Surveillance colonoscopy in Austria: Are we following the guidelines?

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 50 (02) ◽  
pp. 119-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irina Gessl ◽  
Elisabeth Waldmann ◽  
Martha Britto-Arias ◽  
Daniela Penz ◽  
Eleonore Pablik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Screening Colonoscopy ◽  
Reminder Letter ◽  
European Guidelines ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Before And After

Abstract Background and study aim The European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis contain postpolypectomy surveillance recommendations. They recommend follow-up intervals depending on the findings at index colonoscopy, and divide patients into a low-, intermediate- or high-risk group. The aim of this study was to assess the adherence of Austrian endoscopists to the European guidelines and to determine whether sending a reminder letter resulted in better adherence. Methods A single reminder letter containing the guidelines was sent to all endoscopists who participated in the Certificate of Quality for Screening Colonoscopy program in Austria. Adherence was assessed before and after the letter had been sent. Factors associated with adherence were investigated. Results We found poor baseline adherence to the guidelines. After the reminder letter, the adherence slightly improved in the low-risk group, but did not change in the intermediate-risk or high-risk groups. An adenoma detection rate of at least 20 % was associated with higher adherence rates. Generally, internists and hospitals showed better adherence compared with surgeons and private practices, respectively, both before and after the reminder letter. Conclusion A single reminder letter was not enough to improve the poor adherence to the European postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines. Thus, future studies are required to identify and eliminate all factors responsible for nonadherence to postpolypectomy guidelines in order to reach the goal of a safe, effective, and cost-effective colorectal cancer prevention tool in the near future.

Interval cancer after colonoscopy in the Austrian National Screening Programme: influence of physician and patient factors

Gut ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. gutjnl-2019-319427
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Waldmann ◽  
Daniela Penz ◽  
Hana Šinkovec ◽  
Georg Heinze ◽  
Christoph Rinner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Interval Cancer ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Screening Colonoscopy ◽  
Quality Assurance Programme ◽  
Adenoma Detection ◽  
Advanced Adenomas ◽  
Over Time

ObjectivePostscreening colorectal cancer (PSCRC) after screening colonoscopy is associated with endoscopists’ performance and characteristics of resected lesions. Prior studies have shown that adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a decisive factor for PSCRC, but correlations with other parameters need further analysis and ADR may change over time.DesignCohort study including individuals undergoing screening colonoscopy between 1/2008 and 12/2019 performed by physicians participating in a quality assurance programme in Austria. Data were linked with hospitalisation data for the diagnosis of PSCRC (defined as CRC diagnosis >6 months after colonoscopy). ADR was defined dynamically in relation to the time point of subsequent colonoscopies; high-risk groups of patients were those with an adenoma ≥10 mm, or with high-grade dysplasia, or villous or tubulovillous histology, or a serrated lesion ≥10 mm or with dysplasia, or colonoscopies with ≥3 lesions. Main outcome was PSCRC for each risk group (negative colonoscopy, hyperplastic polyps, low-risk and high-risk group of patients) after colonoscopy by endoscopists with an ADR <20% compared with endoscopists with an ADR ≥20%.Results352 685 individuals were included in the study (51.0% women, median age 60 years) of which 10.5% were classified as high-risk group. During a median follow-up of 55.4 months, 241 (0.06%) PSCRC were identified; of 387 participating physicians, 19.6% had at least one PSCRC (8.4% two or more). While higher endoscopist ADR decreased PSCRC incidence (HR per 1% increase 0.97, 95% CI 0.95 to 0.98), affiliation to the high-risk group of patients was also associated with higher PSCRC incidence (HR 3.27, 95% CI 2.36 to 4.00). Similar correlations were seen with regards to high-risk, and advanced adenomas. The risk for PSCRC was significantly higher after colonoscopy by an endoscopist with an ADR <20% as compared with an endoscopist with an ADR ≥20% in patients after negative colonoscopy (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.0, p<0.001) and for the high-risk group of patients (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.49 to 4.22, p<0.001).ConclusionA dynamic calculation of the ADR takes into account changes over time but confirms the correlation of ADR and interval cancer. Both lesion characteristics and endoscopists ADR may play a similar role for the risk of PSCRC. This should be considered in deciding about appropriate surveillance intervals in the future.

