and immunosuppression associated with MDS compromise delivery of these therapies. Few studies have investigated the impact of co-existing AD on the course and outcome of patients with MDS. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical manifestations, laboratory characteristics, response to therapy and survival of MDS patients with AD. Records of patients evaluated at Roswell Park Cancer Institute with pathologically demonstrated MDS between 1993 and 2003 (n=277) were reviewed and patients with evidence of AD were identified. Patients with laboratory abnormalities without disease manifestations were excluded, as were patients with therapy-related MDS following treatment for AD. 13 patients (4%) were identified with co-existing MDS and AD. The initial presentation was AD in 6 (46%) and MDS in 4 (31%), while 3 patients (23%) had near-simultaneous diagnoses of both conditions. The spectrum of AD in these patients included systemic vasculitis in 3 patients, systemic lupus erythematosus in two and rheumatoid arthritis, temporal arteritis, cryoglobulinemia, aphthous stomatitis, pyoderma gangrenosum, inflammatory bowel disease, erythema nodosum and Evans syndrome in one patient each. Anti-double stranded DNA (levels ≥ 40.0 u/ml; normal range 0.0–3.5u/ml), ANA (≥1:160), cold agglutinins, low C3 and elevated ESR (≥100mm/hr) were the serological abnormalities detected at the time of AD diagnosis. Eleven of 13 patients were female, and median age at diagnosis of MDS was 65 years, while the entire cohort was 44% female (p=0.005) and had a median age of 71 yrs at diagnosis. FAB subtypes were RA (n=7), RAEB (n=3), CMMoL (n=2) and RARS (n=1). Cytogenetics were normal in 5 patients; abnormalities in the other 8 patients included −7, +8, and del(5q). The median survival of patients from diagnosis of MDS was 48 months and the survival from diagnosis of AD was 46 months. Known causes of death in 6 patients included sepsis, intracranial hemorrhage, lung cancer and transplant-associated multiorgan failure. Based on this study, AD occurs in 4% of MDS patients, predominantly affects female patients, and has heterogeneous clinical manifestations.The pathobiologic implication of the occurrence of AD at the same time or after the diagnosis of MDS is that the dysplastic clone might be responsible for the induction of immune dysregulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document