scholarly journals Qubit state vector in probability representation of quantum mechanics

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir N. Chernega ◽  
Olga V. Man’ko ◽  
Vladimir I. Man’ko
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (03) ◽  
pp. 1730008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen D. H. Hsu

We explain the measure problem (cf. origin of the Born probability rule) in no-collapse quantum mechanics. Everett defined maverick branches of the state vector as those on which the usual Born probability rule fails to hold — these branches exhibit highly improbable behaviors, including possibly the breakdown of decoherence or even the absence of an emergent semi-classical reality. Derivations of the Born rule which originate in decision theory or subjective probability (i.e. the reasoning of individual observers) do not resolve this problem, because they are circular: they assume, a priori, that the observer occupies a non-maverick branch. An ab initio probability measure is sometimes assumed to explain why we do not occupy a maverick branch. This measure is constrained by, e.g. Gleason’s theorem or envariance to be the usual Hilbert measure. However, this ab initio measure ultimately governs the allocation of a self or a consciousness to a particular branch of the wave function, and hence invokes primitives which lie beyond the Everett wave function and beyond what we usually think of as physics. The significance of this leap has been largely overlooked, but requires serious scrutiny.


1999 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berthold-Georg Englert

Abstract Two-way interferometers with which-way detectors are not only of importance in physical research, they are also a useful teaching device. A number of basic issues can be illustrated and discussed, even at the level of undergraduate teaching. Among these issues are: the physical meaning of a state vector; entangled systems; Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations; statistical operators and the as-if realities associated with them; quantum erasure; Schrödinger's cat; and, finally, wave-particle duality.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 130-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Ya. Doskoch ◽  
Margarita A. Man’ko

The basic notion of physical system states is different in classical statistical mechanics and in quantum mechanics. In classical mechanics, the particle system state is determined by its position and momentum; in the case of fluctuations, due to the motion in environment, it is determined by the probability density in the particle phase space. In quantum mechanics, the particle state is determined either by the wave function (state vector in the Hilbert space) or by the density operator. Recently, the tomographic-probability representation of quantum states was proposed, where the quantum system states were identified with fair probability distributions (tomograms). In view of the probability-distribution formalism of quantum mechanics, we formulate the superposition principle of wave functions as interference of qubit states expressed in terms of the nonlinear addition rule for the probabilities identified with the states. Additionally, we formulate the probability given by Born’s rule in terms of symplectic tomographic probability distribution determining the photon states.


1970 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1954-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Baumann

Abstract Quantum Mechanics and Objective Reality A Schrödinger function (or a density matrix) can he ascribed only to an object whose isolation time is larger than its time of revolution. This condition can never be satisfied for macroscopic bodies. Consequently, the "cut" between object and observer must not separate a macroscopic body (measuring apparatus) from the rest of the universe. Hence in an analysis of the measuring process, the state vector of the universe must be introduced. An interpretation of this state vector is given which provides an objective description of nature.


2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (7&8) ◽  
pp. 568-594
Author(s):  
Nathan Wiebe ◽  
Christopher Grandade

We examine the question of whether quantum mechanics places limitations on the ability of small quantum devices to learn. We specifically examine the question in the context of Bayesian inference, wherein the prior and posterior distributions are encoded in the quantum state vector. We conclude based on lower bounds from Grover’s search that an efficient blackbox method for updating the distribution is impossible. We then address this by providing a new adaptive form of approximate quantum Bayesian inference that is polynomially faster than its classical anolog and tractable if the quantum system is augmented with classical memory or if the low–order moments of the distribution are protected through redundant preparation. This work suggests that there may be a connection between fault tolerance and the capacity of a quantum system to learn from its surroundings.


Author(s):  
Mark A. Rubin

The fact that certain “extraordinary” probabilistic phenomena — in particular, macroscopic violations of the second law of thermodynamics — have never been observed to occur can be accounted for by taking hard preclusion as a basic physical law, i.e. precluding from existence events corresponding to very small but nonzero values of quantum-mechanical weight. This approach is not consistent with the usual ontology of the Everett interpretation, in which outcomes correspond to branches of the state vector, but can be successfully implemented using a Heisenberg-picture-based ontology in which outcomes are encoded in transformations of operators. Hard preclusion can provide an explanation for biological evolution, which can in turn explain our subjective experiences of, and reactions to, “ordinary” probabilistic phenomena, and the compatibility of those experiences and reactions with what we conventionally take to be objective probabilities arising from physical laws.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1348 ◽  
pp. 012101 ◽  
Author(s):  
V N Chernega ◽  
S N Belolipetskiy ◽  
O V Man’ko ◽  
V I Man’ko

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document