Risk factors of colorectal cancer after screening colonoscopy

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 25-29
Author(s):  
Paulina Wieszczy ◽  
Michał F. Kamiński ◽  
Jarosław Reguła
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
High Grade Dysplasia ◽  
Screening Colonoscopy ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Screening Programs

In the era of populational screening programs for colorectal cancer, evaluation of their quality and efficacy becomes an important issue. One of the main criteria taken into account when assessing the quality of a screening program is related to the risk of colorectal cancer developing in the period between the screening colonoscopy and the control examination. The objective of this article consists in presenting the results of the doctoral research carried out by dr. Paulina Wieszcza, a beneficient of the Polpharma Scientific Foundation scholarship. The objective of the doctoral dissertation was to investigate and discuss the relationship between the definition of risk groups as well as the quality of the study and the risk of colorectal cancer developing after the screening colonoscopy. The risk of colorectal cancer developing following adenomas being removed during the screening colonoscopy procedure was assessed using data obtained from the Colorectal Cancer Screening Program and the National Cancer Registry databases. The quality of the study was assessed on the basis of literature evidence regarding the adenoma detection rates (ADR). A total of 236.089 patients were included in colorectal cancer risk analyses, with at least one adenoma being detected in a screening study in 17.7% of cases. Over the follow-up period (median of 7 years, maximum duration of 14 years), colorectal cancer was detected in 439 patients. It was demonstrated that when the high-risk group was defined as patients presenting with adenomas ≥ 20 mm in diameter or high grade dysplasia rather than patients with ≥ 3 adenomas or adenomas ≥10 mm in diameter with high grade dysplasia or villous component (current definition), the number of patients requiring intensive surveillance can be reduced by 74% without any impact on the risk in the low-risk group. The literature review revealed a total of three studies which clearly showed that the risk of colorectal cancer significantly decreased with the increase in the endoscopist’s ADR. Restricting the high-risk group to patients with adenomas ≥ 20 mm in diameter or high-grade dysplasia facilitates optimized care being delivered to patients with a significantly increased risk of colorectal cancer. Scientific evidence is available for the important role of endoscopist’s ADR as the key parameter of the quality of colonoscopic examination.

Identifying an immune-related gene-pair for prognosis prediction of metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15565-e15565
Author(s):  
Qiqi Zhu ◽  
Du Cai ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Min-Er Zhong ◽  
Dejun Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Related Gene ◽  
Training Cohort ◽  
Gene Pairs ◽  
Immune Related Gene

e15565 Background: Few robust predictive biomarkers have been applied in clinical practice due to the heterogeneity of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) . Using the gene pair method, the absolute expression value of genes can be converted into the relative order of genes, which can minimize the influence of the sequencing platform difference and batch effects, and improve the robustness of the model. The main objective of this study was to establish an immune-related gene pairs signature (IRGPs) and evaluate the impact of the IRGPs in predicting the prognosis in mCRC. Methods: A total of 205 mCRC patients containing overall survival (OS) information from the training cohort ( n = 119) and validation cohort ( n = 86) were enrolled in this study. LASSO algorithm was used to select prognosis related gene pairs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to validate the prognostic value of the IRGPs. Gene sets enrichment analysis (GSEA) and immune infiltration analysis were used to explore the underlying biological mechanism. Results: An IRGPs signature containing 22 gene pairs was constructed, which could significantly separate patients of the training cohort ( n = 119) and validation cohort ( n = 86) into the low-risk and high-risk group with different outcomes. Multivariate analysis with clinical factors confirmed the independent prognostic value of IRGPs that higher IRGPs was associated with worse prognosis (training cohort: hazard ratio (HR) = 10.54[4.99-22.32], P < 0.001; validation cohort: HR = 3.53[1.24-10.08], P = 0.012). GSEA showed that several metastasis and immune-related pathway including angiogenesis, TGF-β-signaling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition and inflammatory response were enriched in the high-risk group. Through further analysis of the immune factors, we found that the proportions of CD4+ memory T cell, regulatory T cell, and Myeloid dendritic cell were significantly higher in the low-risk group, while the infiltrations of the Macrophage (M0) and Neutrophil were significantly higher in the high-risk group. Conclusions: The IRGPs signature could predict the prognosis of mCRC patients. Further prospective validations are needed to confirm the clinical utility of IRGPs in the treatment decision.

