Comparison of Orange Orchard Evapotranspiration by Eddy Covariance, Sap Flow, and FAO-56 Methods under Different Irrigation Strategies

2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (7) ◽  
pp. 05020002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Saitta ◽  
Daniela Vanella ◽  
Juan Miguel Ramírez-Cuesta ◽  
Giuseppe Longo-Minnolo ◽  
Filippo Ferlito ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oluwakemi Dare-Idowu ◽  
Lionel Jarlan ◽  
Aurore Brut ◽  
Valerie Le-Dantec ◽  
Vincent Rivalland ◽  
...  

<p>This study aims to analyze the main components of the energy and hydric budgets of irrigated maize in southwestern France. To this objective, the ISBA-A-gs (<span>Interactions between Soil, Biosphere, and Atmosphere) </span>is run over six maize growing seasons. As a preliminary step, the ability of the ISBA-A-gs model to predict the different terms of the energy and water budgets is assessed thanks to a large database of <em>in situ</em> measurements by comparing the single budget version of the model with the new Multiple Energy Balance version solving an energy budget separately for the soil and the vegetation. The <em>in situ</em> data set acquired at the Lamasquere site (43.48<sup>o</sup> N, 1.249<sup>o</sup> E) includes half-hourly measurements of sensible (H) and latent heat fluxes (LE) estimated by an Eddy Covariance system. Measurements also include net radiation (Rn), ground heat flux (G), plant transpiration with sap flow sensors, meteorological variables, and 15-days measurements of vegetation characteristics. The seasonal dynamics of the turbulent fluxes were properly reproduced by both configurations of the model with an R² ranging from 0.66 to 0.89, and a root mean square error lower than 48 W m<sup>-2</sup>. Statistical metrics showed that H was better predicted by MEB with R² of 0.80 in comparison to ISBA-Ags (0.73). However, the difference between the RMSE of ISBA-Ags and MEB during the well-developed stage of the plants for both H and LE does not exceed 8 W m<sup>-2</sup>. This implies that MEB only has a significant added value over ISBA-Ags when the soil and the canopy are not fully coupled, and over a heterogeneous field. Furthermore, this study made a comparison between the sap flow measurements and the transpiration simulated by ISBA-A-gs and MEB. A good dynamics was reproduced by ISBA-A-gs and MEB, although, MEB (R²= 0.91) provided a slightly more realistic estimation of the vegetation transpiration. Consequently, this study investigated the dynamics of the water budget during the growing maize seasons. Results indicated that drainage is almost null on the site, while the observed values of cumulative evapotranspiration that was higher than the water inputs are related to a shallow ground table that provides supplement water to the crop. This work provides insight into the modeling of water and energy exchanges over maize crops and opens perspectives for better water management of the crop in the future.</p>


2001 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kell B Wilson ◽  
Paul J Hanson ◽  
Patrick J Mulholland ◽  
Dennis D Baldocchi ◽  
Stan D Wullschleger

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Nelson

<p>Here we present an overview of methods for partitioning evapotranspiration (ET) from eddy covariance data. We focus on methods that are designed to use the core energy and carbon fluxes, as well as meteorological data, and do not require supplemental measurements or campaigns. A comparison of three such methods for estimating transpiration (T) showed high correlations between them (R<sup>2</sup> of  daily T between 0.80 and 0.87) and higher correlations to daily stand T estimates from sap flow data (R<sup>2</sup> between 0.58 and 0.66) compared to the tower ET (R2 = 0.49). However, the three methods show significant differences in magnitude, with T/ET values ranging from 45% to 77%. Despite the differences in magnitude, the methods show plausible patterns with respect to LAI, seasonal cycles, WUE, and VPD; moreover, they represent an improvement compared to using ET as a proxy for T even when filtering for days after rain. Finally, we outline practical aspects of applying the methods, such as how to apply the methods and code availability.</p>


2015 ◽  
Vol 522 ◽  
pp. 250-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takanori Shimizu ◽  
Tomo’omi Kumagai ◽  
Masahiro Kobayashi ◽  
Koji Tamai ◽  
Shin’ichi Iida ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
pp. 1725-1730
Author(s):  
Simona Consoli ◽  
Alberto Continella ◽  
Antonio Motisi ◽  
Rita Papa ◽  
Luigi Pasotti

2010 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. 2014-2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J. Nunn ◽  
S. Cieslik ◽  
U. Metzger ◽  
G. Wieser ◽  
R. Matyssek

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 14131-14187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Zhang ◽  
F. Tian ◽  
H. C. Hu ◽  
H. P. Hu

Abstract. A multi-scale, multi-technique study was conducted to measure evapotranspiration and its components in a cotton field under mulched drip irrigation conditions in northwestern China. Three measurement techniques at different scales were used: photosynthesis system (leaf scale), sap flow (plant scale), and eddy covariance (field scale). The experiment was conducted from July to September 2012. To upscale the evapotranspiration from the leaf to the plant scale, an approach that incorporated the canopy structure and the relationships between sunlit and shaded leaves was proposed. To upscale the evapotranspiration from the plant to the field scale, an approach based on the transpiration per unit leaf area was adopted and modified to incorporate the temporal variability in the relationships between leaf area and stem diameter. At the plant scale, the estimate of the transpiration based on the photosynthesis system with upscaling was slightly higher (18%) than that obtained by sap flow. At the field scale, the estimates of transpiration derived from sap flow with upscaling and eddy covariance shown reasonable consistency during the cotton open boll growth stage when soil evaporation can be neglected. The results indicate that the upscaling approaches are reasonable and valid. Based on the measurements and upscaling approaches, evapotranspiration components were analyzed under mulched drip irrigation. During the two analysis sub-periods in July and August, evapotranspiration rates were 3.94 and 4.53 mm day−1, respectively. The fraction of transpiration to evapotranspiration reached 87.1% before drip irrigation and 82.3% after irrigation. The high fraction of transpiration over evapotranspiration was principally due to the mulched film above drip pipe, low soil water content in the inter-film zone, well-closed canopy, and high water requirement of the crop.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document