scholarly journals Establishment of an immune-related gene pairs model to predict colon adenocarcinoma prognosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jihang Luo ◽  
Puyu Liu ◽  
Leibo Wang ◽  
Yi Huang ◽  
Yuanyan Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Colon Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Related Gene ◽  
Immune Genes ◽  
Gene Pairs ◽  
Immune Related Gene

Abstract Background Colon cancer is the most common type of gastrointestinal cancer and has high morbidity and mortality. Colon adenocarcinoma(COAD) is the main pathological type of colon cancer. There is a lot of evidence describing the correlation between the prognosis of COAD and the immune system. The objective of the current study was the development of a robust prognostic immune-related gene pairs (IRGPs) model for estimating overall survival of COAD. Methods The gene expression profiles and clinical information of patients with colon adenocarcinoma come from TCGA and GEO databases and are divided into training and validation cohorts. Immune genes were selected which show significantly association with prognosis. Results Among 1647 immune genes, a 17 IRGPs model was built which was significantly associated with OS in the training cohort. In the training and validation data set, the IRGPs model divided patients into high-risk groups and low-risk groups, and the prognosis of the high-risk group was significantly worse( P <0.001). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis confirmed the feasibility of this model. Functional analysis confirmed that multiple tumor progression and stem cell growth-related pathways in high-risk groups were up-regulated. T cells regulatory and Macrophage M0 were significantly highly expressed in the high-risk group. Conclusion We successfully constructed an IRGPs model that can predict the prognosis of COAD, which provides new insights into the treatment strategy of COAD.

scholarly journals Retrospective Comparative Analysis of POPF Using Fistula Risk Score According to Pancreaticoenterostomy Method

2021 ◽  
Vol 105 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 559-563
Author(s):  
Seungmin Lee ◽  
Kwang Yeol Paik
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Risk Score ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula ◽  
Clinical Risk Score ◽  
Reconstructive Methods ◽  
Fistula Risk Score

Background The aim of this study is to examine whether pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) or pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is the better reconstructive method to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) according to the fistula risk. Methods An institutional database was reviewed for patients undergoing PD between January 2008 and August 2019. A total of 159 patients were stratified into 4 groups according to the Clinical Risk Score-Pancreatic Fistula. POPF according to 4 risk groups was compared between PJ and PG. Results Of the 159 patients, 82 underwent PG (51.6%) and 77 underwent PJ (48.4%) reconstruction. POPF rate was 17.1% (n = 14) in the PG group and 12.9% (n = 10) in the PJ group (P = 0.51). POPF rates were not different in intermediate, low, and negligible risks between 2 reconstructive methods. In the high-risk group (n = 47), there were 4 POPFs (22.2%) in PJ group and 9 (31.0%) in the PG group, respectively (P = 0.74). Conclusion In PD, there was no superior method of reconstruction with regard to POPF, even in high-risk glands.

scholarly journals MO048MULTICENTRE PROSPECTIVE VALIDATION OF THE URINARY PEPTIDOME-BASED CLASSIFIER CKD273 AS A PREDICTOR OF RENAL FUNCTION DECLINE IN SUBJECTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morten Lindhardt ◽  
Nete Tofte ◽  
Gemma Currie ◽  
Marie Frimodt-Moeller ◽  
Heiko Von der Leyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Renal Function ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Renal Function Decline

Abstract Background and Aims In the PRIORITY study, it was recently demonstrated that the urinary peptidome-based classifier CKD273 was associated with increased risk for progression to microalbuminuria. As a prespecified secondary outcome, we aim to evaluate the classifier CKD273 as a determinant of relative reductions in eGFR (CKD-EPI) of 30% and 40% from baseline, at one timepoint without requirements of confirmation. Method The ‘Proteomic prediction and Renin angiotensin aldosterone system Inhibition prevention Of early diabetic nephRopathy In TYpe 2 diabetic patients with normoalbuminuria trial’ (PRIORITY) is the first prospective observational study to evaluate the early detection of diabetic kidney disease in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and normoalbuminuria using the CKD273 classifier. Setting 1775 subjects from 15 European sites with a mean follow-up time of 2.6 years (minimum of 7 days and a maximum of 4.3 years). Patients Subjects with T2D, normoalbuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 ml/min/1.73m2. Participants were stratified into high- or low-risk groups based on their CKD273 score in a urine sample at screening (high-risk defined as score &gt; 0.154). Results In total, 12 % (n = 216) of the subjects had a high-risk proteomic pattern. Mean (SD) baseline eGFR was 88 (15) ml/min/1.73m2 in the low-risk group and 81 (17) ml/min/1.73m2 in the high-risk group (p &lt; 0.01). Baseline median (interquartile range) urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) was 5 (3-8) mg/g and 7 (4-12) mg/g in the low-risk and high-risk groups, respectively (p &lt; 0.01). A 30 % reduction in eGFR from baseline was seen in 42 (19.4 %) subjects in the high-risk group as compared to 62 (3.9 %) in the low-risk group (p &lt; 0.0001). In an unadjusted Cox-model the hazard ratio (HR) for the high-risk group was 5.7, 95 % confidence interval (CI) (3.9 to 8.5; p&lt;0.0001). After adjustment for baseline eGFR and UACR, the HR was 5.2, 95 % CI (3.4 to 7.8; p&lt;0.0001). A 40 % reduction in eGFR was seen in 15 (6.9 %) subjects in the high-risk group whereas 22 (1.4 %) in the low-risk group developed this endpoint (p&lt;0.0001). In an unadjusted Cox-model the HR for the high-risk group was 5.0, 95 % CI (2.6 to 9.6; p&lt;0.0001). After adjustment for baseline eGFR and UACR, the HR was 4.8, 95 % CI (2.4 to 9.7; p&lt;0.0001). Conclusion In normoalbuminuric subjects with T2D, the urinary proteomic classifier CKD273 predicts renal function decline of 30 % and 40 %, independent of baseline eGFR and albuminuria.

scholarly journals Immune-Related Four-lncRNA Signature for Patients with Cervical Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Jianfeng Zheng ◽  
Benben Cao ◽  
Xia Zhang ◽  
Zheng Niu ◽  
Jinyi Tong
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Gynecological Malignancy

Cervical cancer (CC) is a common gynecological malignancy for which prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers are urgently needed. The signature based on immune-related lncRNAs (IRLs) of CC has never been reported. This study is aimed at establishing an IRL signature for patients with CC. A cohort of 326 CC and 21 normal tissue samples with corresponding clinical information was included in this study. Twenty-eight IRLs were collected according to the Pearson correlation analysis between the immune score and lncRNA expression ( p < 0.01 ). Four IRLs (BZRAP1-AS1, EMX2OS, ZNF667-AS1, and CTC-429P9.1) with the most significant prognostic values ( p < 0.05 ) were identified which demonstrated an ability to stratify patients into the low-risk and high-risk groups by developing a risk score model. It was observed that patients in the low-risk group showed longer overall survival (OS) than those in the high-risk group in the training set, valid set, and total set. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) for the four-IRL signature in predicting the one-, two-, and three-year survival rates was larger than 0.65. In addition, the low-risk and high-risk groups displayed different immune statuses in GSEA. These IRLs were also significantly correlated with immune cell infiltration. Our results showed that the IRL signature had a prognostic value for CC. Meanwhile, the specific mechanisms of the four IRLs in the development of CC were ascertained preliminarily.

Validation of a Novel Tissue Array Based Classification of Multiple Myeloma (MM).

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1671-1671
Author(s):  
Nizar J Bahlis ◽  
Alex Klimowicz ◽  
Paola Neri ◽  
Anthony Magliocco ◽  
Douglas A. Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Protein Array ◽  
Immunoperoxidase Staining ◽  
Initial Testing ◽  
Independent Validation

Abstract Background: Gene expression profiling molecular classification of MM was proven to be an independent predictor of survival post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT); however it had limited clinical applicability due to its complex methodology and high costs. We have previously reported the results of a protein-array based classification of MM in an initial testing cohort and concluded that positive immunoperoxidase staining for FGFR3, Cyclin B2 or Integrin beta7 correlates with a shortened survival post ASCT (Bahlis et al. Blood2007:110:449a). We now report on the results of this TMA classification in a larger and independent validation cohort. Methods: Immunoperoxidase staining for Cyclins B1, B2, D1, D2 and D3, FGFR3, PAX5 and Integrin beta 7 were previously validated in our initial testing cohort (n=52). Further analysis of our initial testing cohort identified 3 risk groups: positive expression of FGFR3 or Integrin beta 7 defined as “High risk”, positive Cyclin B2 (in the absence of FGFR3 or Integrin beta 7) as “Intermediate risk” and the lack of expression of any of these biomarkers defined as “Low risk”. In order to confirm the predictive value of our proposed protein-array classification, these immunohistochemical (IHC) stains were performed on the bone marrow biopsies of a larger and independent validation cohort of 79 newly diagnosed MM patients uniformly treated with a dexamethasone based regimen followed by ASCT. The clinical parameters, response criteria and survival outcomes (TTP and OS) of this validation cohort were defined according to the international uniform response criteria. For IHC analysis two pathologists who were blinded with regards to the clinical outcome of these patients scored the cases independently as positive or negative. Discordance in their scoring was seen in 20/79 (25.7%) with a consensus scoring reassigned to all of these cases. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate OS and TTP. Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression method. Figure Figure Results: 79 patients were included in this validation cohort, the median age was 54.4 yrs (27.9–71), 23.7% had ISS stage III, median beta 2-microglobulin was 3.29 mg/L (1.16–37.5). Del13q and t(4;14) were detected by FISH in 35.6% and 13.6% of patients, respectively. Post ASCT, 68% achieved a CR or VGPR with an overall median TTP and OS of 2.29 years (CI 1.84–2.73) and 5.74 years (CI 4.98–6.51) respectively. Expression of FGFR3 was detected in 7.6% of the patients, cyclin B2 in 58.2% and integrin-beta7 in 17.7%. In univariate analysis expression of FGFR3 was associated with a significantly shorter TTP (P=0.011) but not OS (P=0.114). Similarly integrin-beta7 predicted for a shorter TTP (P=0.008) but not OS (P=0.570). Cyclin B2 also predicted for worse TTP (P=0.047) but not OS (P=0.098), whereas the expression of cyclins D1, D2, D3 and PAX5 did not affect survival. Based on our testing cohort definition of risk groups, 18/79 (22.8%) were considered as “High risk” with significantly shorter TTP 0.93 years (CI 0.74–1.12) compared to 2.29 years (CI 1.88–2.69) and 3.35 years (CI 2.51–4.19) for the “Intermediate” (34/79; 43%) and “Low” (27/79; 34.2%) risk groups respectively (P=0.002). The 5-years estimates for OS was 57.1% for the High-risk group compared to 66.3% and 71.6% for the Intermediate and Low risk group respectively (P=0.258). Multivariate analysis was performed using ISS, del13q and the TMA risk group classification as variables. The TMA classification and del 13q were the only independent predictors of TTP with the high-risk group having 3.4 fold greater risk of relapse (P=0.001). Conclusion: We have validated our protein array based classification of Multiple Myeloma and confirmed its survival predictive value post ASCT. MM patients with the High-risk signature should be spared the toxicity of ASCT and considered instead for other frontline novel therapeutic agents.

Reduced Intensity Conditioning with Thiotepa and Fludarabine for Allogeneic Transplantation: Evidence for Low Toxicity and Long-Lasting Disease Control in MDS with Low/Intermediate-1 IPSS Score and in AML from MDS in Complete Remission.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3285-3285
Author(s):  
Emilio Paolo Alessandrino ◽  
Luca Malcovati ◽  
Giorgio La Nasa ◽  
Paolo de Fabritiis ◽  
Massimo Bernardi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Valvular Stenosis

Abstract This study investigated Thiotepa (TT) and Fludarabine (Fluda) as a preparative regimen for allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute leukemia from MDS (MDS-AML) older than 50 or with comorbidities contraindicating standard conditioning. Patients were prepared with TT, given over 3 hours as an i.v. infusion at a dose of 10 mg/kg over two days (day -8 and day -7) and Fluda at the dose of 125 mg/m2 i.v. over five days ( from day -7 to day -3). Fresh or cryopreserved allogeneic peripheral stem cells were infused on day 0 or +1. Graft-versus-Host Disease (GvHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine A (CyA) at the dose of 1.5 mg/kg day as a continuous iv infusion from day -5 until engraftment. The CyA was then administered orally at the dose of 3 mg/kg twice a day. Doses were adjusted to maintain plasma level concentrations between 150–350 mg/dL. From day +60, in the absence of acute GvHD, the CyA was tapered down by 20% every 2 weeks until withdrawal. In addition, patients received methotrexate 10 mg/m2 on day +1, and 8 mg/m2 on days + 3, +6 and +11 after transplantation. At the time of transplantation, patients were classified in two risk groups (low vs high risk) according to IPSS score (low/intermediate-1 vs. intermediate-2/high) for MDS patients, and disease status (CR vs. not CR) for MDS-AML. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was carried out to compare Overall Survival (OS), Transplant-Related Mortality (TRM) and probability of relapse. Fifty patients (29 males, 21 females) entered the study; the median age was 54 years (range 38–71). Sixteen MDS patients had a low/intermediate 1 score according to the International Prognostic Score System (IPSS), 16 had an intermediate 2/high IPSS score, 18 had MDS-AML. Thirty patients underwent transplantation as front-line therapy, 20 received one or more cycles of chemotherapy before transplant. Among the latter, nine with MDS-AML were in complete remission at the time of their transplant, while four were in a partial remission. The interval from diagnosis to transplantation ranged from 1 to 52 months (median value 11 months). Contraindications to a standard conditioning regimen were liver disease, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy secondary to hypertension or valvular stenosis, cardiac arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, previous CNS bleeding, and a history of sepsis. All but one patient achieved engraftment, with full donor chimerism by day +30. Patients were followed up for a median time of 21 months (range 0.2–87). TRM at 1 and 2 years after transplantation was 25% and 33%; the 5-year probability of relapse was 27%. Twenty-six patients are alive in complete remission, and the 5-year OS is 50%. The 5-year OS was 73% and 28% in low- and high-risk patients respectively (p=0.002). TRM at 1 and 2 years after transplantation was 13% and 21% in the low-risk group and 39% and 45% in the high-risk group (p=0.046); the 5-year probability of relapse was 10% and 50% in the low- and high-risk group respectively (p=0.015). In a multivariate Cox regression, risk group retained a borderline significance (HR=2.6, p=0.07) when adjusted by age at transplantation (p=0.03) and interval from diagnosis to transplant (n.s.). The combination of Thiotepa and Fludarabine is an effective and well-tolerated conditioning regimen in patients with MDS or MDS-AML who are poor candidates for standard myeloablative transplantation, particularly in MDS patients with low/intermediate-1 IPSS score and MDS-AML patients in CR.

Chemotherapy-associated thrombosis in cancer outpatients: Risk factors and decision making of a prophylactic approach.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20647-e20647
Author(s):  
Martina Torchio ◽  
Benvenuto Franceschetti ◽  
Carla Cavali ◽  
Sonia Zanirato ◽  
Angelo Olgiati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
High Risk Group ◽  
Factors Analysis ◽  
Negative Predictor

e20647 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), is a negative predictor of survival in pts with advanced cancer. International guidelines don’t recommend routine prophlaxis but suggest to consider pts, undergoing chemotherapy (CT), with high risk of VTE. Many clinical risk factors for cancer-associated VTE have been evaluated in a 5 parameter-based (body mass index, platelet and leucocyte counts, hemoglobin value and tumor site) scoring system, the Khorana score, utilized to indicate a prophylactic approach. We prospectively applied this score in cancer outpts beginning CT and an implementation based on 6 addictional factors analysis (sex, age, central venous catheter, CT-agents, antiangiogenetic drugs, erithropoiesis stimulating agent) to evaluate their impact in pts assignment into risk groups. Methods: We studied adult pts, followed at our Department from August 2011 to December 2012, with advanced cancers (breast, NSCLC, colorectal, pancreatic/gastric, urogenital, LNH, Hodgkin's disease, HD, and MM), receiving a first or second line standard CT. We stratified pts into three risk groups (score 0= low; score 1-2=intermediate; score 3-4-5=high) considering both the Khorana scoring system and its implementation. Results: We analyzed 169 pts (103F/66M, median age 62.3, range 35-80 yrs), pt population included: 38 breast, 32 colorectal, 31 LNH, HD and MM, 27 urogenital, 22 NSCLC and 19 pancreatic/gastric. With the Khorana score 49 pts were assigned to the low risk, 87 pts to the intermediate risk (57 with score=1, 28 with score=2), 16 pts (9.4%) to the high risk group (9 with score=3, 4 with score=4, 3 with score=5). When we considered 11 parameters 37 pts (21.8%) were assigned to the high risk group. Conclusions: A more comprehensive quantification of VTE risk, also considering new independent factors, is mandatory for a correct decision making of an antithrombotic-prophylactic approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document